This article discusses a design science approach to organizational development (OD) resulting in some new perspectives about how OD interventions might support more effective organizational change. These relate to the way in which the formal organization is redesigned, the way this design is translated by the members of the organization into their own roles and routines, and the way in which subsequent organizational learning produces the intended performance improvement. The background, nature, and characteristics of design science and design science research are discussed, and using a design science perspective, a process model of planned change projects is presented. Drawing on a case in planned change, it is argued that a design science perspective can provide a powerful combination of the original strengths of OD in human behavior and planned change based on humanistic values on one hand and design competencies involving both humanistic and business values on the other.
Ackoff, R. L., & Sasieni, M. W. (1968). Fundamentals of operations research. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
2.
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational learning. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3.
Bate, S. P., & Robert, G. (2007). Toward more user-centric OD: Lessons from the field of experience-based design and a case study. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43, 41-46.
4.
Beckhard, R. (1969). Organization development: Strategies and models. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
5.
Beer, M., & Nohria, N. (2000). Cracking the code of change. Harvard Business Review, 78(3), 133-141.
6.
Blake, R. R., Mouton, J. S., & McCanse, A. A. (1989). Change by design. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
7.
Boss, R. W. (1989). Organization development in health care. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
8.
Bradford, D., & Burke, W. W. (2004). Is OD in crisis? Introduction to the special issue. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 40, 369-373.
9.
Bunker, B. B., Alban, B. T., & Lewicki, R. J. (2004). Ideas in currency and OD practice: Has the well gone dry? The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 40, 403-422.
10.
Burke, W. (1997). The new agenda for organization development. Organization Dynamics, 25, 7-21.
11.
Checkland, P. (1981). Systems thinking, systems practice. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
12.
Churchman, C. W. (1968). The systems approach. New York: Dell.
13.
Churchman, C. W., Ackoff, R. L., & Arnoff, E. L. (1957). Introduction to operations research. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
14.
Collins, J. (2001). Good to great. New York: Random House.
15.
Emory, W. C. (1985). Business research methods. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
16.
French, W. L., & Bell, C. H. (1990). Organization development: Behavioral science interventions for organization improvement. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
17.
Galbraith, J. R. (1973). Designing complex organizations. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
18.
Gelernter, D. (1998). Machine beauty: Elegance and the heart of technology. New York: Basic Books.
19.
Greiner, L. E., & Cummings, T. G. (2004). Wanted: OD more alive than dead! The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 40, 374-390.
20.
Hammer, M. (1990). Re-engineering work: Don’t automate, obliterate. Harvard Business Review, 68(4), 104-114.
21.
Hammer, M., & Champy, J. (1993). Re-engineering the corporation, a manifesto for business revolution. New York: Harper Business.
22.
Higgs, M. J., & Rowland, D. (2000). Building change leadership capability: The quest for change competence. Journal of Change Management, 1, 116-131.
23.
Jacques, E. (1996). Requisite organization (2nd ed.). Green Cove Springs, FL: Cason Hall & Co.
24.
Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Boston: Harvard School Press.
25.
Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. New York: Harper & Row.
26.
Liedtka, J. M. (2005). If managers thought like designers. Batten Briefings From the Darden Graduate School of Business Administration, 4(2), 1-6.
27.
Morgan, G. (1986). Images of organization. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
28.
Quinn, R. E. (1993, August). The legitimate change agent: A vision for a new profession. ODC Distinguished Speaker Address, Academy of Management Meeting, Atlanta.
29.
Romme, A. G. L. (2003). Making a difference: Organization as design. Organization Science, 14, 559-573.
30.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. London: Temple Smith.
31.
Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. London: Doubleday.
32.
Simon, H. A. (1969). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33.
Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34.
Thompson, J. D. (1956). On building an administrative science. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1, 102-111.
35.
Tichy, N. M. (1983). Managing strategic change: Technical, political and cultural dynamics. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
36.
Trist, E., & Murray, H. (Eds.). (1993). The social engagement of social science, Volume II, the socio-technical perspective. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
37.
Trullen, J., & Bartunek, J. M. (2007). What a design approach offers to organization development. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43, 23-40.
38.
van Aken, J. E. (2001). Management research on the basis of the paradigm of the design sciences: The quest for tested and grounded technological rules (Ecis Working Paper 01.11). Eindhoven, the Netherlands: Eindhoven University of Technology.
39.
van Aken, J. E. (2004). Management research based on the paradigm of the design sciences: The quest for tested and grounded technological rules. Journal of Management Studies, 41, 219-246.
40.
van Aken, J. E. (2005a). Management research as a design science: Articulating the research products of Mode 2 knowledge production. British Journal of Management, 16, 19-36.
41.
van Aken, J. E. (2005b). Valid knowledge for the professional design of large and complex design processes. Design Studies, 26, 379-404.
42.
van Eijnatten, F. M. (1993). The paradigm that changed the work place. Assen, the Netherlands: Van Gorcum.
43.
Walton, R. E. (1973). Quality of working life: What is it? Sloan Management Review, 15, 11-21.
44.
Watson, I. (1997). Applying case-based reasoning: Techniques for enterprise systems. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufman.
45.
Weick, K. E., & Quinn, R. E. (1999). Organizational change and development. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 361-386.
46.
Wirtenberg, J., Abrams, L., & Ott, C. (2004). Assessing the field of organizational development. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 40, 465-479.
47.
Worley, C. G., & Feyerherm, A. E. (2003). Reflections on the future of organization development. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 39, 97-115.
