Relationship of Neonatal Endotracheal Tube Size and Airway Resistance

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Infants receiving mechanical ventilation require narrow-lumen, small-diameter endotracheal tubes. OBJECTIVE: Compare the resistances of endotracheal tubes used in the neonatal intensive care unit. METHODS: Endotracheal tubes of internal diameter 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, and 4.0 mm were tested with a standard neonatal ventilator and a test lung. An endotracheal tube of each diameter was cut to 12 cm and connected to a flow transducer at one end and the test lung at the other. Serial measurements of resistance were made at various flows (6, 8, 10, and 12 L/min) and ventilator rates (30-90 breaths/min) encompassing the ranges of clinical practice. Analysis of variance was performed for each tube size, comparing resistance to flows and ventilator rates. RESULTS: Resistance was significantly higher with the 2.5 mm tube than with the others. There was also a consistent trend, in all the tube sizes, towards higher resistance as flow was increased. CONCLUSIONS: The higher resistance of the 2.5 mm tube may be detrimental to extremely low birthweight infants kept on mechanical support merely "to grow." The higher resistance may increase the work of breathing and thus increase caloric expenditure and impede growth. [Respir Care 2002;47(9):994-997]

Keywords

neonatal endotracheal tube airway resistance mechanical ventilation ventilator

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

LeSouef

, England

, Bryan

. Total resistance of the respiratory system in preterm infants with and without an endotracheal tube. J Pediatr 1984;104(1):108–111.

Gregory

, Kitterman

, Phibbs

, Tooley

, Hamilton

. Treatment of idiopathic respiratory distress syndrome with continuous positive airway pressure. N Engl J Med 1971;284(24):1333–1340.

Sullivan

, Paliotta

, Saklad

Endotracheal tube as a factor in measurement of respiratory mechanics. J Appl Physiol 1976;41(4):590–592.

Southgate

. Airflow resistances of endotracheal tubes (editorial). JAMA 1977;237(13):1362.

Wright

, Marini

, Bernard

. In vitro versus in vivo comparison of endotracheal tube airflow resistance. Am Rev Respir Dis 1989(1);140:10–16.

DeVreis

, Baker

Basic engineering concepts of pulmonary graphics. In: Donn

, editor. Neonatal and pediatric pulmonary graphics: principles and clinical applications. Armonk NY: Futura; 1998:35–56.

Bhutani

, Sivieri

. Physiological principles for bedside assessment of pulmonary graphics. In: Donn

, editor. Neonatal and pediatric pulmonary graphics: principles and clinical applications. Armonk NY: Futura; 1998:57–79.

Woolson

. Statistical methods for the analysis of biomedical data. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1987.

Cowan

, Op't Holt

, Gegenheimer

, Izenberg

, Kulkarni

Effect of inner cannula removal on the work of breathing imposed by tracheostomy tubes: a bench study. Respir Care 2001;46(5):460–465.

10.

Avery

, Tooley

, Keller

, Hurd

, Bryan

, Cotton

, et al. Is chronic lung disease in low birth weight infants preventable? A survey of eight centers. Pediatrics 1987;79(1):26–30.

11.

De Klerk

, De Klerk

. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure and outcomes of preterm infants. J Paediatr Child Health 2001;37(2):161–167.

12.

Lundstrom

. Initial treatment of preterm infants—continuous positive airway pressure or ventilation? Eur J Pediatr 1996;155 Suppl 2:S25–S29.

13.

Contencin

, Narcy

Size of endotracheal tube and neonatal acquired subglottic stenosis. Study Group for Neonatology and Pediatric Emergencies in the Parisian Area. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1993;119(8):815–819.

14.

Sherman

, Nelson

Decreased incidence of subglottic stenosis using an "appropriate-sized" endotracheal tube in neonates. Pediatr Pulmonol 1989;6(3):183–185.

15.

Sherman

, Lowitt

, Stephenson

, Ironson

Factors influencing acquired subglottic stenosis in infants. J Pediatr 1986;109(2):322–327.