The devil in the details: Equalization in Italian municipal federalism

Abstract

This paper provides the first independent and reproducible assessment of the redistributive effects of Italy's municipal federalism, a system recognized by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development as a sophisticated gap-filling model for reducing territorial disparities. The actual redistributive outcomes of these mechanisms remain largely unexplored. Therefore, the research question is: What is the impact of municipal federalism across Italian territories with respect to the horizontal and vertical components of equalization? To answer this, the paper reconstructs institutional background and conducts a quantitative analysis of a statistically representative sample of 79 provincial capital municipalities of Italy's Ordinary Statute Regions, covering the period 2015–2024. Findings reveal that the equalization goals established in the enabling federalist laws have not been achieved due to a series of operational details. While limited in scope, this study contributes to understanding of how technical implementation of municipal federalism may affect equity goals in federal systems. It may also open new avenues for future research into the political and administrative dynamics behind equalization mechanisms.

Points for practitioners

Define and implement essential levels of services (LEPs): without clear LEPs, equalization formulas tend to assign larger needs, and therefore resources, to municipalities with higher expenditure or services.

Increase the weight of vertical equalization transfers to reduce territorial disparities.

Expand the quota of equalized fiscal capacity to better reflect true revenue-generating potential and address structural inequalities among municipalities.

Eliminate hidden mechanisms that offset equalization gains: the presence of non-transparent technical adjustments undermines redistributive goals.

Keywords

Equalization federalism Italy municipalities decentralization

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Akindele

Olaopa

Obiyan

(2002) Fiscal federalism and local government finance in Nigeria: an examination of revenue rights and fiscal jurisdiction. International Review of Administrative Sciences 68(4): 557–577.

Antonini

(2010) Chamber of Deputies Seminar “Standard Needs and Public Finance Decisions in the Implementation of Fiscal Federalism” Transcription. Rome, Palazzo Montecitorio. Available at: https://www.mef.gov.it/export/sites/MEF/ministero/commissioni/copaff/documenti/Intervento_del_Presidente_al_Seminario_Fabbisogni_standard_e_decisioni_di_finanza_pubblica_nell'attuazione_del_federalismo_fiscale_x_19-10-2010.pdf.

Barbé

(2010) La péréquation, principe constitutionnel [Equalization, a constitutional principle]. Revue française de droit constitutionnel 81(1): 3–19. [In French.]

Benkada

Belouchi

(2022) Financial divergences of equalization and their impact on regional development in Morocco. International Review of Administrative Sciences 88(1): 225–239.

Bird

Ebel

(2006) Fiscal federalism and national unity. In: Ahmad

Brosio

(eds) Handbook of Fiscal Federalism. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 11–24.

Boadway

(2004) The theory and practice of equalization. CESifo Economic Studies 50(1): 211–254.

Brinkerhoff

Johnson

(2009) Decentralized local governance in fragile states: learning from Iraq. International Review of Administrative Sciences 75(4): 585–607.

Brugnano

Ferraina

Loi

, et al. (2020) Fiscal federalism and equalization design under the growing public finance constraint: A case of Italian municipalities. In Munich Personal RePEc Archive. mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/102001 (accessed 17 January 2024).

Buchanan

Tullock

(1965) The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy, Vol. 100. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

10.

Cyrenne

Pandey

(2015) Fiscal equalization, government expenditures and endogenous growth. International Tax and Public Finance 22(2): 311–329.

11.

Di Liddo

Longobardi

Porcelli

(2019) Fiscal imbalance and fiscal performance of local governments: empirical evidence from Italian municipalities. The Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy 19(3): 1–7.

12.

Dougherty

Montes

Moisio

, et al. (2022) Going beyond fiscal equalisation: institutional and fiscal tools to fight territorial inequalities. In: 18th Annual Meeting of the Network on Fiscal Relations Across Levels of Government, April 2022 – Hybrid Meeting, 21–22.

13.

Ebinger

Richter

(2016) Decentralizing for performance? A quantitative assessment of functional reforms in the German Länder. International Review of Administrative Sciences 82(2): 291–314.

14.

Faggini

Parziale

(2016) A new perspective for fiscal federalism: the NK model. Journal of Economic Issues 50(4): 1069–1104.

15.

Gennari

Messina

(2014) How sticky are local expenditures in Italy? Assessing the relevance of the flypaper effect through municipal data. International Tax and Public Finance 21(2): 324–344.

16.

Institute for Local Finance and Economy 2016 (2016) Capacità fiscali e fabbisogni standard: la nuova perequazione comunale per il 2017 [Fiscal capacity and standard requirements: the new municipal equalization for 2017]. In: IFEL. Fondazione ANCI. Available at: www.fondazioneifel.it/documenti-e-pubblicazioni/item/8582-capacita-fiscali-e-fabbisogni-standard-la-nuova-perequazione-comunale-per-il-2017 (accessed 12 February 2024). [In Italian.]

17.

Institute for Local Finance and Economy 2016 (2017) Temi per l’analisi degli effetti della perequazione delle risorse comunali [Topics for the analysis of the effects of the equalization of municipal resources]. In: IFEL. Fondazione ANCI. Available at: www.mef.gov.it/ministero/commissioni/ctfs/documenti/2017_03_31_rapporto_IFEL_ANCI_effetti_perequativi_DEF.pdf (accessed 12 February 2024). [In Italian.]

18.

Institute for Local Finance and Economy 2016 (2018a) Il sistema perequativo. Evoluzione della normativa [The equalization system. Evolution of the legislation]. In: IFEL. Fondazione ANCI. Available at: www.fondazioneifel.it/ components/com_banchedati/assets/perequazione/pdf/Sistema_perequativo_Evoluzione_normativa.pdf. 62 (accessed 12 February 2024). [In Italian.]

19.

Institute for Local Finance and Economy 2016 (2018b) Il sistema perequativo. Un inquadramento generale [The equalization system. A general overview]. In: IFEL. Fondazione ANCI. Available at: www. fondazioneifel.it/components/com_banchedati/assets/perequazione/pdf/Sistema_perequativo_Quadro_generale.pdf (accessed 12 February 2024). [In Italian.]

20.

Institute for Local Finance and Economy 2016 (2021) La finanza comunale in sintesi – Rapporto 2021[Municipal Finances in Brief – 2021 Report]. In: IFEL. Fondazione ANCI. Available at: www.fondazioneifel.it/documenti-e-pubblicazioni/item/10839-la-finanza-comunale-in-sintesi-rapporto-2021 (accessed 12 February 2024). [In Italian.]

21.

Janský

Palanský

(2020) Fiscal decentralization and equalization transfers in Georgia: evidence from municipality-level data. Post-Communist Economies 32(1): 54–76.

22.

Lofaro

(2021) Il federalismo fiscale in “perdurante transizione”: sul nuovo assetto finanziario e tributario del federalismo differenziato [Fiscal federalism in “ongoing transition”: on the new financial and tax structure of differentiated federalism]. Istituzioni del federalismo: rivista di studi giuridici e politici: XLII 3: 641–673. [In Italian.]

23.

Marattin

Nannicini

Porcelli

(2022) Revenue vs. expenditure based fiscal consolidation: the pass-through from federal cuts to local taxes. International Tax and Public Finance 29(4): 834–872.

24.

Marchionni

Pollastri

Zanardi

(2017) Fabbisogni standard e capacità fiscali nel sistema perequativo dei Comuni, n. 1/gennaio 2017 [Standard Requirements and Fiscal Capacity in the Municipal Equalization System, No. 1/January 2017]. In: UPB. Ufficio parlamentare di bilancio. Available at: www.upbilancio.it/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Nota-1_2017.pdf (accessed 13 February 2024). [In Italian.]

25.

Mastroiacovo

Ceriani

Gallo

, et al. (2023) Capitolo 4-Federalismo fiscale e IRAP [Chapter 4 – Fiscal Federalism and IRAP]. I QUADERNI DEL CNEL: 107–128. [In Italian.]

26.

Musgrave

(1959) The Theory of Public Finance: A Study in Public Economy. New York: McGraw-Hill.

27.

Oates

(1972) Fiscal Federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

28.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2021) Evaluating fiscal equalisation: Finding the right balance. In: OECD Working Papers on Fiscal Federalism 36. Paris: OECD Publishing.

29.

Porcelli

Scheda

(2022) Analisi dell’incidenza della perequazione fiscale sui bilanci dei comuni delle regioni a statuto ordinario [Analysis of the impact of tax equalization on the budgets of municipalities in ordinary statute regions]. In: Degni

(ed.) V Rapporto Ca’Foscari sui Comuni. Rome: Lit Edizioni, 1027–1050. [In Italian.]

30.

Post

Johnson

(1998) Chaos prevailing on every continent: towards a new theory of decentralized decision-making in complex systems. Chicago-Kent Law Review 73(4): 1055–1099.

31.

Rode

Mitlik

Borrella Mas

MAN

(2018) Does fiscal federalism deter or spur secessionist movements? Empirical Evidence from Europe. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 48(2): 161–190.

32.

Roe

Addison

(eds) (2004) Fiscal Policy for Development: Poverty, Reconstruction and Growth. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

33.

Sharma

(2024) Does fiscal federalism prevent or provoke secessionist conflicts? The Autonomy–Equalization Conundrum and the promise of concessionary federalism. Political Science 76(2–3): 157–188.

34.

Uricchio

(2011) Lo statuto del contribuente nella prospettiva dell’attuazione del federalismo fiscale [The taxpayer’s status in the perspective of the implementation of fiscal federalism]. In: Studi in onore di Umberto Belviso. Cacucci Editore: Bari. [In Italian.]

35.

Uricchio

(2012) Il federalismo della crisi o la crisi del federalismo? Dalla legge delega 42/2009 ai decreti attuativi e alla manovra Salva Italia. Cacucci Editore: Bari.

36.

Uricchio

(2013) Imposizione di scopo e federalismo fiscale [Purpose-based taxation and fiscal federalism]. Maggioli Editore: Santarcangelo di Romagna. [In Italian.]

37.

Wiltshire

(2020) Federalism and policy implementation. In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

38.

Websites

39.

Demo – Istat (2023) https://demo.istat.it/ .

40.

IFEL https://www.fondazioneifel.it/

41.

Ministero dell’Interno, Dipartimento per gli Affari Interni e Territoriali, Banche Dati Enti Locali, prospetto “Fondo di Solidarietà Comunale”: https://finanzalocale.interno.gov. it/apps/floc.php/in/cod/39

42.

Ministero dell’Interno, Dipartimento per gli Affari Interni e Territoriali, Banche Dati Enti Locali, prospetto “Trasferimenti erariali e attribuzioni di risorse”: https://finanzalocale.interno.gov.it/apps/floc.php/in/cod/163

43.

SOSE, OpenCivitas: https://www.opencivitas.it/it

44.

UPB: https://www.upbilancio.it

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB