Building on research on collective relative deprivation, we used independent samples of psychologists and managers to assess the relationship of perceived discrimination to an individual's reactions to the job and to the organization. While workers perceived relatively little sex discrimination, women perceived more discrimination against women than did men, and both sexes perceived more discrimination against women than discrimination against men. For women, perceptions of discrimination against women were associated with lower feelings of power and prestige on the job, more work conflict, more hours spent on paid work activities, and a lessened willingness to make the same career choice. Among men, perceptions of discrimination were related to few outcome measures. Implications for organizations are discussed.
BEM, S. L.Gender schema theory: A cognitive accounting of sex-typing . Psychological Review, 1981, 88, 354-364 .
2.
BIRT, M. , & DION, K. L.Relative deprivation theory and responses to discrimination in a gay male and lesbian sample . British Journal of Social Psychology, 1987, 26, 139-145 .
3.
BLANCHARD, E. A. , & CROSBY, E. (Eds.). Affirmative action in perspective. New York: Springer-Verlag , 1989.
4.
BLAU, E. D. , & FERBER, M. A.Women in the labor market: The last twenty years. In L. Larwood , B. A. Gutek , & A. H. Stromberg (Eds.), Women and work-An annual review (Vol. 1). Newbury Park, CA: Sage , 1985, pp. 19-49.
5.
BRANNON, R.The male sex role: Our culture's blueprint of manhood, and what it's done for us lately. In D. S. David & R. Brannon (Eds.), The forty-nine percent majority: The male sex role. Reading, MA.: Addison-Wesley , 1976, pp. 1-45.
6.
BRUSH, S. G.Women in science and engineering . American Scientist, 1991, 79, 404-419 .
7.
CASH, T. F. , GILLEN, B. , & BURNS, D. S.Sexism and “beautyism” in personnel consultant decision-making . Journal of Applied Psychology, 1977, 62, 301-310 .
8.
CLAYTON, S. D. , & CROSBY, F. J.Justice, gender and affirmative action. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press , 1992.
9.
COHEN, S. L. , & BUNKER, K. A.Subtle effects of sex role stereotype and recruiters hiring decision . Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975, 60, 566-572 .
10.
CROSBY, E.Relative deprivation and working women. New York: Oxford University Press , 1982.
11.
CROSBY, F.The denial of personal discrimination . American Behavioral Scientist, 1984, 27, 371-386 .
12.
DOYLE, J. A.The male experience (3rd ed.). Madison, Wisconsin: Wm. C. Brown , 1995.
13.
DRAZIN, R. , & AUSTER, E. R.Wage differences between men and women: Performance appraisal ratings vs. salary allocation as the locus of bias . Human Resource Management, 1987, 26(2), 157-168 .
14.
FARRELL, W.The myth of male power Why men are the disposable sexNew York: Simon & Schuster , 1993.
15.
GATES, D.White male paranoia . Newsweek, March 29, 1993, 48-53 .
16.
GUTEK, B. A. , & WINTER, S.Women Managers, Women Workers, and Computer Use . Paper presented at the Research Symposium on Women in Management, Queen's College, Kingston, Ontario, 1989.
17.
HELIMAN, M. E. , & HERLIHY, J. M.Affirmative action, negative reaction? Some moderating conditions . Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1984, 33, 204-213 .
18.
HELIMAN, M. E. , SIMON, M. C. , & REPPER, D. P.Intentionally favored, unintentionally harmed? Impact of sex-based preferential selection on self-perceptions and self-evaluations . Journal of Applied Psychology, 1987, 71, 62-68 .
19.
IZRAELI, D. N. , & TABORY, E.The perception of women' status in Israel as a social problem . Sex Roles, 1986, 14, 663-678 .
20.
JACOBS, J.Revolving doors. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press , 1989.
21.
KAHN, W. A. , & CROSBY, F.Discriminating between attitudes and discriminatory behaviors: Change and stasis. In L. Larwood , A. H. Stromberg , & B. A. Gutek (Eds.), Women and work: An annual review (Vol. 1). Newbury Park, CA: Sage , 1985, pp. 215-238.
22.
KOPELMAN, R. E. , GREENHAUS, J. J. , & CONNOLY, T. F.A model of work, family, and interrole conflict: A construct validation study . Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1983, 32, 198-215 .
23.
LERNER, M.The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum Press , 1981.
24.
LEVINSON, R. M.Sex discrimination and employment practices . Social Problems, 1975, 22(4), 533-543 .
25.
LODAHL, T. M. , & KEJNER, M.The definition and measurement of job involvement . Journal of Applied Psychology, 1965, 49, 24-33 .
26.
MADDEN, J.The persistence of pay differentials: The economics of sex discrimination. In L. Larwood , A. H. Stromberg , & B. A. Gutek (Eds.), Women and work An annual review (Vol. 1). Newbury Park, CA: Sage , 1985, pp. 76-112.
27.
MARK, M. M. , & FOLGER, R.Responses to relative deprivation: A conceptual framework. In P. Shaver (Ed.), Review of personal and social psychology: Vol. 5. Emotions, relationships, and health. Newbury Park, CASage , 1984, pp. 192-218.
28.
NIEVA, V. F. , & GUTEK, B. A.Sex effects on evaluation . Academy of Management Review, 1980, 5, 267-276 .
29.
NIEVA, V. F. , & GUTEK, B. A.Women and work: A psychological perspective. New York: Prager , 1981.
30.
O'NEILL, J.Role differentiation and the gender gap in wage rates. In L. Larwood , B. A. Gutek , & A. H. Stromberg (Eds.), Women and work: An annual review (Vol. 1). Newbury Park, CA: Sage , 1985, pp. 50-75.
31.
PHELPS, E. S.The statistical theory of racism and sexism . American Economic Review, 1972, 62(4), 659-661 .
32.
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA V. BAKKE. U.S. Law Weekly, 1978, 46, 4896.
33.
ROPER ORGANIZATION . The 1980 Virginia Slims American Women's Opinion PollStorrs, CT'Roper Center, University of Connecticut , 1980.
34.
RUNCIMAN, W. G.Relative deprivation and social justice: A study of attitudes to social inequality in twentieth-century England. Berkeley: University of California Press , 1966.
35.
SWIM, J. , BORGIDA, E. , MARUYAMA, G. , & MYERS, D. G.Joan McKay versus John McKay: Do gender stereotypes bias evaluations?Psychological Bulletin, 1989, 105, 409-429 .
36.
TAJFEL, H.Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic Press , 1978.
37.
TOUGAS, F. , & VEILLEUX, F.Who likes affirmative action: Attitudinal processes among men and women. In F. A. Blanchard & F. Crosby (Eds.), Affirmative action in perspective. New York: Springer-Verlag , 1989, pp. 111-124.
38.
TSUI, A. , EGAN, T. , & O'REILLY, C.Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1992, 37, 539-579 .
39.
TSUI, A. S. , & GUTEK, B. A.A multiple-constituency investigation of gender differences in performance, affective relationships, and career success of industrial middle managers . Academy of Management Journal, 1984, 27, 619-645 .
40.
WEBER, M. In T. Parsons (Ed.), The theory of social and economic organizations (translated by A. M. Henderson & T Parsons). New York: Free Press , 1947.
41.
WEINER, B.An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion . Psychological Review, 1985, 92, 548-573 .
42.
ZUCKERMAN, M.Attribution of success and failure revisited, or: The motivational bias is alive and well in attribution theory . Journal of Personality, 1979, 47, 245-287 .
