This article considers the reception and genre of the Shāhnāmah in India. It takes as its starting-point comments made by the poet Mirza Asad Allah Khan Ghalib in 1866, moving on to look at a Mughal Shāhnāmah adaptation, the Tarikh-i dil-gusha-i Shamsher-Khani, and its Urdu translations, as well as other Persian, Urdu and Arabic texts. It investigates the (mis)identification of the Shāhnāmah’s genre, looking at cases in which it was understood as historiographical rather than as a romance, and seeking an explanation for this ‘contamination’ of the sincere genre of history by the mendacious romance genre. A methodological split in the historiographical corpus is proposed, between a rationalist (‘aqli) and transmission-based (naqli) method. The contest between these two methods is considered, and the prevalence of transmission-based history and its similarity to romance is brought forward as a possible reason for the porousness of the border between these ostensibly opposing genres.
Abū al-Faraj al-Iṣfahānī and ‘Alī b. Al-Ḥusain. Kitāb al-āġhānī, Vol. 19, Cairo, 1970.
2.
AhmedManan. ‘The Many Histories of Muhammad b. Qasim: Narrating the Muslim Conquest of Sindh’. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago, 2008. Proquest [AAT 3338323].
3.
AtkinsonJames.The Sháh námeh of the Persian Poet Firdausí, London, 1892.
4.
BaihaqīAbū al-Faẓl Muḥammad b. Ḥusain. Tārīḳh-i Baihaqī, Tehran, 2009.
5.
Bāqir āgāh VelūrīMuḥammad b. Muḥammad Murtaẓà Bījāpūrī. ‘Dībāchah-i Rauẓat al-jinān’, in Nawīdī‘Alīm Ṣabā (ed.) Maulānā Bāqir āgāh Velūrī ke adabī nawādir, Madras, 1994, pp. 129–36.
BokhariAfshan. ‘The “Light” of the Timuria: Jahan Ara Begum’s Patronage, Piety and Poetry in 17th-century Mughal India’. Marg, 60, 2008, pp. 52–61.
10.
BosworthC.E. ‘al-ṮHaālibī, Abū Manṣūr’, in BearmanP.BianquisTh.BosworthC.E.van DonzelE.HeinrichsW.P., eds, Encyclopaedia of Islam, Second Edition. Brill, 2011.
11.
ChittickWilliam C.The Sufi Path of Knowledge: Ibn Al-ʻArabi’s Metaphysics of Imagination, Albany, NY, 1989.
12.
CohenRalph. ‘History and Genre’, New Literary History, Vol. 17, 1986, pp. 203–18.
LafontJean.Maharaja Ranjit Singh: Lord of the Five Rivers, New Delhi, 2002.
31.
MaḥjūbMuḥammad Ja‘far. ‘Taḥawwul-i naqqālī wa qiṣṣah-ḳhẉānī’. īrānnāmah, 9, 1991, pp. 186–211.
32.
MalcolmSir John.Sketches of Persia, from the journals of a traveller in the East …, London, 1827.
33.
MeisamiJulie Scott. ‘The Past in Service of the Present: Two Views of History in Medieval Persia’, Poetics Today, 14, 1993, pp. 247–75.
34.
MeisamiJulie Scott.Persian Historiography to the End of the Twelfth Century, Edinburgh, 1999.
35.
MelvilleCharles. ‘The Tarikh-i Dilgusha-yi Shamshir Khani and the Reception of the Shahnama in India’. Paper presented at the Biennial Conference of the Association for the Study of Persianate Societies, Lahore, 28 February 2009.
Narayana RaoVelcheruShulmanDavidSubrahmanyamSanjay. Textures of Time: Writing History in South India, New York, 2003.
43.
PayeurBrittany. ‘The Lilly Shamshir-Khani in a Franco-Sikh Context: A Non-Islamic “Islamic” Manuscript’, in GruberChristiane J. (ed.), The Islamic Manuscript Tradition: Ten Centuries of Book Arts in Indiana University Collections, pp. 221–50, Bloomington, 2010.
SharmaSunil. ‘Amir Khusraw and the Genre of Historical Narratives in Verse’, Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East, 22, 2002, pp. 112–18.
