This report of the results of a Swedish field experiment on the effects of laboratory training argues that individually different changes are to be expected after training, in contrast with changes in central tendency claimed by other researchers. A theoretical rationale elaborating upon the concepts of "meta-goals" and "meta-learnings" is provided. Observer ratings and the results of a variety of scales administered to industrial supervisory personnel reveal individually different changes in the areas of interpersonal behavior and attitudes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adorno, T. W., et al. The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper, 1950.
2.
Ahlberg, A. SPIS-Socioperceptuell interaktionsstudie (SPIS-Socioperceptual Interaction Study). Unpublished master's thesis, Department of Psychology, University of Lund (Sweden), 1969.
3.
Baumgartel, H., & Goldstein, J. W.Need and value shifts in college training groups. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1967, 3, 87-101.
4.
Bennis, W. G.Goals and meta-goals of laboratory training. In W. G. Bennis, E. H. Schein, D. E. Berlew, and F. I. Steele (Eds.), Interpersonal dynamics. Chicago: Dorsey, 1964. Pp. 692-698.
5.
Blake, R. R., & Mouton, J. S.Some effects of managerial grid seminars on union and management attitudes toward supervision. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1966, 2, 387-400.
6.
Bohrnstedt, G. W.Observations on the measurement of change. In E. F. Borgatta and G. W. Bohrnstedt (Eds.), Sociological methodology 1969. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1969. Pp. 113-133.
7.
Bradford, L. P., Gibb, J. R., & Benne, K. D. (Eds.) T-group theory and laboratory method: Innovation in re-education. New York: Wiley, 1964.
8.
Bunker, D. R., & Knowles, E. S.Comparison of behavioral changes resulting from human relations training laboratories of different lengths. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1967, 3, 505-523.
9.
Carrell, J. B.Sensitivity training: Effects on perceived self-ideal self congruence. Dissertation Abstracts, 1974, 34A, 3863-3864.
10.
Cronbach, L. J., & Furby, L.How we should measure "change"-or should we?Psychological Bulletin, 1970, 74, 68-80.
11.
Dunnette, M. D., & Campbell, J. P.Laboratory education: Impact on people and organizations. Industrial Relations, 1968, 8 (1), 1-27.
12.
Fleishman, E. A.The description of supervisory behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1953, 37, 1-6.
13.
Gardell, B., & Westlander, G.Om industriarbete och mental halsa. (On industrial work and mental health.)Stockholm: Swedish Council for Personnel Administration, 1968.
14.
Grenthe, Ebba. FAT-skalan. Konstruktion och en forsta utprovning av ett formular for matning av interpersonella behov och darmed sammanhangande interpersonella beteenden. (The FAT-scale. Construction and preliminary application of an instrument for measurement of interpersonal needs and corresponding interpersonal behavior.) Unpublished master's thesis. Department of Education, University of Lund (Sweden), 1969.
15.
Harris, C. W. (Ed.) Problems in measuring change. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1963.
16.
Harrison, R.Cognitive change and participation in a sensitivity-training laboratory. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1966, 30 (6), 517-520.
17.
Harrison, R., & Hopkins, R. L.The design of cross-cultural training: An alternative to the university model. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1967, 3, 431-460.
18.
Jerkedal, A.Top management education. An evaluation study. Stockholm: Swedish Council for Personnel Administration, 1967.
19.
Lennerlof, L.Dimensions of supervision. Stockholm: Swedish Council for Personnel Administration, 1966.
20.
Lennung, S-A. Effekter av sensitivitetstraning. Del 1-litteraturgenomgang. (Effects of laboratory training. Part 1-A review of the literature.) Report from the Institute of Education, University of Lund, 1972.
21.
Lennung, S-A.Meta-learning, laboratory training, and individually different change. Stockholm: Swedish Council for Personnel Administration, 1974.
22.
Mehaffey, T. D.The effects of a t-group experience on clients with measured high and low dependency needs. Dissertation Abstracts, 1973, 33A, 3299-3300.
23.
Mettal, W. G.Human relations training and creative problem-solving competence in adolescents. Dissertation Abstracts, 1973, 33B, 3288-3288.
24.
Morton, R. B., & Bass, B. M.The organizational training laboratory. Training Directors Journal, 1964, 18 (10), 2-18.
Rokeach, M.The open and closed mind. New York: Basic Books, 1960.
27.
Rubenowitz, S.Emotional flexibility-rigidity as a comprehensive dimension of mind. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1963.
28.
Schein, E. H., & Bennis, W. G.Personal and organizational change through group methods: The laboratory approach. New York: Wiley, 1965.
29.
Schubert, M. L.A comparison of the effects of two models of sensitivity training on "level of experiencing."Dissertation Abstracts, 1973, 34B, 1264-1264.
30.
Schutz, W. C., & Allen, V. I.The effects of a t-group laboratory on interpersonal behavior. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1966, 2, 265-288.
