A number of influential studies advocate the adoption of a lean production system (LPS) in order to improve quality and efficiency in Western automotive plants. Critics argue that such systems place excessive demands upon employees. Very little survey data, however, is available on employees' attitudes toward lean production since companies are frequently reluctant to grant such access. Our survey of 200 employees in a Japanese-owned automotive plant in Australia using lean production found that commitment to the company, speed of work and, in special circumstances, age were predictors of employees' approval of the LPS. Employees' perceived levels of stress and Japanese management techniques, such as consultation and a teamwork orientation, were not predictors of approval of the LPS, a finding that contradicts earlier research in this field. Other variables in the analysis, including employee demographics, had no predictive value. We use the results to comment on the wider debate about the transfer of Japanese manufacturing practices to Western countries.
ADLER, P. S.Time-and-motion regained. Harvard Business Review, 1993, 71(1), 97-108.
2.
AMC. Labour turnover and absenteeism: Costs and causes in the Australian automotive industry. Melbourne: Australian Manufacturing Council, 1990.
3.
BENSON, J.Strategic labor relations: Management practices in Japanese and Australian manufacturing industries. Japanese Studies, 199313(1), 6-23.
4.
BERGGREN, C.Alternatives to lean production: Work organization in the Swedish auto industry. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press, 1992. (a)
5.
BERGGREN, C.Lean production: The end of history?Department of Work Science, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, 1992. (b)
6.
BROWN, C., & REICH, M.When does union-management cooperation work? A look at NUMMI and GM-Van Nuys. California Management Review, 1989, 31(4), 26-44.
7.
COLE, R. E.Work and leisure in Japan. California Management Review, 1992, 34(3), 52-63.
8.
CUSUMANO, M. A.Manufacturing innovation: Lessons from the Japanese auto industry. Sloan Management Review, 1988, 30(1), 29-39.
9.
DERTOUZOS, M. L., LESTER, R. K., SOLOW, R. M., & the MIT Commission on Industrial Productivity. Made in America: Regaining the productive edge. New York: Harper Perennial, 1989.
10.
FLETCHER, B. C.Work stress, disease and life expectancy. Brisbane: John Wiley & Sons, 1991.
11.
FRANKE, R. H., HOFSTEDE, G., & BOND, M. H.Cultural roots of economic performance: A research note. Strategic Management Journal; 1991, 12, 165-173.
12.
FUCINI, J. J., & FUCINI, S.Working for the Japanese. New York: Collier Macmillan, 1990.
13.
GARRAHAN, P., & STEWART, P.The Nissan enigma: Flexibility at work in a local economy. London: Mansell, 1992. (a)
14.
GARRAHAN, P., & STEWART, P.Work organizations in transition: The human resource management implications of the "Nissan Way."Human Resource Management Journal, 1992, 2(2), 46-62. (b)
15.
GRIFFIN, R. W., & BATEMAN, T. S.Job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Intemational Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1986, 157-188.
16.
KRAFCIK, J. F.Triumph of the lean production system. Sloan Management Review, 1988, 30(1), 41-52.
17.
KRAFCIK, J. F.A new diet for US auto workers. Technology Review, 1989, 92(1), 28-36.
18.
LINCOLN, J. R., & KALLEBERG, A. L.Culture, control and commitment: A study of work organization and work attitudes in the United States and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
19.
MARCHINGTON, M., & PARKER, P.Japanization: A lack of chemical reaction. Industrial Relations Journal, 1988, 19(4), 272-285.
20.
MONDEN, Y.Toyota production system: Practical approach to production management. Norcross, Georgia: Industrial Engineering and Management Press, 1983.
21.
NEAR, J. P.Organizational commitment among Japanese and U.S. workers. Organization Studies, 1989, 10(3), 281-300.
22.
OLIVER, N., & DAVIEWS, A.Adopting Japanese-style manufacturing methods: A tale of two (UK) factories. Journal of Management Studies, 1990, 27(5), 555-570.
23.
OLIVER, N., & WILKINSON, B.The Japanization of British industry: New developments in the 1990s (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell, 1992.
24.
OUCHI, W. G.Theory Z: How American business can meet the Japanese challenge. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1981.
25.
PARKER, M., & SLAUGHTER, J.Choosing sides: Unions and the team concept. Boston: South End Press, 1988. (a)
26.
PARKER, M., & SLAUGHTER, J.Management by stress. Technology Review, October 1988, 37-44. (b)
27.
SHADUR, M. A., & BAMBER, G. J.Towards lean management? The international transferability of Japanese management strategies to Australia. International Executive, 1994, 36(3), 343-364.
28.
TABACHNICK, B. G., & FIDELL, L. S.Using multivariate statistics. (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Harper Collins Publishers, 1989.
29.
WEINZIMMER, L. G., & ALWAN, L. C.An evaluation of regression modelling in organizations research: The need for diagnostics. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1992, 332-336.
WILKINSON, B., & OLIVER, N.Obstacles to Japanization: The case of Ford UK. Employee Relations, 1990,12(1), 17-21.
32.
WILLIAMS, K., HASLAM, C., WILLIAMS, J., CUTLER, T., ADCROFT, A., & JOHAL, S.Against lean production, Economy and Society, 1992, 21(3), 321-354.
33.
WOMACK, J. P., JONES, D. T., & ROOS, D.The machine that changed the world. New York: Macmillan, 1990.
34.
YOSHIDA, K.Deming management philosophy: Does it work in the US as well as in Japan?Columbia Journal of World Business, Fall 1989, 10-17.
35.
YOUNG, M. S.A framework for successful adoption and performance of Japanese manufacturing practices in the United States. Academy of Management Review, 1992, 17(4), 677-700.
