Analysis of Toughening Mechanisms of ZrO2/Nano-SiC Ceramic Composites

Abstract

Three effects of nano-particles on the toughness of nano-composite ceramics, namely, nano-particle clustering, crack pinning, and transgranular fracture, are identified from both the experimental and analytical studies. It is found that crack pinning toughens the nano-composite ceramics because a higher stress intensity factor is needed to cause crack propagation around or pull-out of the nano-particle. The nano-particle along the grain boundary steers the crack into the matrix grain due to the strong cohesion between the nano-particle and the matrix. Transgranular fracture increases with the increase of the volume fraction of nanoparticles. Since the fracture resistance of the grain boundary is lower than that of the grain lattice, the higher the probability of transgranular fracture induced by nanoparticles, the tougher is the nano-composite. Nano-particle clustering, which increases with increasing volume fraction of nano-particles, leads to the reduction of both the strength and toughness of the nano-composite ceramics. The larger the size of the clustered particle, the more defects it contains and, thus, the easier it is for the crack to pass through the clustered particle. That is, the nano-particle clustering can reduce toughening induced by crack pinning. The theoretical prediction, based on the combination of the three effects of nano-particles, is in agreement with the experimental data.

Keywords

toughening mechanisms ceramics fracture nano-particle composite ZrO2 SiC

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Cotterell, B. and Rice, J.R. (1980). Slightly Curved or Kinked Cracks, Int. J. Fract., 116: 155-169.

2. Gauckler, K.J. and Graule, T.J. (1992). Swiss Patent, No.02377/92-1.

3. Hwang, K.T. , Kim, C.S. , Auh, K.H. , Cheong, D.S. and Niihara, K. (1997). Influence of SiC Particle Size and Drying Method on Mechanical Properties and Microstructure of Si3Ni4/SiC Nanocomposite, Materials Letters, 132: 251-257.

4. Izaki, K. , Hakkei, K. and Ando, K. (1988). Ultrastructure Processing for Advanced Ceramics, pp. 981-990, New York, John Willey & Sons.

5. Lawn, B.R. , Evans, A.G. and Marshall, D.B. (1980). Elastic/Plastic Indentation Damage in Ceramics: The Median/Radial Crack System, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 62: 574-581.

6. Levin, I. , Kaplan, W.D. , Brandon, D.G. and Wieder, T. (1994). Residual Stresses in Alumina-SiC Nanocomposites, Acta Metall. Mater., 42(4): 1147-1154.

7. McColm, I.J. (1990). Ceramic Hardness, Plenum Press, New York.

8. Niihara, K. and Nakahira, A. (1990). Particulate Strengthened Oxide Nanocomposites, In: Vincenzini P. Trieste (ed.), Advanced Structural Inorganic Composites, pp. 637-664, Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co.

9. Niihara, K. (1991). New Design Concept of Structural Ceramic-ceramic Nanocomposites, The Centennial Issue of the Ceramic Society of Japan, J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn., 99(10): 962-974.

10.

10. Niihara, K. , Suganuma, K. , Nakahira, A. and Izaki, K. (1990). Interfaces of Si3N4/SiC Nano-Composite, J. Mater. Sci. Let., 9: 598-599.

11.

11. Niihara, K. , Unal, N. and Nakahira, A. (1994). Mechanical Properties of (Y-TZP)-Aluminasilicon Carbide Nano-composites and the Phase Stability Y-TZP Particles in it, J. Mater. Sci., 29: 164-168.

12.

12. Ortize, M. and Phillips, R. (1999). Nanomechanics of Defects in Solids, Advances in Applied Mechanics, 36: 1-79.

13.

13. Perlonan, A.B. and Sih, G.C. (1967). Elastostatic Problems of Curvilinear Cracks in Bonded Dissimilar Materials, Int’l J. of Engin. Sci., 5: 845-867.

14.

14. Pezzotti, G. , Nishida, T. and Sakai, M. (1996). Physical Limitations of the Inherent Toughness and Strength in Ceramic-ceramic and Ceramic-metal Nanocomposites, J. Ceramic Soc. of Jpn., 103: 889-896.

15.

15. Pezzotti, G. , Nishida, T. and Sakai, M. (1997). Reply to Comments on Physical Limitations of the Inherent Toughness and Strength in Ceramic-ceramic and Ceramic-metal Nanocomposites, J. Ceramic Soc. of Jpn., 104: 557-558.

16.

16. Sato, S. , Chu, M.C. , Kim, J.H. , Kobayashi, Y. and Ando, K. (1996). Influence of SiC Particle Size on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Si3N4/SiC Composite Ceramics, J. Ceramic Soc. of Jpn., 103: 667-670.

17.

17. Sawaguchi, A. , Toda, K. and Niihara, K. (1991). Mechanical and Electrical Properties of Nanocomposites, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 74: 1142-1144.

18.

18. Sumi, Y. (1989). Energy Consideration on Branched and Curved Crack Extension, In: Weng, G.J. , Taya, M. and Abe, H. (eds), Micromechanics and Inhomogeneity, pp. 407-419, Toshio Mura’s Anniversary Volume, Springer, Berlin.

19.

19. Sumi, Y. (1992). A Second Order Perturbation Solution of a Non-collinear Crack and its Application to Crack Path Prediction of Brittle Fracture in Weldment. Naval Architect, Ocean Eng., 28: 143-156.

20.

20. Tan, H.L. and Yang, W. (1998). Toughening Mechanisms of Nano-composite Ceramics, Mechanics of Materials, 30: 111-123.

21.

21. Tian, W. , Zhou, Y. and Zhou, W.L. (1998). SiC Nanoparticle Reinforced Si3N4 Matrix Composites, J. Mat. Sci., 33: 797-802.

22.

22. Toya, M. (1972). A Crack Along the Interface of a Circular Inclusion Embedded in an Infinite Solid, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 22: 325-348.

23.

23. Zhao, J. , Stearns, L.C. , Harmer, M.P. , Chan, H.M. and Miller, G.A. (1993). Mechanical Behavior of Alumina-silicon Carbide ‘‘Nanocomposite’’, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 76(2): 225-240.