Abstract
Background:
Suicide is one of the most important causes of deaths in the United Kingdom, and the numbers are currently increasing.
Aim:
There are numerous identified determinants of suicidality, and physical multimorbidity is potentially important but is currently understudied. Thus, this study aims to investigate the association of physical multimorbidity with suicidality.
Methods:
Cross-sectional data from the Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey 2007, which was conducted in England between October 2006 and December 2007 by the National Center for Social Research and Leicester University were analyzed. Respondents were asked about 20 physical health conditions, and suicidal ideation and suicide attempts were assessed.
Results:
Out of 7,403 individuals aged 16 years or over, the prevalence of physical multimorbidity, suicidal ideation, and suicide attempts were 35.1%, 4.3%, and 0.7%, respectively. After adjustment for potential confounders, compared to no physical conditions, 1, 2, 3, and ⩾4 conditions were associated with significant 1.79 (95% CI [1.25, 2.57]), 2.39 (95% CI [1.63, 3.51]), 2.88 (95% CI [1.83, 4.55]), and 6.29 (95% CI [4.12, 9.61]) times higher odds for suicidal ideation. Mediation analysis showed that cognitive problems (mediated percentage 39.2%) and disability (37.5%) explained the largest proportion between multimorbidity and suicidal ideation. Pain (38.0%) and cognitive problems (30.7%) explained the largest proportion between multimorbidity and suicide attempts.
Conclusion:
In this large sample of UK adults, physical multimorbidity was associated with significantly higher odds for suicidal ideation and suicide attempts. Moreover, several potential mediators were identified, and these may serve as future targets for interventions that aim to prevent suicidality among people with physical multimorbidity.
Introduction
Considering the high and increasing prevalence of suicides in the UK, it is of utmost importance to identify risk factors of suicidal ideation and suicide attempts to aid in the development of targeted interventions. While there is a multitude of identified determinants of suicidal behaviors, one potentially important but understudied risk factor is that of physical multimorbidity.
In the UK, multimorbidity is highly prevalent with data estimating that it affects one in four adults (Stafford et al., 2017). Physical multimorbidity (i.e. ⩾2 physical conditions) may increase the risk for suicidal ideation and suicide attempts via, for example, social isolation, disability, perceived burdensomeness, and financial difficulties (Xiong et al., 2020). In terms of the association between physical multimorbidity and suicide attempts, there are much fewer studies. Furthermore, there are currently no studies on physical multimorbidity and suicidal thoughts and behavior from the UK, while the mediators of this association are largely unknown. It is important to identify such mediators as they can act as targets for suicide prevention interventions.
Thus, the present study aimed to investigate associations of physical multimorbidity with suicidal ideation and suicide attempt in a large sample of English adults. A further aim was to investigate to what extent a broad range of psychological, physical, and environmental factors mediate the physical multimorbidity-suicidal ideation/suicide attempt relationships.
Methods
Cross-sectional data from the Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey (APMS) 2007 (NHS, 2021) were analyzed. The survey was conducted in England between October 2006 and December 2007. To obtain a nationally representative sample of the adult population aged ⩾16 years old residing in private households, multistage stratified probability sampling was used. The small user Postcode Address File (PAF) served as the sampling frame with postcode sectors serving as the primary sampling units (PSUs). Sectors were stratified by both region and socioeconomic status. One person was invited to participate from each household that was randomly selected. Information was obtained through computer-assisted personal interviews (CAPI) and computer-assisted self-interviews (CASI). The survey response rate was 57%. To correct for the probability of selection and survey non-response, sampling weights were created to obtain a representative sample of the intended target population. The Royal Free Hospital and Medical School Research Ethics Committee provided ethical approval for the study with all participants providing written informed consent.
Physical conditions and physical multimorbidity
Respondents were asked about 20 physical health conditions (cancer, diabetes, epilepsy, migraine, cataracts/eyesight problems, ear/hearing problems, stroke, heart attack/angina, high blood pressure, bronchitis/emphysema, asthma, allergies, stomach ulcer, or other digestive problems, liver problems, bowel/colon problems, bladder problems/incontinence, arthritis, bone/back/joint/muscle problems, infectious disease, and skin problems). To be counted, conditions had to have been diagnosed by a doctor or other health professional and have been present in the previous 12 months. The number of physical conditions was summed and categorized as 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and ⩾5. Multimorbidity was defined as two or more physical conditions (NICE, 2021).
Suicidal ideation and suicide attempts
Suicidal ideation was assessed by the question ‘Have you ever thought of taking your life, even if you would not really do it?’ and suicide attempt by the question ‘Have you ever made an attempt to take your life, by taking an overdose of tablets or in some other way?’ For those who answered ‘yes’, a follow-up question was asked about whether this had occurred in the previous 12 months. Answering ‘yes’ to the first questions and the follow-up question was considered past 12-month suicidal ideation and suicide attempts, respectively.
Mediators
The mediators (i.e. depression, anxiety, insomnia, pain, cognitive problems, perceived stress, loneliness, disability, and social support) were selected based on previous literature (Hajek et al., 2020; HHS.gov, 2021; Pu et al., 2017; Sindi et al., 2020; St John et al., 2014; Stravynski & Boyer, 2001; Wei et al., 2020). The interviewers administered the Clinical Interview Schedule Revised (CIS-R). This can be administered by lay interviewers and was used to generate ICD-10 diagnoses of depressive episode and anxiety disorder (generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, phobia, and obsessive-compulsive disorder) in the prior week (Lewis et al., 1992). The reliability and validity of the CIS-R have been reported in previous publications (Jordanova et al., 2004; Lewis et al., 1992). Insomnia was defined as fulfilling all the following three criteria: (i) problems trying to get to sleep or getting back to sleep (if had woken up) in the past month; and in the past 7 days, (ii) had problems with sleep on at least four nights in addition to (iii) taking at least 1 hour trying to get to sleep on the night with least sleep (Freeman et al., 2010). The question on pain was ‘During the past 4 weeks, how much did pain interfere with your normal work (including both work outside the home and housework)?’. The answer options were ‘not at all’, ‘a little bit’, ‘moderately’, ‘quite a bit’, and ‘extremely’. Cognitive function was assessed by two questions with ‘yes’ and ‘no’ answer options: ‘In the past month, have you had any problems in concentrating on what you were doing?’ (concentration); and ‘Have you noticed any problems with forgetting things in the past month?’ (memory). Two separate dichotomous variables were created for concentration and memory based on these answer options. Cognitive problems were defined as answering ‘yes’ to at least one of these two questions. For perceived stress, participants were asked whether their tasks at work and at home were very stressful over the past 2 weeks. Answer options were ‘most of the time’, ‘usually’, ‘occasionally’, and ‘not at all’. Disability was defined as having one or more difficulties with seven types of activities of daily living (ADL): personal care, medical care, preparing meals, mobility, shopping, housework, practical tasks such as decorating, dealing with paperwork and managing money (Brewin & Wing, 1989). Respondents were asked to assess to what extent they had felt ‘lonely and isolated from other people’ in the previous 2 weeks. Answer options were ‘very much’, ‘sometimes’, ‘not often’, and ‘not at all’. The level of social support was assessed by seven questions on whether: family and friends did things to make them happy, made them feel loved, could be relied on no matter what, would see that they were taken care of no matter what, accepted them just the way they are, made them feel an important part of their lives, and gave them support and encouragement. The answer options to these questions consisted of a 3-point scale: ‘not true (coded = 0)’, ‘partly true (coded = 1)’, or ‘certainly true (coded = 2)’. Following a scoring method used in a previous publication (Wickham et al., 2014), the answers to these items were summed to create a scale score that ranged from 0 to 14 with higher scores indicating greater social support (Cronbach’s α = .88).
Control variables
The selection of control variables was based on past literature (Huh et al., 2019) and included age, sex, equivalized income tertiles (high ⩾£29,826, middle £14,057<£29,826, and low <£14,057), education [qualification (degree, non-degree, A-level, GCSE, and other): yes or no)], ethnicity (white British, or other), smoking (never, past, and current), and alcohol dependence. The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) was used to assess alcohol consumption (Saunders et al., 1993). Those with an AUDIT score of 10 and above were assessed for alcohol dependence with the Severity of Alcohol Dependence Questionnaire (SADQ-C; Stockwell et al., 1994), with scores of 4 and above (out of 60) on this measure being used to determine past 6-month presence of alcohol dependence.
Statistical analysis
The statistical analysis was done with Stata 14.2 (Stata Corp LP, College station, Texas). The difference in sample characteristics was tested by Chi-square tests and Student’s t-tests for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was done to assess the association between number of physical conditions (exposure) and suicidal ideation or suicide attempts (outcomes). Test of trend was conducted by including the number of physical conditions in the model as a continuous variable rather than a categorical variable.
Next, in order to gain an understanding of the extent to which various factors may explain the relationship between physical multimorbidity (i.e. ⩾2 physical conditions) and suicidal ideation or suicide attempts, we conducted a mediation analysis. We used the khb (Karlson Holm Breen) command in Stata (Breen et al., 2013) for the mediation analysis. This method can be applied in logistic regression models and decomposes the total effect (i.e. unadjusted for the mediator) of a variable into direct and indirect effects. Using this method, the percentage of the main association explained by the mediator can also be calculated (mediated percentage). Each potential mediator was included in the model individually.
All regression analyses including the mediation analysis were adjusted for age, sex, income, education, ethnicity, smoking, and alcohol consumption. As approximately one-fifth of the participants did not provide information on income, a missing category was included in the models only for this variable to avoid the exclusion of a large number of participants from the analysis. The sample weighting and the complex study design were taken into account in all analyses. Results from the regression analyses are presented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The level of statistical significance was set at p < .05.
Results
The final sample consisted of 7,403 individuals aged ⩾16 years [M (SD) age 46.3 (18.6) years; 48.6% males]. The prevalence of physical multimorbidity (i.e. ⩾2 physical conditions), suicidal ideation, and suicide attempts were 35.1%, 4.3%, and 0.7%, respectively. The most common individual physical conditions were bone, back, joint/muscle problems (21.9%), and high blood pressure (16.9%), while the most common pairs of physical conditions were bone, back, joint/muscle problems co-occurring with arthritis (5.6%) or high blood pressure (5.1%; Supplemental Appendix Figure S1). The sample characteristics are provided in Table 1. Physical multimorbidity and suicidal ideation were both associated with higher prevalence of female sex, lower levels of wealth, past or current smoking, depression, anxiety, insomnia, pain, cognitive problems, disability, and higher levels of perceived stress, and loneliness. The prevalence of suicidal ideation and suicide attempts were significantly higher in people with physical multimorbidity, asthma, bladder problems/incontinence, bowel/colon problems, bronchitis/emphysema, epilepsy, and migraine or frequent headaches (Table 2). People with arthritis, bone, back, joint or muscle problems, liver problems, skin problems, and stomach ulcers/other digestive problems had a significantly higher prevalence of suicidal ideation but not suicide attempts. The prevalence of suicidal ideation and suicide attempts increased linearly with an increasing number of physical conditions (Figure 1). For example, the prevalence of suicidal ideation was 3.0% among people without physical conditions but this increased to 9.2% among those with ⩾4 physical conditions. After adjustment for potential confounders, compared to no physical conditions, 1, 2, 3, and ⩾4 conditions were associated with significant 1.79 (95% CI [1.25, 2.57]), 2.39 (95% CI [1.63, 3.51]), 2.88 (95% CI [1.83, 4.55]), and 6.29 (95% CI [4.12, 9.61]) times higher odds for suicidal ideation (Table 3). A 3 (OR = 5.64; 95% CI [1.50, 21.19]) and ⩾4 (OR = 13.25; 95% CI [4.58, 38.37]) physical conditions were associated with significantly increased odds for suicide attempts. The test for trend showed that there is a significant dose-dependent association for both suicidal ideation and suicide attempts. Mediation analysis showed that cognitive problems (mediated percentage 39.2%) mediated the largest proportion of the association between physical multimorbidity and suicidal ideation, followed by disability (37.5%), pain (35.6%), loneliness (30.5%), anxiety (25.5%), insomnia (18.6%), perceived stress (11.7%), and depression (11.5%; Table 4). For suicide attempts, the significant mediators were pain (38.0%), cognitive problems (30.7%), disability (26.3%), loneliness (22.4%), anxiety (17.2%), and depression (6.9%).
Sample characteristics (overall and by physical multimorbidity or suicidal ideation).
Note. Data are % unless otherwise stated. SD = standard deviation.
Physical multimorbidity referred to ⩾2 physical conditions.
p-Value was calculated by Chi-squared tests and Student’s t-tests for categorical and continuous variables, respectively
Based on a scale ranging from 0 to 14 with higher scores representing higher levels of social support.
Prevalence of suicidal ideation and suicide attempts by absence or presence of physical diseases and physical multimorbidity.
p-Value was based on Chi-squared tests.
Physical multimorbidity referred to ⩾2 physical conditions.
Estimates for suicide attempts could not be obtained as there were no suicide attempts among people with these conditions.

Prevalence of suicidal ideation and suicide attempts by number of physical conditions.
Association between number of physical conditions and suicidal ideation or suicide attempts (outcomes).
Note. Models are adjusted for age, sex, income, education, ethnicity, smoking, and alcohol dependence. Significant test for trend for both suicidal ideation and suicide attempts (p < .05). OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval.
Mediators in the association between physical multimorbidity (i.e. ⩾2 physical conditions) and suicidal ideation or suicide attempts.
Note. Models are adjusted for age, sex, income, education, ethnicity, smoking, and alcohol dependence. OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval.
Mediated percentage was only calculated in the presence of a significant indirect effect (p < .05).
Discussion
Findings from the present study support and add to previous literature. They support previous literature (Xiong et al., 2020) by further confirming that physical multimorbidity is associated with higher odds for suicidal ideation and suicide attempt among adults in England, and add to this literature by identifying potential key mediating variables.
There are several plausible pathways that likely explain the association between physical multimorbidity and suicidal ideation/suicide attempt. First, several physical conditions were individually associated with suicidal ideation and suicide attempt in our study. For example, epilepsy may increase risk for suicidal behavior as limbic epileptogenic areas in temporal lobe epilepsy, such as the amygdala, are involved in social behaviors, including impulse control, anxiety, and emotional memory. Moreover, altered serotonergic neurotransmission has been described in epilepsy, as well as impulsive and suicidal behavior (de Oliveira et al., 2011). In the case of migraine, literature has shown that the levels of cortisol and functioning of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) axis are affected by stressful events such as headaches. Specifically, HPA activity has been found to be correlated with low grade cognitive stress in those who experience migraines, and this may subsequently lead to suicidal behaviors (Berhane et al., 2018). Other individual physical conditions identified as being associated with suicidal ideation or suicide attempts may also increase suicidal thoughts and behaviors through suffering caused by the symptoms, hopelessness, and perceived burden, etc.
Interestingly, in our study, cognitive impairment explained the largest proportion of the association between physical multimorbidity and suicidal ideation (% mediated 39.2%) or suicide attempts (30.7%). Multiple individual physical conditions identified in this study as being associated with suicidal thoughts and/or behaviors have also been found to be associated with cognitive impairment [e.g. migraines (de Araújo et al., 2012), asthma (Caldera-Alvarado et al., 2013), arthritis (Wallin et al., 2012), epilepsy (Miller et al., 2016), and emphysema (Torres-Sánchez et al., 2015)]. For example, emphysema may lead to cognitive decline via low peripheral oxygen saturation (⩽ 88%) which has been strongly associated with a risk of cognitive impairment in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and the use of home oxygen therapy has been associated with a reduction in that risk (Torres-Sánchez et al., 2015). Migraines may lead to cognitive impairment via central nervous system dysfunction underlying migraine pathophysiology (de Araújo et al., 2012). Furthermore, people with physical diseases are more likely to have sleep problems (Koyanagi et al., 2014), and sleep problems, in turn, may give rise to cognitive impairment (Vanek et al., 2020).
In addition to this, some pairs of physical conditions may mutually influence each other to accelerate cognitive decline (e.g. heart disease and cerebrovascular disease; Vassilaki et al., 2015), while drug interactions in people with multimorbidity may also increase the risk for cognitive decline (Koyanagi et al., 2018). In turn, cognitive impairment may increase suicidality owing to neurocognitive deficits that may lead to an incorrect appraisal of one’s life situation and consequently poor decision-making (Pu et al., 2017).
Disability (% mediated 26.3%–37.5%) and pain (35.6%–38.0%) were also identified as key mediating variables. Physical multimorbidity can give rise to disability and pain owing to specific symptoms of individual physical conditions (e.g. stroke and arthritis), and these may increase the risk for suicidal thoughts/behavior not only via the specific suffering due to the symptoms but other factors such as social exclusion (Milner et al., 2019) and hopelessness (Hooley et al., 2014). Moreover, the desire to escape physical pain by death is often seen as the only solution, and it has been suggested that chronic exposure to pain and pain tolerance can reduce fear about death and increase the capability to carry out suicide (Jacob et al., 2018).
The large sample of UK adults and the identification of potential mediating variables in the physical multimorbidity/suicidal thought and behavior relationship are clear strengths of the present study. However, findings must be interpreted in light of the study limitations. First, the information used in this study was based on self-report, and therefore, social desirability and recall bias may exist. Second, as cross-sectional data were used, the temporal ordering of physical multimorbidity and suicidality cannot be unequivocally determined. Third, data on the duration of physical illness, disease severity, and other specific information (e.g. cancer type) were not available, despite the fact that these could be important determinants of risk for suicidality. Future studies on this topic should consider incorporating this information. Finally, the variable on cognition was a crude measure consisting of only two answer options. Thus, it is possible for the mediated percentage to have differed if cognition was based on a different measure (e.g. Likert scale).
In conclusion, in this large sample of UK adults, physical multimorbidity was associated with a significantly higher odds for suicidal ideation and suicide attempts. Moreover, several potential mediators were identified, and these may serve as future targets for interventions that aim to prevent suicidality among people with physical multimorbidity.
Supplemental Material
sj-docx-1-isp-10.1177_00207640221137993 – Supplemental material for The association of physical multimorbidity with suicidal ideation and suicide attempts in England: A mediation analysis of influential factors
Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-isp-10.1177_00207640221137993 for The association of physical multimorbidity with suicidal ideation and suicide attempts in England: A mediation analysis of influential factors by Lee Smith, Jae Il Shin, San Lee, Jae Won Oh, Guillermo F López Sánchez, Karel Kostev, Louis Jacob, Mark A. Tully, Felipe Schuch, Daragh T. McDermott, Damiano Pizzol, Nicola Veronese, Junmin Song, Pinar Soysal and Ai Koyanagi in International Journal of Social Psychiatry
Footnotes
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the National Center for Social Research and the University of Leicester who were the Principal Investigators of this survey. In addition, we would also like to thank the UK Data Archive and the National Center for Social Research as the data collectors and for making these data publically available. They bear no responsibility for this analysis or interpretation of this publically available dataset.
Conflict of interest
All authors confirm to have no actual or potential conflict of interests.
Funding
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work is supported by the European Union – Next Generation EU to Dr. Guillermo F. López Sánchez.
Submission declaration and verification
The article has not been published previously.
Supplemental material
Supplemental material for this article is available online.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
