The author investigates factors influencing the adoption of dispute resolution procedures in the nonunion workplace. Various explanations are tested using data from a 1998 survey of dispute resolution procedures in the telecommunications industry. The results suggest that both institutional pressures and human resource strategies are factors driving the adoption of nonunion procedures. Among institutional factors, rising individual employment rights litigation and expanded court deferral to nonunion arbitration have led to increased adoption of mandatory arbitration procedures in the nonunion workplace. At the same time, an older institutional factor—union substitution by nonunion employers aimed at avoiding union organizing—continues to inspire the adoption of nonunion dispute resolution procedures, especially peer review. Finally, the results provide some support for a link between the use of high performance work systems and the adoption of nonunion dispute resolution procedures.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AppelbaumEileenBaileyThomasBergPeter, and KallebergArne L.. 2000. Manufacturing Advantage. Ithaca, N.Y.: ILR Press (an imprint of Cornell University Press).
2.
ArthurJeffrey B.1992. “The Link between Business Strategy and Industrial Relations Systems in American Steel Minimills.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 45, No. 3 (April), pp. 488–506.
3.
BerenbeimRonald. 1980. Nonunion Complaint Systems: A Corporate Appraisal. New York: The Conference Board.
4.
BlauPeter M., and SchoenherrRichard A.. 1971. The Structure of Organizations. New York: Basic Books.
5.
BronfenbrennerKate. 1997. “The Role of Union Strategies in NLRB Certification Elections.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 50, No. 2 (January), pp. 195–212.
6.
Bureau of National Affairs (BNA).1999. Individual Employment Rights Manual. Washington, D.C.
7.
ColvinAlexander J.S.1999. “Citizens and Citadels: Dispute Resolution and the Governance of Employment Relations.” Ph.D. Diss., Cornell University.
8.
DelaneyJohn T., and FeuillePeter. 1993. “The Determinants of Nonunion Grievance and Arbitration Procedures.” Proceedings of the 44th Annual Meeting of the IRRA. Madison, Wis.: IRRA, pp. 529–38.
9.
DeleryJohn E.1998. “Issues of Fit in Strategic Human Resource Management: Implications for Research.”Human Resource Management Review, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 289–309.
10.
DeleryJohn E., and DotyHarold D.. 1996. “Modes of Theorizing in Strategic Human Resource Management: Tests of Universalistic, Contingency, and Configurational Performance Predictions.”Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 39, No. 4 (December), pp. 802–35.
11.
DertouzosJames N.HollandElaine, and EbenerPatricia. 1988. The Legal and Economic Consequences of Wrongful Termination. Santa Monica, Calif.: Rand Institute for Civil Justice.
12.
DertouzosJames N., and KarolyLynn A.. 1991. Labor-Market Responses to Employer Liability. Santa Monica, Calif.: Rand Institute for Civil Justice.
13.
DunlopJohn T., and ZackArnold M.. 1997. Mediation and Arbitration of Employment Disputes. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14.
EdelmanLauren B.AbrahamSteven E., and ErlangerHoward S.. 1992. “Professional Construction of Law: The Inflated Threat of Wrongful Discharge.”Law and Society Review, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 47–83.
15.
EdelmanLauren B.UggenChristopher, and ErlangerHoward S.. 1999. “The Endogeneity of Legal Regulation: Grievance Procedures as Rational Myth.”American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 105, No. 2 (September), pp. 406–54.
16.
EdwardsRichard T.1979. Contested Terrain. New York: Basic Books.
17.
EppCharles R.1990. “Connecting Litigation Levels and Legal Mobilization: Explaining Interstate Variation in Employment Civil Rights Litigation.”Law and Society Review, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 145–63.
18.
EwingDavid W.1989. Justice on the Job: Resolving Grievances in the Nonunion Workplace. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
19.
FeuillePeter, and ChachereDenise R.. 1995. “Looking Fair or Being Fair: Remedial Voice Procedures in Nonunion Workplaces.”Journal of Management, Vol. 21, No. 1 (March), pp. 27–42.
20.
FeuillePeter, and DelaneyJohn T.. 1992. “The Individual Pursuit of Organizational Justice: Grievance Procedures in Nonunion Workplaces.”Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, Vol. 10. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press, pp. 187–232.
21.
FolgerRobert, and CropanzanoRussell. 1998. Organizational Justice and Human Resource Management. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.
22.
FreemanRichard B., and MedoffJames L.. 1984. What Do Unions Do?New York: Basic Books.
23.
General Accounting Office (GAO).1995. Employment Discrimination: Most Private-Sector Employers Use Alternative Dispute Resolution. GAO/HEHS-95-150 Employment Discrimination. Washington, D.C.
24.
GoddardJohn, and DelaneyJohn T.. 2000. “Reflections on the ‘High Performance’ Paradigm's Implications for Industrial Relations as a Field.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 53, No. 3 (April), pp. 482–502.
25.
HuberPeter J.1967. “The Behavior of Maximum Likelihood Estimates under Non-Standard Conditions.”Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Vol. 1, pp. 221–33.
26.
HuselidMark A.1995. “The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Turnover, Productivity, and Corporate Financial Performance.”Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 38, No. 3 (June), pp. 635–72.
27.
IchniowskiCaseyKochanThomas A.LevineDavidOlsonCraig, and StraussGeorge. 1996. “What Works at Work: Overview and Assessment.”Industrial Relations, Vol. 35, No. 3 (Fall), pp. 356–74.
28.
IchniowskiCaseyShawKatherine, and PrennushiGiovanna. 1997. “The Effects of Human Resource Management Practices on Productivity: A Study of Steel Finishing Lines.”American Economic Review, Vol. 87, No. 3 (June), pp. 291–313.
29.
KatzHarry C., ed. 1997. Telecommunications: Restructuring Work and Employment Relations Worldwide. Ithaca, N.Y.: ILR Press (an imprint of Cornell University Press).
30.
KatzHarry C., and DarbishireOwen R.. 2000. Converging Divergences: Worldwide Change in Employment Relations. Ithaca, N.Y.: ILR Press (an imprint of Cornell University Press).
31.
KatzHarry C., and KochanThomas A.. 2000. An Introduction to Collective Bargaining and Industrial Relations, 2nd edition.New York: Irwin McGraw Hill.
32.
KaufmanBruce. 1993. The Origins and Evolution of the Field of Industrial Relations. Ithaca, N.Y.: ILR Press.
33.
KeefeJeffrey H., and BattRosemary. 1997. “United States.” In KatzHarry C., ed., Telecommunications: Restructuring Work and Employment Relations Worldwide. Ithaca, N.Y.: ILR Press (an imprint of Cornell University Press), pp. 31–88.
34.
KlaasBrian S., and FeldmanDaniel C.. 1993. “The Evaluation of Disciplinary Appeals in Non-Union Organizations.”Human Resource Management Review, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 49–81.
35.
KochanThomas A.KatzHarry C., and McKersieRobert B.. 1994. The Transformation of American Industrial Relations. Ithaca, N.Y.: ILR Press.
36.
LewinDavid. 1997. “Workplace Dispute Resolution.” In LewinDavidMitchellDaniel J.B., and ZaidiMahmood A., eds., The Human Resource Management Handbook, Part II. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press, pp. 197–218.
37.
MacDuffieJohn-Paul. 1995. “Human Resource Bundles and Manufacturing Performance: Organizational Logic and Flexible Production Systems in the World Auto Industry.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 48, No. 2 (January), pp. 197–221.
38.
McCabeDouglas M.1988. Corporate Nonunion Complaint Procedures and Systems. New York: Praeger.
39.
MilesThomas J.2000. “Common Law Exceptions to Employment at Will and U.S. Labor Markets.”Journal of Law, Economics, and Organizations, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 74–101.
40.
Olson-BuchananJulie B.1996. “Voicing Discontent: What Happens to the Grievance Filer after the Grievance?”Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 81, No. 1 (February), pp. 52–63.
41.
OstermanPaul. 1994. “How Common Is Workplace Transformation and Who Adopts It?”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 47, No. 2 (January), pp. 173–88.
42.
OstermanPaul. 1995. “Work/Family Programs and the Employment Relationship.”Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 40, No. 4, pp. 681–700.
43.
OstermanPaul. 2000. “Work Reorganization in an Era of Restructuring: Trends in Diffusion and Effects on Employee Welfare.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 53, No. 2 (January), pp. 179–96.
44.
SchwabStewart J.1993. “Life-Cycle Justice: Accommodating Just Cause and Employment at Will.”Michigan Law Review, Vol. 92, No. 1, pp. 8–62.
45.
ShawJasonDeleryJohnJenkinsG. DouglasJr., and GuptaNina. 1998. “An Organization-Level Analysis of Voluntary and Involuntary Turnover.”Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 39, No. 5 (December), pp. 1–15.
46.
SheppardBlair H.LewickiRoy J., and MintonJohn W.. 1992. Organizational Justice: The Search for Fairness in the Workplace. New York: Macmillan.
47.
SlichterSumnerHealyJames J., and LivernashE. Robert. 1960. The Impact of Collective Bargaining on Management. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
48.
StoneKatherine V.W.1996. “Mandatory Arbitration of Individual Employment Rights: The Yellow Dog Contract of the 1990s.”Denver University Law Review, Vol. 73, pp. 1017–50.
49.
StoneKatherine V.W.1999. “Employment Arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act.” Chapter 2 in EatonAdrienne E. and KeefeJeffrey H., eds., Employment Dispute Resolution and Worker Rights in the Changing Workplace. Champaign, Ill.: Industrial Relations Research Association.
50.
TarasDaphne G.1997. “Managerial Intentions and Wage Determination in the Canadian Petroleum Industry.”Industrial Relations, Vol. 36, No. 2 (Spring), pp. 178–205.
51.
WestinAlan F., and FelieuAlfred G.. 1988. Resolving Employment Disputes without Litigation. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of National Affairs.
52.
ZackArnold M.1999. “Agreements to Arbitrate and the Waiver of Rights under Employment Law.” Chapter 3 in Adrienne E. Eaton and KeefeJeffrey H., eds., Employment Dispute Resolution and Worker Rights in the Changing Workplace. Champaign, Ill.: Industrial Relations Research Association.
