In this article, we examine differences in the technical efficiency (TE) orientation of 79 sample Indian Microfinance Institutions (MFIs) during 2010–2011 under various combinations of three inputs and three outputs, by using the data envelopment analysis (DEA). Furthermore, we have used principal component analysis (PCA) technique to identify various TE orientation of TE in Indian MFIs namely, loan portfolio orientation, client orientation (i.e. breadth of outreach) and average loan size per borrower (i.e. depth of outreach) orientation. We find that TE in Indian MFIs tremendously varies when we use different input and output combinations to specify production. The analysis shows that all fully technically efficient MFIs have loan portfolio orientation, may be they have financial orientation. Similarly, some MFIs have breadth of outreach and depth of outreach orientation, which may be due to their social orientation.
AndersonR. E.TathamR. L.BlackW. C. (1995). Multivariate data analysis: With readings. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
2.
BankerR. D.CharnesA.CooperW. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078–1092.
3.
BassemB. S. (2008). Efficiency of microfinance institutions in the Mediterranean: An application of DEA. Transition Studies Review, 15(2), 343–354.
4.
BasuP.SrivastavaP. (2005). Scaling-up microfinance for India’s rural poor (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3646). Washington, DC: World Bank.
5.
BergerA. N.HumphreyD. B. (1997). Efficiency of financial institutions: International survey and directions for future research. European Journal of Operational Research, 98(2), 175–212.
6.
BergS. A.FørsundF. R.HjalmarssonL.SuominenM. (1993). Banking efficiency in the Nordic countries. Journal of Banking & Finance, 17(2), 371–388.
7.
CaudillS.GropperD.HartarskaV. (2009). Which microfinance institutions are becoming more cost-effective with time? Evidence from a mixture model. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 42(4), 651–672.
8.
CaudillS.GropperD.HartarskaV. (2012). Microfinance institution costs: Effects of gender, subsidies and technology. Journal of Financial Economic Policy, 4(4), 292–319.
9.
CincaC. S.MolineroC. M. (2004). Selecting DEA specifications and ranking units via PCA. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 55(5), 521–528.
10.
CoelliT. J. (1996). A guide to DEAP version 2.1: A data envelopment analysis (computer) program (DEAP) (CEPA Working Paper 96/08). Centre for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, University of New England, Australia.
11.
CoelliT. J.RaoD. P.O’DonnellC. J.BatteseG. E. (2005). An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. New York: Springer.
12.
DesrochersM.LamberteM. (2003). Efficiency and expense preference behaviour in Philippines’ cooperative rural banks (Working Paper. No. 03-21). Motreal: CIRPEE.
13.
FerrierG.LovellC. A. K. (1990). Measuring cost efficiency in banking: Econometric and linear programming evidence. Journal of Econometrics, 46(1), 229–245.
14.
FisherThomasSriramM. S. (2002). Beyond micro-credit: Putting development back into microfinance. New Delhi: Vistar Publications.
15.
Gutierrez-NietoB.Serrano-CincaC.MolineroC. M. (2007). Microfinance institutions and efficiency. Omega, 35(2), 131–142.
16.
HaqM.SkullyM.PathanS. (2010). Efficiency of microfinance institutions: A data envelopment analysis. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, 17(1), 63–97.
17.
HartarskaV.ParmeterC.NadolnyakD.ZhouD. B. (2010). Economies of scope for microfinance: Differences across output measures. Pacific Economic Review, 15(4), 464–481.
18.
HartarskaV.ParmeterC. F.NadolnyakD. (2011). Economies of scope of lending and mobilizing deposits in rural MFIs: A semiparametric analysis. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 93(2), 389–398.
19.
HartarskaV.MerslandR. (2012). Which governance mechanisms promote efficiency in reaching poor clients? Evidence from rated microfinance institutions. European Financial Management, 18(2), 218–239.
20.
HartarskaV.NadolnyakD.ShenX. (2012a). Efficiency in microfinance cooperatives. Iberoamerical Journal of Development Studies, 1(2), 53–74.
21.
HartarskaV.NadolnyakD.ShenX. (2012b). Social performance and cost minimizing MFI size. Journal of Cost Management, 26(5), 20.
22.
HartarskaV.ShenX.MerslandR. (2013). Scale economies and elasticities of substituion in microfinance institutions. Journal of Banking and Finance, 37(1), 118–131.
23.
HassanM. K.TufteD. R. (2001). The X-efficiency of a group based lending institution: The case of Grameen Bank. World Development, 29, 1071–1082.
24.
HermesN.LensinkR.MeestersA. (2009). Financial development and the efficiency of microfinance institutions (Unpublished working paper). University of Groningen, Netherlands.
25.
HermesN.MeestersA. (2011). The performance of microfinance institutions: Do macro conditions matter? In ArmendarizB.MarcLabie (Eds), The handbook of microfinance (pp. 173–201). Chennai: World Scientific Publishers.
26.
KuussaariH.VesalaJ. (1995). The efficiency of Finnish Banks in producing payment and account transactions (Working Paper No. 956) Bank of Finland, Financial Market Department, Helsinki.
27.
MasoodT.AhmadM. I. (2010). Technical efficiency of microfinance institutions in India—A stochastic frontier approach. Prajnan, 39(3), 159–176.
28.
Mix Market. (2011). Data accessed from microfinance information exchange for microfinance industry. Retrieved, from www.mixmarket.org/mfi/country/india
29.
MorduchJ.HaleyB. (2002). Analysis of the effects of microfinance on poverty reduction (Working Paper No. 1014). New York: NYU Wagner.
30.
Muneer BabuM. (2013). An empirical study of regulation and performance of microfinance institutions in India (Unpublished Ph.D. thesis submitted to Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur).
31.
Muneer BabuM. (2016, in press). Macroeconomic determinants of technological change in Indian microfinance institutions. Global Business Review, 17(5).
32.
Muneer BabuM.KulshreshthaP. (2013). Efficiency of Indian microfinance institutions: A data envelopment analysis. The Indian Economic Journal, 60(4), 81–101.
33.
Muneer BabuM.KulshreshthaP. (2014). Productivity change and technical efficiency in Indian microfinance institutions. Studies in Microeconomics, 2(2), 165–200.
34.
NABARD. (1999). Task force on supportive policy and regulatory framework for microfinance: Report. Mumbai: National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD). Retrieved from https://www.nabard.org/english/Publications.aspx/
35.
NadiyaM.RamananR. (2011). Probing on the efficiency and sustainability status of Indian microfinance institutions: A data envelopment analysis application (Unpublished paper). Calicut: National Institute of Technology.
36.
NawazA. (2010). Efficiency and productivity of microfinance: Incorporating the role of subsidies (Working Paper No. 10). Brussels: School of Economics and Management, Centre Emile Bernheim.
37.
NormanM.StokerB. (1991). Data envelopment analysis: The assessment of performance. Chichester: John Wiley.
38.
NSSO. (2003). All-India debt and investment survey 2002 (Report No. 501 [59/18.2/2]), NSS 59th Round (January–December2003). New Delhi: National Sample Survey organization.
39.
PastorJ. M. (1999). Efficiency and risk management in Spanish banking: A method to decompose risk. Applied Financial Economics, 9(4), 371–384.
40.
PastorJ. T.RuizJ. L.SirventI. (2002). A statistical test for nested radial DEA models. Operations Research, 50(4), 728–735.
41.
PaxtonJ. (2007). Technical efficiency in a semi-formal financial sector: The case of Mexico. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 69(1), 57–74.
42.
QayyumA.AhmadM. (2006). Efficiency and sustainability of microfinance institutions in South Asia. Pakistan: Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.
43.
RBI. (1999). All India debt and investment survey, 1991–92—Salient Features. RBI Bulletin.
44.
ShermanH. D.GoldF. (1985). Bank branch operating efficiency-evaluation with data envelopment analysis. Journal of Banking and Finance, 9(2), 297–315.
45.
Tortosa-AusinaE. (2002). Exploring efficiency differences over time in the Spanish banking industry. European Journal of Operational Research, 139(3), 643–664.
