This study compares organizational commitment in six western countries: USA, Great Britain, New Zealand, Germany, Norway, and Sweden. The main focus is on the hypothesized existence of conflicting values due to different systems of norms. The assumption made is that the central norms, values, and expectations in any particular work organization, originate in a more general technical/economic system of norms; and that subordinated groups, supporters of left-wing values, those identifying with lower social classes, and union members all espouse other systems of norms, which are not entirely compatible with this technical/economic system, and that these groups are therefore likely to display lower organizational commitment than other groups. The results in this paper do suggest the existence of conflicting norms and that this has implications for organizational commitment. The most noteworthy finding is that organizational commitment correlates with right-wing political values in five of the six countries. Other similarities and differences between the countries are also identified and discussed, and new avenues for further comparative research are suggested.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bamberger, Peter A. , Avraham N. Kluger , and Ronena Suchard . 1990. “The Antecedents and Correlates of Union Commitment: A Meta-Analysis.”Academy of Management Journal42: 304-318 .
2.
Becker, Howard S.1960. “Notes on the Concept of Commitment.”American Journal of Sociology66: 32-40 .
3.
Becker, J.W. , James A. Davies , Peter Ester , and Peter Mohler , eds. 1990. Attitudes to Inequality and the Role of Government. Rijswiik: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau .
4.
Bielby, Wiliam T. and Denise Bielby . 1989. “Family Ties: Balancing Commitment to Work and Family in Dual Earner Households.”American Sociological Review54: 776-789 .
5.
Bielby, Denise . 1992. “Commitment to Work and Family.”Annual Review of Sociology18: 281-302 .
6.
Burawoy, Michael . 1979. Manufacturing Consent. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press .
7.
Davis, James A. , and Roger Jowell . 1989. “Measuring National Differences. An Introduction to the International Social Survey Programme (ISSP).” In British Social Attitudes. Special International Report, edited by Roger Jowell , Sharon Witherspoon , and Lindsay Brook . Aldershot: Gower .
8.
De Vaus, David and Ian McAllister . 1991. “Gender and Work Orientation: Values and Satisfaction in Western Europe.”Work and Occupations18: 72-93 .
9.
Dobbin, Frank and Terry Boychuk . 1999. “National Employment System and Job Autonomy: Why Job Autonomy is High in the Nordic Countries and Low in the United States, Canada and Australia.”Organization Studies20: 257-291 .
10.
Dølvik, Jon Erik and Torgeir Aarvaag Stokke. 1998. “Norway: The Revival of Centralized Concertation.” In Changing Industrial Relations in Europe, 2d ed., edited by Anthony Ferner and Richard Hyman . Oxford: Blackwell .
11.
Edwards, Paul , Mark Hall , Richard Hyman , Paul Marginson , Keith Sisson , Jeremy Waddington , and David Winchester . 1998. “Great Britain: From Partial Collectivism to Neo-liberalism to Where?” In Changing Industrial Relations in Europe, 2d ed., edited by Anthony Ferner and Richard Hyman . Oxford: Blackwell .
12.
Ellingsæter, Anne Lise . 1995. Gender, Work, and Social Change. Beyond Dualistic Thinking. Oslo: Institute for Social Research .
13.
Erikson, Robert and John H Goldthorpe . 1992. The Constant Flux. A Study of Class Mobility in Industrial Societies. Oxford: Clarendon Press .
14.
Freeman, Richard B. and James L. Medoff . 1984. What Do Unions Do?New York: Basic Books .
15.
Gallie, D. , D. Kostova , and P. Kuchar . 1999. “Employment Experience and Organizational Commitment: An East-West European Comparison.”Work Employment and Society13: 621-641 .
16.
Gallie, Duncan . 2000. “The Quality of Working Life: Is Scandinavia Different?” Paper presented to the International Working Party on Labour Market Segmentation Conference, July 12-15, Manchester.
17.
Ganzeboom, Harry and Donald J. Treiman . 1996. “Internationally Comparable Measures of Occupational Status for the 1988 International Standard Classification of Occupations.”Social Science Research25: 201-239 .
18.
Gill, Collin and Hubert Krieger . 2000. “Recent Survey Evidence on Participation in Europe: Towards a European Model?”European Journal of Industrial Relations6(1): 109-132 .
19.
Golden, Miriam A. , Michael Wallerstein , and Peter Lange . 1999. “Postwar Trade Union Organization and Industrial Relations in Twelve Countries.” In Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism, edited by Herbert Kitschelt , Peter Lange , Gary Marks , and John D. Stephens . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
20.
Goldthorpe, John H. and Anthony Heath . 1992. “Revised Class Schema 1992.” Working paper no. 13, Joint Unit for the Study of Social Trends, Nuffield College, Oxford .
21.
Goldthorpe, John H.2000. On Sociology: Numbers, Narratives, and the Integration of Research and Theory. Oxford: University Press .
22.
Gooderham, Paul N. , Odd Nordhaug , and Kristen Ringdal . 1999. “Institutional and Rational Determinants of Organizational Practices: Human Resource Management in European Firms.”Administrative Science Quarterly44: 507-531 .
23.
Graham, Andrew . 1997. “The UK 1979-95: Myths and Realities of Conservative Capitalism.” In Political Economy of Modern Capitalism, edited by Colin Crouch and Wolfgang Streeck . London: Sage .
24.
Gordon, Michael E. and Robert T. Ladd . 1990. “Dual Allegiance: Renewal, Reconsideration, and Recantation.”Personnel Psychology43(1): 37-70 .
25.
Hackman, J.R. and E.E. Lawler III . 1971. “Employee Reactions to Job Characteristics.”Journal of Applied Psychology Monograph55: 259-286 .
26.
Hakim, Catherine . 1991. “Grateful Slaves and Self-made Women: Fact and Fantasy in Women’s Work Orientations.”European Sociological Review7: 101-121 .
27.
Hakim, Catherine . 1995. “Five Feminist Myths about Women’s Employment.”British Journal of Sociology46: 429-455 .
28.
Hakim, Catherine . 1996. “The Sexual Division of Labour and Women’s Heterogeneity.”British Journal of Sociology46: 429-455 .
29.
Hirchman, Albert O.1970. Exit, Voice, and Loyality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
30.
Hollingsworth, J. Rogers . 1997. “The Institutional Embeddedness of American Capitalism.” In Political Economy of Modern Capitalism, edited by Colin Crouch and Wolfgang Streeck . London: Sage .
31.
Huber, Evelyn and John D. Stephens . 2001. “Welfare State and Production Regimes in the Era of Retrenchment.” In The New Politics of the Welfare State, edited by Paul Pierson . Oxford: Oxford University Press .
32.
Hult, Carl and Stefan Svallfors . 2002. “Production Regimes and Work Orientations: A Comparison of Six Western Countries.”European Sociological Review18(3) 315-331 .
33.
Hult, Carl . Forthcoming. “Organizational Commitment, Person-Environment Fit, and Job Satisfaction: A Comparison of Six Western Countries.”Organization Studies.
34.
Jacobi, Otto , Berndt Keller , and Walther Müller-Jentsch . 1998. “Germany: Facing New Challenges.” In Changing Industrial Relations in Europe, 2d ed., edited by Anthony Ferner and Richard Hyman . Oxford: Blackwell .
35.
Johnson, W. Roy , Gloria J. Johnson , and Christine R. Patterson . 1999. “Moderators of the Relationship between Company and Union Commitment: A Meta-Analyses.”Journal of Psychology133(1): 85-104 .
36.
Jowell, Roger . 1998. “How Comparative is Comparative Research?”American Behavioral Scientist42: 168-177 .
37.
Kalleberg, Arne . 1977. “Work Values and Job Rewards: A theory of Job Satisfaction.”American Sociological Review42: 124-143 .
38.
Kegan, R and L. Laskow . 2001. “The Real Reason People Won’t Change.”Harvard Business Review79(10): 84-92 .
39.
Kelsey, Jane . 1995. Economic Fundamentalism. London: Pluto Press .
40.
King, Desmond and Stewart Wood . 1999. “The Political Economy of Neo-Liberalism: Britain and the United States in the 1980s.” In Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism, edited by Herbert Kitschelt , Peter Lange , Gary Marks , and John D. Stephens . Cambrideg: Cambridge University Press .
41.
Kjellberg, Anders . 1998. “Sweden: Restoring the Model?” In Changing Industrial Relations in Europe, 2d ed., edited by Anthony Ferner and Richard Hyman . Oxford: Blackwell .
42.
Lincoln, James and Arne L. Kalleberg . 1990. Culture, Control and Commitment. A Study of Work Organization and Work Attitudes in the United States and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
43.
Locke, E.1969. “What is Job Satisfaction?”Organizational Behavior and Human Performance4: 309-366 .
44.
Lorence, Jon . 1987. “Subjective Labor Force Commitment of US: Men and Women, 1973-1985.”Social Science Quarterly68: 745-760 .
45.
Loscocco, Karyn A.1989. “The Interplay of Personal and Job Characteristics in Determining Work Commitment.”Social Science Research18: 370-394 .
Marsden, Peter V. , Arne L. Kalleberg , and Cynthia R. Cook . 1993. “Gender Differences in Organizational Commitment: Influences of Work positions and Family Roles.”Work and Occupations20: 368-390 .
48.
Mintzberg, Henry . 1983. Structures in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall .
49.
Mottaz, J. Clifford . 1987. “An Analysis of the Relationship between Work Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment.”The Sociological Quarterly28: 541-558 .
50.
Mottaz, J. Clifford . 1988. “Determinants of Organizational Commitment.”Human Relations41: 467-482 .
51.
Mowday, Richard and Richard Steers . 1979. “The Measurement of Organizational Commitment.”Journal of Vocational Behavior14: 224-247 .
52.
Mueller, Charles W. , Jean E. Wallace , and James L. Price . 1992. “Employee Commitment: Resolving Some Issues.”Work and Occupations19: 211-236 .
53.
OECD . 1999. “New Enterprise Work Practices and Their Labour Market Implications.”Employment Outlook (Paris), pp. 178-221 .
54.
Pontusson, Jonas . 1997. “Between Neo-Liberalism and the German Model: Swedish Capitalism in Transition.” In Political Economy of Modern Capitalism, edited by Colin Crouch and Wolfgang Streeck . London: Sage .
55.
Porter, L. , R. Steers , R. Mowday , and P. Boulian . 1974. “Organizational Commitment, Job Satisfaction, and Turnover among Psychiatric Technicians.”Journal of Applied Psychology59: 603-609 .
56.
Rhodes, Martin . 2000. “Restructuring the British Welfare State: Between Domestic Constraints and Global Imperatives.” In Welfare and Work in the Open Economy: Volume II: Diverse Responses to Common Challenges, edited by Fritz Scharpf and Vivien A Schmidt . Oxford: Oxford University Press .
57.
Rowe, Reba and William E. Snizek . 1995. “Gender Differences in Work Values: Perpetuating the Myth.”Work and Occupations22: 215-229 .
58.
Schwartz, Herman . 2000. “Internationalization and Two Liberal Welfare States. Australia and New Zealand.” In Welfare and Work in the Open Economy: Volume II: Diverse Responses to Common Challenges, edited by Fritz Scharpf and Vivien A Schmidt . Oxford: Oxford University Press .
59.
Soskice, David . 1999. “Divergent Production Regimes: Coordinated and Uncoordinated Market Economies in the 1980s and 1990s.” In Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism, edited by Herbert Kitschelt , Peter Lange , Gary Marks , and John D. Stephens . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
60.
Streeck, Wolfgang . 1997. “German Capitalism: Does it Exist? Can it Survive?” In Political Economy of Modern Capitalism, edited by Colin Crouch and Wolfgang Streeck . London: Sage .
61.
Svallfors, Stefan . 1996. “National Differences in National Identities: An introduction to the International Social Survey Program.”New Community22: 127-134 .
62.
Svallfors, Stefan , Jørgen Goul Andersen , and Knut Halvorsen . 2001. “Work Orientations in Scandinavia: A Comparison of Denmark, Norway, and Sweden.”Acta Sociologica44(2): 139-156 .
63.
Tolbert, Pamela S. and Phyllis Mohen . 1998. “Men’s and Women’s Definitions of ‘Good’ Jobs: Similarities and Differences by Age and Across Time.”Work and Occupations25: 168-194 .
64.
Western, Bruce . 1997. Between Class and Market: Postwar Unionization in the Capitalist Democracies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
