Nowadays, many public policies focus on economic values, such as efficiency and client choice. Public professionals often show resistance to implementing such policies. We analyse this problem using an interdisciplinary approach. From public administration, we draw on the policy alienation concept, which consists of five dimensions: strategic powerlessness, tactical powerlessness, operational powerlessness, societal meaninglessness and client meaninglessness. These are considered as factors that influence the willingness of professionals to implement policies (change willingness — a concept drawn from the change management literature). We test this model in a survey among 478 Dutch healthcare professionals implementing a new reimbursement policy. The first finding was that perceived autonomy (operational powerlessness) significantly influenced change willingness, whereas strategic and tactical powerlessness were not found to be significant. Second, both the meaninglessness dimensions proved highly significant. We conclude that clarifying the value of a policy is important in getting professionals to willingly implement a policy, whereas their participation on the strategic or tactical levels seems less of a motivational factor. These insights help in understanding why public professionals embrace or resist the implementation of particular policies.
Points for practitioners
Policymakers develop public policies which, nowadays, tend to focus strongly on economic values, such as increasing efficiency or offering citizens the opportunity to choose among suppliers of public services. Public professionals, who have to implement these policies, are often reluctant to do so. This study shows that the causes of this resistance are unlikely to be found in the lack of influence these professionals have in the shaping of the policy at the national or organizational level. Rather, professionals might resist implementing policies because they do not see them as meaningful for society, or for their own clients. Therefore, policymakers should focus on this perceived meaninglessness and adopt ways to counter this, for example by intensively communicating the value associated with a policy.
Abbott A. ( 1988) The System of the Professions. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
2.
Ackroyd S., Kirkpatrick I. and Walker RM ( 2007) Public management reform in the UK and its consequences for professional organization: A comparative analysis. Public Administration85(1): 9-26.
3.
Alvesson M. and Johansson AW ( 2002) Professionalism and politics in management consultancy work. In: Clarke T and Finchham R (eds) Critical consulting. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 228-246.
4.
Armenakis AA and Bedeian AG ( 1999) Organizational change: A review of theory and research in the 1990s. Journal of Management25(3): 293-315.
5.
Blauner R. ( 1964) Alienation and Freedom. Chicago, IL : University of Chicago Press.
6.
Bouma JT ( 2009) Why Participation Works: The Role of Employee Involvement in the Implementation of the Customer Relationship Management Type of Organizational Change. Groningen: SOM Research School.
7.
Brandsen T. ( 2009) Civicness in organizations: A reflection on the relationship between professionals and managers. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations20(3): 260-273.
8.
Brodkin EZ ( 2007) Bureaucracy redux: Management reformism and the welfare state. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory17(1): 1-17.
9.
Bucher R. and Stelling J. ( 1969) Characteristics of professional organizations. Journal of Health and Social Behavior10(1): 3-15.
10.
Burke WW and Litwin GH ( 1992) A causal model of organizational performance and change . Journal of Management18(3): 523-545.
11.
Christensen T. and Laegreid P. ( 2008) NPM and beyond - structure, culture and demography . International Review of Administrative Sciences74(1): 7-24.
12.
Deakin N. ( 1994) The Politics of Welfare: Continuities and Change . London: Harvester Wheatsheaf .
13.
De Boer W. and Steenbeek R. ( 2005) Probleemsituaties en dilemma’s in de verzekeringsgeneeskunde .
14.
DeHart-Davis L. and Pandey S. ( 2005) Red tape and public employees: Does perceived rule dysfunction alienate managers? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory15(1): 133-148.
15.
De Ruyter A., Kirkpatrick I., Hoque K., Lonsdale C. and Malan J. ( 2008) Agency working and the degradation of public service employment: The case of nurses and social workers. International Journal of Human Resource Management19(3): 432-445.
16.
DeVellis RF ( 2003) Scale Development: Theory and Applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
Durkheim E. ( 1992[1957]) Professional Ethics and Civic Morals. London: Routledge.
18.
Duyvendak JW, Knijn T and Kremer M (eds) ( 2006) Policy, People, and the New Professional: De-professionalisation and Re-professionalisation in Care and Welfare. Amsterdam : Amsterdam University Press.
19.
Easton D. ( 1965) A System Analysis of Political Life. London: Wiley.
20.
Emery Y. and Giauque D. ( 2003) Emergence of contradictory injunctions in Swiss NPM projects . International Journal of Public Sector Management16(6): 468-481.
21.
Eraut M. ( 1994) Developing Professional Knowledge and Competence . London: Routledge.
22.
Evetts J. ( 2003) The sociological analysis of professionalism. International Sociology18(2): 395-415.
23.
Evetts J. ( 2006) Short note: The sociology of professional groups . Current Sociology54(1): 133-143.
24.
Ewalt JAG and Jennings ET ( 2004) Administration, governance, and policy tools in welfare policy implementation. Public Administration Review64(4): 449-462.
25.
Exworthy M and Halford S (eds) (1998) Professionals and the New Managerialism in the Public Sector. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
26.
Freidson E. ( 1994) Professionalism Reborn: Theory, Prophecy, and Policy . Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
27.
Freidson E. ( 2001) Professionalism: The Third Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
Greenwood R., Suddaby R. and Hinings CR ( 2002) Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Academy of Management Journal45(1): 58-80.
29.
Hanlon G. ( 1998) Professionalism as enterprise: Service class politics and the redefinition of professionalism. Sociology32(1): 43-63.
30.
Helderman JK, Schut FT, Van Der Grinten TED and Van De Ven Wpmm ( 2005) Market-oriented health care reforms and policy learning in the Netherlands. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law30(1-2): 189-210.
31.
Higgs M. and Rowland D. ( 2005) All changes great and small: Exploring approaches to change and its leadership. Journal of Change Management5(2): 121-151.
32.
Hinkin TR ( 1998) A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods1: 104-121.
33.
Hood C. ( 1991) A public management for all seasons. Public Administration19(1): 3-19.
34.
Judson AS ( 1991) Changing Behavior in Organizations: Minimizing Resistance to Change. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
35.
Kanungo RN ( 1982) Work Alienation: An Integrative Approach. New York: Praeger Publishers.
36.
Kickert WJM ( 2010) Managing emergent and complex change: The case of Dutch agencification. International Review of Administrative Sciences76(3): 489-515.
37.
Kimberly JR, de Pouvourville G. and Thomas ADA ( 2009) The Globalization of Managerial Innovation in Health Care . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38.
Krause EA ( 1996) Death of the Guilds. New Haven, CT : Yale University Press.
39.
Lewin K. ( 1951) Field Theory in Social Science. New York: Harper.
40.
Lipsky M. ( 1980) Street-level Bureaucracy. New York : Russell Sage Foundation.
41.
McGregor D. ( 1960) The Human Side of Enterprise. New York : Wiley.
42.
May PJ and Winter SC ( 2009) Politicians, managers, and street-level bureaucrats: Influences on policy implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory19(3): 453-476.
43.
Meier KJ and O’Toole LJ ( 2002) Public management and organizational performance: The effect of managerial quality. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management21(4): 629-643.
44.
Metselaar EE ( 1997) Assessing the willingness to change: Construction and validation of the DINAMO. Doctoral dissertation, Free University of Amsterdam.
45.
Meyers MK and Vorsanger S. ( 2003) Street-level bureaucrats and the implementation of public policy. In: Peters BG and Pierre J (eds) Handbook of Public Administration . London: Sage, 245-256.
46.
Morgeson FP and Humphrey SE ( 2008) Job and team design: Toward a more integrative conceptualization of work design. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management27: 39-92.
47.
Noordegraaf M. ( 2007) From ’pure’ to ’hybrid’ professionalism: Present-day professionalism in ambiguous public domains. Administration and Society39(6): 761-785.
48.
Noordegraaf M and Steijn AJ (eds) (forthcoming 2011) Professionals under Pressure: Perspectives on Professionals and Professionalism. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
49.
Organ DW and Greene CN ( 1981) The effects of formalization on professional involvement: A compensatory process approach. Administrative Science Quarterly26(2): 237-252.
50.
O’Toole LJ ( 2000) Research on policy implementation: Assessment and prospects . Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory10(2): 263-288.
51.
Palm I., Leffers F., Emons T., Van Egmond V. and Zeegers S. ( 2008) De GGz ontwricht: Een praktijkonderzoek naar de gevolgen van het nieuwezorgstelsel in de geestelijke gezondheidszorg [Mental healthcare disrupted: Practical research on the effects of the new health system in mental healthcare]. Den Haag: SP.
52.
Parsons T. ( 1964) The Social System. New York : Free Press.
53.
Piderit SK ( 2000) Rethinking resistance and recognizing ambivalence: A multidimensional view of attitudes toward organizational change. Academy of Management Review25(4): 783-794.
54.
Podsakoff PM and Organ DW ( 1986) Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management12(4): 531-544.
55.
Pollitt C. and Bouckaert G. ( 2004) Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis . Oxford: Oxford University Press .
56.
Raelin JA ( 1986) The Clash of Cultures: Managers and Professionals . Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
57.
Rayce SLB, Holstein BE and Kreiner S. ( 2008) Aspects of alienation and symptom load among adolescents . European Journal of Public Health19(1): 79-84.
58.
Sagie A. and Koslowsky M. ( 1994) Organizational attitudes and behaviors as a function of participation in strategic and tactical change decisions: An application of path-goal theory. Journal of Organizational Behavior15(1): 37-47.
59.
Schön DA ( 1983) The Reflective Practitioner. New York : Basic Books.
60.
Seeman M. ( 1959) On the meaning of alienation. American Sociological Review24(6): 783-791.
61.
Stone D. ( 2003) Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making . New York: Norton & Co.
62.
Thomas R. and Davies A. ( 2005) Theorizing the micro-politics of resistance: New public management and managerial identities in the UK public services. Organization Studies26(5): 683-706.
63.
Tummers LG ( 2009) Policy alienation of public professionals: The development of a scale. Annual Work Conference Netherlands Institute of Government (NIG) (12-13 November). Leiden : Leiden University.
64.
Tummers LG, Bekkers Vjjm and Steijn AJ ( 2009) Policy alienation of public professionals: Application in a new public management context. Public Management Review11(5): 685-706.
65.
Tummers LG, Steijn AJ and Bekkers Vjjm (forthcoming 2011) Pressures professionals experience while implementing policies: Looking beyond new public management. In: Noordegraaf M and Steijn AJ (eds) Professionals under Pressure: Perspectives on Professionals and Professionalism . Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
66.
Van Bockel J. and Noordegraaf M. ( 2006) Identifying identities: Performance-driven, but professional public managers. International Journal of Public Sector Management19(6): 585-597.
67.
Van den Brink G., Jansen T. and Pessers D. ( 2006) Beroepszeer: Waarom nederland niet goed werkt. Amsterdam: Boom.
68.
Van Thiel S. and Leeuw FL ( 2002) The performance paradox in the public sector. Public Performance and Management Review25(3): 267-281.
69.
Wagner JA III ( 1994) Participation’s effects on performance and satisfaction: A reconsideration of research evidence. Academy of Management Review19(2): 312-330.
70.
Wanberg CR and Banas JT ( 2000) Predictors and outcomes of openness to changes in a reorganizing workplace. Journal of Applied Psychology85(1): 132-142.
71.
Weick KE ( 2000) Emergent change as a universal in organizations . In: Beer M and Nohria N (eds) Breaking the Code of Change . Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 223-241.
72.
White D. ( 1996) A balancing act: Mental health policy-making in Quebec . International Journal of Law and Psychiatry19(3-4): 289-307.
