This article reports the results of an empirical study of the impact of school inputs on pupils' performance in private (independent) schools in the United Kingdom, using a new school-level panel dataset constructed from information provided by the Independent Schools Information Service. The authors show a consistent negative relationship between the pupil-teacher ratio at a school and the examination results achieved by pupils aged 18, controlling for the pupils' performance in examinations two years earlier. The results are noteworthy in comparison with results of studies for the state sector, relatively few of which have found a consistent and statistically significant effect of the pupil-teacher ratio.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AkerhielmKaren. 1995. “Does Class Size Matter?”Economics of Education Review, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 229–41.
2.
AngristJoshua D.LavyVictor. 1999. “Using Maimonides' Rule to Estimate the Effect of Class Size on Scholastic Achievement.”Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 114, No. 2 (May), pp. 533–75.
3.
BoozerMichaelRouseCecilia. 2001. “Intraschool Variation in Class Size: Patterns and Implications.”Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 50, No. 1 (July), pp. 163–89.
4.
BradleySteveTaylorJim. 1998. “The Effect of School Size on Exam Performance in Secondary Schools.”Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 60, No. 3, pp. 291–325.
5.
DeardenLorraineFerriJavierMeghirCostas. 2002. “The Effect of School Quality on Educational Attainment and Wages.”Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 84, No. 1 (February), pp. 1–20.
6.
DustmannChristianRajahNajmavon SoestArthur. 2002. “Class Size, Education, and Wages.” IZA Bonn Discussion Paper No. 501.
7.
FeinsteinLeonSymonsJames. 2001. “Attainment in Secondary School.”Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 51, No. 2, pp. 300–321.
8.
GibbonsSteve. 2002. “Geography, Resources, and Primary School Performance.” Centre for the Economics of Education Discussion Paper No. 25. London School of Economics.
9.
GlassGene V.SmithMary Lee. 1979. “Meta-Analysis of Research on Class Size and Achievement.”Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, Vol. 1, pp. 2–16.
10.
HanushekEric A.1986. “The Economics of Schooling: Production and Efficiency in Public Schools.”Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 24, No. 3 (September), pp. 1141–77.
11.
HanushekEric A.1989. “The Effect of Differential Expenditures on School Performance.”Education Researcher, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 45–51.
12.
HanushekEric A.1992. “The Trade-Off between Child Quantity and Quality.”Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 100, No. 1 (February), pp. 84–117.
13.
HanushekEric A.1996a. “A More Complete Picture of School Resource Policies.”Review of Educational Research, Vol. 66, pp. 397–409.
14.
HanushekEric A.1996b. “School Resources and Student Performance.” In BurtlessGary, ed., Does Money Matter? The Effect of School Resources on Student Achievement and Adult Success. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, pp. 43–73.
15.
HanushekEric A.1997. “Assessing the Effects of School Resources on Student Performance: An Update.”Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 141–64.
16.
HanushekEric A.1998. “The Evidence on Class Size.” Rochester, N.Y.: Occasional Paper No. 98-1, W. Allen Wallis Institute of Political Economy, University of Rochester, February.
17.
HoxbyCaroline M.2000. “The Effects of Class Size on Student Achievement: New Evidence from Population Variation.”Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 115, No. 4 (November), pp. 1239–85.
18.
KruegerAlan B.2000. “Economic Considerations and Class Size.” Unpublished Paper, Princeton University.
19.
KruegerAlan B.1999. “Experimental Estimates of Education Production Functions.”Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 114, No. 2 (May), pp. 497–532.
20.
KruegerAlan B.WhitmoreDiane M., 2001. “The Effect of Attending a Small Class in the Early Grades on College-Test Taking and Middle School Test Results: Evidence from Project STAR.”Economic Journal, Vol. 111, No. 468, pp. 1–28.
21.
LazearEdward P.2001. “Educational Production.”Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 116, No. 3 (August), pp. 777–803.
22.
MostellerFrederick. 1995. “The Tennessee Study of Class Size in the Early School Grades.”The Future of Children, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 113–27.
23.
SanderWilliam. 1999. “Endogenous Expenditures and Student Achievement.”Economics Letters, Vol. 64, No. 2, pp. 223–31.
24.
VignolesAnnaLevacicRosalindWalkerJamesMachinStephenReynoldsDavid. 2000. “The Relationship between Resource Allocation and Pupil Attainment: A Review.”Centre for the Economics of Education, London School of Economics.
25.
WößmannLudger. 2001. “New Evidence on the Missing Resource-Performance Link in Education.” Kiel Working Paper No. 1051.
