RETRACTED: Research self-efficacy sources of DBA candidates: A qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) study in China

Gump SE. Examining the “other” DBA: the role of diploma programs in graduate business education in the United Kingdom. Int Educ 2005; 34: 5–16.

Farrell C Oerton S Plant E. Doing a doctorate in business administration: the case for critical reflexivity. Int J Manage Educ 2018; 16: 370–379.

Hay A Samra-Fredericks D. Desperately seeking fixedness: Practitioners' accounts of ‘becoming doctoral researchers’. Manage Lear 2016; 47: 407–423.

Lee A Boud D. Framing doctoral education as practice. In: Boud D Lee A (eds) Changing practices of doctoral education. London, UK: Routledge, 2009, pp.10–25.

Fenge L. Sense and sensibility: making sense of a professional doctorate. Reflect Pract 2010; 11: 645–656.

Loxley A Seery A. The role of the professional doctorate in Ireland from the student perspective. Stud Higher Educ 2012; 37: 3–17.

Simpson CG Sommer D. The practice of professional doctorates: the case of a U.K.-based distance DBA. J Manage Educ 2016; 40: 576–594.

Phillips JC Russell RK. Research self-efficacy, the research training environment, and research productivity among graduate students in counseling psychology. Counsel Psychol 1994; 22: 628–641.

Vasil L. Self-efficacy expectations and causal attributions for achievement among male and female university faculty. J Vocat Behav 1992; 41: 259–269.

Bandura A. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: Freeman, 1997.

Bandura A Jourden FJ. Self-regulatory mechanisms governing the impact of social comparison on complex decision making. J Personal Soc Psychol 1991; 60: 941–951.

Zimmerman BJ. Self-efficacy: an essential motive to learn. Contemp Educ Psychol 2000; 25: 82–91.

Forester M Kahn JH Hesson-McInnis MS. Factor structures of three measures of research self-efficacy. J Career Assess 2004; 12: 3–16.

Tiyuri A Saberi B Miri M , et al. Research self-efficacy and its relationship with academic performance in postgraduate students of Tehran university of medical sciences in 2016. J Educ Health Promot 2018; 7: 11–11.

Bishop RM Bieschke KJ. Applying social cognitive theory to interest in research among counseling psychology doctoral students: a path analysis. J Counsel Psychol 1998; 45: 182–188.

Liu C Wang L Qi R , et al. Prevalence and associated factors of depression and anxiety among doctoral students: the mediating effect of mentoring relationships on the association between research self-efficacy and depression/anxiety. Psychol Res Behav Manag 2019; 12: 195–208.

Overall NC Deane KL Peterson ER. Promoting doctoral students' research self-efficacy: combining academic guidance with autonomy support. Higher Educ Res Dev 2011; 30: 791–805.

Kozhakhmet S Moldashev K Yenikeyeva A , et al. How training and development practices contribute to research productivity: a moderated mediation model. Stud Higher Educ 2020. https://www-tandfonline-com-s.web.bisu.edu.cn/doi/citedby/10.1080/03075079.2020.1754782?scroll=top&needAccess=true

Ismayilova K Klassen RM. Research and teaching self-efficacy of university faculty: relations with job satisfaction. Int J Educ Res 2019; 98: 55–66.

Bieschke KJ Bishop RM Garcia VL. The utility of the research self-efficacy scale. J Career Assess 1996; 4: 59–75.

Kahn JH. Predicting the scholarly activity of counseling psychology students: a refinement and extension. J Counsel Psychol 2001; 48: 344–354.

Taylor N Maxwell T. Enhancing the relevance of a professional doctorate: the case of the doctor of education degree at the university of new England. Int J Work-Integrated Lear 2004; 5: 60.

Evans T. Flexible doctoral research: emerging issues in professional doctorate programs. Stud Contin Educ 1997; 19: 174–182.

Neumann R. Doctoral differences: professional doctorates and PhDs compared. J Higher Educ Policy Manage 2005; 27: 173–188.

Fink D. The professional doctorate: its relativity to the PhD and relevance for the knowledge economy. I J Doctoral Stud 2006; 1: 35–44.

Maxwell TW Kupczyk‐Romanczuk G. Producing the professional doctorate: the portfolio as a legitimate alternative to the dissertation. Innov Educ Teach Int 2009; 46: 135–145.

Caldwell C White H Red Owl RH. The case for creating a DBA program – a virtue-based opportunity for universities. J Acad Ethics 2007; 5: 179–188.

Wellington J Sikes P. A doctorate in a tight compartment’: why do students choose a professional doctorate and what impact does it have on their personal and professional lives. Stud Higher Educ 2006; 31: 723–734.

Stephenson J Malloch M Cairns LG. Managing their own programme: a case study of the first graduates of a new kind of doctorate in professional practice. Stud Contin Educ 2006; 28: 17–32.

Manathunga C Smith C Bath D. Developing and evaluating authentic integration between research and coursework in professional doctorate programs. Teach Higher Educ 2004; 9: 235–246.

Bourner T Bowden R Laing S. Professional doctorates in England. Stud Higher Educ 2001; 26: 65–83.

Taylor J. Quality and standards: the challenge of the professional doctorate. Higher Educ Europe 2008; 33: 65–87.

Kortt MA Pervan SJ Hogan O. The rise and fall of the Australian DBA. J Educ Train 2016; 58: 390–408.

Wallace M Byrne C Vocino A , et al. A decade of change in Australia’s DBA landscape. J Educ Train 2015; 57: 31–47.

Kot FC Hendel DD. Emergence and growth of professional doctorates in the United States, United Kingdom, Canada and Australia: a comparative analysis. Stud Higher Educ 2012; 37: 345–364.

Francisco J Domínguez J Pérez MAM. Professional doctorates and careers: the Spanish case. Eur J Educ 2012; 47: 153–171.

Bandura A. Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educ Psychol 1993; 28: 117–148.

Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: asocial cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall, 1986.

Woolfolk AE. Educational psychology. Wu Xinchun, revised. Beijing: Pearson&Renming University of China, 2013, pp.297–298.

Hemmings B Kay R. The relationship between research self-efficacy, research disposition, and publication output. Educ Psychol 2016; 36: 347–361.

Mullikin EA Bakken LL Betz NE. Assessing Research self-efficacy in physician-scientists: the clinical research appraisal inventory. J Career Assess 2007; 15: 367–387.

Bailey J. Academics’ motivation and self-efficacy for teaching and research. Higher Educ Res Dev 1999; 18: 343–359.

Unrau YA Grinnell RM. The impact of social work research courses on research self‐efficacy for social work students. Soc Work Educ 2005; 24: 639–651.

Royalty GM Gelso CJ Mallinckrodt B , et al. The environment and the student in counseling psychology does the research training environment influence graduate students' attitudes toward research. Counsel Psychol 1986; 14: 9–30.

Betz NE. Research training in counseling psychology: have we addressed the real issues. Counsel Psychol 1986; 14: 107–113.

Pintrich PR Smith DAF Garcia T , et al. A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor, MI: National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning, 1991.

Berk RA Berg J Mortimer R , et al. Measuring the effectiveness of faculty mentoring relationships. Acad Med 2005; 80: 66–71.

Wilson KL Lizzio A Ramsden P. The development, validation and application of the course experience questionnaire. Stud Higher Educ 1997; 22: 33–53.

Gelso CJ. Research in counseling: methodological and professional issues. Counsel Psychol 1979; 8: 7–36.

Ramsden P. A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: the course experience questionnaire. Stud Higher Educ 1991; 16: 129–150.

Gelso CJ Mallinckrodt B Judge AB. Research training environment, attitudes toward research, and research self-efficacy: the revised research training environment scale. Counsel Psychol 1996; 24: 304–322.

Ujvarine AS Zrinyi M Toth H , et al. The role of faculty and clinical practice in predicting why nurses graduate in Hungary. Nurse Educ Today 2011; 31: 94–101.

Hair JF Anderson RE Tatham RL , et al. Multivariate data analysis, 5th edition. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall, 1998.

Nunnally JC Bernstein IH. The assessment of reliability. Psychom Theory 1994; 3: 248–292.

Fornell C Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Market Res 1981; 18: 39–50.

Ford JK Mac Callum RC Tait M. The application of exploratory factor analysis in applied psychology: a critical review and analysis. Pers Psychol 1986; 39: 291–314.

Kimmitt J Munoz P Newbery R. Poverty and the varieties of entrepreneurship in the pursuit of prosperity. J Bus Ventur 2020; 35: 105939.

Ragin CC. Fuzzy-set social science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.

Ragin CC. Redesigning social inquiry: fuzzy sets and beyond. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008.

Trengove E. Peer interaction as mechanism for providing timely and accessible feedback to a large undergraduate class. Int J Electr Eng Educ 2017; 54: 119–130.