Abstract
This article examines the NAACP’s campaign against police brutality from 1937 to 1965, drawing on over 90 case files from the association’s national archives. Using a Critical Race Theory framework, it analyzes how the NAACP developed investigatory, judicial, and media tactics to counteract systematic racial abuse in the absence of state accountability. The study identifies a shift from reactive legalism to a more expansive activism model that blended evidence collection, public exposure, and community-driven narratives to challenge official impunity. Despite the 1945 Screws v. United States decision, which theoretically expanded federal authority, the Department of Justice consistently declined to pursue prosecution, forcing the NAACP to develop alternative accountability mechanisms. This multi-level organizational approach, shaped by tactical adaptation and bureaucratic learning, demonstrates the power of administrative infrastructure in sustaining civil rights work beyond landmark court cases. By focusing on how the NAACP treated police brutality as both a constitutional and epistemic crisis, the article illuminates broader implications for understanding organizational memory, movement strategy, and the ongoing struggle for racial justice in hostile legal environments.
Plain Language Summary
Between 1937 and 1965, Black Americans faced routine police violence with almost no government accountability, and this study draws on more than ninety case files from the NAACP’s national archives to show how the organization responded. Early on, the NAACP relied mainly on legal action after incidents occurred, but over time it built a broader system: gathering and standardizing evidence, supporting community members in documenting abuses, and working with journalists to bring those stories to public attention. When a 1945 Supreme Court decision (Screws v. United States) appeared to give the federal government greater authority to prosecute abusive officers, the Department of Justice still refused to act, forcing the NAACP to deepen its own accountability infrastructure instead. What the case files reveal across these decades is careful, cumulative learning, as the organization kept detailed records, revisited earlier cases, and carried those lessons forward in ways that made it faster and more effective over time. By treating police violence as both a legal problem and a question of whose accounts were believed and whose were dismissed, the NAACP sustained a long campaign in a deeply hostile environment, offering lessons about organizational persistence and community-driven accountability that remain relevant to reform efforts today.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
