Recent world events have brought the need to better understand how to work and live in a heterogeneous world into relief. The origins of group dynamics and development theory are reviewed, arguing that although traditional group theory has proven useful in homogeneous groups, applying these theories to the heterogeneous groups common to organizations today counters efforts to honor and promote multiculturalism. The ways in which traditional theory, due to its epistemological origins in organicism, tacitly undermines efforts to promote the inclusion of multiple voices in groups is described. The authors demonstrate how a paradigmatic shift from organicism to contextualism provides a framework for generating more useful theories and practices of group dynamics and development that include heterogeneity and pluralism and acknowledge the role of power and privilege. Principles for a contextualist theory of group dynamics and process are developed, stressing the pragmatic values of utility and action.
Argyris, C.
, & Schön, D. A. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2.
Arrow, H.
, McGrath, J. E., & Berdahl, J. L. (2000). Small groups as complex systems: Formation, coordination, development, and adaptation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3.
Back, K.W.
(1972). Beyond words: The story of sensitivity training and the encounter movement. New York: Russell Sage.
4.
Baker, A. C.
, Jensen, P. J., & Kolb, D. A. (Eds.). (2002). Conversational learning: An experiential approach to knowledge creation. Westport, CT: Quorum.
5.
Bellah, R. N.
, Madsen,R., Sullivan, W. M., Swidler, A., & Tipton,S. M. (1991). The goodsociety. New York: Vintage.
6.
Bennis, W. G.
, & Shepard, H. A. (1956). A theory of group development. Human Relations, 9, 415-437.
7.
Berger, P. L.
, & Luckmann,T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Doubleday.
8.
Berman, M.
(1996). The shadow side of systems theory. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 36, 22-28.
9.
Bion, W. R.
(1959). Experiences in groups and other papers. New York: Basic Books.
10.
Block, P.
(1987). The empowered manager: Positive political skills at work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11.
Brower, A. M.
(1989).Group developmentas constructedreality: A social-cognitive understandingof group formation. Social Work With Groups, 12, 23-41.
12.
Burnand, G.
(1990). Group development phases as working through six fundamental human problems. Small Group Research, 21, 255-273.
13.
Burns, T.
, & Stalker, G. M. (1961). The management of innovation. London: Tavistock Publications.
14.
Burrell, G.
, & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
15.
Calás, M.
, & Smircich, L. (1996). The woman's'point of view: Feminist approaches to organization studies. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbookof organizationstudies (pp. 218-258).London: Sage.
16.
Cartwright, D.
, & Zander, A. (Eds.). (1968). Group dynamics: Research and theory (3rd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
17.
Chatman, J. A.
, & Flynn, F. J. (2001). The influence of heterogeneity on the emergence and consequences of norms in work teams. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 956-974.
18.
Comerford, S. A.
(2005). Engaging through learning—Learningthrough engaging: An alternative approach to professional learning about human diversity. Social Work Education, 24, 113-135.
19.
Comerford, S. A.
, & Fambrough, M. J. (2002). Constructing learning sites for solidarity and social action: Genderautobiography forconsciousnessraising. Affilia: Journal of Womenin Social Work, 17, 411-428.
20.
Crocker, O. L.
, Chiu, J. S. L., & Charney, C. (1985). Quality circles: A guide to participation and productivity. New York: New American Library.
21.
Diggins, J. P.
(1994). The promise of pragmatism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22.
Downing, J.
(1958). Cohesiveness, perception, and values. Human Relations, 11, 157-166.
23.
Dyer, W. G.
(1994). Team building: Current issues and new alternatives (3rd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
24.
Edmondson, A.
(1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350-383.
25.
Farrell, M. P.
(1976).Patterns in the development of self-analytic groups. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 12, 523-542.
26.
Gardenswartz, L.
, & Rowe, A. (2003). Diverse teams at work: Capitalizing on the power of diversity. Burr Ridge, IL: Irwin.
27.
Gergen,K.
(1991). The saturatedself: Dilemmas of identityin contemporary life. New York: Basic Books.
28.
Gersick, C. J. G.
(1988). Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 9-41.
29.
Gibb, J.
(1978). Trust: A new vision of human relationships for business, education,family, and personal living. North Hollywood, CA: Newcastle.
30.
Gibson, C. B.
, & Cohen, S. G. (Eds.). (2003). Virtual teams that work: Creating conditions for virtual team effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
31.
Gillette, J.
, & McCollom,M. (Eds.).(1990). Groupsin context: A new perspective on groupdynamics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
32.
Gladstein, D. L.
(1984). Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 499-517.
33.
Glazer, N.
(1997). We are all multiculturalists now. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34.
Guinier, L.
(1994). The tyranny of the majority: Fundamental fairness in representative democracy.New York: Free Press.
35.
Hackman, J. R.
(Ed.). (1990). Groups that work (and those that don't). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
36.
Harvey, J. B.
(1988). The Abilene paradox and other meditations on management. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Hayden, C.
, & Molenkamp, R. J. (2002). Tavistock primer II. Jupiter, FL: A. K. Rice Institute.
39.
Hegel, G. W. G.
(1974). Hegel: The essential writings. New York: Harper Torchbooks.
40.
Irwin, J.
(1997). Notes on the status of the concept subculture. In K. Gelder & S. Thornton (Eds.), The subcultures reader (pp. 66-70). London: Routledge.
41.
Janis, I. L.
(1972). Victims of groupthink. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
42.
Katz, D.
,& Kahn,R. L. (1978). The socialpsychologyof organizations (2nded.).New York: John Wiley.
43.
Kelley, G. A.
(1963). A theory of personality: The psychology of personal constructs. New York: Norton.
44.
Kuhn, T. S.
(1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago.
45.
Lawler, E. E., III.
(1988). High-involvement management: Participative strategies for improving organizational performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
46.
Levine, J. M.
, & Moreland,R. L. (1990).Progress in small groupresearch. AnnualReview of Psychology, 41, 585-614.
47.
Lewin, K.
(1951). Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers. Chicago: University of Chicago.
48.
Lyddon,W. J.
, & Adamson,L. A. (1992).Worldview and counselingpreference: An analoguestudy. Journal of Counseling and Development, 71, 41-47.
49.
Maslow, A. H.
(1948). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370-396.
50.
McGrath, J. E.
(1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
51.
McGregor, D.
(1960). The human side of enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill.
52.
McGuire, M. Y.
(1979). Stephen Pepper, world hypotheses and the structure of metapsychology. International Review of Psychoanalysis, 6, 217-230.
53.
Michaelsen,L. K.
, Knight,A. B., & Fink, L. D. (Eds.).(2004). Team-basedlearning: A transformativeuse of small groups in college teaching. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
54.
Miller, J. G.
(1971). The nature of living system. Behavioral Science, 16, 278-301.
55.
Miller, P.
(1992). The Tavistock mission: A review essay. Human Relations, 45, 411-426.
56.
Mohrman, A. M., Jr.
, Mohrman, S. A., Ledford, G. E., Jr., Cummings, T. G., & Lawler, E. E., III. (1989). Large-scale organizational change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
57.
Moreland,R. L.
, & Levine, J. M. (1988). Groupdynamicsover time: Developmentand socialization in small groups.In J. E. McGrath (Ed.), The social psychology of time: New perspectives (pp. 151-181).Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
58.
Myers, D. G.
(1993). Exploring social psychology (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
59.
Myers, L. J.
, Speight, S. L., Highlen, P. S., Cox, C. I., Reynolds, A. L., Adams, E. M., et al. (1991). Identity developmentandworldview: Toward an optimalconceptualization. Journal of Counseling and Development, 70, 54-63.
60.
Nkomo, S. M.
, & Cox, T. L, Jr. (1996). Diverse identities in organizations. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 338-356). London: Sage.
61.
Payne, R. L.
(1976). Truisms in organizational behavior. Interpersonal Development, 6, 203-221.
62.
Pepper, S. C.
(1942). World hypotheses: A study in evidence. Berkeley: University of California.
63.
Pettigrew, A. M.
(1985). Contextualist research: A natural way to link theory and practice. In E. E. Goulet, A. M. Mohrman, Jr., S. A. Mohrman, G. E. Ledford, Jr., T. G. Cummings, & Associates (Eds.), Doing research that is useful for theory and practice (pp. 222-274). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
64.
Polanyi, M.
(1963). The tacit dimension. New York: Doubleday.
65.
Reddy, W. B.
, & Jamison, K. (1988). Team building: Blueprints for productivity and satisfaction. Bethel, ME: NTL Institute.
66.
Reese, H. W.
, & Overton, W. F. (1970). Models of development and theories of development. In L. R. Goulet & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), Life-span developmental psychology: Research and theory (pp. 115-145). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
67.
Ritzer, G.
(1992). Metatheorizing. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
68.
Rogers, C. R.
(1951). Client-centered therapy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
69.
Rogers, C. R.
(1970). Encounter groups. New York: Harper & Row.
70.
Rorty, R.
(1989). Contingency, irony, and solidarity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
71.
Schein, E. H.
(1988). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
72.
Schein, E. H.
(1998). Process consultation revisited: Building the helping relationship. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
73.
Scholtes, P. R.
(1988). The team handbook: How to use teams to improve quality. Madison, WI: Joiner Associates.
74.
Schütz, A.
(1962). Collected papers (Vol. 1). The Hague, the Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
75.
Schutz, W. C.
(1973). Elements of encounter. New York: Bantam.
76.
Searle, J. R.
(1995). The construction of social reality. New York: Free Press.
77.
Shaw, M. E.
(1981). Group dynamics: The psychology of small group behavior (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
78.
Slife, B. D.
, & Williams, R. N. (1995). What's behind the research: Discovering hidden assumptions in the behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
79.
Stogdill, R. M.
(1959). Individual behavior and group achievement: A theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
80.
Taylor, C.
(1994). The politics of recognition. In A. Gutman (Ed.), Multiculturalism: Examining the politics of recognition (pp. 4-25). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
81.
Taylor, F.
(1911). The principles of scientific management. New York: Harper & Row.
82.
Tuckman, B. W.
(1963). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 384-399.
83.
Tuckman, B. W.
, & Jensen, M. C. (1977). Stages of small group development revisited. Group and Organization Studies, 2, 419-427.
84.
Turquet, P. M.
(1974). Leadership: The individual and the group. In G. S. Gibbard, J. J. Hartman, & R. D. Mann (Eds.), Analysis of groups (pp. 349-371). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
85.
von Bertalanffy, L.
(1968). Organismic psychology and systems theory. Barre, MA: Clark University with Barre Publishers.
86.
Watson, W. E.
, Kumar, K., & Michaelsen,L. K. (1993).Cultural diversity's impact on groupprocess and performance: Comparing culturally homogeneous and culturally diverse task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 590-602.
87.
Weick, K. E.
(1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
88.
Wells, L., Jr.
(1990). The group as a whole: A systemic socioanalytic perspective on interpersonal and group relations. In J. Gillette & M. McCollom (Eds.), Groups in context: A new perspective on group dynamics(pp. 50-85). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
89.
Wheelan, S. A.
, & McKeague, R. L. (1993). Developmental patterns in small and large groups. Small Group Research, 24, 60-83.
90.
White, J.
, McMillen, C., & Baker, A. C. (2001). Challenging traditional models: Toward an inclusive model of group development. Journal of Management Inquiry, 10, 40-57.
91.
Wilber, K.
(1995). Sex, ecology, spirituality: The spirit of evolution. Boston: Shambhala.
92.
Wyss-Flamm, E. D. (2002a).Conversational learning and psychological safety in multicultural teams. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Case Western Reserve University.
93.
Wyss-Flamm, E. D.
(2002b). Conversational learning in multicultural teams. In A. C. Baker, P. J. Jensen, & D. A. Kolb (Eds.), Conversational learning: An experiential approach to knowledge creation (pp. 139-164). Westport, CT: Quorum.
94.
Yalom, I. D.
(1985). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy (3rd ed.). New York: Basic Books.
95.
Zaleznik, A.
, & Moment, D. (1964). The dynamics of interpersonal behavior. New York: John Wiley.
96.
Zander, A.
(1982). Making groups effective. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
