This paper argues that current conceptions of organizational activity as ritual conformity (or isomorphism) to institutional demands which exist in the environment must also incorporate an understanding of organizational enactment. Enactment entails a conception of the environment in terms of processes of reality construction; organizations are active in creating and defining institutional demands. Data is drawn from a study of the response of mental health organizations to outpatient commitment which is a legal policy designed to fulfill the societal demands for deinstitutionalization of the mentally ill. Organizational responses were highly variable, despite the existence of outpatient commitment as a legal policy with active encouragement of its use by the State Division of Mental Health. This variability can be understood in terms of organizational enactments; each organization construed the workings of the policy according to its own definitions and stocks of knowledge, and then conformed with its own enactment.
AIKEN, M., & HAGE, G.Organizational interdependence and intraorganizational structure. American Sociological Review, 1968, 33, 912-931.
2.
ALDRICH, H. E., & PFEFFER, J.Environments of organizations. Annual Review of Sociology, 1976, 2, 79-105.
3.
ALEXANDER, J., & AMBURGEY, T. L.The dynamics of change in the American hospital industry: Transformation or selection?Medical Care Review, 1987, 44, 279-321.
4.
BAXTER, V.The process of change in public service organizations. Sociological Quarterly, 1989, 30, 283-304.
5.
CICOUREL, A. V.The social organization of juvenile justice. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1968.
6.
DiMAGGIO, P., & POWELL, W. W.The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 1983, 48, 147-160.
7.
DOBBIN, F. R., EDELMAN, L., MEYER, J. W., SCOTT, W. R., & SWIDLER, A.The expansion of due proces in organizations. In L. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Ballenger Publishing, 1988, pp. 71-98.
8.
EDELMAN, L. B.Legal environments and organizational governance: The expansion of due process in the American work-place. American Journal of Sociology, 1990, 95, 1401-1440.
9.
GUNN, L.Origin and implementation of North Carolina's outpatient commitment law. Popular Government, 1986, 52, 17-22.
10.
HASENFELD, Y.Community mental health centers as human service organizations. In W. Scott and B. Black (Eds.), The organization of mental health services. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1986, pp. 133-146.
MEYER, J. W.Institutionalization and the rationality of formal organizational structure. In J. W. Meyer and W. R. Scott (Eds.), Organizational environments. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1983, pp. 261-282.
13.
MEYER, J. W., & ROWAN, B.Institutional organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. In J. W. Meyer and W. R. Scott (Eds.), Organizational environments. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1983, pp. 21-44.
14.
MEYER, J. W., & SCOTT, W. R.Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1983.
15.
MORGAN, G.Images of organizations. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1986.
16.
MULVEY, E. P., GELLER, J. L., & ROTH, L. H.The promise and peril of involuntary outpatient commitment. American Psychologist, 1987, 46, 571-584.
PFEFFER, J., & SALANICK, G.The external control of organizations: A resource dependency perspective. New York: Harper and Row, 1978.
19.
PONDY, L. R., & MITROFF, I. I.Beyond open system models of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 1979, 3, 3-39.
20.
POWELL, W.Institutional effects on organizational structure and performance. In L. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Co., 1988, pp. 115-136.
21.
SCHEID-COOK, T. L.Outpatient commitment as both social control and least restrictive alternative. Sociological Quarterly, 1991, 32, 433-460.
22.
SCHOONHAVEN, C. B., & JERRELL, J. M.Testing institutional isomorphism arguments: homogeneity in community mental health center fields. Presented at the ASA Annual Meetings, Washington, D.C., August, 1985.
23.
SCHUTZ, A.The phenomenology of the social world (Translated by George Walsh and Frederick Lehnert with an Introduction by George Walsh). Northwestern University Press, 1967.
24.
SCOTT, W. R.From technology to environment. In J. W. Meyer and W. Richard Scott (Eds.), Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality, Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1983, pp. 13-17.
25.
SCOTT, W. R.The adolescence of institutional theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1987, 32, 493-511.
26.
SELZNICK, P.TVA and the grass roots: A study in the sociology of formal organization. New York: Harper and Row, 1966.
27.
SILVERMAN, D.The theory of organisations: A sociological frameworkBasic Books, 1971.
28.
SILVERMAN, D., & JONES, J.Organizational work: The language of grading and the grading of language. London: Collier MacMillan, 1976.
29.
SMIRCICH, L.Studying organizations as cultures. In G. Morgan (Ed.), Beyond method: Strategies for social research. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1983, pp. 160-172.
30.
SMIRCICH, L., & STUBBART, C.Strategic management in an enacted world. Academy of Management Review, 1985, 10, 724-736.
31.
TOLBERT, P., & ZUCKER, l.Institutional sources of change in organizational structure: The diffusion of civil service reform 1880-1935. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1983, 28, 22-39.
32.
WEICK, K. E.Enactment processes in organizations. In B. M. Staw and G. Salancik (Eds.), New direction in organizational behavior. Chicago: St. Clair Press, 1977, pp. 267-300.
33.
WEICK, I. E.The social psychology of organizing (2nd ed.). Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley Publishing, 1979(1968).
34.
WILKINS, A. L.Organizational stories as symbols which control the organization. In L. Pondy, P. Frost, G. Morgan, and T. Dandridge (Eds.), Organizational symbolism. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press, 1983, pp. 81-92.
35.
ZUCKER, L. G.Institutional theories of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 1987, 13, 443-464.
36.
ZUCKER, L. G.Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballenger Publishing Co., 1988.
