The fragmentation of the transnational women’s movement has been accompanied by massive questions regarding its impact on women’s political empowerment. This article investigates whether fragmentation of the movement facilitates or hampers empowerment while emphasizing a difference between the Global North and South. The results from a multisource database from 1990 to 2021 tested with mixed-effects linear regression show generally positive, enhancing effects of fragmentation on political empowerment; however, the effects on the North are weaker. This study challenges the homogeneity often imputed to the women’s movement and combines multiple theoretical frameworks to interrogate the nuanced mechanisms through which fragmentation exerts its influence politically on the women’s movement. Empirically, the article thus fills a critical gap in testing conflicting hypotheses about this fragmentation and its diverse impacts worldwide on women’s political empowerment.
AlexanderACBolzendahlCJalalzaiF (eds) (2018) Measuring Women’s Political Empowerment across the Globe: Strategies, Challenges and Future Research, 1st edn. Cham: Springer.
AlvarezSE (2000) Translating the global effects of transnational organizing on local feminist discourses and practices in Latin America. Meridians1(1): 29–67.
4.
AmentaECarenNChiarelloE, et al. (2010) The political consequences of social movements. Annual Review of Sociology36(1): 287–307.
5.
AvdeyevaOMelinM (2021) International socialization, international politics, and the spread of state bureaucracies for women’s advancement. Journal of Human Rights20(4): 396–413.
6.
BakkeKMCunninghamKGSeymourLJM (2012) A plague of initials: Fragmentation, cohesion, and infighting in civil wars. Perspectives on Politics10(2): 265–283.
7.
BanaszakLABeckwithKRuchtD (eds) (2003) Women’s Movements Facing the Reconfigured State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
BasuA (ed.) (2019) Women’s Movements in the Global Era: The Power of Local Feminisms, 2nd edn. London: Routledge.
9.
BeckE (2017) Reconsidering women’s empowerment: The contradictory effects of microfinance for Guatemalan women. Studies in Comparative International Development52(2): 217–241.
10.
BeerC (2009) Democracy and gender equality. Studies in Comparative International Development44(3): 212–227.
11.
BernhardMTzelgovEJungDJ, et al. (2015) The varieties of democracy core civil society index. Available at: https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.2139/ssrn.2667493
12.
BernsteinM (1997) Celebration and Suppression: The Strategic Uses of Identity by the Lesbian and Gay Movement. American Journal of Sociology103(3): 531–65. https://doi.org/10.1086/231250.
BoyleEHKimMLonghoferW (2015) Abortion liberalization in world society, 1960–2009. American Journal of Sociology121(3): 882–913.
15.
BrownKE (2020) Gender, Religion, Extremism: Finding Women in Anti-Radicalization. New York: Oxford University Press.
16.
ColeWM (2022) The dialectics of universalism and particularism: World society, religious traditions, and women’s political representation, 1960–2013. International Sociology37(1): 3–30.
17.
CoppedgeMGerringJKnutsenCH, et al. (2021) Varieties of democracy (V-dem) project. V-Dem [Country–Year/Country–Date] Dataset v11. Available at: https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.23696/vdemds21
18.
CunninghamKGBakkeKMSeymourLJM (2012) Shirts today, skins tomorrow: Dual contests and the effects of fragmentation in self-determination disputes. The Journal of Conflict Resolution56(1): 67–93.
19.
DesaiM (2009) Gender and the Politics of Possibilities: Rethinking Globalization. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
20.
DufloE (2012) Women empowerment and economic development. Journal of Economic Literature50(4): 1051–1079.
21.
ErtanSMonroyCVallejoJP, et al. (2018) The status of women’s political empowerment worldwide. In: AlexanderACBolzendahlCJalalzaiF (eds) Measuring Women’s Political Empowerment Across the Globe. Cham: Springer, pp. 55–76.
22.
EschleCMaiguashcaB (2018) Theorising feminist organising in and against neoliberalism: Beyond co-optation and resistance?European Journal of Politics and Gender1(1–2): 223–239.
23.
EvansE (2015) The Politics of Third Wave Feminisms: Neoliberalism, Intersectionality, and the State in Britain and the US. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
24.
EybenRNapier-MooreR (2009) Choosing words with care? Shifting meanings of women’s empowerment in international development. Third World Quarterly30(2): 285–300.
25.
FernandoJL (1997) Nongovernmental organizations, micro-credit, and empowerment of women. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science554(1): 150–177.
26.
FerreeMM (2006) The evolution of transnational feminisms consensus, conflict, and new dynamics. In: FerreeMMTrippAM (eds) Global Feminism: Transnational Women’s Activism, Organizing, and Human Rights. New York: New York University Press, pp. 88–125.
27.
ForesterSKelly-ThompsonKLusvardiA, et al. (2022) New dimensions of global feminist influence: Tracking feminist mobilization worldwide, 1975–2015. International Studies Quarterly: A Publication of the International Studies Association66(1): sqab093.
28.
FriedmanEJ (2009) Regionalizing women’s human rights in Latin America. Politics & Gender5(3): 349–375.
29.
GamsonJ (1996) The Organizational Shaping of Collective Identity: The Case of Lesbian and Gay Film Festivals in New York. Sociological Forum (Randolph, N.J.)11(2): 231–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02408366.
HesfordWSKozolW (2005) Just Advocacy? Women’s Human Rights, Transnational Feminisms, and the Politics of Representation. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
32.
HtunMWeldonSL (2010) When do governments promote women’s rights? A framework for the comparative analysis of sex equality policy. Perspectives on Politics8(1): 207–216.
33.
HtunMWeldonSL (2018) Cambridge Studies in Gender and Politics: The Logics of Gender Justice: State Action on Women’s Rights around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34.
HughesMMKrookMLPaxtonP (2015) Transnational women’s activism and the global diffusion of gender quotas. International Studies Quarterly: A Publication of the International Studies Association59(2): 357–372.
35.
HughesMMPaxtonPQuinsaatS, et al. (2018) Does the global North still dominate women’s international organizing? A network analysis from 1978 to 2008. Mobilization an International Quarterly23(1): 1–21.
36.
IsaacLChristiansenL (2002) How the civil rights movement revitalized labor militancy. American Sociological Review67(5): 722.
37.
KabeerN (1999) Resources, agency, achievements: Reflections on the measurement of women’s empowerment. Development and Change30(3): 435–464.
38.
KabeerN (2011) Between affiliation and autonomy: Navigating pathways of women’s empowerment and gender justice in rural Bangladesh: Women’s empowerment and gender justice in rural Bangladesh. Development and Change42(2): 499–528.
39.
KluczewskaK (2022) Donor-funded women’s empowerment in Tajikistan: Trajectories of women’s NGOs and changing attitudes to the international agenda. Studies in Comparative International Development57(1): 63–84.
40.
KriesiH (1996) The organizational structure of new social movements in a political context. In: McAdamDMcCarthyJDZaldMN (eds) Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 152–184.
41.
KristofNDWuDunnS (2010) Half the Sky: Turning Oppression into Opportunity for Women Worldwide. New York: Three Rivers Press.
42.
La SpadaE (2022) Costly concessions, internally divided movements, and strategic repression: A movement-level analysis. International Studies Quarterly: A Publication of the International Studies Association66(4): sqac052.
43.
LavrinenkoO (2023) WINGOs as conduits of world culture, their relationships with emancipative values, and women’s political empowerment worldwide, 1981–2020. International Journal of Comparative Sociology. Epub ahead of print 21 July. DOI: 10.1177/00207152231188316.
MazurAGMcBrideDEHoardS (2016) Comparative strength of women’s movements over time: Conceptual, empirical, and theoretical innovations. Politics, Groups, and Identities4(4): 652–676.
46.
MeyerDSMinkoffDC (2004) Conceptualizing political opportunity. Social Forces; A Scientific Medium of Social Study and Interpretation82(4): 1457–1492.
47.
MinkoffDC (1999) Bending with the wind: Strategic change and adaptation by women’s and racial minority organizations. American Journal of Sociology104(6): 1666–1703.
48.
MoghadamVM (2013) Globalization and Social Movements: Islamism, Feminism, and the Global Justice Movement. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
49.
MoghadamVM (2018) Feminism and the future of revolutions. Socialism and Democracy32(1): 31–53.
50.
MontoyaC (2015) From Global to Grassroots: The European Union, Transnational Advocacy, and Combating Violence against Women. New York: Oxford University Press.
51.
MorganR (ed.) (1996) Sisterhood Is Global: The International Women’s Movement Anthology. New York: Feminist Press at The City University of New York.
52.
MurdieAPeksenD (2015) Women’s rights INGO shaming and the government respect for women’s rights. The Review of International Organizations10(1): 1–22.
53.
NeundorfAShorrocksR (2022) Revisiting the impact of modernization on support for women politicians: The role of women’s political empowerment. Comparative Political Studies55(8): 1298–1331.
54.
OlzakSRyoE (2007) Organizational diversity, vitality and outcomes in the civil rights movement. Social Forces; A Scientific Medium of Social Study and Interpretation85(4): 1561–1591.
55.
PaxtonPHughesMMGreenJL (2006) The international women’s movement and women’s political representation, 1893–2003. American Sociological Review71(6): 898–920.
56.
PemsteinDMarquardtKLTzelgovE, et al. (2019) The V-Dem measurement model: Latent variable analysis for cross-national and cross-temporal expert-coded data (March 2019). Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3595962
57.
RobertsAKwonR (2021) The interplay of female empowerment and subjective beliefs about women in 51 countries. International Journal of Comparative Sociology62(1): 3–31.
58.
RosenJ (2017) Gender quotas for women in national politics: A comparative analysis across development thresholds. Social Science Research66: 82–101.
59.
SmithJGemiciBPlummerS, et al. (2018) Transnational social movement organizations and counter-hegemonic struggles today. Journal of World-Systems Research24(2): 372–403.
60.
SmithJHughesMMPlummerS, et al. (2021) Inter-organizational relations in transnational environmental and women’s activism: Multilateralists, pragmatists, and rejectionists. Globalizations18(2): 300–320.
61.
SmithJPlummerSHughesMM (2017) Transnational social movements and changing organizational fields in the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries. Global Networks17(1): 3–22.
62.
SmithJWiestDHughesM, et al. (2019) Transnational Social Movement Organizations Dataset (TSMOD), 1953–2013 [Data set]. Harvard Dataverse [Distributor]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/NRUBSV
63.
SouleSAKingBG (2008) Competition and resource partitioning in three social movement industries. American Journal of Sociology113(6): 1568–1610.
64.
StilesKW (2002) Civil Society by Design: Donors, NGOs, and the Intermestic Development Circle in Bangladesh. New York: Praeger.
65.
StockemerD (2017) Income inequality and women’s descriptive representation. International Journal of Comparative Sociology58(1): 33–54.
66.
SundströmAPaxtonPWangY-T, et al. (2017) Women’s political empowerment: A new global index, 1900–2012. World Development94: 321–335.
67.
SwissL (2011) The adoption of women and gender as development assistance priorities: An event history analysis of world polity effects. International Sociology: Journal of the International Sociological Association27(1): 96–119.
68.
SwissL (2016) World society and the global foreign aid network. Sociology of Development2(4): 342–374.
69.
SwissLFallonKM (2017) Women’s transnational activism, norm cascades, and quota adoption in the developing world. Politics & Gender13(03): 458–487.
70.
TrippAM (2006) The evolution of transnational feminisms: Consensus, conflict, and new dynamics. In: FerreeMMTrippAM (eds) Global Feminism: Transnational Women’s Activism, Organizing, and Human Rights. New York: New York University Press, pp. 51–75.
71.
TrippAMKangA (2008) The global impact of quotas: On the fast track to increased female legislative representation. Comparative Political Studies41(3): 338–361.
72.
United Nations Development Program (UNDP) (2022) Human Development Report 2021/2022: Uncertain Times, Unsettled Lives: Shaping our Future in a Transforming World. New York: UNDP. Available at: https://hdr.undp.org/content/human-development-report-2021-22 (accessed 16 September 2024)
WiestDSmithJ (2007) Explaining participation in regional transnational social movement organizations. International Journal of Comparative Sociology48(2–3): 137–166.
75.
WilksM-C (2019) Activist, entrepreneur, or caretaker? Negotiating varieties of women in development. Gender & Society: Official Publication of Sociologists for Women in Society33(2): 224–250.
WotipkaCMNakagawaMSvecJ (2018) Global linkages, the higher education pipeline, and national contexts: The worldwide growth of women faculty, 1970–2012. International Journal of Comparative Sociology59(3): 212–238.
78.
Yuval-DavisN (2006) Human/women’s rights and feminist transversal politics. In: FerreeMMTrippAM (eds) Global Feminism: Transnational Women’s Activism, Organizing, and Human Rights. New York: New York University Press, pp. 439–471.
