The paper describes the application to longitudinal research of a method of data collection which combines quantitative and qualitative material. It is claimed that Group Feedback Analysis (GFA) helps to validate data collected by various methods and produces additional ethnographic material and insight into the process under investigation. When the people who supply the data are experienced in the subject matter, as is the case with managers and other employees in organizational research, GFA makes it possible for them to help with the interpretation of the data instead of leaving it entirely to the researcher. The method, which has previously been used in cross-sectional research, is shown to have utility in a longitudinal design where it can facilitate organizational learning. It can also contribute to the refinement of a theoretical model.
ARGYRIS, C.The impact of budgets on people. New York: Controllership Institute, 1952.
2.
ARGYRIS, C.Intervention theory and method: A behavioral science view. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1970.
3.
ARGYRIS, C., & SCHON, D.Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1974.
4.
ARGYRIS, C.Strategy change and defensive routines. Boston: Pitman, 1985.
5.
BAUMGARTEL, H.Using employee questionnaire results for improving organizations. Kansas Business Review, 1959, 12, 2-6.
6.
BERRY, A. J., & OTLEY, D. TThe aggregation of estimates in hierarchical organizations. Journal of Management Studies, (1975), 12, 175-193.
7.
BROWN, L. D.Research action: Organizational feedback and change. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1972, 8, 697-674.
8.
BROWN, A. J., & HELLER, F A.The application of Group Feedback Analysis to questionnaire data in a longitudinal study. Human Relations, 1981, 34(2), 141-156.
9.
BRYMAN, A.Quantity and quality in social science research. London: Routledge, 1992.
10.
BULMER, M.The use of social research: Social investigation in public policy making. London: Allen & Unwin, 1982.
11.
CHASE, P.A survey feedback approach to organization development. Proceedings of the Executive Study Conference. Educ. Test Service, Princeton, 1968.
12.
DIO (Decisions in Organizations research group), Decisions in organizations: A comparative study. Industrial Relations, 1979, 18, 295-309.
13.
DIO, A contingency model of participative decision making: An analysis of 56 decisions in three Dutch organizations. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 1983, 56, 1-18.
14.
DUNPHY, D.Under new management: Australian organizations in transition. Sydney: McGraw-Hill, 1990.
15.
ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL RESEARCH COUNCIL. Building Partnerships: Enhancing the Quality of Management Research. The Report of the Commission on Management Research, Economic and Social Research Council, Swindon, UK, 1994.
16.
ELLEGARD. K., ENGSTROM, T., & NILSSON, L.reforming industrial work: principles and realities. Swedish Work Environment Fund Pamphlet 64, Vol. 19, 1992, p. 307-307.
17.
FROHLICH, D., GILL, C. & KRIEGER H.Roads to participation in the European community-Increasing prospects of employee representatives in technological change. Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, 1991.
18.
GRELLER, M. & HEROLD, D.Sources of feed-back: A preliminary investigation. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1975, 13, 244-256.
19.
HELLER, F A.Group feed-back analysis: A method of field research. Psychological Bulletin, 1969, 72, 108-117.
20.
HELLER, F A.Group feed-back analysis as a change agent. Human Relations, 1970, 23, 319-333.
21.
HELLER, F A. (Ed.). The use and abuse of social science. London and Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1986.
22.
HELLER, F A., DRENTH, P, KOOPMAN, P. & RUS, V.Decisions in organizations: A longitudinal study of routine, tactical and strategic decisions. London and Beverely Hills: Sage Publications, 1988.
23.
HELLER, F A.Participation and competence: A necessary relationship. In W Lafferty and E. Rosenstein (Eds.), International Handbook of participation in organizations (Vol. 2). Oxford University Press, 1991.
24.
HELLER, F A.Decision making and the under-utilization of competence. In F Heller (Ed.), Decision making and leadership. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
25.
HELLER, F A. & WILPERT, B.Competence and power in managerial decision making: A study of senior levels of organization in eight countries. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 1981.
26.
HELLER, F A., DRENTH, P. J. D., KOOPMAN, P., & RUS, VDecision in organizations: A longitudinal study of routine, tactical and strategic decisions. London and Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1988.
27.
HOPWOOD, A.Accounting and human behavior. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1976.
28.
IDE (Industrial Democracy in Europe research group). Industrial democracy in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981.
29.
IDE (Industrial Democracy in Europe research group). Industrial democracy in Europe revisited. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.
30.
JENKINS, D. H.Feedback and group evaluations. Journal of Social issues, 1948, 4(2), 50-60.
31.
KARAPIN, R. S.A review of the literature. In E A. Heller (Ed.), The use and abuse of social science. London: Sage, 1986.
32.
LIKERT, R.New patterns of management. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1961.
33.
LOWE, E. A. & SHAW, R. WAn analysis of managerial biasing: Evidence from a company's budgeting process. Journal of Management Studies, 1968.
34.
MANN, E. C.Studying or creating change: A means to understanding social organization. Research in Industrial Human Relations, Industrial Relations Research Association, No. 17, 1957.
35.
MEIJER, T & ROE, R. A.The Analysis and Design of Mental Information Work: A Method Based on the Action Facilitation Approach. WORC Paper 93.01.002/3, Paper presented at the Sixth European Congress on Work and Organizational psychology, Alicante, April 14-17, 1993.
36.
MILES, R. E.Human relations or human resources?Harvard Business Review, 1965, 43, 148-163.
37.
MINTZBERG, H., RAISINGHAM, D., & THEORET, A.The structure of "unstructured" decision processes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1976, 21, 246-275.
38.
NADLER, D.The use of feed-back for organizational change. Group and Organization Studies, 1976, 1, 177-186.
39.
NOWOTNY, H.LAMBIRI-DIMAKI, J. (Eds.), The difficult dialogue between producers and users of social science research. Vienna: European Center for Social Welfare Training and Research, 1985.
40.
O'BRIEN, G. E.The Centrality of Skill Utilization for Job Design. Bedford Park, The Flinders University of South Australia, Working Paper Series No. 37, 1979.
41.
RUS, VYugoslav Self-Management: 30 years later. In B. Wilpert and A. Sorge (Eds.), International yearbook of organizational democracy (Vol. II), Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 1984.
42.
SCHIENSTOCK, G.Industrial relations theory and employee participation. In C. Lammers and G. Szell (Eds.), International handbook of participation in organizations (Vol. 1). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.
43.
TRIST, E. L., HIGGIN, G. W, MURRAY, H., & POLLOCK, A. B.Organizational choice. London: Thvistock Publications, 1963.
44.
WALL, T. D., & LISCHERON, J. A.Worker participation: A critique of the literature and some fresh evidence. London: McGraw-Hill, 1977.
