Does it matter where your manager works? Comparing managerial work mode (traditional,telework,virtual) across subordinate work experiences and outcomes
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online November, 2011
Does it matter where your manager works? Comparing managerial work mode (traditional,telework,virtual) across subordinate work experiences and outcomes
Although research has begun to examine impacts from employee work modes such as teleworking, studies to date have overlooked the impact that managers who work away from the office might have on subordinates. Using a large dataset (N = 11,059), this study therefore compares three managerial work modes (traditional, telework, virtual work), to investigate differences in subordinate work experiences and outcomes. Results suggest that in comparison to subordinates with managers in a traditional work mode, work experiences and outcomes are generally less positive for subordinates with teleworking managers who spend a portion of the week away from the office, and they are lower as well for subordinates with virtual managers who are away from the office full time. These results differ based on the subordinate’s own work mode and are modest in magnitude. This study suggests a need for further investigation into the effects of managerial work modes on subordinate experiences and outcomes.
AllenDGRennRW (2003) The impact of telecommuting design on social systems, self-regulation, and role boundaries. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management22: 125–163.
2.
AntonakisJAtwaterL (2002) Leader distance: A review and proposed theory. The Leadership Quarterly13(6): 673–704.
3.
AntonakisJBendahanSJacquartPLaliveR (2010) On making causal claims: A review and recommendation. The Leadership Quarterly21(6): 1086–1120.
4.
BaileyDEKurlandNB (2002) A review of telework research: Findings, new directions, and lessons for the study of modern work. Journal of Organizational Behavior23: 383–400.
5.
BartolKMLiuWZengXWuK (2009) Social exchange and knowledge sharing among knowledge workers: The moderating role of perceived job security. Management and Organization Review5(2): 223–240.
6.
BaruchY (2000) Teleworking: Benefits and pitfalls as perceived by professionals and managers. New Technology, Work and Employment15(1): 34–49.
7.
BaumeisterRLearyMR (1995) The need to belong, desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivatin. Psychologial Bulletin117(3): 497–529.
8.
BelangerF (1999) Workers’ propensity to telecommute: An empirical study. Information and Management35(3): 139–153.
9.
BelangerFCollinsRW (1998) Distributed work arrangements: A reserach framework. Information Society14(2): 137–152.
10.
BelangerFCollinsRWCheneyPH (2001) Technology requirements and work group communication for telecommuters. Information Systems Research12(2): 155–176.
11.
BlauPM (1964) Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
12.
BoswellWROlson-BuchananJB (2007) The use of communication technologies after hours: The role of work attitudes and work-life conflict. Journal of Management33(4): 592–610.
13.
BurthaMConnaughtonSL (2004) Learning the secrets of long-distance leadership. Knowledge Management Review7(1): 24–27.
14.
Camarinha-MatosL (2004) Virtual Organizations: Systems and Practices. Santa Clara, CA: Springer-Verlag.
15.
CohenJCohenPWestSGAikenLS (2003) Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 3rd edn.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
16.
CooperCKurlandNB (2002) Telecommuting, professional isolation and employee development in public and private organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior23(4): 511–532.
17.
CramtonCD (2001) The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organization Science12(3): 346–371.
18.
CramtonCD (2002) Finding common ground in dispersed collaboration. Organizational Dynamics30(4): 356–367.
19.
DaftRLLengelRH (1986) Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science32(5): 554–571.
20.
DarrWJohnsG (2004) Political decision-making climates: Theoretical processes and multi-level antecedents. Human Relations57(2): 169–200.
21.
GajendranRSHarrisonDA (2007) The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology92(6): 1524–1541.
22.
GerstnerCRDayDV (1997) Meta-analytic review of leader-member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Academy of Management Journal82(6): 827–844.
23.
GoldenTD (2006a) Avoiding depletion in virtual work: Telework and the intervening impact of work exhaustion on commitment and turnover intentions. Journal of Vocational Behavior69(1): 176–187.
24.
GoldenTD (2006b) The role of relationships in understanding telecommuter satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Behavior27(3): 319–340.
25.
GoldenTD (2007) Coworkers who telework and the impact on those in the office: Understanding the implications of virtual work for coworker satisfaction and turnover intentions. Human Relations60(11): 1641–1667.
26.
GoldenTDBarnes-FarrellJMascharkaP (2009) Implications of virtual management for subordinate performance appraisals: A pair of simulation studies. Journal of Applied Social Psychology39(7): 1589–1608.
27.
GoldenTDRaghuramS (2010) fostering teleworker knowledge sharing: The role of altered relational and technological interactions. Journal of Organizational Behavior31(8): 1061–1085.
28.
GoldenTDVeigaJFDinoR (2008) The impact of professional isolation on teleworker job performance and turnover intentions: Does time spent teleworking, interacting face-to-face, or having access to communication enhancing technology matter?Journal of Applied Psychology93(6): 1412–1421.
29.
GoldenTDVeigaJFSimsekZ (2006) Telecommuting’s differential impact on work-family conflict: Is there no place like home?Journal of Applied Psychology91(6): 1340–1350.
30.
GraenGCashmanJ (1975) A role-making model of leadership in formal organizations: A development approach. In HuntJGLarsonL (eds) Leadership Frontiers. Kent, OH: Kent State University Press, 143–165.
31.
GraenGBScanduraTA (1987) Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. Research in Organizational Behavior9: 175–208.
32.
GraenGBUhl-BienM (1991) The transformation of professionals into self-managing and partially self-designing contributions: Towards a theory of leader-making. Journal of Management Systems3(3): 33–48.
33.
GuimaraesTDallowP (1999) Empirically testing the benefits, problems, and success factors for telecommuting programmes. European Journal of Information Systems8(1): 40–53.
34.
HandyC (1995) Trust and the virtual organization. Harvard Business Review73(3): 40–50.
35.
HertelGGeisterSKonradtU (2005) Managing virtual teams: A review of current empirical research. Human Resource Management Review15(1): 69–95.
36.
HillEJFerrisMMärtinsonV (2003) Does it matter where you work? A comparison of how three work venues (traditional office, virtual office, home office) influence aspects of work and personal/family life. Journal of Vocational Behavior63(2): 220–241.
37.
HillEJMillerBCWeinerSPColihanJ (1998) Influences of the virtual office on aspects of work and work/life balance. Personnel Psychology51(3): 667–683.
38.
HindsPJBaileyDE (2003) Out of sight, out of synch: Understanding conflict in distributed teams. Organization Science14(6): 615–632.
39.
HindsPJMortensenM (2005) Understanding conflict in geographically distributed teams: The moderating effects of shared identity, shared context, and spontaneous communication. Organization Science16(3): 290–307.
40.
HolmLD (2006) The social exchange framework. In BurkePJ (ed.) Contemporary Social Psychological Theories. Stanford, CA: Stanford Social Sciences.
41.
HomansGC (1958) Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology62: 597–606.
42.
IgbariaMGuimaraesT (1999) Exploring differences in employee turnover intentions and its determinants among telecommuters and non-telecommuters. Journal of Management Information Systems16(1): 147–164.
43.
JarvenpaaSLLeidnerDE (1999) Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organization Science10(6): 791–815.
44.
JexSMGudanowskiDM (1992) Efficacy beliefs and work stress: An exploratory study. Journal of Organizational Behavior13(5): 509–517.
45.
KellowayEK (1998) Using LISREL for Structural Equation Modeling: A Researcher’s Guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
46.
KieslerSCummingsJN (2002) What do we know about proximity and distance in work groups? A legacy of research. In HindsPJKieslerS (eds) Distributed Work. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 57–80.
47.
KossekEELautschBAEatonSC (2006) Telecommuting, control, and boundary management: Correlates of policy use and practice, job control, and work-family effectiveness. Journal of Vocational Behavior68(2): 347–367.
KraussRFussellS (1990) Mutual knowledge and communication effectiveness. In GalegherJKrautREgidoC (eds) Intellectual Teamwork: Social and Technological Foundations of Cooperative Work. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 111–146.
50.
KrautREFussellSRBrennanSESeigelJ (2002) Understanding the effects of proximity on collaboration: Implications for technologies to support remote collaborative work. In: HindsPJKieslerS (eds) Distributed Work. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 137–162.
51.
KugelmassJ (1995) Telecommuting: A Manager’s Guide to Flexible Work Arrangements. New York: Lexington Books.
52.
KurlandNBEganRD (1999) Telecommuting: Justice and control in the virtual organization. Organization Science10(4): 500–513.
53.
LautschBAKossekEEEatonSE (2009) Supervisory approaches and paradoxes in managing telecommuting implementation. Human Relations62(6): 795–827.
54.
LidenRCWayneSJStilwellD (1993) A longitudinal study on the early development of leader-member exchanges. Journal of Applied Psychology78(4): 662–672.
55.
MajorDAKozwolskiSWJChaoGTGardnerPD (1995) A longitudinal investigation of newcomer expectations, early socialization outcomes, and the moderating effects of role development. Journal of Applied Psychology80(3): 418–431.
56.
MarascuiloLALevinJR (1983) Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences: A Researcher’s Guide. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
57.
MayerDNishiiLSchneiderBGoldsteinH (2007) The precursors and products of justice climates: Group leader antecedents and employee attitudinal consequences. Personnel Psychology60(4): 929–963.
58.
McCloskeyDWIgbariaM (1998) A review of the empirical research on telecommuting and directions for future research. In: IgbariaMTanM (eds) The Virtual Workplace. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
59.
MongePRothmanLWEisenbergEMMillerKIKirstieKK (1985) The dynamics of organizational proximity. Management Science31(9): 1129–1142.
60.
Montoya-WeissMMMasseyAPSongM (2001) Getting it together: Temporal coordination and conflict management in global virtual teams. Academy of Management Journal44(6): 1251–1262.
61.
NagyMS (2002) Using a single-item approach to measure facet job satisfaction. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology75(1): 77–87.
62.
NapierBJFerrisGR (1993) Distance in organizations. Human Resource Management Review3(4): 321–357.
63.
NillesJM (1994) Making Telecommuting Happen: A Guide for Telemanagers and Telecommuters. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
64.
OgilvieJR (1987) The role of human resource management practices in prediction of organizational communication. Group & Organizational Studies11(4): 335–359.
65.
OlsenLBanegasD (2008) National science foundation and telework exchange study validates telework productivity hypothesis. Telework Exchange press release, 11March.
66.
PritchardRDKarasickBW (1973) The effects of organizational climate on managerial job performance and job satisfation. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance9: 126–146.
67.
RaghuramSWiesenfeldBGarudRGuptaV (2001) Factors contributing to virtual work adjustment. Journal of Management27(3): 383–405.
68.
RaginsBRCottonJLMillerJS (2000) Marginal mentoring: The effects of type of mentor, quality of relationship, and program design on work and career attitudes. Academy of Management Journal43(6): 1177–1194.
69.
RamsowerRM (1983) Telecommuting: The Organizational and Behavioral Effects of Working From Home. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms International.
70.
RiceREGattikerUE (2001) New media and organizational structure. In: JablinFPutnamL (eds) Handbook of Organizational Communication: Advances in Theory, Research and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 544–581.
71.
Sarbaugh-ThompsonMFeldmanMS (1998) Electronic mail and organizational communication: Does saying ‘hi’ really matter?Organization Science9(6): 685–698.
72.
ShawJDDineenBRFangRVellellaRF (2009) Employee-organization exchange relationships, HRM practices, and quit rates of good and poor performers. Academy of Management Journal52(5): 1016–1033.
73.
ShortJWilliamsEChristieB (1976) The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. London: John Wiley & Sons.
74.
Spence-LaschingerHK (2004) Hospital nurses’ perceptions of respect and organizational justice. Journal of Nursing34(7–8): 354–364.
75.
StephensGKSzajnaB (1998) Perceptions and expectations: Why people choose a telecommuting work style. International Journal of Electronic Commerce3(1): 70–85.
76.
ThatcherSMBZhuX (2006) Changing identities in a changing workplace: Identification, identity enactment, self-verification, and telecommuting. Academy of Management Review31(4): 1076–1088.
77.
Van DyneLKossekELobelS (2007) Less need to be there: Cross-level effects of work practices that support work-life flexibility and enhance group processes and group-level OCB. Human Relations60(8): 1123–1154.
78.
VegaG (2003) Managing Teleworkers and Telecommuting Strategies. Westport, CT: Praeger.
79.
VenkateshVSpeierC (2000) Creating an effective training environment for enhancing telework. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies52(6): 991–1005.
80.
WanousJPHudyMJ (2001) Single-item reliability: A replication and extension. Organizational Research Methods4(4): 361–375.
81.
WanousJPReicheersAEHudyMJ (1997) Overall job satisfaction: How good are single-item measures?Journal of Applied Psychology82(2): 247–252.
82.
WiesenfeldBRaghuramSGarudR (1999) Communication modes as determinants of organizational identity in a virtual organization. Organization Science10(6): 777–790.
