Focusing on ‘democratic deficit’, this article examines how globalization affects the legitimacy of intergovernmental organizations (IGOs). Two contextual factors are considered: (i) democracy at the domestic level and (ii) global inequality. Since these two factors determine the severity of democratic deficit in each country, the impact of globalization on citizens’ support for IGOs significantly varies across states. Globalization does not undermine the legitimacy of IGOs in democratically well-attuned rich states. The Pew Global Attitudes Project 2002 lends support to this primary argument.
Abbott, Kenneth and Duncan Snidal. 1998. ‘Why States Act through Formal International Organizations’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 3–32.
2.
Annan, Kofi. 2002. ‘Democracy as an International Issue’, Global Governance, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 135–42.
3.
Archibugi, Daniele, David Held and Martin Kohler, eds. 1998. Re-Imaging Political Community: Studies in Cosmopolitan Democracy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
4.
Arrighi, Giovanni and Jessica Drangel. 1986. ‘The Stratification of the World-Economy: An Exploration of the Semiperipheral Zone’, Review, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 9–74.
5.
Backstrand, Karin. 2008. ‘Accountability of Networked Climate Governance: The Rise of Transnational Climate Partnership’, Global Environmental Politics, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 74–102.
6.
Barnett, Michael and Martha Finnemore. 1999. ‘The Politics, Power, and Pathologies of International Organizations’, International Organization, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 699–732.
7.
Barnett, Michael and Martha Finnemore. 2004. Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
8.
Brambor, Thomas, William Clark and Matt Golder. 2006. ‘Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses’, Political Analysis, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 63–82. Regarding Stata’s codes, see http://www.homepages.nyu.edu/~mrg217/interaction.html. Accessed on 5 January 2009.
9.
Brewer, Paul. 2004. ‘Public Trust in (Or Cynicism about) Other Nations across Time’, Political Behavior, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 317–41.
10.
Brewer, Paul, Kimberly Gross, Sean Aday and Lars Willnat. 2004. ‘International Trust and Public Opinion about World Affairs’, American Journal of Political Science, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 93–109.
11.
Bruner, Lane. 2003. ‘Global Governance and the Critical Public’, Rhetoric and Public Affairs, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 687–708.
12.
Chua, Amy. 2003. World on Fire: How Exporting Free Market Democracy Breeds Ethnic Hatred and Global Instability. New York: Doubleday.
13.
Cohn, Theodore. 2008. Global Political Economy: Theory and Practice (4th edn). New York: Pearson/Longman.
14.
Collier, Paul and Jan Gunning. 1999. ‘Why has Africa Grown Slowly?’ Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 3–22.
15.
Cornia, Giovanni, Richard Jolly and Frances Stewart. 1987. Adjustment with a Human Face: Protecting the Vulnerable and Promoting Growth, vol. 1. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
16.
Cox, Robert. 1986. ‘Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory’, in Robert Keohane, ed., Neorealism and its Critics, pp. 158–254. New York: Columbia University Press.
17.
Dollar, David and Aart Kraay. 2002. ‘Spreading the Wealth’, Foreign Affairs, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 120–33.
18.
Dreher, Axel. 2006. ‘Does Globalization Affect Growth? Evidence from a new Index of Globalization’, Applied Economics, vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 1091–1110.
19.
Franck, Thomas. 1990. The Power of Legitimacy Among Nations. New York: Oxford University Press.
20.
Freedom House. ‘Freedom in the World’, http://www.freedomhouse.org/template.cfm?page= 1. Accessed on 8 July 2009.
21.
Friedman, Thomas. 1999. The Lexus and the Olive Tree. New York: Farrar, Strauss, and Giroux.
22.
Gabel, Matthew. 1998. Interests and Integration: Market Liberalization, Public Opinion, and European Union. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
23.
Gill, Stephen. 2000. ‘Towards a Postmodern Prince? The Battle in Seattle as a Moment in the New Politics of Globalisation’, Millennium—Journal of International Studies, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 131–40.
24.
Gill, Stephen. 2002. ‘Constitutionalizing Inequality and the Clash of Globalizations’, International Studies Review, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 47–65.
25.
Grant, Ruth and Robert Keohane. 2005. ‘Accountability and Abuses of Power in World Politics’, American Political Science Review, vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 29–43.
26.
Green, Duncan and Matthew Griffith. 2002. ‘Globalization and its Discontents’, International Affairs, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 49–68.
27.
Grieco, Joseph. 1988. ‘Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism’, International Organization, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 485–507.
28.
Hainmueller, Jens and Michael Hiscox. 2006. ‘Learning to Love Globalization: Education and Individual Attitudes Towards International Trade’, International Organization, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 469–98.
29.
Hawken, Paul. 2000. ‘The WTO: Inside, Outside, All Around the World’, http://www.co-intelligence.org/WTOHawken.html. Accessed on 19 July 2009.
30.
Held, David. 1995. Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
31.
Heston, Alan,Robert Summers and Bettina Aten. 2006. ‘Penn World Table Version 6.2.’ Center for International Comparisons of Production, Income and Prices, University of Pennsylvania, September 2006, http://pwt.econ.upenn.edu/php_site/pwt_index.php. Accessed on 8 July 2009.
32.
Hoffman, Stanley. 2002. ‘Clash of Globalizations’, Foreign Affairs, vol. 81, no. 4, pp. 104–15.
33.
Holsti, Ole. 1992. ‘Public Opinion and Foreign Policy: Challenges to the Almond-Lippman Consensus’, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 439–66.
34.
Howse, Robert and Kalypso Nicolaidis. 2003. ‘Enhancing WTO Legitimacy: Constitutionalization of Global Subsidiarity’, Governance, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 73–94.
35.
Huber, Peter. 1967. ‘The Behavior of Maximum Likelihood Estimates under Non-standard Conditions’, Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, vol. 1, pp. 221–33.
36.
Hurd, Ian. 1999. ‘Legitimacy and Authority in International Politics’, International Organization, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 379–408.
37.
IMF (International Monetary Fund). 2008. ‘Filling Accountability Gaps through Civil Society Engagement’, 18 November, The IMF and Civil Society, http://www.imf.org/external/np/exr/cs/news/2008/111808.htm Accessed on 8 July 2009.
38.
Junne, G.C.A.2001. ‘International Organizations in a Period of Globalization: New (problems of) Legitimacy’, in Jean-Marc Coicaud and Veijo Heiskanen, eds, The Legitimacy of International Organizations, pp. 189–220. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
39.
Keck, Margaret and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Kennedy, Paul. 1987. The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict from 1500 to 2000. New York: Random House.
42.
Kennedy, Paul. 2006. The Parliament of Man: The Past, Present, and the Future of the United Nations. New York: Random House.
43.
Keohane, Robert. 1985. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
44.
Keohane, Robert. 1998. ‘International Institutions: Can Interdependence Work’, Foreign Policy, vol. 110, pp. 82–96.
45.
Keohane, Robert. 2002. ‘Governance in a Partially Globalized World’, in David Held and Anthony McGrew, eds, Governing Globalization: Power, Authority and Global Governance, pp. 325–47. Cambridge: Polity Press.
46.
Keohane, Robert. 2003. ‘Global Governance and Democratic Accountability’, in David Held and Mathias Koenig-Archibugi, eds, Taming Globalization: Frontiers of Governance, pp. 130–59. Cambridge: Polity Press.
47.
Krasner, Stephen. 1985. Structural Conflict: The Third World Against Global Liberalism. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
48.
Mearsheimer, John. 1994/95. ‘The False Promise of International Institutions’, International Security, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 5–49.
49.
Mingst, Karen and Margaret Karns. 2007. The United Nations in the 21st Century (3rd edn). Cambridge, MA: Westview Press.
50.
Mishler, William and Richard Rose. 2001. ‘What are the Origins of Political Trust? Testing Institutional and Cultural Theories in Post-Communist Societies’, Comparative Political Studies, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 30–62.
51.
Moravcsik, Andrew. 2002. ‘In Defense of the “Democratic Deficit”: Reassessing Legitimacy in the European Union’, Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 603–24.
52.
Moravcsik, Andrew. 2004. ‘Is there a “Democratic Deficit” in World Politics? A Framework for Analysis’, Government and Opposition, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 336–63.
53.
Morphet, Sally. 2007. ‘Future Prospects for the United Nations’, Global Governance, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 139–50.
54.
Nanz, Patrizia and Jens Steffek. 2002. ‘Global Governance, Participation and Public Sphere’, in David Held and Mathias Koenig-Archigugi, eds, Global Governance and Public Accountability, pp. 190–211. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
55.
Nederveen Pieterse, Jan. 2002. ‘Global Inequality: Bringing Politics Back in’, Third World Quarterly, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 1023–46.
56.
Norris, Pippa. 1997. ‘Representation and the Democratic Deficit’, European Journal of Political Research, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 273–82.
57.
Nunnaly, Jum. 1978. Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Nye, Joseph. 2002. The Paradox of American Power: Why the World’s Only Superpower Can’t Go It Alone. New York: Oxford University Press.
60.
Oneal, John and Bruce Russett. 1997. ‘The Classical Liberals Were Right: Democracy, Interdependence, and Conflict, 1950–1985’, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 267–93.
61.
Patel, Vibhuti. 1994. ‘Women and Structural Adjustment in India’, Social Scientist, vol. 22, no. 3, 4, pp. 16–34.
62.
Pew Research Center For The People And Press. 2002. ‘What The World Thinks in 2002: How Global Publics View Their Lives, Their Countries, The World, America’, The Pew Global Attitudes Project. Released on 2 December 2002 at <http://pewglobal.org/reports/pdf/165.pdf>. Accessed on 5 April 2009. The Pew Global Attitudes Project dataset 2002 is accessible at <http://pewglobal.org/>. Accessed on 8 July 2009. The codebook is also available at the same website.
63.
Porter, Tony. 2001. ‘The Democratic Deficit in the Institutional Arrangements for Regulating Global Finance’, Global Governance, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 427–39.
64.
Primo, David, Matthew Jacobsmeier and Jeffrey Milyo. 2007. ‘Estimating the Impact of State Policies and Institutions with Mixed-Level Data’, State Politics and Policy Quarterly, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 446–59.
65.
Raab, Marcel, Michael Ruland, Benno Schonberger, Hans-Peter Blossfeld, Dirk Hofacker, Sandra Buchholz and Paul Schmelzer. 2008. ‘GlobalIndex—A Sociological Approach to Globalization Measurement’, International Sociology, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 596–631. The dataset is available at http://www.transeurope-project.org/page.php?id=356. Accessed on 8 July 2009.
66.
Raudenbush, Stephen and Anthony Bryk. 2002. Hierarchical Linear Models: Application and Data Analysis Methods (2nd edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
67.
Riggs, Robert. 1980. ‘The Bank, the IMF, and the WHO’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 329–57.
68.
Rodrik, Dani. 1997. Has Globalization Gone Too Far?Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
69.
Ruggie, John. 1982. ‘International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order’, International Organization, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 379–415.
70.
Ruggie, John. 2003. ‘The United Nations and Globalization: Patterns and Limits of Institutional Adaptation’, Global Governance, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 301–21.
71.
Russett, Bruce and John Oneal. 2001. Triangulating Peace, Democracy, Interdependence and International Organizations. New York: W.W. Norton.
72.
Sobel, Richard. 2001. The Impact of Public Opinion on US Foreign Policy since Vietnam. New York: Oxford University Press.
73.
Steinberg, Richard. 2002. ‘In the Shadow of Law or Power? Consensus-based Bargaining and Outcomes in the GATT/TWO’, International Organization, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 339–74.
74.
Stiglitz, Joseph. 2002. Globalization and Its Discontents. New York: W.W. Norton.
75.
Torgler, Benno. 2008. ‘Trust in International Organizations: An Empirical Investigation Focusing on the United Nations’, Review of International Organizations, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 65–93.
76.
UNDP (United Nations Development Program). 2002. Human Development Report 2002: Deepening Democracy in a Fragmented World. New York: Oxford University Press.
77.
Van Rossem, Ronan. 1996. ‘The World-System Paradigm as General Theory of Development: A Cross-National Test’, American Sociological Review, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 508–27.
78.
Verweij, Marco and Timothy Josling. 2003. ‘Special Issue: Deliberately Democratizing Multilateral Organization’, Governance, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–21.
79.
Wade, Robert. 2001. ‘The Rising Inequality of World Income Distribution’, Finance and Development, vol. 38, no. 4, http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2001/12/wade.htm. Accessed on 8 July 2009.
80.
White, Halbert. 1980. ‘A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity’, Econometrica, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 817–30.
81.
Woods, Ngaire. 2006. The Globalizers: The IMF, the World Bank, and Their Borrowers. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
82.
Young, Oran. 1989. ‘The Politics of International Regime Formation: Managing Natural Resources and the Environment’, International Organization, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 349–75.
83.
Ziring, Lawrence, Robert Riggs and Jack Plano. 2005. The United Nations and World Politics: International Organization and World Politics (4th edn). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
84.
Zurn, Michael. 2002. ‘Global Governance and Legitimacy Problems’, in David Held and Mathias Koenig-Archibugi, eds, Global Governance and Public Accountability, pp. 136–63. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
