This article considers whether and how shifts in the division of labour in the context of organizational change lead to the empowerment or degradation of workplace roles. It focuses on the emergence of assistants in the British public services and, in particular, whether this leads to the degradation or empowerment of those who fill the role and the professionals they work with. Concentrating upon assistant roles in education and social care, case study findings suggest that as these roles develop, the assistants themselves and their co-professionals are empowered to some degree both in terms of their work and employment conditions. However, it notes that these consequences are not unambiguously positive for the stakeholders and vary by sub-sector. The article lends support to those who have argued that changes in the division of labour result in blended and potentially contradictory outcomes for the workers involved. It also contributes to a literature which suggests that outcomes are contingent upon context, proposing that sub-sector conditions can be influential.
Abbott, A.The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labour. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1988.
2.
Appelbaum, E. & Batt, R.The new American workplace. New York: ILR Cornell, 1994.
3.
Audit Commission.Recruitment and retention: A public service workforce for the twenty first century. London: Audit Commission, 2002.
4.
Bach, S., Kessler, I. & Heron, P.Assistant roles and changing job boundaries in the public services: End of project report. Swindon: ESRC, 2005.
5.
Barclay Report.Social workers: Their role and tasks. London: Bedford Square Press, 1982.
6.
Barley, S. & Kunda, G. Design and devotion: Surges of rational and normative ideologies. Administrative Science Quarterly,1992, 37(3), 363—90.
7.
Braverman, H. Labor and monopoly capital : The degradation of work in the twentieth century . New York: Monthly Review Press , 1974.
8.
Broadbent, J. & Laughlin, R.Public service professionals and the New Public Management. In K. McLaughlin, S. Osborne & E. Ferlie (Eds), New Public Management: Current trends and future prospects. London: Routledge, 2002, pp. 95—108.
9.
Carter, B.Restructuring state employment: Labour and non labour in the capitalist state . Capital and Class, 1997, 63, 65—85.
10.
Chakera, S. & Saunders, L.Review of selected literature of teaching assistants. London: GTC, 2002.
11.
Conley, H.Modernisation or casualisation? Numerical flexibility in public services. Capital and Class, 2006, 89, 31—57.
12.
DfES.Raising standards and tackling workload: A national agreement. London: HMSO , 2003.
13.
DfES.Higher standards, better schools for all. Cm 6677. London: HMSO, 2005.
14.
Edwards, P. & Collinson, M.Empowerment and managerial labor strategies. Work and Occupations , 2002, 29(3), 272—99.
15.
Edwards, P., Collinson, M. & Rees, C.The determinants of employee responses to TQM: Six case studies. Organization Studies, 1998, 19(3), 449—75.
16.
Ferlie, E., Ashburner, L., Fitzgerald, L. & Pettigrew, A.The New Public Management in action. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.
17.
Friedman, A.Industry and class struggle at work and monopoly capitalism. London: Macmillan, 1977.
18.
Gane, N.Max Weber as social theorist. European Journal of Social Theory , 2005, 8(2), 211—26.
19.
Garrahan, P. & Stewart, P.The Nissan enigma: Flexibility at work in a local economy. London: Mansell, 1992.
20.
Garrett, P.How to be modern: New Labour's neoliberal modernity and the Change for Children programme. British Journal of Social Work, published online 18 October 2006, available online at: [ http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/bcl345v1].
21.
Geary, J.Task participation: Employees' participation enabled or constrained? In K. Sisson (Ed.), Personnel management , 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell, 1995, pp. 634—61.
22.
Giddens, A.The third way and its critics. Cambridge: Polity, 2000.
23.
Gleeson, D. & Knights, D.Challenging dualism: Public professionalism in troubled times. Sociology, 2006, 40(2), 277—95.
24.
Gospel, H.Markets, firms, and the management of labour in modern Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
25.
Hackman, J. & Oldman, G.Motivation through the design of work. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1976, 16, 250—79.
26.
Hales, C.Management and empowerment programmes. Work, Employment and Society, 2000, 14(3), 501—20.
27.
Healy, K. & Meagher, G.The reprofessionalization of social work: Collaborative approaches for achieving professional recognition. British Journal of Social Work, 2004, 34(2), 243—60.
28.
Heffernan, K.Social work, new public management and the language of the `service user'. British Journal of Social Work, 2006, 36(1), 139—47.
Ironside, M. & Seifert, R.Industrial relations in schools. London: Routledge, 1995.
31.
Kessler, I., Bach, S. & Heron, P.Understanding assistant roles in social care. Work, Employment and Society, 2006, 20(4), 667—86.
32.
Kinnie, N., Purcell, J. & Hutchinson, S. Fun and surveillance : The paradox of high commitment management in call centres. International Journal of Human Resource Management , 2000, 11(5), 967—85.
33.
Knights, D. & McCabe, D. `Ain't misbehavin'? Opportunities for resistance under new forms of `quality' management. Sociology, 2000, 34(3), 421—36.
34.
Larson, M.The rise of professionalism. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977.
35.
Lymbery, M.Care management and professional autonomy. British Journal of Social Work, 1998, 28, 863—78.
36.
Lynn, L.Public management: Old and new. London: Routledge, 2006.
37.
Marchington, M., Goodman, J., Wilkinson, A. & Ackers, P.Understanding the meaning of participation: Views from the workplace. Human Relations, 1994, 47(8), 867—94.
38.
Merson, M.Teachers and the myth of modernisation. British Journal of Educational Studies, 2000, 48(2), 155—69.
39.
Morris, E. Professionalism and trust — The future of teachers and teaching. London: Social Market Foundation, 2001.
40.
National Union of Teachers (NUT).Teaching assistants briefing paper. Available online at: [ http://www.teachers.org.uk], 2002.
41.
National Union of Teachers (NUT).Response to the DfES documents: Excellence and enjoyment: A strategy for primary schools . London: NUT, 2003.
42.
Office of Public Sector Reform (OPSR).Reforming our public services: Principles into practice. London: The Cabinet Office, 2002.
43.
Parkin, F.Marxism and class theory. New York: Columbia University Press, 1979.
44.
Power, M.The audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.
45.
Thompson, P.Crawling from the wreckage: The labour process and the politics of production . In D. Knights & H. Wilmott (Eds), Labour process theory. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1990, pp. 95—124.
46.
Unison.Local government conference 2004: Remodelling the school workforce. Available online at: [http://cms.unison.co.uk/MotionText.asp?DocumentID=993866], 2004.
47.
Wilkinson, B., Morris, J. & Mundy, M.The iron fist in the velvet glove: Management and organization in Japanese manufacturing transplants in Wales. Journal of Management Studies, 1995, 32(6), 819—30.
48.
Wood, S.The transformation of work? In S. Wood (Ed.), The Transformation of Work? Skill, Flexibility and the Labour Process. London: Unwin, 1989.
