Research Selectivity,Managerialism,and the Academic Labor Process: The Future of Nonmainstream Economics in U.K. Universities

Abstract

This paper reports the results of empirical research designed to explore the impact of research selectivity on the work and employment of academic economists in U.K. universities. Research selectivity is seen as part of the general trend toward "managerialism" in higher education in both the U.K. and abroad. Managerialism based on performance indicators and hierarchical control has been contrasted with collegiate control-based or informal peer review. However, analysis of the academic labor process has idealized collegiate relations at the expense of professional hierarchies and intellectual authority relations. We argue that in the U.K., there has evolved a mainstream economics which is located within a well-defined neoclassical core. We find that the existence of lists of core mainstream journals which are believed to count most in the periodic ranking exercise poses a serious threat to academic freedom and diversity within the profession, institutionalizing the control which representatives of the mainstream exercise over both the academic labor process and job market. In this way, managerialism combines with peer review to outflank resistance to new forms of controlling academic labor at the same time as reinforcing disciplinary boundaries through centralized systems of bureaucratic standardization and control.

Keywords

managerialism academic labor process economics

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

BELL, D. Models and reality in economic discourse. In D. Bell and I. Kristol (Eds.), The crisis in economic theory. New York: Basic Books, 1981.

BOURDIEU, P Homo academicus. Cambridge Polity Press, 1988.

BURAWOY, M. The politics of production. London: Verso, 1985.

CLEGG, S. R. Frameworks of power London: Sage, 1989.

CLEGG, S. Power relations and the constitution of the resistant subject. In J. M. Jermier , D. Knights , and W Nord (Eds.), Power and resistance in organizations: Agency, subjectivity and the labor process. London: Routledge, 1994.

COLLINSON, D. Strategies of resistance, power, knowledge and subjectivity in the Workplace. In J. M. Jermier , D. Knights , and W Nord (Eds.), Power and resistance in organizations: Agency, subjectivity and the labor process. London: Routledge, 1994, pp. 25-68.

DEARLOVE, J. The Deadly Dull Issue of University 'Administration?" Good Governance, Managerialism, and Organizing Academic Work. Society for Research into Higher Education Conference, Edinburgh, 1995.

DIAMOND, A. M. The core journals in economics. Current Contents, 1989, 21, 4-11.

DUNCAN, C. (Ed.). The evolution of public management. London: Macmillan, 1992.

10.

FARNHAM, D. , & HORTON, S. Managing the new public services. London: Macmillan, 1993.

11.

GRIFFITH, J. Research Assessment: As Strange a Maze as e'er Men Trod. Report No. 4, Council for Academic Freedom and Academic Standards, London.

12.

HALSEY, A. The decline of donnish dominion. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992.

13.

HEY, J. D. Managing editor's annual report on the EJ. Royal Economic Society Newsletter, 1995, 88, January, 2-3.

14.

Higher Education Funding Council for England . A Report for the Universities Funding Council on the Conduct of the 1992 Research Assessment Exercise. June, 1993.

15.

Higher Education Funding Council for England . Conduct of the 1996 Research Assessment Exercise: Panel Membership and Units of Assessment. June, 1994.

16.

Higher Education Funding Council for England . 1996 Research Assessment Exercise: Membership of Assessment Panels. July, 1995.

17.

HODGSON, G. The professional status of heterodox economics journals in the UK. Unpublished paper, October, 1994.

18.

JOHNES, G. Measures of research output; university departments of economics in the UK, 1984-8. The Economic Journal, 1990, 100, 556-560.

19.

JOHNES, G. , & JOHNES, J. Measuring the research performance of UK economics departments: An application of data envelopment analysis. Oxford Economic Papers, 1993, 45, 332-347.

20.

KNIGHTS, D. , & WILLMOTT, H. Power and subjectivity at work: From degradation to subjugation. Sociology, 1989, 23/4, 475-483.

21.

KNIGHTS, D. , & WILLMOTT, H. Labor process theory. London: MacMillan, 1990.

22.

LEE, F S., & HARLEY, S. Economics divided: The fallacy of peer review in a paradigm bound social science. Unpublished, 1996.

23.

McCUTCHEN, C. W Peer review: Treacherous servant, disastrous master. Technology Review, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, October, 1991.

24.

KUHN, T S. The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1970.

25.

MILLER, H. Academics and the labor process. In C. Smith , D. Knights , and H. Willmott (Eds.), White collar work. Basingstoke: McMillan, 1991.

26.

MILLER, H. The management of change in universities. Buckingham: Open University Press, 1995.

27.

PARKER, M. , & JARY, D. The McUniversity: Organisations, management and academic subjectivity. Organization, 1995, 2, 319-338.

28.

PEEKE, G. Mission and change: Institutional mission and its application to the management of further and higher education. Buckingham: SRHE/Open University Press, 1994.

29.

POMMEREHNE, W , SCHNEIDER, F , GILBERT, G. , & FREY, B.

Concordia discourse: Or what do economists think?"

Theory and Decision, 1984, 16, 251-308.

30.

POLLITT: C. Managerialism and the public services (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell, 1993.

31.

PRITCHARD, C. Just how managed is the McUniversity? Unpublished, 1995.

32.

PUXTY, A. , SIKKA, P , & WILLMOTT H. Systems of Surveillance and the Silencing of U.K. Academic Accounting Labor. Paper presented at the Labor Process Conference, Aston University, Birmingham, 1994.

33.

SARGENT, J. R.

Are American economists better?

Oxford Economic Papers, 1963, 15, 2-7.

34.

SMYTH, J. (Ed.). Academic work: The changing labor process in higher education. Buckingham: SRHE/Open University Press, 1995.

35.

TURNER, S. M. Class, status and teacher trade unionism: The case of public sector further and higher education: Croom Helm, 1989.

36.

WHITLEY, R. The structure and context of economics as a scientific field. Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, 1986, 4, 179-209.

37.

WHITLEY, R. The organization and role of journals in economics and other scientific fields. Economics Notes by Monte dei Paschi di Siena, 1991, 20(1), 6-32.

38.

WILLMOTT, H. Managing the academics: Commodification and control in the development of university education in the U.K. Human Relations, 1995, 48, 993-1025.

39.

WILSON, T The proletarianization of academic labor. Industrial Relations Journal, 1981, 22, 50-262.

40.

WRAY, R. L. The social sources and implications of the HIV-Aids model. Unpublished paper, University of Denver, 1994.