Nanocomposite sponges or foams have been established as three dimensional progressive nanomaterials. This review article fundamentally précises the design and advancements in the field of essential three-dimensional nanocomposite nanostructures. The nanocomposite sponges of nanocarbons or carbonaceous nanoparticles (graphene, carbon nanotube, etc.) as well as inorganic nanoparticles have been fabricated using facile practices such as hydrothermal, freeze-drying, infiltration, hot pressing, foaming, and others. Particularly, literature reports on the combination of nanoparticles mostly with thermoplastic polymeric matrices (polyurethane, poly (vinyl alcohol), polycaprolactone), thermoset (epoxy), and conducting polymers to form efficient nanocomposite sponges. Consequently, high performance nanocellular sponges have been developed with hierarchical nanostructure, fine nanofiller scattering, interface formation, and matrix-nanofiller interactions. Ensuing nanocomposite sponges revealed exclusive shape memory responses in addition to indispensable structural and physical features (high surface area, flexibility, porosity, conductivity, heat, and mechanical robustness). These emergent stimuli responsive cellular materials exposed high-tech potential towards supercapacitors, sensors, and electromagnetic interference shielding devices/materials. Here, shape memory nanocomposite sponges own various merits, like low density, flexibility, reversible deformability, sustainability, and external stimuli regulated device functioning, relative to traditional planar structured energy/electronic devices. In this way, the shape memory properties have further enhanced the marvelous characteristics of high performance nanocomposite sponges. Above all, using shape memory nanocomposite sponge based energy/electronic devices own next level potential of extended life spans and high performance relying upon key factors, like reversible structural deformations, revocable fatigue, and easily recoverable cracks/damages, as compared to traditional non-responsive nanomaterials.
GaidhaniATribeLCharpentierP. Polystyrene carbon composite foam with enhanced insulation and fire retardancy for a sustainable future: critical review. J Cell Plast2023; 59: 0021955X231215753.
2.
HeMHuS. A strategy for extending the processing temperature for polypropylene in foam extrusion and its theoretical validation. J Cell Plast2023; 59: 0021955X221144705.
3.
KuhnigkJStandauTDörrD, et al.Progress in the development of bead foams–a review. J Cell Plast2022; 58(4): 707–735.
4.
GaballahSEl-NagarMEAbdel-MaksoudG, et al.Presenting shape memory polymers SMP and some reinforcement materials for gaps filling in archaeological bones. Egypt J Chem2021; 64(7): 3605.
5.
SalimianSZadhoushANaeimiradM, et al.A review on aerogel: 3D nanoporous structured fillers in polymer‐based nanocomposites. Polym Compos2018; 39(10): 3383–3408.
6.
WanCJiaoYWeiS, et al.Functional nanocomposites from sustainable regenerated cellulose aerogels: a review. Chem Eng J2019; 359: 459–475.
7.
SánchezCPJérômeCNoelsL, et al.Review of thermoresponsive electroactive and magnetoactive shape memory polymer nanocomposites. ACS Omega2022; 7(45): 40701–40723.
8.
WeiCZhangQWangZ, et al.Recent advances in MXene‐based aerogels: fabrication, performance and application. Adv Funct Mater2023; 33(9): 2211889.
9.
OuyangTTangWLeiW, et al.Tribological and friction-induced vibration behaviors of inorganic fullerene-like tungsten disulfide and three-dimensional graphene as lubricant additives. J Tribol2023; 145(3): 031701.
10.
RahmanMAYagyuJIslamMS, et al.Three-dimensional sulfonated graphene oxide proton exchange membranes for fuel cells. ACS Appl Nano Mater2023.
11.
KhanHRKhanFSAhmedS, et al.Smart nanomaterials and three-dimensional printing for flexible solar cell applications. In: Smart Multifunctional Nano-Inks. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier science. 2023.
12.
GaoHDuanH. 2D and 3D graphene materials: preparation and bioelectrochemical applications. Biosens Bioelectron2015; 65: 404–419.
13.
QinL-CZhaoXHiraharaK, et al.The smallest carbon nanotube. Nature2000; 408(6808): 50.
14.
TianBHuangZXuX, et al.Three-dimensional Ag/carbon nanotube-graphene foam for high performance dendrite free lithium/sodium metal anodes. J Mater Sci Technol2023; 132: 50–58.
15.
ShaoGHanaorDAShenX, et al.Freeze casting: from low‐dimensional building blocks to aligned porous structures—a review of novel materials, methods, and applications. Adv Mater2020; 32(17): 1907176.
16.
XueFQiX-DHuangT, et al.Preparation and application of three-dimensional filler network towards organic phase change materials with high performance and multi-functions. Chem Eng J2021; 419: 129620.
17.
ChenLZhangYLiuW, et al.Graphene nanoarchitectonics: a new material horizon for reinforcement of sustainable polymers. Frontiers in Materials2020; 7: 276.
18.
JiangDChenYLiN, et al.Synthesis of luminescent graphene quantum dots with high quantum yield and their toxicity study. PLoS One2015; 10(12): e0144906.
19.
LinSQinYHuangX, et al.Use of pre-charred surfaces to improve fire performance of wood. Fire Saf J2023; 136: 103745.
20.
ZhuZLinPWangH, et al.A facile one-step synthesis of highly efficient melamine salt reactive flame retardant for epoxy resin. J Mater Sci2020; 55(27): 12836–12847.
21.
LanDZhouHWuH. A polymer sponge with dual absorption of mechanical and electromagnetic energy. J Colloid Interface Sci2023; 633: 92–101.
22.
YangW-JWeiC-XYuenACY, et al.Fire-retarded nanocomposite aerogels for multifunctional applications: a review. Compos B Eng2022; 237: 109866.
23.
OuyangYSongLZhaoX, et al.3D flexible superhydrophobic polyphosphazene coated melamine sponge for oil–water separation. Separation and Purification Technology2023; 306: 122600.
24.
ChuZFengYXuT, et al.Magnetic, self–heating and superhydrophobic sponge for solar–driven high–viscosity oil–water separation. J Hazard Mater2023; 445: 130553.
25.
FangYLiL-YMawulé DassekpoJB, et al.Heat transfer modelling of carbon nanotube reinforced composites. Compos B Eng2021; 225: 109280.
26.
CheongJYBenkerLZhuJ, et al.Generalized and feasible strategy to prepare ultra-porous, low density, compressible carbon nanoparticle sponges. Carbon2019; 154: 363–369.
27.
RecupidoFLamaGCAmmendolaM, et al.Rigid composite bio-based polyurethane foams: from synthesis to LCA analysis. Polymer2023; 267: 125674.
28.
ZhangHShiTMaA. Recent Advances in design and preparation of polymer-based thermal management material. Polymers2021; 13(16): 2797.
EyssaHMAfifiMMoustafaH. Improvement of the acoustic and mechanical properties of sponge ethylene propylene diene rubber/carbon nanotube composites crosslinked by subsequent sulfur and electron beam irradiation. Polym Int2023; 72(1): 87–98.
31.
ZhangZMuZWangY, et al.Lightweight structural biomaterials with excellent mechanical performance: a review. Biomimetics2023; 8(2): 153.
32.
LiuSQinSJiangY, et al.Lightweight high-performance carbon-polymer nanocomposites for electromagnetic interference shielding. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2021; 145: 106376.
33.
CaoHYeLJinY, et al.Structural heterogeneity and evolution in ultrahigh-filled polypropylene/flake graphite composites during injection molding. Compos Sci Technol2022; 227: 109590.
34.
LiuSDuvigneauJVancsoGJ. Nanocellular polymer foams as promising high performance thermal insulation materials. Eur Polym J2015; 65: 33–45.
35.
HassanAMAl-ShalabiEWAlameriW, et al.Manifestations of surfactant-polymer flooding for successful field applications in carbonates under harsh conditions: a comprehensive review. J Petrol Sci Eng2023; 220: 111243.
36.
AkhilURadhikaNSalehB, et al. A comprehensive review on plant‐based natural fiber reinforced polymer composites: fabrication, properties, and applications. Polym Compos. 2023; 44: 2598–2633.
37.
EyssaHEl RefayHMSanadM. Enhancement of the thermal and physicochemical properties of styrene butadiene rubber composite foam using nanoparticle fillers and electron beam radiation. Radiochim Acta2022; 110(3): 205–218.
38.
ZuruziASHaffizTMAffidahD, et al.Towards wearable pressure sensors using multiwall carbon nanotube/polydimethylsiloxane nanocomposite foams. Mater Des2017; 132: 449–458.
39.
Yousefi BonabSSKouzehgarHTaghizadeh TabriziA, et al.Assessment of the effect of electrophoretic deposition parameters on hydrogen storage performance of graphene oxide layer applied on nickel foam. Int J Hydrogen Energy2022; 47(4): 2491–2499.
40.
Panahi-SarmadMNorooziMAbrishamM, et al.A comprehensive review on carbon-based polymer nanocomposite foams as electromagnetic interference shields and piezoresistive sensors. ACS Appl Electron Mater2020; 2(8): 2318–2350.
41.
BarbarosIYangYSafaeiB, et al.State-of-the-art review of fabrication, application, and mechanical properties of functionally graded porous nanocomposite materials. Nanotechnol Rev2022; 11(1): 321–371.
42.
XieMHeJLiX, et al.Ammonium polyphosphate/montmorillonite nanocomposite with a completely exfoliated structure and charring–foaming agent flame retardant thermoplastic polyurethane. Mater Sci Eng, B2022; 283: 115825.
43.
SharmaAKokilGRHeY, et al.Inorganic/organic combination: inorganic particles/polymer composites for tissue engineering applications. Bioact Mater2023; 24: 535–550.
44.
ShalimovATashkinovM. Numerical analysis of the mechanical response of two-phase nanocomposites consisting of nanoporous gold and polymer. Materials2022; 15(4): 1574.
45.
NiWWuHBWangB, et al.One‐pot synthesis of ultra‐light nickel nanofoams composed of nanowires and their transformation into various functional nanofoams. Small2012; 8(22): 3432–3437.
46.
MitchellSTFreseNGölzhäuserA, et al.Ultralight carbon nanofoam from naphtalene-mediated hydrothermal sucrose carbonization. Carbon2015; 95: 434–441.
47.
LuAHHaoGPSunQ, et al.Chemical synthesis of carbon materials with intriguing nanostructure and morphology. Macromol Chem Phys2012; 213(10‐11): 1107–1131.
48.
BłaszczyńskiTŚlosarczykAMorawskiM. Synthesis of silica aerogel by supercritical drying method. Procedia Eng2013; 57: 200–206.
49.
Abdul MujeebuMAshrafNAlsuwayighAH. Effect of nano vacuum insulation panel and nanogel glazing on the energy performance of office building. Appl Energy2016; 173: 141–151.
50.
ThapliyalPCSinghK. Aerogels as promising thermal insulating materials: an overview. J Mater2014; 2014: 1–10.
51.
BerardiU. The development of a monolithic aerogel glazed window for an energy retrofitting project. Appl Energy2015; 154: 603–615.
52.
FanXChenXDaiL. 3D graphene based materials for energy storage. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci2015; 20(5-6): 429–438.
53.
YaoHZhangGZhangF, et al.A novel Ni Coordination Supramolecular Network hybrid monolith of 3D graphene as electrode materials for supercapacitors. Mater Today Energy2017; 6: 164–172.
54.
TangWPengLYuanC, et al.Facile synthesis of 3D reduced graphene oxide and its polyaniline composite for super capacitor application. Synth Met2015; 202: 140–146.
55.
GuoFZhengXLiangC, et al.Millisecond response of shape memory polymer nanocomposite aerogel powered by stretchable graphene framework. ACS Nano2019; 13(5): 5549–5558.
56.
ChenTShiPZhangJ, et al.Natural polymer konjac glucomannan mediated assembly of graphene oxide as versatile sponges for water pollution control. Carbohydr Polym2018; 202: 425–433.
57.
QuanKLiGTaoL, et al.Diaminopropionic acid reinforced graphene sponge and its use for hemostasis. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2016; 8(12): 7666–7673.
58.
YeSFengJWuP. Highly elastic graphene oxide–epoxy composite aerogels via simple freeze-drying and subsequent routine curing. J Mater Chem A Mater2013; 1(10): 3495–3502.
59.
YangWWangN-NPingP, et al.Novel 3D network architectured hybrid aerogel comprising epoxy, graphene, and hydroxylated boron nitride nanosheets. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2018; 10(46): 40032–40043.
60.
ChuC-CWhiteKLLiuP, et al.Electrical conductivity and thermal stability of polypropylene containing well-dispersed multi-walled carbon nanotubes disentangled with exfoliated nanoplatelets. Carbon2012; 50(12): 4711–4721.
61.
GhoshSKDasTKGangulyS, et al.Carbon nanotubes and carbon nanofibers based co-continuous thermoplastic elastomeric blend composites for efficient microwave shielding and thermal management. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2022; 161: 107118.
62.
HuXZhuCWuH, et al.Large-scale preparation of flexible phase change composites with synergistically enhanced thermally conductive network for efficient low-grade thermal energy recovery and utilization. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2022; 154: 106770.
63.
YadavPGuptaSMSharmaS. A review on stabilization of carbon nanotube nanofluid. J Therm Anal Calorim2022; 147(12): 6537–6561.
QiaoLDuK. Scalable production of high-quality carbon nanotube dispersion in aqueous solution using cellulose as dispersant by a freezing/thawing process. J Colloid Interface Sci2022; 623: 1200–1209.
66.
KlimmWKwokK. Computational analysis of tunneling conduction in piezoresistive carbon nanotube polymer composites. J Intell Mater Syst Struct2022; 34: 1045389X221128575.
TamersitKKouzouABouroubaH, et al.Synergy of electrostatic and chemical doping to improve the performance of junctionless carbon nanotube tunneling field-effect transistors: ultrascaling, energy-efficiency, and high switching performance. Nanomaterials2022; 12(3): 462.
69.
MaJYuanJMingW, et al.Non-traditional processing of carbon nanotubes: a review. Alex Eng J2022; 61(1): 597–617.
70.
GongJTangWXiaL, et al.Flexible and weavable 3D porous graphene/PPy/lignocellulose-based versatile fibrous wearables for thermal management and strain sensing. Chem Eng J2023; 452: 139338.
71.
LiLJiaGHuangW, et al.Multi-responsive soft actuator with integrated ultrasensitive sensing performances for human motion detection and soft robots. Sensor Actuator Phys2023; 351: 114149.
72.
ZhangWWeiXZhangX, et al.Well-dispersed Prussian blue analogues connected with carbon nanotubes for efficient capacitive deionization process. Separation and Purification Technology2022; 287: 120483.
73.
XuHLiYWangR. Pore-rich iron-nitrogen-doped carbon nanofoam as an efficient catalyst towards the oxygen reduction reaction. Int J Hydrogen Energy2019; 44(48): 26285–26295.
74.
DeBlockRHKoJSSassinMB, et al.Carbon nanofoam paper enables high-rate and high-capacity Na-ion storage. Energy Storage Mater2019; 21: 481–486.
75.
ChandrasekaranSCampbellPGBaumannTF, et al.Carbon aerogel evolution: allotrope, graphene-inspired, and 3D-printed aerogels. J Mater Res2017; 32(22): 4166–4185.
76.
TučekJBłońskiPUgolottiJ, et al.Emerging chemical strategies for imprinting magnetism in graphene and related 2D materials for spintronic and biomedical applications. Chem Soc Rev2018; 47(11): 3899–3990.
77.
ZhouGZhangHXuS, et al.Fast triggering of shape memory polymers using an embedded carbon nanotube sponge network. Sci Rep2016; 6(1): 24148.
78.
WangJLuoJKunkelR, et al.Development of shape memory polymer nanocomposite foam for treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Mater Lett2019; 250: 38–41.
79.
GuiXLiHZhangL, et al.A facile route to isotropic conductive nanocomposites by direct polymer infiltration of carbon nanotube sponges. ACS Nano2011; 5(6): 4276–4283.
80.
ZhouGZhangHXuS, et al.Fast triggering of shape memory polymers using an embedded carbon nanotube sponge network. Sci Rep2016; 6(1): 24148.
81.
DattaSHenryTCSliozbergYR, et al.Carbon nanotube enhanced shape memory epoxy for improved mechanical properties and electroactive shape recovery. Polymer2021; 212: 123158.
82.
PengQWeiHQinY, et al.Shape-memory polymer nanocomposites with a 3D conductive network for bidirectional actuation and locomotion application. Nanoscale2016; 8(42): 18042–18049.
83.
SharmaSSharmaAVishwakarmaP, et al.A theoretical framework representing seminal fire detection system design using shape memory polymer embedded with carbon nanotubes sponge. Mater Today Proc2021; 44: 1617–1620.
84.
BrownJEMoreauJEBermanAM, et al.Shape memory silk protein sponges for minimally invasive tissue regeneration. Adv Healthcare Mater2017; 6(2): 1600762.
AgarwalPChopraMArcherLA. Nanoparticle netpoints for shape‐memory polymers. Angew Chem2011; 123(37): 8829–8832.
87.
XuJSongJ. High performance shape memory polymer networks based on rigid nanoparticle cores. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A2010; 107(17): 7652–7657.
88.
AntonyGJMBhavyaBRajaS, et al.Solvent casting-assisted synthesis of thermally responsive shape memory polymer and its composites. Polym Bull2022; 80: 12211–12232.
89.
Correia ACO. Shape memory chitosan-based scaffolds for biomedical applications. Portugal: Universidade do Minho, 2013.
90.
LiuPChenWBaiS, et al.Fabrication of an ultralight flame-induced high conductivity hybrid sponge based on poly (vinyl alcohol)/silver nitrate composite. Mater Des2018; 139: 96–103.
91.
ChenH. Fabrication of polymer/metal composite micro/nano array structures and the applications in biological interfaces and actuators. In: 2021 IEEE 16th international conference on nano/micro engineered and molecular systems (NEMS). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 2021.
92.
FalsafiSRTopuzFBajerD, et al.Metal nanoparticles and carbohydrate polymers team up to improve biomedical outcomes. Biomed Pharmacother2023; 168: 115695.
93.
MahmoodzadehAValizadehNEdalatiM, et al.Robust adhesive nanocomposite sponge composed of citric acid and nano clays modified cellulose for rapid hemostasis of lethal non-compressible hemorrhage. Carbohydr Polym2023; 326: 121614.
94.
PhadtareVDParaleVGLeeK-Y, et al.Polymer-incorporated MXene aerogels: synthesis, classification, and properties. Polym Rev2024; 64: 761–817.
95.
YangW-JWeiC-XYuenACY, et al.Fire-retarded nanocomposite aerogels for multifunctional applications: a review. Compos B Eng2022; 237: 109866.
96.
WangN-NWangHWangY-Y, et al.Robust, lightweight, hydrophobic, and fire-retarded polyimide/MXene aerogels for effective oil/water separation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2019; 11(43): 40512–40523.
97.
WangLSongPLinC-T, et al. 3D shapeable, superior electrically conductive cellulose nanofibers/Ti3C2Tx MXene aerogels/epoxy nanocomposites for promising EMI shielding. Research. 2020. DOI: 10.34133/2020/4093732.
98.
WangLZhangMYangB, et al.Highly compressible, thermally stable, light-weight, and robust aramid nanofibers/Ti3AlC2 MXene composite aerogel for sensitive pressure sensor. ACS Nano2020; 14(8): 10633–10647.
99.
HusainZShakeelur RahemanARAnsariKB, et al.Nano-sized mesoporous biochar derived from biomass pyrolysis as electrochemical energy storage supercapacitor. Materials Science for Energy Technologies2022; 5: 99–109.
100.
VermaSPadhaBMahajanP, et al.Effect of electrolyte on the performance of supercapacitors. ECS Trans2022; 107(1): 10821–10829.
101.
ChenCMenLLiuA, et al.Enhanced electrochemical and capacitive deionization performances of single-layer graphene oxide/nitrogen-doped porous carbon/activated carbon fiber composite electrodes. J Environ Chem Eng2022; 10(6): 108696.
102.
HarussaniMSapuanSNadeemG, et al.Recent applications of carbon-based composites in defence industry: a review. Defence Technology2022; 18: 1281–1300.
103.
MoFZhangHWangY, et al.Heteroatom-doped hierarchical porous carbon for high performance flexible all-solid-state symmetric supercapacitors. J Energy Storage2022; 49: 104122.
104.
KumarRThangappanR. Electrode material based on reduced graphene oxide (rGO)/Transition metal oxide composites for supercapacitor applications: a review. Emergent Mater2022; 5: 1881–1897.
105.
Buldu-AkturkMToufaniMTufaniA, et al.ZnO and reduced graphene oxide electrodes for all-in-one supercapacitor devices. Nanoscale2022; 14(8): 3269–3278.
106.
WanLDuCYangS. Synthesis of graphene oxide/polybenzoxazine-based nitrogen-containing porous carbon nanocomposite for enhanced supercapacitor properties. Electrochim Acta2017; 251: 12–24.
107.
XuJTanZZengW, et al.A hierarchical carbon derived from sponge‐templated activation of graphene oxide for high‐performance supercapacitor electrodes. Adv Mater2016; 28(26): 5222–5228.
108.
WangMYangJLiuS, et al.Nitrogen-doped hierarchically porous carbon nanosheets derived from polymer/graphene oxide hydrogels for high-performance supercapacitors. J Colloid Interface Sci2020; 560: 69–76.
109.
GaoSDingJWangW, et al.MXene based flexible composite phase change material with shape memory, self-healing and flame retardant for thermal management. Compos Sci Technol2023; 234: 109945.
110.
XuXSkellyJDSongJ. Chemically crosslinked amphiphilic degradable shape memory polymer nanocomposites with readily tuned physical, mechanical, and biological properties. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2023; 15: 2693–2704.
QinYChenYZhangX, et al.Ionic conductive, antidrying, and flexible organohydrogels suitable for pressure sensors and gas sensors. ACS Appl Electron Mater2023; 5: 2758–2768.
113.
AdohiBBrosseauCLaurV, et al.Graphene and temperature controlled butterfly shape in permittivity-field loops of ferroelectric polymer nanocomposites. Appl Phys Lett2017; 110(2): 022902.
114.
ChenHZhuoFZhouJ, et al.Advances in graphene-based flexible and wearable strain sensors. Chem Eng J2023; 464: 142576.
115.
BolandCSKhanURyanG, et al.Sensitive electromechanical sensors using viscoelastic graphene-polymer nanocomposites. Science2016; 354(6317): 1257–1260.
116.
ZareiMLeeGLeeSG, et al.Advances in biodegradable electronic skin: material progress and recent applications in sensing, robotics, and human–machine interfaces. Adv Mater2023; 35(4): 2203193.
117.
EkunROJonathanEMEmmanuelOI, et al.An overview of graphene-based nanomaterials in electronic skin biosensing. In: TMS 2023 152nd annual meeting & exhibition supplemental proceedings. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2023.
118.
HuHZhaoZWanW, et al.Polymer/graphene hybrid aerogel with high compressibility, conductivity, and “sticky” superhydrophobicity. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2014; 6(5): 3242–3249.
YaoHBGeJWangCF, et al.A flexible and highly pressure‐sensitive graphene–polyurethane sponge based on fractured microstructure design. Adv Mater2013; 25(46): 6692–6698.
121.
ZhangB-XHouZ-LYanW, et al.Multi-dimensional flexible reduced graphene oxide/polymer sponges for multiple forms of strain sensors. Carbon2017; 125: 199–206.
122.
ZhouJLiHLiuW, et al.A facile method to fabricate polyurethane based graphene foams/epoxy/carbon nanotubes composite for electro-active shape memory application. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2016; 91: 292–300.
123.
BalmoriA. Electromagnetic radiation as an emerging driver factor for the decline of insects. Sci Total Environ2021; 767: 144913.
124.
ÖnderANGüven YıldırımE. Environmental Problems. Different perspectives on environmental. Konya, Turkey: ISRES Publishing, 2021, pp. 306–338.
125.
SinghRLSinghPK. Global environmental problems. Principles and applications of environmental biotechnology for a sustainable future. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2017, pp. 13–41.
126.
RyuSHHanYKKwonSJ, et al.Absorption-dominant, low reflection EMI shielding materials with integrated metal mesh/TPU/CIP composite. Chem Eng J2022; 428: 131167.
127.
RavindrenRMondalSNathK, et al.Investigation of electrical conductivity and electromagnetic interference shielding effectiveness of preferentially distributed conductive filler in highly flexible polymer blends nanocomposites. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2019; 118: 75–89.
128.
MaLWeiLHamidinejadM, et al.Layered polymer composite foams for broadband ultra-low reflectance EMI shielding: a computationally guided fabrication approach. Mater Horiz2023; 10(10): 4423–4437.
129.
MaLHamidinejadMWeiL, et al.Absorption-dominant EMI shielding polymer composite foams: microstructure and geometry optimization. Materials Today Physics2023; 30: 100940.
130.
ZhangLChenDJinB, et al.Ultrahigh electromagnetic wave transmitting polyphenylene sulfide microcellular foams based on molecular structure design for 5G communication. Ind Eng Chem Res2023; 62(14): 5850–5863.
131.
KausarA. A review of fundamental principles and applications of polymer nanocomposites filled with both nanoclay and nano-sized carbon allotropes–graphene and carbon nanotubes. J Plast Film Sheeting2020; 36(2): 209–228.
132.
GhanemiRMousaviSRQewamiS, et al.Extrusion foaming of multiphasic polyethylene/ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer/carbon nanotube mixtures: tailoring foam properties by selective localization of nanoparticles. J Cell Plast2023; 59(5-6): 337–359.
133.
XuMWeiLMaL, et al.Microcellular foamed polyamide 6/carbon nanotube composites with superior electromagnetic wave absorption. J Mater Sci Technol2022; 117: 215–224.
134.
HamidinejadSMChuRKZhaoB, et al.Enhanced thermal conductivity of graphene nanoplatelet–polymer nanocomposites fabricated via supercritical fluid-assisted in situ exfoliation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2018; 10(1): 1225–1236.
135.
LuDMoZLiangB, et al.Flexible, lightweight carbon nanotube sponges and composites for high-performance electromagnetic interference shielding. Carbon2018; 133: 457–463.
136.
HuZJiXLiB, et al.A self-assembled graphene/polyurethane sponge for excellent electromagnetic interference shielding performance. RSC Adv2019; 9(44): 25829–25835.
137.
JiangQLiaoXLiJ, et al.Flexible thermoplastic polyurethane/reduced graphene oxide composite foams for electromagnetic interference shielding with high absorption characteristic. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2019; 123: 310–319.
138.
LiYShenBYiD, et al.The influence of gradient and sandwich configurations on the electromagnetic interference shielding performance of multilayered thermoplastic polyurethane/graphene composite foams. Compos Sci Technol2017; 138: 209–216.
139.
CaoLZhengYXueQ, et al.Covalent grafting of PMMA organic film on porous silicon for achieving ultralow-k organic films. ACS Appl Electron Mater2022; 4(12): 6047–6057.
140.
RathikaGSubaVLakshmiDS, et al.Exploring the biosynthesized metal nanoparticles for their catalytic degradation of toxic water wastes and antimicrobial potential. J Inorg Organomet Polym Mater2022; 32: 3153–3169.
141.
ZhaoBHamidinejadMZhaoC, et al.A versatile foaming platform to fabricate polymer/carbon composites with high dielectric permittivity and ultra-low dielectric loss. J Mater Chem A Mater2019; 7(1): 133–140.
142.
LiCLiZYeX, et al.Crosslinking-induced spontaneous growth: a novel strategy for synthesizing sandwich-type graphene@ Fe3O4 dots/amorphous carbon with high lithium storage performance. Chem Eng J2018; 334: 1614–1620.
143.
YuW-CZhangG-QLiuY-H, et al.Selective electromagnetic interference shielding performance and superior mechanical strength of conductive polymer composites with oriented segregated conductive networks. Chem Eng J2019; 373: 556–564.
144.
WangGLiaoXYangJ, et al.Frequency-selective and tunable electromagnetic shielding effectiveness via the sandwich structure of silicone rubber/graphene composite. Compos Sci Technol2019; 184: 107847.
145.
YuXWangBGongD, et al.Graphene nanoribbons on highly porous 3D graphene for high‐capacity and ultrastable Al‐ion batteries. Adv Mater2017; 29(4): 1604118.
146.
FanXPengZYeR, et al.M3C (M: Fe, Co, Ni) nanocrystals encased in graphene nanoribbons: an active and stable bifunctional electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction and hydrogen evolution reactions. ACS Nano2015; 9(7): 7407–7418.
147.
DuttaSKimJIdeY, et al.3D network of cellulose-based energy storage devices and related emerging applications. Mater Horiz2017; 4(4): 522–545.
148.
YeSFengJ. Self-assembled three-dimensional hierarchical graphene/polypyrrole nanotube hybrid aerogel and its application for supercapacitors. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2014; 6(12): 9671–9679.
149.
YuMMaYLiuJ, et al.Polyaniline nanocone arrays synthesized on three-dimensional graphene network by electrodeposition for supercapacitor electrodes. Carbon2015; 87: 98–105.
150.
ZhaoSYanYGaoA, et al.Flexible polydimethylsilane nanocomposites enhanced with a three-dimensional graphene/carbon nanotube bicontinuous framework for high-performance electromagnetic interference shielding. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2018; 10(31): 26723–26732.
151.
DegirmenciUKircaM. Reverse non-equilibrium molecular dynamics simulations on the thermal conductivity of three-dimensional graphene nano-ribbon foams. J Phys Chem Solid2020; 136: 109130.
