As autonomous cars and complex features of them grow in popularity, ensuring that analyses and capabilities are reproducible and repeatable has taken on importance in education plans too. This paper describes a reproducible research plan on mini autonomous race car programming. This educational plan is designed and implemented as part of a summer internship program at Kocaeli University and it consists of theoretical courses and laboratory assignments. A literate programming approach with the Python language is used for programming the race car. To assess the educational program’s impact on the learning process and to evaluate the acceptance and satisfaction level of students, they answered an electronic questionnaire after finishing the program. According to students’ feedback, the reproducible educational program is useful for learning and consolidating new concepts of mini autonomous car programming.
CollbergCProebstingTA.Repeatability in computer systems research. Commun ACM2016;
59: 62–69.
2.
HothornTLeischF.Case studies in reproducibility. Brief Bioinformat2011;
12: 288–300.
3.
RuvoloP. Dude, where’s my robot?: A localization challenge for undergraduate robotics. ProcAAAI ConfArtifIntell 31: 4798–4802.
4.
BihlTJenkinsTCoxC, et al.. From lab to internship and back again: learning autonomous systems through creating a research and development ecosystem. In: Proc AAAI Conf Artif Intell33: 9635–9643.
5.
CasserVPirkSMahjourianR, et al.. Depth prediction without the sensors: leveraging structure for unsupervised learning from monocular videos. In: Proc AAAI Conf Artif Intell33: 8001–8008.
6.
ChiLMuY. Deep steering: learning end-to-end driving model from spatial and temporal visual cues. arXiv preprint arXiv:1708037982017.
7.
FridmanLJenikBReimerB. Arguing machines: perception control system redundancy and edge case discovery in real-world autonomous driving. arXiv preprint arXiv:1710044592017.
8.
SniderJM, et al.Automatic steering methods for autonomous automobile path tracking.
Pittsburgh, PA:
Robotics Institute, 2009.
9.
BohgJCiocarlieMCiveraJ, et al..
Big data on robotics. Big Data2016;
4: 195–196.
BonsignorioF.A new kind of article for reproducible research in intelligent robotics [from the field]. IEEE Robot Automat Mag2017;
24: 178–182.
15.
DahnounN.Teaching electronics to first-year non-electrical engineering students. Int J Electr Eng Educ2017;
54: 178–186.
16.
NourbakhshICrowleyKWilkinsonK, et al.. The educational impact of the robotic autonomy mobile robotics course. Technical Report CMU-RI-TR-03-29. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University, 2003.
17.
NourbakhshIRCrowleyKBhaveA, et al..
The robotic autonomy mobile robotics course: robot design, curriculum design and educational assessment. Auton Robots2005;
18: 103–127.
18.
de GabrielJMGMandowAFernandez-LozanoJ, et al..
Using lego nxt mobile robots with labview for undergraduate courses on mechatronics. IEEE Trans Educ2011;
54: 41–47.
19.
CalnonMGiffordCMAgahA.Robotics competitions in the classroom: enriching graduate-level education in computer science and engineering. Global J Eng Educ2012;
14: 6–13.
20.
BousabaNAConradCMHJMCecchiV. Keys to success in the IEEE hardware competition. In: Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, pp.1–18.
21.
ChrisC. Learning with first LEGO league. In: McBride R and Searson M (eds) Proceedings of society for information technology & teacher education international conference 2013. New Orleans, LA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), pp. 5118–5124.
22.
FikeHBarnhartPBrevikCE, et al.. Using a robotics competition to teach about and stimulate enthusiasm for Earth science and other STEM topics In EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts, EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts 18: EPSC2016–10.
McLurkinJRykowskiJJohnM, et al..
Using multi-robot systems for engineering education: teaching and outreach with large numbers of an advanced, low-cost robot. IEEE Trans Educ2013;
56: 24–33.
28.
DanahyEWangEBrockmanJ, et al..
Lego-based robotics in higher education: 15 years of student creativity. Int J Adv Robot Syst2014;
11: 27.
29.
AfariEKhineM. Robotics as an educational tool: Impact of Lego mindstorms. International Journal of Information and Education Technology 2017;
7: 437–442.
30.
CrenshawTLBeyerS. Upbot: a testbed for cyber-physical systems. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on cyber security experimentation and test. CSET’10. Berkeley, CA: USENIX Association, pp. 1–8.
31.
KellyJBinneyJPereiraA, et al. Just add wheels: leveraging commodity laptop hardware for robotics and AI education. In: AAAI 2008 AI Education Colloquium. Chicago, IL. Also appears in AAAI Technical Report WS-08-02. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press, pp. 50–55.
32.
KaramanSAndersABouletM, et al.. Project-based, collaborative, algorithmic robotics for high school students: programming self-driving race cars at MIT. In: 2017 IEEE integrated STEM education conference (ISEC). pp. 195–203. IEEE.
KluyverTRagan-KelleyBPérezF, et al.. Jupyter notebooks—a publishing format for reproducible computational workflows. In: Loizides F and Scmidt B (eds) Positioning and power in academic publishing: players, agents and agendas. Amsterdam: IOS Press, pp. 87–90.
39.
ShenH.Interactive notebooks: sharing the code. Nature2014;
515: 151–152.
KulSEkenSSayarA.Distributed and collaborative real-time vehicle detection and classification over the video streams. Int J Adv Robot Syst2017;
14: 1729881417720782.
TwiggPPonnapalliPFowlerM.Workshop problem-solving for improved student engagement and increased learning in engineering control. Int J Electr Eng Educ2018;
55: 120–129.
44.
SkruchP, et al.. Control systems in semi and fully automated cars. In Mitkowski W, Kacprzyk J and Oprzedkiewicz K (eds) Trends in advanced intelligent control, optimization and automation. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 155–167. ISBN 978-3-319-60699-6.
MontemerloMThrunSKollerD, et al.. Fastslam: a factored solution to the simultaneous localization and mapping problem. In: In Proceedings of the AAAI national conference on artificial intelligence. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI, pp. 593–598.
50.
SermanetPEigenDZhangX, et al. Overfeat: integrated recognition, localization and detection using convolutional networks, https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.6229 (2013).
51.
SimonyanKZissermanA. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. CoRR2014; abs/1409.1556.
52.
RedmonJDivvalaSGirshickR, et al.. You only look once: unified, real-time object detection. In: 2016 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR), pp. 779–788.
KarsliMSatilmişYŞaraM, et al.. End-to-end learning model design for steering autonomous vehicle. In: 2018 26th Signal processing and communications applications conference (SIU), pp. 1–4. IEEE.
58.
Sat Ilm IşYTufanFŞaraM, et al.. Cnn based traffic sign recognition for mini autonomous vehicles. In: Światek J, Borzemski L and Wilimowska Z (eds) Information systems architecture and technology: proceedings of 39th international conference on information systems architecture and technology—ISAT 2018. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 85–94. ISBN 978-3-319-99996-8.
59.
RedmonJFarhadiA. Yolo9000: better, faster, stronger. In: 2017 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR), pp. 7263–7271.
