This article examines the trends in women’s economic outcomes in the United States, focusing primarily on labor force participation, occupational attainment, and the gender wage gap. Considerable progress was made on all dimensions prior to the 1990s followed by a slowing or stalling of gains thereafter, with a plateauing of female labor force participation trends and a slowing of women’s occupational and wage convergence with men. The author considers the likelihood that progress in narrowing gender gaps will resume in these areas, and concludes it is unlikely without policy intervention. She then considers new policy initiatives to address work–family issues and labor market discrimination that may help to increase female labor force participation and narrow gender inequities in the labor market.
AganAmanda Y.CowgillBoGeeLaura. Forthcoming. Salary history and employer demand: Evidence from a two-sided audit. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics.
2.
AutorDavid H.KatzLawrence F.KearneyMelissa S2008. Trends in U.S. wage inequality in the 1990s: Revising the revisionists. Review of Economics and Statistics90(2):300–23.
BessenJamesMengChenDenkErich. 2024. Perpetuating inequality: What salary history bans reveal about wages. Journal of Economic Inequality 22:709–33.
5.
BlauFrancine D.BrummundPeterLiuAlbert Yung-Hsu. 2013. Trends in occupational segregation by gender 1970–2009: Adjusting for the impact of changes in the occupational coding system. Demography50(2):471–92, Table 2.
6.
BlauFrancine D.HendricksWallace E1979. Occupational segregation by sex: Trends and prospects. Journal of Human Resources14(2):197–210.
7.
BlauFrancine D.KahnLawrence M1997. Swimming upstream: Trends in the gender wage differential in the 1980s. Journal of Labor Economics15(1, pt. 1):1–42.
8.
BlauFrancine D.KahnLawrence M2006. The U.S. gender pay gap in the 1990s: Slowing convergence. Industrial and Labor Relations Review60(1):45–66.
9.
BlauFrancine D.KahnLawrence M2007. Changes in the labor supply behavior of married women: 1980–2000. Journal of Labor Economics25(3):393–438.
10.
BlauFrancine D.KahnLawrence M2013. Female labor supply: Why is the US falling behind?American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings103(3):251–56.
11.
BlauFrancine D.KahnLawrence M2017. The gender wage gap: Extent, trends, and explanations. Journal of Economic Literature55(3):789–865.
12.
BlauFrancine D.LynchLisa M2024. 50 years of breakthroughs and barriers: Women in economics, policy, and leadership. In McGranahanLeslieSchanzenbachDiane W. (Eds.), “Confronting Poverty: Measuring Its Causes, Costs, and Consequences,” special issue, ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science711:225–44.
13.
BlauFrancine D.WinklerAnne E2018. Women, men, and family. In AverettSusan L.ArgysLaura M.HoffmanSaul D. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Women and the Economy, pp. 395–424. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190628963.013.16
14.
BlauFrancine D.WinklerAnne E2022. The Economics of Women, Men, and Work, 9th ed.New York: Oxford University Press.
BudigMichelle J.HodgesMelissa J.EnglandPaula. 2019. Wages of nurturant and reproductive care workers: Individual and job characteristics, occupational closure, and wage-equalizing institutions. Social Problems66(2):294–319.
18.
CarpenterChristopher S.EppinkSamuel T.GonzalesGilbert. 2020. Transgender status, gender identity, and socioeconomic outcomes in the United States. ILR Review73(3):573–99.
19.
ChaYoungjoo. 2013. Overwork and the persistence of gender segregation in occupations. Gender & Society27(2):158–84.
20.
ChaYoungjooWeedenKim A2014. Overwork and the slow convergence in the gender gap in wages. American Sociological Review79(3):457–84.
21.
CorrellShelley J.KellyErin L.O’ConnorLindsey TrimbleWilliamsJoan C2014. Redesigning, redefining work. Work and Occupations41(1):3–17.
22.
CortésPatriciaFengYingGuida-JohnsonNicolásPanJessica. 2024. Automation and gender: Implications for occupational segregation and the gender skill gap. NBER Working Paper No. 32030. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
23.
CortésPatriciaPanJessica. 2023. Children and the remaining gender gaps in the labor market. Journal of Economic Literature61(4):1359–409.
24.
CotterDavidHermsenJoan M.VannemanReeve. 2011. The end of the gender revolution? Gender role attitudes from 1977 to 2008. American Journal of Sociology117(4):259–89.
CullenZoe B.2024. Is pay transparency good?Journal of Economic Perspectives38(1):153–80.
27.
DuncanOtis DudleyDuncanBeverly. 1955. A methodological analysis of segregation indexes. American Sociological Review20(2):210–17.
28.
EnglandPaulaBudigMichelleFolbreNancy. 2002. Wages of virtue: The relative pay of care work. Social Problems49(4):455–73.
29.
EnglandPaulaLevineAndrewMishelEmma. 2020. Progress toward gender equality in the United States has slowed or stalled. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) 117(13):6990–97. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1918891117
30.
FolbreNancy. 1994. Children as public goods. American Economic Review84(2):86–90.
31.
FolbreNancyGauthamLeilaSmithKristin. 2023. Gender inequality, bargaining, and pay in care services in the United States. ILR Review76(1):86–111.
32.
FortinNicole M.2015. Gender role attitudes and women’s labor market participation: Opting-out, AIDS, and the persistent appeal of housewifery. In “Economics of Gender,” special issue, Annals of Economics and Statistics117/118:379–401.
GoldinClaudia. 2006. The quiet revolution that transformed women’s employment, education, and family. American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings96(2):1–21.
35.
GoldinClaudia. 2014. A grand gender convergence: Its last chapter. American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings104(4):1091–119.
36.
GoldinClaudiaKatzLawrence F2016. A most egalitarian profession: Pharmacy and the evolution of a family-friendly occupation. Journal of Labor Economics34(3):705–46.
37.
HansenBenjaminMcNicholsDrew. 2020. Information and the persistence of the gender wage gap: Early evidence from California’s salary history ban. NBER Working Paper No. 27054. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
JacobsJerry A.1989. Long-term trends in occupational segregation by sex. American Journal of Sociology95(1):160–73.
40.
JacobsJerry A.GersonKathleen. 2004. The Time Divide: Work, Family, and Gender Inequality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41.
JuhnChinhuiMurphyKevin M1997. Wage inequality and family labor supply. Journal of Labor Economics15(1, pt. 1):72–97.
42.
KearneyMelissa S.2023. The Two-Parent Privilege. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
43.
KlevenHenrikLandaisCamilleSøgaardJakob Egholt. 2019. Children and gender inequality: Evidence from Denmark. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics11(4):181–209.
KuhnPeterLozanoFernando. 2008. The expanding workweek? Understanding trends in long work hours among U.S. men, 1979–2006. Journal of Labor Economics26(2):311–43.
46.
KuziemkoIlyanaPanJessicaShenJennyWashingtonEbonya. 2018. The mommy effect: Do women anticipate the employment effects of motherhood? NBER Working Paper No. 24740. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
47.
LevanonAsafEnglandPaulaAllisonPaul. 2009. Occupational feminization and pay: Assessing causal dynamics using 1950–2000 U.S. Census data. Social Forces88(2):865–81.
MincerJacob. 1962. Labor force participation of married women: A study of labor supply. In LewisH. Gregg (Ed.), Aspects of Labor Economics, Universities–National Bureau of Economic Research Conference Studies, no. 14, pp. 63–105. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
52.
OlivettiClaudiaPetrongoloBarbara. 2017. The economic consequences of family policies: Lessons from a century of legislation in high-income countries. Journal of Economic Perspectives31(1):205–30.
53.
NaiduSuresh. 2022. Is there any future for a US labor movement?Journal of Economic Perspectives36(4):3–28.
54.
PatnaikAnkita. 2019. Reserving time for daddy: The consequences of fathers’ quotas. Journal of Labor Economics37(4):1009–59.
55.
ReevesRichard V.2022. Of Boys and Men: Why the Modern Male Is Struggling, Why It Matters, and What to Do about It. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
