This article seeks to understand the changing behavior of oppositional groups during socioeconomic changes using a comparative study of Singapore and Hong Kong. In order to better understand this process, three ideal typical phases are suggested. An almost complete lack of oppositional behavior characterizes the first phase, the ‘colonial phase’. Second, the ‘localization phase’ occurs due to the increasing complexity of the political system and the need to become more responsive to the people. A major legitimacy crisis fundamentally changes the relationship between oppositional groups and the Government. In the ‘decolonization phase’, oppositional groups become mobilized and form coalitions to demand greater democratization.
Au, A. ( 2006) ‘Singapore’s Spleen over Kidney Scandal’ , Asia Times, 5 January. http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Southeast_Asia/HA05Ae01.html (accessed 30 July 2006).
2.
Au, W. ( 2005) The Political Parallels to the NKF Scandal. http://www.yawningbread.org/arch_2005/yax-527.htm (accessed 30 July 2006).
3.
Bermeo, N. ( 1990) ‘Rethinking Regime Change’, Comparative Politics22(3): 359-77.
4.
Butenhoff, L. ( 1999) Social Movements and Political Reform in Hong Kong. Westport, CT: Praeger.
5.
Campbell, D. ( 1980) ‘A Secret Plan for Dictatorship’, New Statesman12: 8, 9+12.
6.
Case, W.F. ( 1996) ‘Can the Halfway House Stand?’, Comparative Politics28(4): 437-64.
7.
Chan, H.C. ( 1975) ‘Politics in an Administrative State: Where Has the Politics Gone?’, in S.C. Meow (ed.) Trends in Singapore: Proceedings and Background Paper , pp. 51-68. Singapore: Singapore University Press.
8.
Chee, S.J. ( 2006) Statement of Chee Soon Juan submitted to the High Court . Singapore: Bankruptcy Petition Hearing, 10 February. http://www.ahrchk.net/statements/mainfile.php/2006statements/431/ (accessed 31 July 2006).
9.
Chen, P.S.J. ( 1978) ‘The Power Elite in Singapore’, in P.S.J. Chen and H.-D. Evers (eds) Studies in ASEAN Sociology, pp. 73-82. Singapore : Chopmen.
10.
Cheung, A.B.-L. and K.-S. Louie ( 1991) Social Conflicts in Hong Kong, 1975-1986: Trends and Implications. Occasional Paper No. 3. Hong Kong, Chinese University of Hong Kong: Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies.
11.
Cottam, M.L. and R.W. Cottam ( 2001) Nationalism and Politics: The Political Behavior of Nation States. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner .
12.
Gillis, E.K. ( 2005) Singapore Civil Society and British Power. Singapore: Talisman.
13.
Gomez, J. ( 2002) Internet Politics: Surveillance and Intimidation in Singapore . Singapore: Think Centre.
14.
Jim, T. ( 1981) ‘Blacklisted Group Hits Back’, South China Morning Post, 30 March. http://sunzi1.lib.hku.hk/ER/detail/2197636 (accessed 19 June 2008).
15.
Kadir, S. ( 2004) ‘Singapore: Engagement and Autonomy within the Political Status Quo’, in M. Alagappa (ed.) Civil Society and Political Change in Asia: Expanding and Contracting Democratic Space, pp. 324-54. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
16.
King, A.Y.-C. (1975) ‘Administrative Absorption of Politics in Hong Kong: Emphasis on the Grass Roots Level’, Asian Survey15(5): 422-39.
17.
Lam, W.-M. ( 2004) Understanding the Political Culture of Hong Kong. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
18.
Lau, S.-K. and P.-S. Wan ( 1997) Social Conflicts in Hong Kong: 1987-1995. Occasional Paper No. 62. Hong Kong, Chinese University of Hong Kong: Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies.
19.
Leung, B.K.P. ( 1996) Perspectives on Hong Kong Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20.
Li, X. ( 2007) ‘PAP Moves to Counter Criticism of Party, Govt in Cyberspace’, The Straits Times, 3 February. http://www.lexisnexis.com/de/business/results/docview/docview.do?docLinkInd=true&risb=21_T7555295754&format=GNBFULL&sort=BOOLEAN&startDocNo=1&resultsUrlKey=29_T7555295757&cisb=22_T7555295756&treeMax=true&treeWidth=0&csi=144965&docNo=4 (accessed 10 October 2009).
21.
Linz, J. ( 1978) The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes: Crisis, Breakdown and Reequilibration. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
22.
Linz, J. and A. Stepan ( 1996) Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore , MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
23.
Lo, S.-H. ( 1988) ‘Decolonization and Political Development in Hong Kong: Citizen Participation’, Asian Survey28(6): 613-29.
24.
Lo, S.-H. ( 1997) The Politics of Democratization in Hong Kong. Houndmills: Macmillan.
25.
Lui, T.-L. and S.W.K. Chiu ( 1999) ‘Social Movements and Public Discourse on Politics’ , in T.-W. Ngo (ed.) Hong Kong’s History, pp. 101-18. London: Routledge.
26.
McAdam, D. ( 1982) Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930-1970. Chicago, IL: University Press of Chicago.
27.
Mauzy, D.K. and R.S. Milne ( 2002) Singapore Politics under the People’s Action Party . London: Routledge.
28.
Means, P.G. ( 1996) ‘Soft Authoritarianism in Malaysia and Singapore’ , Journal of Democracy7(4): 103-17.
29.
Miners, N.J. ( 1981) The Government and Politics of Hong Kong. Hong KongOxford University Press.
30.
Mutalib, H. ( 2004) Parties and Politics: A Study of Opposition Parties and the PAP in Singapore (2nd edn). Singapore: Marshall Cavendish Academic.
31.
Mydans, S. ( 2006) ‘Singapore’s Young Challengers Beg to Differ’ , International Herald Tribune, 6 May. http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/05/05/news/sing.php (accessed 30 July 2006).
32.
Rajaratnam, S. ( 1975) ‘Non-Communist Subversion in Singapore’, in S.C. Meow (ed.) Trends in Singapore: Proceedings and Background Papers, pp. 111-22. Singapore: Singapore University Press.
33.
Reuters (2001) Singapore Bars Two Groups from Foreign Funding, 30 March. http://www.singapore-window.org/sw01/010330re.htm (accessed 29 July 2006).
34.
Rodan, G. ( 2006) Singapore ‘Exceptionalism’? Authoritarian Rule and State Transformation. Working Paper No. 131. Perth:Murdoch University, Asia Research Centre. Available at http://www.arc.murdoch.edu.au/wp/wp131.pdf (accessed 10 October 2009).
35.
Rodan, G. and K. Jayasuriya ( 2007) ‘The Technocratic Politics of Administrative Participation: Case Studies of Singapore and Vietnam’, Democratization14(5): 795-815.
36.
Scott, I. ( 1989) Political Change and the Crisis of Legitimacy in Hong Kong. London: Hurst & Company .
37.
Sim, S.-F. ( 2004) Dewesternising Theories of Authoritarianism: Economics, Ideology and the Asian Economic Crisis in Singapore. Working Paper No. 103 . Perth: Murdoch University, Asia Research Centre.
38.
Sing, M. ( 2000) ‘Mobilization for Political Change: The Pro-Democracy Movement in Hong Kong (1980s-1994)’, in S.W.K. Chiu and T.L. Lui (eds) The Dynamics of Social Movement in Hong Kong, pp. 21-53. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
39.
Sing, M. ( 2004) Hong Kong’s Tortuous Democratization: A Comparative Analysis. London: RoutledgeCurzon .
40.
So, A.Y. ( 1999) Hong Kong’s Embattled Democracy: A Societal Analysis . Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
41.
Tamney, J.P. ( 1996) The Struggle over Singapore’s Soul: Western Modernization and Asian Culture. Berlin: de Gruyter .
42.
Tien, H.-M. and Y.-H. Chu ( 1998) ‘Building Democracy in Taiwan’, in D. Shambaugh (ed.) Contemporary Taiwan, pp. 97-127. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
43.
Wong, S.-Y. ( 2005) Ex-NKF Patron Mrs Goh Chok Tong Regrets Remarks about TT Durai’s Pay: SM Goh, 16 July. http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/singaporelocalnews/view/158246/1/.html (accessed 6 August 2006).
44.
Workers’ Party of Singapore (2006) You Have a Choice: Manifesto 2006. http://www.wp.org.sg/party/manifesto_2006.htm (accessed 4 August 2006).
