Numerical Analysis of Controlled Injection Strategies in Resin Transfer Molding

Abstract

Minimization of mold filling time without losing the part quality is an important issue in the Resin Transfer Molding (RTM) process. Among the various methods to achieve this, resin injection through multiple injection gates has become a practical way. However, inappropriate injection methods lead to numerous air entrapments, high inlet pressure and fiber mat deformation. In this study, a processing parameter called Maximum Permissible Injection Pressure (MPIP) is introduced. This parameter is used as a constraint in all injection strategies utilized to study the mold filling process. A switching injection strategy at single gate injection is also proposed based on the concept of MPIP. In this strategy, resin injection at a specified gate is switched from constant flow rate to constant pressure, leading to a low inlet pressure during the filling process. According to the concept of switching injection, two different multiple gate injection strategies including sequential switching injection and simultaneous adjusted switching injection are investigated for complicated mold geometries. A computer code based on the Control Volume Finite Element Method (CV/FEM) is developed to study the mold filling process in all cases. The validity of the computer code used is checked by experiment and close agreement is found between numerical simulation and experimental observations. The results show that the simultaneous adjusted switching injection methods lead to maximum reduction in filling time, low inlet pressure and minimum number of vents.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Young, W.B. (1994). Journal of Composite Materials, 28: 1098-1113 .

2. Lin, M.Y., Murphy, M.J. and Hahn, H.T. (2000). Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 31: 361-371 .

3. Rudd, C.D., Owen, M.J. and Middleton, V. (1990). Material Science and Technology, 6: 656-665 .

4. Chan, A.W. and Morgan, R.J. (1992). In: Proceeding of the 8-th Advanced Conference, pp. 69-73 , Chicago, Illinois, USA, 2-5 November.

5. Berker, B., Barooah, P. and Sun, J.Q. (1997). Journal of Materials Processing and Manufacturing Science, 6: 407-422 .

6. Liu, B., Bickerton, S. and Advani, S.G. (1996). Composites Part A, 27A: 135-141 .

7. Kang, M.K., Jung, J.J. and Lee, W.I. (2000). Composites Part A, 31: 407-422 .

8. Shojaei, A., Ghaffarian, S.R. and Karimian, S.M.H. (2000). Second Asian-Australasian Conference on Composite Materials: ACCM-2000, Kyongju, Korea, 1: 173-178 .

9. Shojaei, A., Ghaffarian, S.R. and Karimian, S.M.H. (2002). The 6th International Conference on Flow Processes in Composite Materials: FPCM-6, Auckland, New Zealand: 159-167 .

10.

10. Barooah, P., Berker, B. and Sun, J.Q. (1998). Journal of Materials Processing and Manufacturing Science, 6: 169-184 .

11.

11. Barooah, P., Berker, B. and Sun, J.Q. (2001). Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering ASME, 123: 240-247 .

12.

12. Demirci, H.H. and Coulter, J.P. (1994). Journal of Materials Processing and Manufacturing Science, 2: 335-354 .

13.

13. Demirci, H.H. and Coulter, J.P. (1995). Journal of Materials Processing and Manufacturing Science, 3: 409-425 .

14.

14. Demirci, H.H. and Coulter, J.P. (1996). Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 7: 23-38 .

15.

15. Nielson, D. and Pitchumani, R. (2000). In: Proceeding of ASME Heat Transfer Division, ASME-HTD-366-3: 1159-1170 .

16.

16. Nielson, D. and Pitchumani, R. (2001). Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 32: 1789-1803 .

17.

17. Nielson, D. and Pitchumani, R. (2002). Composites Science and Technology, 62: 283-298 .

18.

18. Shojaei, A, Ghaffarian, S.R. and Karimian, S.M.H. (2003). Polymer Composites, 24(4).

19.

19. Coulter, J.P. and Guceri, S. (1988). J. Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 7: 200-219 .

20.

20. Chan, A.W. and Hwang, S.T. (1991). Polymer Engineering and Science, 31: 1149-1156 .

21.

21. Um, M.K. and Lee, W.I. (1991). Polymer Engineering & Science, 31: 765-771 .

22.

22. Young, W.B., Han, K., Fong, L.H., Lee, L.J. and Liou, M. (1991). Polymer Composites, 12: 391-403 .

23.

23. Gauvin, R. and Trochu, F. (1993). Plastics, Rubber and Composites processing and Applications, 19: 151-157 .

24.

24. Bruschke, M.V. and Advani, S.G. (1994). International Journal For Numerical Methods in Fluids, 19: 575-603 .

25.

25. Yoo, Y.E. and Lee, W.I. (1996). Polymer Composites, 17: 368-374 .

26.

26. Shojaei, A., Ghaffarian, S.R. and Karimian, S.M.H. (2002). Composite Science and Technology, 62: 861-879 .

27.

27. Shojaei, A., Ghaffarian, S.R. and Karimian, S.M.H. (2003). Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, in press.

28.

28. Lin, M., Hahn, H.T. and Huh, H. (1998). Composites Part A, 29: 541-550 .

29.

29. Press, W.H., Flannery, B.P., Teukolsky, S.A. and Vetterling, W.T. (1986). Numerical Recipes - the Art of Scientific Computing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge .

30.

30. Cai, Z. (1992). Journal of Composite Materials. 26: 1310-1337 .