Structure and properties of flexible polyurethane foams with nano- and micro-fillers

Abstract

The feasibility of using mineral nano- and micro-fillers as replacement of copolymer polyols in flexible foams was examined. Nano-fillers were nano-clays, a natural montmorillonite (Cloisite Na⁺) and montmorillonite modified with an organic quaternary ammonium salt (Cloisite 10A), and nano-silica dispersed in methylethylketone. Micro-fillers were micronized clay and silica. Flexible foams were prepared from the ethylene oxide caped polyether triol and toluene diisocyanate with water as the chemical blowing agent. All foams had good morphology except those with nano-clay. The open cell content was above 95%, but air flow was very low in all samples. Micro-fillers did not significantly change cell structure and morphology of hard domains. They moderately increased density, hardness, compression strength, and compression set and decreased elongation at break. The other properties were not affected. Cloisite Na⁺ (non-treated montmorillonite) and nano-silica with a hydrophilic surface increased hardness, compression strength, and rebound resilience of the foams, whereas Nano-clay 10A (surface-treated montmorillonite) decreased the modulus, hardness, and compression strength. Tensile and tear strengths decreased with the addition of nano-clay fillers, but increased with nano-silica.

Keywords

polyurethane foams nanoparticles silicas clay

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Komori Y. and Kuroda K. Layered silicate-polymer intercalation compounds. In: Pinnavaia TJ and Beall GW (eds) Polymer-clay nanocomposites. New York, USA: Wiley Series in Polymer Science, 2000, pp.3-18.

Herrington R. , Turner R. and Lidy W. Flexible foam fundamentals. In: Herrington R and Hock K (eds) Flexible polyurethane foams. Freeport, USA: The Dow Chemical Company, 1997, pp.3.1-3.57.

Bailey FE Flexible polyurethane foams. In: Klempner D and Frisch K (eds) Handbook of polymeric foams and foams technology. New York , USA: Hanser Publishers, 1991, pp.47-71.

Kaushiva BD Influence of diethanolamine (DEOA) on structure-property behavior of molded flexible polyurethane foams. In: Structure-property relationships of flexible polyurethane foams. PhD thesis. Blacksburg , USA: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University , 1999, pp.35-59.

Rightor EG , Urquhart SG , Hitchcock AP , et al. Identification and quantitation of urea precipitates in flexible polyurethane foam formulations by X-ray spectromicroscopy. Macromolecules 2002; 35: 5873-5882.

Cao X. , Lee J. , Widya T. and Macosko CW Structure and properties of polyurethane/clay nanocomposites and foams. SPE ANTEC Tech Pap 2004; 62: 1896-1900.

Javni I. , Zhang W. , Karajkov V. , Petrovic ZS and Divjakovic VJ Effect of nano- and micro-silica fillers on polyurethane foam properties. J Cell Plast 2002; 38: 229-239.

Petrovic ć ZS , Javni I. , Waddon A. and Banhegyi G. Structure and properties of polyurethane-silica nanocomposites. J Appl Polym Sci 2000; 76: 133-151.

Finnigan B. , Jack K. , Campbell K. , et al. Segmented polyurethane nanocomposites: Impact of controlled particle size nanofillers on the morphological response to uniaxial deformation . Macromolecules 2005; 38: 7386-7396.

10.

Koerner H. , Liu W. , Alexander M. , Mirau P. , Dowty H. and Vaia RA Deformation-morphology correlations in electrically conductive carbon nanotube-thermoplastic polyurethane nanocomposites. Polymer 2005; 46: 4405-4420.

11.

Modesti M. , Lorenzetti A. and Besco S. Influence of nanofillers on thermal insulating properties of polyurethane nanocomposites foams. Polym Eng Sci 47: 1351-1358.

12.

Cao X. , Lee LJ , Widya T. and Macosko CW Polyurethane/clay nanocomposites foams: processing, structure and properties . Polymer 2005; 46: 775-783.

13.

Widya T. and Macosko CW Nanoclay-modified rigid poly-urethane foam. Int J Macromol Sci, Phys 2005; 44: 897-908.

14.

Krishnamurthi B. , Bharadwaj-Somaskandan S. and Shutov F. Nano- and micro-fillers for polyurethane foams: effect on density and mechanical properties. Proc Polyurethanes EXPO 2001; 42: 239-244.

15.

Finnigan B. , Casey P. , Cookson D. , et al. Impact of controlled particle size nanofillers on the mechanical properties of segmented polyurethane nanocomposites . Int J Nanotechnol 2007; 4: 496-515.

16.

Paik Sung CS , Smith TW and Sung NH Properties of segmented polyether poly(urethaneureas) based of 2,4-toluene diisocyanate. 2. Infrared and mechanical studies. Macromolecules 1980; 13: 117-121.

17.

Yontz DJ , Hsu SL , Lidy WA , Gier DR and Mazor MH Direct observation of morphological differences as a function of reaction temperature in model systems for polyurethane foams. J Polym Sci, Part B: Polym Phys 1998; 36: 3065-3077.

18.

Kwon OJ , Oh ST , Lee SD , Lee NR , Shin CH and Park JS Hydrophilic and flexible polyurethane foams using sodium alginate as polyol: effects of PEG molecular weight and cross-linking agent content on water absorbency . Fibers Polym 2007; 8: 347-355.

19.

Lee HS , Wang YK and Hsu SL Spectroscopic analysis of phase separation behavior of model polyurethanes . Macromolecules 1987; 20: 2089-2095.

20.

Pattanayak A. and Jana SC Polyurethane-clay nanocomposites via bulk polymerization methods. SPE ANTEC Tech Pap 2004; 62: 1962-1966.

21.

Toth R. , Voorn DJ , Handgraaf JW , et al. Multiscale computer simulation studies of water-based montmorillonite/poly(ethylene oxide) nanocomposites. Macromolecules 2009 ; 42: 8260-8270.

22.

Parnell SR TPU/nanoclay composites produced via reactive extrusion. SPE ANTEC Tech Pap 2006; 64: 2077-2081.