The spread of the forces of globalization have significantly affected the modern world. Thus, in this article, I attempt to identify how globalization has negatively influenced development of tertiary or higher educational policies in underdeveloped countries. Using the case study of India, I observe that the liberalization of the Indian economy resulted in a large inflow of foreign direct investment which in turn influenced the emergence of a new higher education policy, in order to meet the manpower requirements of multinational corporations. Such a policy has increased social dissatisfaction within the society due to the dichotomy between the needs and wants of the citizens, resulting in growth of social conflict.
Agrawal, P.K. ( 2006) Higher Education in India: A Need for Change. Working paper No. 180. ICRIER, June.
2.
Bhagwati, J.N. and P. Desai ( 1970) India: Planning for Industrialization: Industrialization and Trade Policies since 1951. London & New York: Oxford University Press.
3.
Chai, J.C.H. and K.C. Roy ( 2006) Economic Reform in China and India: Development Experience in a Comparative Perspective. Northampton: Edward Elgar.
4.
Cohen, M.A. and M.F. Küpçü ( 2005) ‘Privatizing Foreign Policy’. World Policy Journal22(3): 34-52.
5.
Collier, R.B. and D. Collier ( 1991) Shaping the Political Arena. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6.
Finer, H. ( 1949) Theory and Practice of Modern Government (rev. edn). New York: H. Holt
7.
Friedrich, C.J. ( 1937) Constitutional Government and Politics: Nature and Development . New York: Harper.
8.
Hall, P.A. ( 1986) Governing the Economy: The Politics of State Intervention in Britain and France. New York: Oxford University Press.
9.
Kaufman, B.I. ( 1977) ‘Mideast Multinational Oil, U.S. Foreign Policy, and Antitrust: The 1950s’, Journal of American History63(4): 937-59.
10.
King, D.S. ( 1995) Actively Seeking Work: The Politics of Unemployment and Welfare Policy in the United States. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
11.
Korten, D.C. ( 1995) When Corporations Rule the World. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press/San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
12.
Kotler, P., S. Jatusripitak and S. Maesincee ( 1997) The Marketing of Nations. New York : Free Press.
13.
Krasner, S. ( 1984) ‘Approaches to the State: Alternative Conceptions and Historical Dynamics’, Comparative Politics16(2): 223-46.
14.
Lieberman, R.C. ( 2002) ‘Ideas, Institutions, and Political Order: Explaining Political Change’, American Political Science Review96(4): 697-712.
15.
March, J. and J.P. Olsen ( 1984) ‘The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life’, American Political Science Review78(3): 734-49.
16.
North, D.C. ( 1990) Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17.
Park, H.S. ( 1984) Human Needs and Political Development: A Dissent to Utopian Solutions. VermontSchenkman Books.
18.
Pierson, P. ( 1993) ‘When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change’, World Politics45(4): 595-628.
19.
Pierson, P. ( 2004) Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20.
Ray, D.M. ( 1972) ‘Corporations and American Foreign Relations’ , Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science403(1): 80-92.
21.
Richani, N. ( 2005) ‘Multinational Corporations, Rentier Capitalism, and the War System in Colombia’, Latin American Politics and Society47(3): 113-44.
22.
Rondinelli, D.A. ( 2002) ‘Transnational Corporations: International Citizens or New Sovereigns’, Business and Society Review107(4): 391-413.
23.
Skocpol, T. ( 1992) Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Thelen, K. ( 1999) ‘Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics’ , Annual Review of Political Science2(1): 369-404.
25.
Thelen, K. ( 2000) ‘Timing and Temporality in the Analysis of Institutional Evolution and Change’, Studies in American Political Development14(Spring): 102-9.
26.
Thelen, K. ( 2003) ‘How Institutions Evolve: Insights from Comparative Historical Analysis’, in J. Mahoney and D. Rueschemeyer (eds) Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, pp. 208-40. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
27.
Vernon, R. ( 1971) Sovereignty at Bay: The Multinational Spread of US Enterprises . New York: Basic Books.
28.
Wheare, K.C. ( 1953) Federal Government. London & New York: Oxford University Press.
