The publication of International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSASs) in the field of governmental financial reporting has raised the necessity for a wide-ranging discussion about the harmonization of public sector accounting systems. The article has a double aim: to show the adoption or not of IPSASs in local and central government and to analyse the level of convergence between the different countries studied. In order to achieve these objectives, we carried out an empirical study, whose results allow us to show that while some accounting systems are very close to the IPSASs model, others are completely different. Nevertheless, we think that this could be a starting point and that in the near future countries could tend towards IPSASs more and more, which may be the most probable way to reach convergence accounting systems between them.
Adhemar, P. (2002) `The Public Sector Committee (PSC): The Standars Project', in V. Montesinos and J.M. Vela (eds) Innovations in Governmental Accounting, pp. 61—71. Dordrecht: Kluwer .
2.
Athukorala, S.L. and Reid, B. (2003) Accrual Budgeting and Accounting in Government and its Relevance for Developing Member Countries. Manila , Philippines: Asian Development Bank .
3.
Bac, A.D. (2003) `IPSASs and Dutch Government Accounting', in Henk Lagendijk, Dick Swagerman and Willen Verhoog (eds) Is Fair Value Fair and Other Urgent Issues, pp. 325—34. Chichester: Wiley .
4.
Barton, A. (2003) ` The Department of Defence: Australia's Most Profitable Business ?', Australian Accounting Review13(2): 35—40 .
5.
Brusca, I. and Condor, V. (2002) ` Towards the Harmonisation of Local Accounting Systems in the International Context' , Financial Accountability & Management18(2): 129—62 .
6.
Budäus, D. and Buchholtz, K. (1996) `Controlling Local Government Cost and Performance: An International Comparison“, in J.L. Chan , R.H. Jones and K.G. Lüder (eds) Research in Governmental and Nonprofit Accounting, vol. 9, pp. 33—57. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press .
7.
Chamisa E. (2000) ` The Relevance and Observance of the IASC Standards in Developing Countries and the Particular Case of Zimbabwe ', The International Journal of Accounting35(2): 267—86 .
8.
Chan, J.L. (2003) ` Government Accounting: An Assessment of Theory, Purposes and Standards ', Public Money & Development23(1): 13—21 .
9.
Chow, C.W. and Wong-Boren, A. (1987) ` Voluntary Financial Disclosure by Mexican Corporations' , The Accounting ReviewLXII(3): 533—41 .
10.
Cooke, T.E. (1989) ` Disclosure in the Corporate Annual Reports of Swedish Companies ', Accounting and Business Research19(74): 113—24 .
11.
Doupnik, S. and Taylor, M.E. (1985) ` An Empirical Investigation of the Observance of IASC Standards in Western Europe ', Management International Review25: 27—33 .
12.
Fédération des Experts Comptables Européens (FEE) (2003) `The Adoption of Accrual Accounting and Budgeting by Governments'; at http://www.fee.be/publications/default.asp?library_ref=4&content_ref=263 (accessed 11 February 2007).
13.
Fédération des Experts Comptables Européens (FEE) (2007) `Accrual Accounting in the Public Sector', at http://www.fee.be/publications/default.asp?library_ref=4 ; accessed 11 February 2007.
14.
Glaum, M. and Street, D. (2003) ` Compliance with the Disclosure Requirements of Germany's New Market: IAS versus US GAAP' , Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting14: 1—64 .
15.
Guthrie, J. , Humphrey, C. and Olson, O. (1998) `Public Financial Management Changes in OECD Nations' , Advances in International Comparative Management Supplement3: 255—69 .
16.
International Accounting Standards Committee (IASC) (1988) Survey of the Use and Application of International Accounting Standards. London: IASC .
17.
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2001) Manual on Fiscal Transparency. Washington, DC: Fiscal Affairs Department .
18.
Jones, R. (2000) ` National Accounting, Government Budgeting and Accounting Discipline' , Financial Accountability & Management16(2): 101—16 .
19.
Jones, S. and Wolnizer, P. (2003) ` Harmonisation and the Conceptual Framework: An International Perspective' , Abacus39(3): 375—87 .
20.
Lüder, K. (1992) `A Contingency Model of Governmental Accounting Innovations in the Political Administrative Environment', in J. Chan and J.M. Patton (eds) Research in Governmental and Nonprofit Accounting, Vol. 7, pp. 99—127. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press .
21.
Lüder, K. (1994) `The Contingency Model Reconsidered: Experiences from Italy, Japan and Spain', in E. Buschor and K. Schedler (eds) Perpsectives on Performance Measurement and Public Sector Accounting, pp. 1—15. Bern: Haupt .
22.
Lüder, K. (1998) `Governmental Accounting in West European Countries: With Special Reference to the Federal Republic of Germany', in J.L. Chan and R.H. Jones (eds) Governmental Accounting and Auditing: International Comparisons, pp. 82—104. New York: Routledge .
23.
Lüder, K. (2000) ` National Accounting, Governmental Accounting and Cross-country Comparisons of Government Financial Condition' , Financial Accountability & Management16(2): 117—28 .
24.
Lüder, K. and Kampmann, B. (1993) Harmonisierung des öffentlichen Rechnungswesens in der Europäishen Gemeinshaft. SpeyerForschungsinstitut für Öffentliche Verwaltung bei der Hochschule für Verwaltungswissenschaften Séller .
25.
Lüder, K. , Hinzmann, C. , Kampmann, B. and Otte, R. (1990) Vergleichende Analyse öffentlicher Rechnungssysteme- Querschnittanalyse. Speyer Forschungsberichte no. 89.
26.
Mautz, R.K. (1989) ` Not-for-profit Financial Reporting: Another View ', Journal of Accountancy August: 60—6 .
27.
Nair, R.D. and Frank, W.G. (1981) ` The Harmonisation of International Accounting Standards, 1973—1979', International Journal of Accounting , Education and Research17: 61—77 .
28.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (1993) Public Management Developments: Survey 1993. Paris: OECD .
29.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (1994) Public Management Developments: Survey 1994. Paris: OECD .
30.
Pallot, J. (1990) ` The Nature of Public Sector Assets: A Response to Mautz' , Accounting Horizons4(4): 79—85 .
31.
Pallot, J. (1992) ` The Nature of Public Sector Assets: A Response to Mautz' , Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal5(1): 38—59 .
32.
Pallot, J. (1997) ` Infrastructure Accounting for Local Authorities: Technical Management and Political Context' , Financial Accountability & Management13(3): 225—42 .
33.
Pallot, J. and Yamamoto, K. (2002) `Government or Governance? Japan's New Balance Sheet in International Perspective', in V. Montesinos and J.M. Vela (eds) Innovations in Governmental Accounting, pp. 131—44. Dordrecht : Kluwer .
34.
Pina, V. and Torres, L. (1999) ` An Empirical Study about the Degree of the Coincidence of Central Government Financial Reporting in the EU, USA, Canada, New Zealand and Australia ', paper for the 5th Cigar Conference , Tilburg, Holland.
35.
Purvis, S.E.C. , Gernon, H. and Diamond, M. (1991) ` The IASC and its Comparability Project: Prerequisites for Success' , Accounting Horizons June:. 25—44 .
36.
Roberts, C. , Salter, S.B. and Kantor, J. (1996) ` The IASC Comparability Project and Current Financial Reporting Reality: An Empirical Study of Reporting in Europe' , The British Accounting Review28: 1—22 .
37.
Simpkins, K. (2006) A Review of the Policy of Sector-neutral Accounting Standard-setting in Australia, Australian Financial Reporting Council (FRC), at http://www.frc.gov.au/reports/other/Sector_neutral_Standards_Report.asp (accessed 11 February 2007 ).
38.
Sutcliffe, P. (2003) `The Standards Programme of IFAC's Public Sector Committee' , Public Money & Management23(1): 29—36 .
39.
United States Agency for International Development (USAID) (1999) Sistema Integrado Modelo de Administración Financiera, Control y Auditoria para America Latina, SIMAFAL II [Integrated System Model of Financial Administration, Control and Auditory for Latin America]. La Paz, Bolivia .
40.
Vela, J.M. and Fuertes, I. (2000) `Local Government Accounting in Europe: A Comparative Approach', in E. Caperchioni and R. Mussari (eds) Comparative Issues in Local Government Accounting, pp. 87—102. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers .
