The main goal of this study is to examine the size effects including both in-plane dimensional and thickness effects for laminated woven E-glass–epoxy composite subjected to low velocity heavy mass impact. The studies have been carried out with plate dimensions of 150 × 150 mm, 150 × 100 mm and 150 × 50 mm for in-plane dimensional effect. Two nominal thicknesses with averages of 1.4 and2.8 mm are used for studying the thickness effect. The impact testings are conducted with a vertical drop-weight testing machine developed in the department laboratory. Affixed to the drop-weight device, a piezoelectric force transducer, localized in the hemispherical impactor nose, yields the complete force versus time history of impact event. Impact tests are performed at increasing impact velocities 1, 2 and 3m/s and impactor mass of 2.6 kg on clamped plates. A numerical evaluation of these specimens is also carried out by using 3DIMPACT transient dynamic finite element analysis code. The contact forces between the impactor and the composite plate as functions of time, transient stresses during impact and the predicted delamination sizes of composites are found numerically.
1. Rotem, A. and Lifshitz, J. M. (1971). Longitudinal Strength of Unidirectional Fibrous Composite Under High Rate of Loading. In: Proceedings of the 26th Annual Tech. Conf. Soc. Plastics Industry, Section 10-G, Reinforced Plastics, Composites Division, Washington, DC, pp. 1–10.
2.
2. Lifshitz, J. M. (1976). Impact Strength of Angle Ply Fiber Reinforced Materials, Journal of Composite Materials, 10(1): 92–101.
3.
3. Sierakowski, R. L., Nevil, G. E., Ross, A. and Jones, E. R. (1971). Dynamic Compressive Strength and Failure of Steel Reinforced Epoxy Composites, Journal of Composite Materials, 5(3): 362–377.
4.
4. Sierakowski, R. L. and Chaturvedi, S. K. (1997). Dynamic Loading and Characterization of Fiber-Reinforced Composites, Wiley, New York.
5.
5. Abrate, S. (1998). Impact on Composite Structures, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
6.
6. Sun, C. T. and Chattopadhyay, S. (1975). Dynamic Response of Anisotropic Laminated Plates Under Initial Stress to Impact of a Mass, ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics, 42: 693–698.
7.
7. Dobyns, A. L. (1981). Analysis of Simply-Supported Orthotropic Plates Subjected to Static and Dynamic Loads, AIAA Journal, 19: 642–650.
8.
8. Whitney J. M. and Pagano, N. J. (1970). Shear Deformation in Heterogeneous Anisotropic Plates, Journal of Applied Mechanics, 37: 1026–1031.
9.
9. Green, E. R. (1993). Response of A Fibre Composite Laminate to a Time-Varying Surface Line Load, Journal of Applied Mechanics, 60: 217–221.
10.
10. Green, E. R. and Green, W. A. (1992). Reciprocal Relations for Dynamic Green’s Functions in Fibre Composite Laminates, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 40(7): 1495–1506.
11.
11. Christoforou A. P. and Yigit, A. S. (1996). Impact of Composite Structures – the Momentum Balance Method, Journal of Composite Materials, 30(10): 1068–1087.
12.
12. Sankar, B. V. (1992). Scaling of Low-Velocity Impact for Symmetric Composite Laminates, J. Reinforced Plastics Composites, 11: 297–305.
13.
13. Qian, Y. and Swanson, S. R. (1990). A Comparison of Solution Techniques for Impact Response of Composite Plates, Composite Structures, 14(3): 177–192.
14.
14. Christoforou, A. P. and Swanson, S. R. (1991). Analysis of Impact Response in Composite Plates, International Journals of Solids and Structures, 27(2): 161–170.
15.
15. Jih, C. J. and Sun, C. T. (1993). Prediction of Delamination in Composite Laminates Subjected to Low Velocity Impact, Journal of Composite Materials, 27(7): 684–701.
16.
16. Wang H. and Vukhanh, T. (1994). Damage Extension in Carbon Fibre/PEEK Cross Ply Laminates Under Low Velocity Impact, Journal of Composite Materials, 28(8): 684–707.
17.
17. Lal, K. M. (1983). Low Velocity Transverse Impact Behavior of 8-Ply Graphite-Epoxy Laminates, J. Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 2: 216–225.
18.
18. Lal, K. M. (1982). Prediction of Residual Tensile Strength of Transversely Impacted Composite Laminates, Struct. Solid Mech. NASA, CP-2245: 97–111.
19.
19. Yang, S. H. and Sun, C. T. (1982). Indentation Law for Composite Laminates, Composite Materials: Testing and Design (6th Conf.) ASTM STP 787. 1. ASTM, PA, Philadelphia, pp. 425–449.
20.
20. Tan, T. M. and Sun, C. T. (1985). Use of Statical Indentation Laws in the Impact Analysis of Laminated Composite Plates, Journal of Applied Mechanics, 52: 6–12.
21.
21. Sun, C. T. and Chen, J. K. (1985). On the Impact of Initially Stressed Composite Laminates, Journal of Composite Materials, 19: 490–504.
22.
22. Choi, H. Y., Wu, H. Y. T. and Chang, F. K. (1991). A New Approach Toward Understandings Damage Mechanisms and Mechanics of Laminated Composites due to Low-Velocity Impact, Part II-Analysis, Journal of Composite Materials, 25: 1012–1038.
23.
23. Doyle, J. F. (1987). Determining The Contact Force During the Transverse Impact of Plates, Experimental Mechanics, 27: 68–72.
24.
24. Prasad, C. B., Ambur, D. R. and Starnes, Jr. J. H. (1994). Response of Laminated Composite Plates to Low-Speed Impact by Different Impactors, AIAA Journal, 32(6): 1270–1277.
25.
25. Chang, C. and Sun, C. T. (1989). Determining Transverse Impact on a Composite Laminate by Signal Deconvolution, Experimental Mechanics, 29: 414–419.
26.
26. Wu, E., Yeh, J. C. and Yen, C. S. (1994). Identification of Impact Forces at Multiple Locations on Laminated Plates, AIAA Journal, 32: 2433–2439.
27.
27. Chandrashekhara, K., Okafor, A. C. and Jiang, Y. P. (1998). Estimation of Contact Force on Composite Plates Using Impact-Induced Strain and Neural Networks, Composites Part B, 29B: 363–370.
28.
28. Liu, D., Raju B. B. and Dang, X. (1998). Size Effects on Impact Response of Composite Laminates, Int. J. Impact Engng., 21(10): 837–854.
29.
29. Shadid, I., Sun, H. T. and Chang, F. K. (1995). Predicting Scaling Effect on the Notched Strength of Prepreg and Fiber Tow-Placed Laminated Composites, Journal of Composite Materials, 29(8): 1063–1095.
30.
30. Harris C. E. and Morris, D. E. (1986). Effects of Laminate Thickness and Specimen Configuration on the Fracture of Laminated Composites, Composite Mater. Testing Design ASTM STP, 893: 177–195.
31.
31. Okutan, B., Aslan, Z. and Karakuzu, R. (2001). A Study of the Effects of Various Geometric Parameters on the Failure Strength of Pin-Loaded Woven-Glass Fiber Reinforced Epoxy Laminate, Composite Science and Technology, 61: 1491–1497.
32.
32. ASTM Standards and Literature References for Composite Materials, 2nd Edn., American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA. (1990).
33.
33. Wu, H. Y. T. and Chang, F. K. (1989). Transient Dynamic Analysis of Laminated Composite Plates Subjected to Transverse Impact, Computers and Structures, 31(3): 453–466.
34.
34. Choi, H. Y. and Chang, F. K. (1992). A Model for Predicting Damage in Graphite/Epoxy Laminated Composites Resulting from Low-Velocity Point Impact, Journal of Composite Materials, 26(14): 2134–2169.
35.
35. Choi, H. Y., Downs, R. J. and Chang, F. K. (1991). A New Approach Toward Undestandings Damage Mechanisms and Mechanics of Laminated Composites Due to Low-Velocity Impact: Part I – Experiments, Journal of Composite Materials, 25: 992–1011.
36.
36. Chun, L. and Lam, K. Y. (1998). Dynamic Response of Fully-Clamped Laminated Composite Plates Subjected to Low-Velocity Impact of a Mass, Int. J. Solids Structures, 35(11): 963–979.
37.
37. Naik, N. K., Chandra Sekher, Y. and Meduri, S. (2000). Damage in Woven-Fabric Composites Subjected to Low-Velocity Impact, Composites Science and Technology, 60: 731–744.
38.
38. Lekhnitskii, S. G., Tsai, S. W. and Cheron, T. (1968). Anisotropic Plates, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, New York.
