While it is agreed that there can be a difference between the routine as inscribed in artefacts, the ostensive aspect of the routine and its performative aspect, little is known about the relationship between these parts of the routine. Further, while authors acknowledge that there is variability in routines as performed, the contemporary literature says less about the sources of this variability. Using empirical data from the Swedish community care setting, the present article explores the workings of and relationship between the different aspects of `the home-help delivery routine'. The article also explores the sources of variability in workers' execution of this routine in situ. The article provides rich illustrations of the differences between the routine as inscribed in artefacts, as `articulated patterns' and the workers' performance of the routine in specific situations. In contrast to the argument that alignment between these aspects contributes to stability in the routine, this article claims that divergences between them promote stability. The article highlights how factors in the local context, including exceptions created by technology, constitute sources of variability in the routine. It further shows how values in the contemporary society, adopted by individuals as emotional-ethical principles, shape individuals' performance of the routine and thereby generate variability in the routine. In general, the article underlines the importance of considering the cultural context in which the routine is situated, at micro- and macro-level, when analysing its operation. Indeed, factors beyond the routine influence individuals' conception of and execution of the routine.
Akrich, M.The description of technological objects. In W.E. Bijker & J. Law (Eds), Shaping technology/building society. Studies in sociotechnical change . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992, pp. 205-25.
2.
Ashforth, B.E. & Fried, Y.The mindlessness of organizational behaviors. Human Relations , 1988, 41, 305-29.
3.
Becker, M.C.Organizational routines: A review of the literature. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2004, 13(4), 643-77.
4.
Becker, M.C.A framework for applying organizational routines in empirical research: Linking antecedents, characteristics and performance outcomes of recurrent interaction patterns. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2005, 14(5), 817-46.
5.
Becker, M.C. & Knudsen, T.The role of routines in reducing pervasive uncertainty. Journal of Business Research, 2005, 586, 746-57.
6.
Berg, M.Problems and promises of the protocol. Social Science & Medicine, 1997, 44, 1081-8.
7.
Birnholtz, J.P., Cohen, M.D. & Hoch, S.V.Organizational character: On the regeneration of camp popular grove . Organization Science, 2007, 18(2), 315-32.
8.
Bourdieu, P.The logic of practice. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1990.
9.
Brewer, J. & Hunter, A.Multimethod research: A synthesis of style. London : Sage, 1989.
10.
Callaghan, G. & Thompson, P.Edwards revisited: Technical control and call centres. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 2001, 22(1), 13-36.
11.
Cohen, M.D. & Bacdayan, P.Organizational routines are stored as procedural memory: Evidence from a laboratory study. Organization Science, 1994, 5(4), 554-68.
12.
Cohen, M.D., Burkhart, R., Dosi, G., Egidi, M., Marengo, L., Wargelin, M. & Winter, S.Routines and other recurring action patterns of organizations: Contemporary research issues. Industrial and Corporate Change, 1996, 53, 653-98.
13.
Collinson, S. & Wilson, D.C.Inertia in Japanese organizations: Knowledge management routines and failure to innovate. Organization Studies, 2006, 27, 1359-87.
14.
Cooren, F., Thompson, F., Canestraro, D. & Bodor, T.From agency to structure: Analysis of an episode in a facilitation process . Human Relations, 2006, 59, 533-65.
15.
Cyert, R.M. & March, J.G.A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1963.
16.
Deery, S., Iverson, R. & Walsh, J.The effect of customer service encounters on job satisfaction and emotional exhaustion. In S. Deery & N. Kinnie (Eds), Call centres and human resource management. Basingstoke: Palgrave , 2004, pp. 201-23.
Dosi, G., Marengo, L., Bassanini, A. & Valente, M.Norms as emergent properties of adaptive learning: The case of economic routines . Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 1999, 9(1), 5-26.
19.
Feldman, M.S.Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organization Science, 2000, 11, 611-29.
20.
Feldman, M.S.A performative perspective on stability and change in organizational routines . Industrial and Corporate Change, 2003, 12, 727-52.
21.
Feldman, M.S. & Pentland, B.T.Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2003, 48, 94-118.
22.
Gersick, C.J.G. & Hackman, J.R.Habitual routines in task-performing teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1990, 47, 65-97.
23.
Giddens, A.The constitution of society. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.
24.
Gilson, L.L., Mathieu, J.E., Shalley, C.E. & Ruddy, T.M.Creativity and standardization. Complementary of conflicting drivers of team effectiveness?Academy of Management Journal, 2005, 48(3), 521-31.
25.
Goffman, E.Felicity's condition. American Journal of Sociology , 1983, 89(1), 1-53.
26.
Hanlon, G., Strangleman, T., Goode, J., Luff, D., O'Cathain, A. & Greatbatch, D.Knowledge, technology and nursing: The case of NHS Direct. Human Relations, 2005, 58(2), 147-71.
27.
Harvey, J., Lefebvre, L.A. & Lefebvre, E.Flexibility and technology in services: A conceptual model. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 1997, 17(1), 29-45.
28.
Hochschild, A.R.The managed heart: Commercialism of human feeling. Berkeley : University of California Press, 1983.
29.
Hodgson, G.M.Economics and evolution. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1993.
30.
Hodgson, G.The ubiquity of habits and rules. Cambridge Journal of Economics , 1997, 21(6), 663-84.
31.
Hodgson, G.M.The approach of institutional economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 1998, 36, 166-92.
32.
Howard-Grenville, J.A.The persistence of flexible organizational routines: The role of agency and organizational context. Organizational Science, 2005, 16(6), 618-36.
33.
Ilgen, D.R. & Hollenbeck, J.R.The structure of work: Job design and roles . In M.D. Dunnette & L.M. Hough (Eds), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1991, pp. 165-207.
34.
Latour, B.The powers of association. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1986, pp. 264-80.
35.
Latour, B.Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artefacts . In B. Latour, W. Bijker & J. Law (Eds), Shaping technology-building society. Studies in sociotechnical change , Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992, pp. 225-59.
36.
Leidner, R.Fast food, fast talk: Service work and the routinization of everyday life . Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993.
37.
March, J.G.Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 1991, 2, 71-87.
38.
March, J.G. & Olsen, J.P.Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. New York: Free Press, 1989.
39.
March, J.G. & Simon, H.A.Organizations. New York: Wiley, 1958.
May, W.E.Consensus or coercion. Journal of the American Medical Association , 1985, 254, 1077.
42.
McCracken, G.The long interview. Qualitative Research Methods Series, no. 13. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 1988.
43.
McGall, G.J. & Simmons, J.L. (Eds). Issues in participant observation: A text and reader: 1-5. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley , 1969.
44.
Merton, R.K.Bureaucratic structure and personality. Social Forces , 1940, 17, 560-8.
45.
Miner, A.Organizational evolution and the social ecology of jobs. American Sociological Review, 1991, 56, 772-85.
46.
Miner, A.S. & Estler, S.E.Accrual mobility: Job mobility in higher education through responsibility accrual. Journal of Higher Education, 1985 , 56, 121-43.
47.
Mintzberg, H.The structuring of organizations: A synthesis of the research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1979.
48.
Mouzelis, N.Sociological theory: What went wrong?London: Routledge, 1995.
49.
Narduzzo, A.E., Rocco, M. & Warglien, N.Talking about routines in the field: The emergence of organizational capabilities in a new cellular phone network company. In G. Dosi, R.R. Nelson & S.G. Winter (Eds), The nature and dynamics of organizational capabilities. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000, pp. 7-50.
50.
Nelson, R.R.Routines. In G. Hodgson, W. Samuels & M. Tool (Eds), The Elgar companion to institutional and evolutionary economics, 2. Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 1994, pp. 249-53.
51.
Nelson, R.R. & Winter, S.G.An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press, 1982 .
52.
Patton, M.Q.Qualitative research and evaluation methods, 4th edn. London: SAGE, 2004.
53.
Pentland, B.T. & Feldman, M.S.Organizational routines as a unit of analysis. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2005, 14(5), 793-815.
54.
Pentland, B.T. & Rueter, H.H.Organizational routines as grammars of action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1994, 39, 484-510.
55.
Perrow, C.A.Framework for the comparative analysis of organizations. American Sociological Review, 1967, 32, 194-208.
56.
Reason, J.Lapses of attention in every day life. In R. Parasuraman & D.R. Davies (Eds), Varieties of attention. Orlando, FL: Academic Press, 1984, pp. 515-49.
57.
SFS2001: 453. The Social Services Law, available online at: [ http://www.notisum.se/rnp/SLS/lag/20010453.HTM].
58.
Simon, H.A.Administrative behavior. New York: The Free Press, 1945.
59.
Social Ministry.Nationell handlingsplan för hälso- och sjukvården. Publication: 2005-103-4, 2005.
60.
Stene, E.An approach to the science of administration, American Political Science Review, 1940, 34, 1124-37.
61.
Suchman, L.Plans and situated actions: The problems of human machine communication . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
62.
Taylor, P., Mulvey, G., Hyman, J. & Bain, P.Work organisation, control, and the experience of work in call centres . Work, Employment & Society, 2002, 16(1), 133-50.
63.
Tsoukas, H.The firm as a distributed knowledge system: A constructionist approach . Strategic Management Journal, 1996, 17, 11-25.
Weick, K.E.The social psychology of organizing. Reading, MA : Addison-Wesley, 1979.
66.
Weick, K.E.The generative properties of richness. Academy of Management Journal, 2007, 50(1), 14-19.
67.
Weick, K.E. & Roberts, K.Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1993, 38, 357-81.
68.
Weiss, H.M. & Ilgen, D.R.Routinized behavior in organizations. Journal of Behavioral Economics, 1985, 14, 57-67.
69.
Winter, S.G.The research program of the behavioral theory of the firm: Orthodox critique and evolutionary perspective. In B. Gilad & S. Kaish (Eds), Handbook of behavioral economics. Greenwich, CT : JAI Press, 1986, pp. 151-88.
