Contradictory research findings make it almost impossible to arrive at generalized conclusions about the side-bet theory despite the amount of attention this theory has received. In an attempt to resolve the argument about the ability of the theory to explain the formation of organizational commitment, this study examines previous findings of relevant correlational data from 50 published studies, using the Hunter, Schmidt, and Jackson (1982) metaanalysis procedure. Results show that 11 side-bet variables have estimates of low population correlations with organizational commitment. For most of the side-bet variables, no meaningful or generalizable relationships with organizational commitment were found. The results indicate that there is very little empirical support for the side-bet theory. Three possible conclusions are proposed. Discussion of the implications of each conclusion and how they relate to future investigation of the side-bet theory concludes the paper.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ALUTTO, J. A., HREBINIAK, L. G., & ALONSO, R. C.On operationalizing the concept of commitment. Social Forces, 1973, 51, 448-454.
2.
AMERNIC, J. H., & ARANYA, N.Organizational commitment: Testing two theories. Relations Industrielles, 1983, 38, 319-341.
3.
ANGLE, H. L., & PERRY, J. L.Organizational commitment -individual and organizational influence. Work and Occupations, 1983, 10, 123-146.
4.
ARANYA, N., & JACOBSON, D.An empirical study of theories of organizational and occupational commitment. Journal of Social Psychology, 1975, 97, 15-22.
5.
BABA, V. V., & JAMAL, M.On Becker's theory of commitment: An empirical verification among blue collar workers. Relations Industrielles, 1979, 34,123-137.
6.
BECKER, H. S.Notes on the concept of commitment. American Journal of Sociology, 1960, 66, 32-40.
7.
BHAGAT, R. S., & CHASSIE, M. B.Determinants of organizational commitment in working women: Some implications for organizational identification. Journal of Occupational Behavior, 1981, 2, 17-30.
8.
BRUNNING, S. N., & SNYDER, A. R.Sex and position as predictors of organizational commitment. Academy of Management Journal, 1983, 26,485-491.
9.
BUCHANAN, B.Government managers, business executives and organizational commitment. Public Administration Review, 1974, 34, 339-347.
10.
COOPER, H. M., & ROSENTHAL, R.Statistical vs. traditional procedures for summarizing research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 1980, 87, 442-449.
11.
CRONBACH, L. J.Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 1951, 16, 297-337.
12.
FARRELL, D., & RUSBULT, C. E.Exchange variables as predictors of job satisfaction, job commitment, and turnover; The impact of rewards, costs, alternatives, and investments. Organizational and Human Performance, 1981, 27,78-95.
13.
FERRIS, K. R.Organizational commitment and performance in professional accounting firms. Accounting, Organizations, and Society, 1981, 6, 317-325.
14.
FERRIS, K. R., & ARANYA, N.A comparison of two organizational commitment scales. Personnel Psychology, 1983, 36,87-89.
15.
FUCAMI, V. M., & LARSON, W. E.Commitment to company and union: Parallel models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1984, 69, 367-377.
16.
FULLAGER, C.A factor-analytic study on the validity of a union commitment scale. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1986, 71, 129-136.
17.
GLASS, G. V., McGAW, B., & SMITH, L. S.Meta-analysis in social research. Beverley Hills, California: Sage, 1981.
18.
GORDON, M. E., PHILPOT, W. J., BURT, E. R., THOMPSON, A. C., & SPILLER, E. W.Commitment to the union: Development of a measure and an examination of its correlates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1980, 65, 479-499.
19.
GORDON, M. E., BEAUVAIS, L. L., & LADD, T. R.The job-satisfaction and union commitment of unionized engineers. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 1984, 37, 359-370.
20.
GRIFFIN, R. W., & BATEMAN, T. S.Job satisfaction and organizational commitment. In C. L. Cooper and I. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1986, 157-188.
HODSON, R., & SULLIVAN, T. A.Totem or tyrant? Monopoly, regional and local sector effects on worker commitment. Social Forces, 1985, 63, 716-731.
23.
HREBINIAK, L. G.Effect of job level and participation on employee attitudes and perceptions of influence. Academy of Management Journal, 1974, 17, 649-662.
24.
HREBINIAK, L. G., & ALUTTO, J. A.Personal and role-related factors in the development of organizational commitment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1972, 17, 555-573.
25.
HUNT, S. D., CHONKOL, L. B., & WOOD, V. R.Organizational commitment and marketing. Journal of Marketing, 1985, 46, 112-126.
26.
HUNTER, J. E., SCHMIDT, F. L., & JACKSON, G. B.Meta-analysis. Cumulating research findings across studies. Beverley Hills, California: Sage, 1982.
27.
KIDRON, A.Work values and organizational commitment. Academy of Management Journal, 1978, 21, 239-247.
28.
KOCH, J. L., & STEERS, R. M.Job attachment, satisfaction and turnover among public sector employees. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 1978, 12, 113-128.
29.
LEE, S. M.An empirical analysis of organizational identification. Academy of Management Journal, 1971, 14, 213-226.
30.
LOWENBERG, G., & COHEN, A.Situational specificity hypothesis: What shall we use? Manuscript submitted for publication, 1990.
31.
LUTHANS, F., BAACK, D., & TAYLOR, L.Organizational commitment: Analysis of antecedents. Human Relations, 1987, 40, 219-236.
32.
MANNHEIM, B.Managerial orientations and worker's job responses in labor-owned and private plants in Israel. Organization Studies, 1984, 5, 23-42.
33.
McDANIEL, M. A., HIRSH, H. R., SCHMIDT, F. L., RAJU, N. S., & HUNTER, J. E.Interpreting the results of meta-analysis research: A comment on Schmitt, Gooding, Noe, and Kirsch. Personnel Psychology, 1986, 39, 141-148.
34.
McGEE, G. W., & FORD, R. C.Two (or more?) dimensions of organizational commitment: Re-examination of the affective and continuance scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1987, 72, 638-642.
35.
MEYER, P. J., & ALLEN, J. N.Testing the side-bet theory of organizational commitment: Some methodological considerations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1984, 69, 372-378.
36.
MORRIS, G. H. & SHERMAN, D. J.Generalizability of organizational commitment model. Academy of Management Journal, 1981, 24, 512-526.
37.
MORROW, P. C.Concept redundancy in organizational research: The case of work commitment. Academy of Management Review, 1983, 8, 486-500.
38.
MOWDAY, R. T., PORTER, L. W., & STEERS, R. M.Employee-organization Linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover. New York: Academic Press, 1982.
39.
PEARLMAN, K., SCHMIDT, F. L., & HUNTER, J. E.Validity generalization results for tests used to predict training success and job proficiency in clerical occupations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1980, 65, 373-406.
40.
PORTER, L. W., STEERS, R. M., MOWDAY, R. T., & BOULIAN, P. V.Organizaitonal commitment, job satisfactions, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1974, 59, 603-609.
41.
REICHERS, A. E.A review and reconceptualization of organizational commitment. Academy of Management Journal, 1985, 10,465-476.
42.
RITZER, G., & TRICE, H. M.An empirical study of Howard Becker's side-bet theory. Social Forces, 1969, 47, 475-479.
43.
ROMZEK, B. S.The effects of public service recognition, job security, and staff reductions on organizational involvement. Public Administration Review, 1985, 45, 282-291. (a)
44.
ROMZEK, B. S.Perceptions of agency effectiveness as the basis for differences in organizational involvement: A research note. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 1985, 75-85, (b)
45.
ROSENTHAL, R.The "file drawer problem" and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 1979, 85,185-193.
46.
RUSBULT, C. E.Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the investment model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1980, 16, 172-186.
47.
SAAL, F. E.Job involvement: A multivariate approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1978, 63, 53-61.
48.
SCHMITT, N., & NOE, R. A.On shifting standards for conclusions regarding validity generalization. Personnel Psychology, 1986, 39,849-851.
49.
SCHMITT, N., GOODING, R. Z., NOE, R. A., & KIRSCH, M.Meta-analysis of validity studies published between 1964 and 1982 and the investigation of study characteristics. Personnel Psychology, 1984, 37, 407-422.
50.
SEKARAN, V., & MOWDAY, R. T.Job involvement: A cross-cultural analysis of the impact of individual and job factors on job involvement. International Review of Applied Psychology, 1981, 30,51-64.
51.
SHELDON, M. E.Investment and involvement as mechanisms producing commitment to the organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1971, 16,143-150.
52.
SHOEMAKER, D. J., SNIZEK, W. E., & BRYANT, C. D.Towards a further clarification of Becker's side-bet hypothesis as applied to organizational and occupational commitment. Social Forces, 1977, 56, 598-603.
53.
STEBBINS, R. A.On misunderstanding the concept of commitment: A theoretical clarification. Social Forces, 1970, 48,526-529.
54.
STEERS, R. M.Antecedents and outcomes of organizational commitment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1977, 22,46-56.
55.
STEVENS, J. M., BEYER, J. M., & TRICE, H. M.Assessing personal, role, and organizatinal predictors of managerial commitment. Academy of Mangement Journal, 1978, 21,380-396.
56.
VRENDENBURGH, D. J., & TRINKAUS, J. R.An analysis of role stress among hospital nurses. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 1983, 23,82-95.
57.
WERBEL, J. D., & COULD, S.A comparison of the relationship of commitment to the turnover in recently-hired and tenured employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1984, 69, 687-690.
58.
WIENER, Y., & VARDI, Y.Relationships between job organization and work outcomes: An integrative approach. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1980, 26, 81-96.
