Some companies invest large amounts of money in corporate art collections. One of the reasons for this investment may be that works of art can be used to communicate corporate identity. The aim of this study was to explore whether people are able to align a work of art with a given corporate identity. Forty-six participants rated the fit of eight works of art with four different corporate identities of existing companies. The results showed that participants agree strongly with respect to whether a work of art was aligned with a specific identity. That works of art can be recognized as aligned with a company’s identity has important implications for companies that use reproductions of works of art to decorate their walls insofar as customers may take the art as a symbol of the company’s identity.
Argenti, P. A. (1998). Corporate communication (2nd ed.). Boston: Irwin McGraw-Hill.
2.
Argenti, P. A.,& Forman, J. (2002). The power of corporate communication. New York:McGraw-Hill.
3.
Benoit, W. L., & Czerwinsi, A. (1997). A critical analysis of USAir’s image repair discourse. Business Communication Quarterly, 60(3), 38-57.
4.
Bezuinigingen KPN raken befaamde kunstcollectie [KPN cutbacks affect renowned art collection]. (2002, January 17). De Volkskrant, p. 1.
5.
Birkigt, K., & Stadler, M. M. (1986). Corporate identity: Grundlagen, Funktionen, Fallspielen. Landberg am Lech, Germany: Verlag Moderne Industrie.
6.
Carroll, A. B. (1997). Social responsibility. In P. H. Werhane & R. E. Freeman (Eds.), The Blackwell encyclopedic dictionary of business ethics (pp. 593-595). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
7.
Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business and Society, 38, 268-295.
8.
Cowden, K., & Sellnow, T. L. (2002). Issues advertising as crisis communication: Northwest Airline’s use of image restoration strategies during the 1998 pilot’s strike. Journal of Business Communication, 39, 193-219.
9.
Garber, L. L., Jr., & Hyatt, E. M. (2003). Color as a tool for visual persuasion. In L. M. Scott & R. Batra (Eds.), Persuasive imagery: A consumer response perspective (pp. 313-336). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
Hoeken, H., & Kuijpers, N. (2002). Kunst omdat het moet? [Collecting art because we have to?]. In C. van denBrandt& M. van Mulken (Eds.), Bedrijfscommunicatie II (pp.107-116). Nijmegen, Netherlands: Nijmegen University Press.
11.
Hooghiemstra, R. (2000). Corporate communication and impression management: New perspectives why companies engage in corporate social reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 27, 55-68.
12.
Jenkins, N. (1991). The business of image. Visualising the corporate message. London: Kogan Page.
13.
Maignan, I. (2001). Consumers’ perceptions of corporate social responsibilities: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Business Ethics, 30, 57-72.
14.
Maignan, I., & Ralston, D. A. (2002). Corporate social responsibility in Europe and the U.S.: Insights from business’ self-presentations. Journal of International Business Studies, 33, 497-514.
15.
Olins, W. (1989). Corporate identity: Making business strategy visible through design. London:Thames & Hudson.
16.
Pimentel, R. W., & Heckler, S. E. (2003). Changes in logo designs: Chasing the elusive butterfly curve. In L. M. Scott & R. Batra (Eds.), Persuasive imagery: A consumer response perspective (pp. 105-127). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17.
Renkema, J., & Hoeken, H. (1998). The influence of negative newspaper publicity on corporate image in the Netherlands. Journal of Business Communication, 35, 521-535.
18.
Riel, C. B. M. van (1995). Principles of corporate communication. London: Prentice Hall.
19.
Seifert, B., Morris, S. A., & Bartkus, B. R. (2003). Comparing big givers and small givers: Financial correlates of corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 45, 195-211.
20.
Simpson, W. G., & Kohers, T. (2002). The link between corporate social and financial performance: Evidence from the banking industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 35, 97-109.
21.
Snider, J., Hill, R. P., & Martin, D. (2003). Corporate social responsibility in the 21st century: A view from the world’s most successful firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 48, 175-187.
22.
Stevens, B. (1999). Persuasion, probity, and paltering: The Prudential crisis. Journal of Business Communication, 36, 319-334.
23.
Tyler, L. (1992). Ecological disaster and rhetorical response: Exxon’s communications in the wake of the Valdez spill. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 6, 149-171.
