We “do gender” while we are at work, while we produce an organizational culture and its rules governing what is fair in the relationship between the sexes. The inner ambiguity of gender construction is expressed in the dilemma: how can we do gender without second-sexing the female? The management of cross-gendered situations (dual presence) is based on a two-stage ritual involving the ceremonial work of paying homage to the symbolic order of gender (a deep trans-psychic structure) and the remedial work of repairing the inequality inherent in gender difference. Studying the ambiguity of gender symbols enables us to use indirect speech and discoursively to change gender relationships in organizations.
BALBO, L.La doppia presenza . Inchiesta, 1979, 8(32), 3-6 .
2.
BALBO, L.Time to care. Milan: Angel i 1987.
3.
CAIAS, M. , & SMIRCICH, L.Rewriting gender into organizational theorizing: Directions from feminist perspectives. In M. Reed , and M. Hughes (Eds.), Rethinking organizations. London: Sage , 1992.
4.
CHODOROW, N.The reproduction of mothering. Berkeley: University of California Press , 1978.
5.
CZARNIAWSKI-JOERGES, B.Exploring complex organizations: A cultural perspective. Sage: London , 1992.
6.
DE BEAUVOIR, S. Le deuxième sexe, Paris; Gallinard, 1949.
7.
DERRIDA, J. De la granmatologie. Paris: Les editions de Minuit, 1967.
8.
DURKHEIM, E. Les fonnes elementaries de la vie religieuse; le systeme totemique en Australie. Paris: Alcun, 1912.
9.
FERGUSON, K.The feminist case against bureaucracy. Philadelphia: Temple , 1984.
10.
FOUCAULT, M. Les mots et les chose. Paris: Gallimard, 1966.
11.
(The history of sexuality. New York: Random House , 1980).
12.
FROST, P. J. , et al.Organizational culture. London: Sage , 1985.
13.
GAGLIARDI, P. (Ed.). Symbols and arifacts. Berlin: de Gruyter , 1990.
14.
GHERARDI, S. Le micro-decisioni nelle organizazioni. Bologna: II Mulino, 1990.
15.
GHERARDI, S. L'ufficio come luogo di costruzione simbolica del femminile e del maschile. Sociologia del Lavoro, 1991, 43, 116-136.
16.
GHERARDI, S.The Symbolic Order of Gender in Organizational Culture . Paper presented at SCOS Conference, Lancaster, July 1992.
GHERARDI, S., & MASIERO, A. Ricerca sul lavoro femminile nell'organizzazione Provincia di Milano. In C.S.F. Parit{e discriminazione, Milan: Angeli, 1989.
19.
GHERARDI, S. , & STRATI, A.The texture of organizing an Italian academic department . Journal of Management Studies, 1990, 27(6), 605-618 .
20.
GHERARDI, S. , & TURNER, B. A.Real men don't collect soft data. Trento: Quaderni del Dipartimento di Politica Sociale , 1988.
21.
GOFFMAN, E.The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City: Doubleday , 1959.
GOFFMAN, E.Relations in public. New York: Harper Row , 1971.
24.
GOFFMAN, E.Gender display . Studies in the Anthropology of Visual Communication, 1976, 3, 69-77 .
25.
GOFFMAN, E.The arrangement between the sexes . Theory and Society, 1977, 4, 301-331 .
26.
HEARN, J. , & PARKIN, W.“Sex” at “Work, “The power and paradox of organizational sexuality. New York: St. Martin's Press , 1987.
27.
HEARN, J. , et al.The sexuality of organization. London: Sage , 1989.
28.
HENLEY, N. , & FREEMAN, J.The sexual politics of interpersonal behaviour. In J. Freeman (Ed.), Women: A feminist perspective. Palo Alto: Mayfield , 1979.
29.
HERITAGE, J. Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1984.
30.
IRIGARAY, L. Speculum. De l'autre femme. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit, 1974.
31.
JUNG, C. Psychologie und alchemie. Zurich: Rescher Verlag, 1944.
32.
JUNG, C.Collected works (Vol. 9, Part 1). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul , 1953.
33.
KANTER, R. M.Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books , 1977.
34.
KONECKI, K. , Dependence and worker flirting. In B. A. Turner (Ed.), organizational symbolismBerlin: De Gruyter , 1990.
35.
KRISTEVA, J.Women can never be defined. In E. Harks (Ed.), New French feminism. New York: Schocken , 1981.
36.
LAKOFF, R.Language and woman's place. New York: Harper and Row , 1975.
37.
MARTIN, J.Deconstructing organizational taboos: The suppression of gender conflict in organizations . Organization Science, 1990, 1, 339-359 .
38.
McINTOSH, P.Feeling like a fraudWellesley: Work in Progress , 1984.
39.
MUMBY, D. , & PUTNAM, L.The politics of emotion: A feminist reading of bounded rationality . Academy of Management Review, 1992, 3, 465-486 .
40.
OWEN, M.Apologies and remedial interchanges. Berlin: Monton , 1983.
41.
PATEMAN, C.The sexual contract. Cambridge: Polity Press , 1988.
42.
PRINGLE, R.Secretaries talkNew York: Verso , 1989.
43.
SCOTT, J. W.Deconstructing equality versus difference: Or the uses of poststructuralist theory for feminism . Feminist Studies, 1988, 1, 34-50 .
44.
SPENDER, D.Man made language. London: Routledge & Kegan , 1980.
45.
SPRATI, A.Organizational culture. In G. Szell (Ed.), Concise encyclopedia of participation and co-management. Berlin: de Gruyter , 1992.
46.
SYNNOIT, A.Shame and glory: A sociology of hair . The British Journal of Sociology, 1987, 38, 381-343 .
47.
TURNER, B. A.Organizational symbolism. Berlin: de Gruyter , 1990.
48.
TURNER, B. A.The symbolic understanding of organizations. In M. Reed , and M. Hughes (Eds.), Rethinking organization. London: Sage , 1992.
49.
VECA, S.Cittadinanza. Milan: Feltrinelli , 1990.
50.
WEEDON, C.Feminist practice and poststiucturalist theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell , 1987.
51.
WEST C. , & ZIMMERMAN, D.Doing gender . Gender and Society, 1987, 1(2), 125-151 .
52.
ZANUSO, L.Gli studi sulla doppia presenza: Dal conflitto alla norma. In M. C. Marcuzzo and A. Rossi Doria (Eds.), La ricerca della donne. Studi feminist in Italia. Turin: Rosemberg e Sellier , 1987.
