Fiber Orientation Effects on High Strain Rate Properties of Graphite/Epoxy Composites

Abstract

Excellent mechanical properties such as high-strength, low weight, fatigue life, and impact resistance, as well as advanced manufacturing methods and flexibility of the stacking sequence make polymer matrix composites attractive candidates for use in several performance-oriented structures. However, relatively little is known of their response to impact loading, which usually occurs at strain rates higher than those used to measure the quasi-static mechanical properties of materials. In this study, the split-Hopkinson bar is used extensively to study the effect of fiber orientation on the compressive dynamic properties of a unidirectional IM7/8551-7 graphite/epoxy composite. The specimens were approximately 3/8. cubes, and were prepared using a water-cooled diamond grit blade. The off-axis angles were 0 (longitudinal direction), 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, and 90 (transverse direction) degrees. Quasi-static tests were also performed for comparison purposes. The high strain rates vary from 250-1100/s. The tests show that changing the fiber orientation changes the values of the ultimate strength and strain of the IM7/8551-7 graphite/epoxy composite. The results show that the ultimate strength in general decreases as the off-axis (test) angle is increased. However, the results show that the decrease is not uniform as in the case of the quasi-static tests. The strain increases for initial increase in the off-axis angle, but then the results don’t show any consistent trend for additional angle increments. A semi-empirical equation is obtained for this material system and can be modified to account for other polymer matrix composites.

Keywords

IM7/8551-7 graphite epoxy high strain rate split Hopkinson pressure bar quasi-static L/D ratio transient time

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Choe, G.H. , 1989. “Impact testing of composite materials at high strain rates.” Master’s Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Delaware.

2. Frey, T.J. , 1990. “High strain rate effects on composite material properties.” Master’s Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Delaware.

3. Powers, B.M. , J.R. Vinson , I.W. Hall and V. Nardone , 1995. “High Strain Rate Mechanical Properties to Silicon Carbide Reinforced 2080 Aluminum Metal Matrix Composites,” Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Composite Materials.

4. Powers, B.M. , J.R. Vinson and I.W. Hall , 1995. “High Strain Rate Mechanical Properties of IM7/ 8551-7 Graphite Epoxy Composites,” Proceedings of the 10th Technical Conference of the American Society for Composites.

5. Powers, B.M. , J.R. Vinson , M. Wardle and B. Scott , 1995. “High Strain Rate Effects on Two AS4 Graphite Fiber Polymer Matrix Composites,” ASME Aerospace Division Bound Volume AD-48, “High Strain Rate Effects on Polymer, Metal, and Ceramic Matrix Composite and Other Advanced Materials.”

6. Powers, B.M. , J.R. Vinson , I.W. Hall and R.F. Hubbard , 1995. “High Strain Rate Mechanical Properties of Cycom 5920/1583,” Proceedings of the 36th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, SDM Conference.

7. Powers, B.M. , J.R. Vinson , M. Wardle and B. Scott , 1996. “High Strain Rate Effects on Two Graphite Fiber K3B Polyimide Matrix Composites,” Proceedings of the 37th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/ AHS/ASC Structures, SDM Conference.

8. Sierakowski, R.L. , G.E. Newill, Jr. , C.A. Ross and E.R. Jones , 1971. “Dynamic Compressive Strength and Failure of Steel Reinforced Composites.” J. Composite Materials. 5: 362-377.

9. Griffiths, L.J. and D.J. Martin , 1971. “A Study of the Dynamic Behaviour of a Carbon-Fibre Composite using the Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar.” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 7: 2329-2341.

10.

10. Hancox, N.L. , 1975. “The Compressive Strength of Unidirectional Carbon Fiber Reinforced Plastics.” J. Mater. Sci. 10: 234-242.

11.

11. Powers, B. , 1996. “High strain rate effects on composite material properties.” Master’s Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Delaware.

12.

12. Staab, G.H. and A. Gilat , 1995. “High Strain Rate Response of Angle-Ply Glass/Epoxy Laminates.” J. of Comp. Matl. 29: 1308-1320.

13.

13. Takeda, N. and L. Wan , 1995. ”Impact Compression Damage Evolution in Unidirectional Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composites.” High Strain Rate Effects on Polymer, Metal and Ceramic Matrix Composites and Other Advanced Materials, Y.D.S. Rajapakse and J.R. Vinson (Eds.), 109-114.

14.

14. Woldesenbet, E. and J.R. Vinson , 1997. “Effect of Specimen Geometry in the High Strain Rate Testing of Graphite/Epoxy Composites.” 38th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference Proceedings, Kissimmee, FL.

15.

15. Woldesenbet, E. and J.R. Vinson , 1997. “Effect of Fiber Orientation on High Strain Rate Properties of Graphite/Epoxy Composites,” to be presented at the 12th Annual Technical Conference of the American Society for Composites (ASC), Dearborn, MI.

16.

16. Zerilli, F.J. and R.W. Armstrong , 1987. “Dislocation-Mechanics-Based Constitutive Relations for Material Dynamics Calculations.” J. Appl. Phys. 6: 1816-1825.

17.

17. Johnson, G.R. and W.H. Cook , 1985. “Fracture Characteristics of Three Metals Subjected to Various Strains, Strain Rates, Temperatures and Pressures.” Eng. Fracture Mech. 21: 31-48.

18.

18. Weeks, C.A. and C.T. Sun , 1995. “Nonlinear Rate Dependent Response of Thick-Section Composite Laminates.” High Strain Rate Effects on Polymer, Metal and Ceramic Matrix Composites and other Advanced Materials, Y.D.S. Rajapakse and J.R. Vinson (Eds.), 109-114.