Unpacking the mechanisms linking public–private innovation partnership and public value creation: a configurational approach

Abstract

Public–private innovation partnership (PPIP) is a collaborative model in which the public and private sectors jointly produce innovative public goods and services. However, how both organizations create public value within this hybrid governance arrangement remains unclear. To address this question, this study explores which combinations of conditions in strategic management and collaborative innovation contribute to public value creation in PPIP, using a fuzzy-set qualitative analysis of the digital innovation in Chinese government hotline services. Results indicate that legally binding contracts enhance material public value, while shared relational norms promote procedural public value. Moreover, risk management, knowledge sharing, and information publicness play crucial roles in the creation of both material and procedural public value.

Points for practitioners

The study identifies configurations factors driving public value creation in PPIP, rooted in the dual logics of strategic management and collaborative innovation.

Producing and balancing material and procedural public value results from the combination of contractual rigor and relational governance, with complex causal mechanisms.

In PPIP, “hard”contractual mechanisms drive MPV-oriented outcomes, while “soft” shared relational norms foster PPV-oriented outcomes.

Risk management, shared knowledge bases, and external transparency are core to creating public value in PPIP.

Keywords

collaborative innovation material public value procedural public value public–private innovation partnership strategic management

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alonso

Andrews

(2022) Can public–private innovation partnerships improve public services? Evidence from a synthetic control approach. Public Administration Review 82(6): 1138–1153.

Basurto

Speer

(2012) Structuring the calibration of qualitative data as sets for qualitative comparative analysis (QCA). Field Methods 24(2): 155–174.

Brogaard

(2021) Innovative outcomes in public–private innovation partnerships: a systematic review of empirical evidence and current challenges. Public Management Review 23(1): 135–157.

Brown

Osborne

(2013) Risk and innovation: towards a framework for risk governance in public services. Public Management Review 15(2): 186–208.

Bryson

Sancino

Benington

, et al. (2017) Towards a multi-actor theory of public value co-creation. Public Management Review 19(5): 640–654.

Bryson

Crosby

Barberg

(2023) Public value governance and strategic public management. In: Handbook on Strategic Public Management. Edward Elgar Publishing, 92–113.

Bryson

Crosby

Bloomberg

(2015) Public Value and Public Administration. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.

Callens

Verhoest

Boon

(2022) Combined effects of procurement and collaboration on innovation in public–private-partnerships: a qualitative comparative analysis of 24 infrastructure projects. Public Management Review 24(6): 860–881.

Crosby

Hart

Torfing

(2017) Public value creation through collaborative innovation. Public Management Review 19(5): 655–669.

10.

Cui

Osborne

(2023) Unpacking value destruction at the intersection between public and private value. Public Administration 101(4): 1207–1226.

11.

Dimeski

(2019) New public management and digital era governance approaches in function of promoting entrepreneurship in the public sector. Journal of Public Administration 1(1): 48–54.

12.

dos Reis

CJO

Gomes

(2023) Public value creation and appropriation mechanisms in public–private partnerships: how does it play a role? Public Administration 101(2): 693–715.

13.

Hammond

Bailey

Gore

, et al. (2022) The problem of success and failure in public–private innovation partnerships. Journal of Social Policy 51(4): 771–791.

14.

Kivleniece

Quelin

(2012) Creating and capturing value in public–private ties: a private actor’s perspective. Academy of Management Review 37(2): 272–299.

15.

Klijn

Nederhand

Stevens

(2022) The necessity of collaboration in branding: analysing the conditions for output legitimacy through qualitative comparative analysis (QCA). Public Management Review 24(5): 664–682.

16.

Lopes

Farias

(2022) How can governance support collaborative innovation in the public sector? A systematic review of the literature. International Review of Administrative Sciences 88(1): 114–130.

17.

Mazumder

Garg

(2021) Decoding digital transformational outsourcing: the role of service providers’ capabilities. International Journal of Information Management 58: 102295.

18.

Moore

(1995) Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government. Cambridge, Massachusetts, England: Harvard University Press.

19.

Neumann

Matt

Hitz-Gamper

, et al. (2019) Joining forces for public value creation? Exploring collaborative innovation in smart city initiatives. Government Information Quarterly 36(4): 101411.

20.

Nissen

Evald

Clarke

(2014) Knowledge sharing in heterogeneous teams through collaboration and cooperation: exemplified through public–private-innovation partnerships. Industrial Marketing Management 43(3): 473–482.

21.

Picazo-Vela

Gutiérrez-Martínez

Duhamel

, et al. (2018) Value of inter-organizational collaboration in digital government projects. Public Management Review 20(5): 691–708.

22.

Picazo-Vela

Gutiérrez-Martínez

Duhamel

, et al. (2021) Value of inter-organizational collaboration in digital government projects. In: Digital Government and Public Management. Routledge, 95–76.

23.

Ragin

(2008) Measurement versus calibration: a set-theoretic approach. In: Box-Steffensmeier

Brady

Collier

(eds) The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 174–198.

24.

Ragin

(2009) Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

25.

Ragin

Fiss

(2008) Net effects analysis versus configurational analysis: an empirical demonstration. Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond 240: 190–212.

26.

Reeves

(2013) Mind the gap: accountability and value for money in public–private partnerships in Ireland. In: Hodge

Greve

Boardman

(eds) Rethinking Public–Private Partnerships. London: Routledge, pp.78–97.

27.

Reynaers

(2014) Public values in public–private partnerships. Public Administration Review 74(1): 41–50.

28.

Smith

Sochor

Karlsson

(2019) Public–private innovation: barriers in the case of mobility as a service in West Sweden. Public Management Review 21(1): 116–137.

29.

Soecipto

Verhoest

(2018) Contract stability in European road infrastructure PPPs: how does governmental PPP support contribute to preventing contract renegotiation? Public Management Review 20(8): 1145–1164.

30.

Song

Liu

Sun

, et al. (2023) Contextual recipes for adopting private control and trust in public–private partnership governance. Public Administration 101(3): 884–901.

31.

Sørensen

Torfing

(2011) Enhancing collaborative innovation in the public sector. Administration & Society 43(8): 842–868.

32.

Stoker

(2006) Public value management: a new narrative for networked governance? The American Review of Public Administration 36(1): 41–57.

33.

Thabit

Sancino

Mora

(2025) Strategic public value(s) governance: a systematic literature review and framework for analysis. Public Administration Review 85(3): 885–906.

34.

Torfing

(2019) Collaborative innovation in the public sector: the argument. Public Management Review 21(1): 1–11.

35.

Verweij

Klijn

Edelenbos

, et al. (2013) What makes governance networks work? A fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis of 14 Dutch spatial planning projects. Public Administration 91(4): 1035–1055.

36.

Wang

Teo

Janssen

(2021) Public and private value creation using artificial intelligence: an empirical study of AI voice robot users in Chinese public sector. International Journal of Information Management 61: 102401.

37.

Warsen

Klijn

Koppenjan

(2019) Mix and match: how contractual and relational conditions are combined in successful public–private partnerships. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 29(3): 375–393.

38.

Weihe

(2008) Public–private partnerships and public–private value trade-offs. Public Money and Management 28(3): 153–158.

39.

Yang

(2013) Innovation in the Chinese public sector: typology and distribution. Public Administration 91(2): 347–365.

40.

Zhang

Guo

(2021) Still hold aloft the banner of social change? Nonprofit advocacy in the wave of commercialization. International Review of Administrative Sciences 87(4): 925–943.

41.

Zhao

(2009) The mandate of heaven and performance legitimation in historical and contemporary China. American Behavioral Scientist 53(3): 416–433.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.05 MB