This case study of a faculty strike examines the crisis response strategies of a university and its faculty union and the changing uses of technology to communicate to key stakeholders. An analysis of the types of crisis response strategies reveals that both the university and the faculty union used defensive and ingratiation strategies to build their cases and protect their reputations. The university also used denial to argue that the strike was not disrupting operations. The university and the union both relied on e-mails, Web sites, and press releases to update their constituencies. The difference was that for the union in particular, technology both expanded the options for sending information and accelerated the flow of information when conditions changed. The case study illustrates that technology has diminished an organization's control of crisis communication by opening numerous communication channels for others to use to explain their positions and build support.
American Federation of Labor-Congress of Industrial Organizations. (2006). Executive pay watch database. Retrieved September 10, 2007, from http://www.aflcio.org/corporatewatch/paywatch/ceou/database.cfm?tkr=GT&pg=4.
2.
Argenti, P.A. (2006). How technology has influenced the field of corporate communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication , 20(3), 357-370.
3.
Barker, R.T., & Horsley, J.S. (2002). Toward a synthesis model for crisis communication in the public sector. Journal of Business and Technical Communication , 16(4), 406-440.
4.
Barnett, V. (2003). The use of information technology in a strike . Journal of Labor Research, 24(1), 55-72.
5.
Chaison, G. (2005). The dark side of information technology for unions . WorkingUSA: The Journal of Labor and Society, 8(4), 395-402.
Coombs, W.T. (2004). Impact of past crises on current crisis communication: Insights from situational crisis communication theory. Journal of Business Communication, 41(3), 265-289.
8.
Coombs, W.T. (2006). Code red in the boardroom. Westport, CN: Praeger.
9.
Covello, V., Minamyer S., & Clayton, K. (2007). Effective risk and crisis communication during water security emergencies: Summary report of EPA sponsored message mapping workshops. Washington, DC: Office of Research and Development, National Homeland Security Research Center. Retrieved November 29, 2007, from http://www.epa.gov/nhsrc/pubs/reportCrisisCom040207.pdf
10.
Dezenhall, E., & Weber, J. (2007). Damage control-Why everything you know about crisis management is wrong. New York: Portfolio Hardcover.
11.
Eastern Michigan University. (2006a, September 11). Back to the classroom, back to the negotiating table [Press release]. Retrieved September 10, 2007, from http://www.emich.edu/univcomm/releases/091106strikesuspended.html .
12.
Eastern Michigan University. (2006b, September 3). EMU demands union put students first [Press release] . Retrieved September 10, 2007, from http:///www.emich.edu/univcomm/releases/090306strike.html
13.
Eastern Michigan University. (2006c, September 5). EMU terminates negotiations as AAUP refuses "last, best offer" [Press release]. Retrieved September 10, 2007, from http://www.emich.edu/univcomm/releases/090506bestoffer.html
14.
Eastern Michigan University (2006d, September 5). Update, Sept. 5, 2006, 10:30 p.m. [Web site update]. Retrieved September 10, 2007, from http://www.emich.edu/strikeinfo/
15.
Eastern Michigan University-American Association of University Professors. (2006a, September 11). EMU faculty putting students first [Web site posting]. Retrieved September 10, 2007, from http://www.emu-aaup.org/node/208
16.
Eastern Michigan University-American Association of University Professors. (2006b, September 8). EMU faculty strongly reaffirms strike support; administration rejects binding fact-finding [Website posting]. Retrieved September 10, 2007, from http://www.emu-aaup.org/node/200
17.
Eastern Michigan University-American Association of University Professors. (2006c, September 8). Negotiations status report & comparison of proposals [Website posting]. Retrieved September 10, 2007, from http://www.emu-aaup.org/node/199
Fink, S. (2000). Crisis management-Planning for the inevitable (Rev. ed.). Lincoln, NE: iUniverse, Inc.
20.
Fiorito, J. (2005). Perspectives. WorkingUSA: The Journal of Labor and Society, 8(4), 423-437.
21.
Gely, R., & Bierman, L. (2007). Social isolation and American workers: Employee blogging and legal reform. Harvard Journal of Law and Technology , 20(2), 288-331.
22.
Homel, M. (2006a, August 30). 08-30-2006 negotiations log [Blog posting]. Retrieved October 28, 2007, from http://www.emuprofessors.org/node/171
23.
Homel, M. (2006b, September 4). 09-04-2006 negotiations log [Blog posting]. Retrieved September 10, 2007, from http://www.emu-aaup.org/blog/2
24.
Homel, M. (2006c, September 5). 09-05-2006 negotiations log [Blog posting]. Retrieved November 4, 2007, from http://www.emuprofessors.org/node/192
25.
Lerbinger, O. (1997). The crisis manager: Facing risk and responsibility . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26.
Massey, J.E. (2001). Managing organizational legitimacy: Communication strategies for organizations in crisis. The Journal of Business Communication, 38(2), 153-183.
27.
Mitroff, I.I., & Anagnos, G. (2000). Managing crises before they happen: What every executive and manager needs to know about crisis management. New York: American Management Association.
28.
Nelson, C. (2006). Solidarity. Inside higher ed. Retrieved October 28, 2007, from http://insidehighered.com/views/2006/09/12/nelson
29.
Ness, I. (2005). Letter from the editor: Information technology and the future of unions. Journal of Labor and Society, 8, 377-381.
30.
Ogrizek, M., & Guillery, J.M. (1999). Communicating in crisis . New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
31.
Penrose, J.M. (2000). The role of perception in crisis planning. Public Relations Review, 26(2), 155-171.
32.
Pinock, S.R. (2005). Organizing virtual environments: National union deployment of the blog and new cyberstrategies. WorkingUSA: The Journal of Labor and Society, 8(4), 457-468.
33.
Pinsdorf, M.K. (1987). Communicating when your company is under siege: Surviving public crisis. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.
34.
Ray, S.J. (1999). Strategic communication in crisis management: Lessons from the airline industry. Westport, CT: Quorum.
35.
Regster, M., & Larkin, J. (2002). Risk issues and crisis management (2nd ed.). London: Kogan Page.
36.
Santora, T.A. (2002). The virtual union hall. In A. B. Shostak (Ed.), Cyber union handbook (pp. 180-181). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
37.
Schultz, M. (2006a, September 7). EMU classes hit-or-miss, thanks to strike. The Detroit News, p. 10A.
38.
Schultz, M. (2006b, August 31). EMU faculty may strike at midnight . The Detroit News, p. 1B.
39.
Shostak, A.B. (2001). Tomorrow's cyber unions: A new path to renewal and growth. WorkingUSA, The Journal of Labor and Society, 5(2), 82-105.
40.
Shostak, A.B. (2002). Today's unions as tomorrow's cyberunions: Labor's newest hope. Journal of Labor Research, 23(2), 237-248.
41.
Shostak, A.B. (2005). On the state of cyberunionism: An American progress report. WorkingUSA: The Journal of Labor and Society, 8(4), 403-421.
42.
Smith, D., & Elliot, D. (2006). Key readings in crisis management: Systems and structures for prevention and recovery. New York: Routledge.
43.
Stephens, K.K., Malone, P.C., & Bailey, C.M. (2005). Communicating with stakeholders during a crisis . Journal of Business Communication, 42, 390-419.
44.
Stevens, C.D., & Greer, C.R. (2005). E-voice, the Internet, and life within unions: Riding the learning curve. WorkingUSA: The Journal of Labor and Society, 8(4), 439-455.
45.
Suchman, M.C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610.
46.
United Steelworkers. (n.d.). Solidarity express [Web site]. Retrieved February 20, 2008, from http://www.gkdsolidarityexpress.org/
47.
Yin, R.K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
