Stress Concentrations in Graphite/Epoxy Model Composites during Creep at Room Temperature and Elevated Temperatures

Abstract

Micro Raman spectroscopy (MRS) was used to monitor the change in the local stress concentrations surrounding a single fiber break in 2-dimensional graphite fiber/epoxy composites during creep at room temperature and elevated temperatures up to 80 C. The experimental results were compared with a few shearlagbased multifiber composite models: Hedgepeth, which assumes perfect bonding between the linear elastic fiber and shear-only matrix; MSSL, which additionally accounts for the axial stiffness of the matrix; and VBI, which assumes a viscoelastic shear-only matrix. Instead of assuming time-independent stress concentrations around a fiber break as in previous models, this work investigated the change in the stress concentrations due to the local matrix creep. The VBI model uses parameters measured from unreinforced matrix creep tests to predict the time dependent strain– stress evolution in the composite around fiber breaks. The stress concentrations of the nearby intact fibers were found to change due to the combined effects of temperature sensitive matrix creep and creep-driven inelastic zone growth emanating from the fiber break, which were in good agreement with the VBI predictions in the absence of significant inelastic zones.

Keywords

stress concentration Micro Raman Spectroscopy shear-lag model polymer composites creep elevated temperature

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Barry, P.W. (1978). Longitudinal Tensile Strength of Unidirectional Fibrous Composites, J. Mater. Sci., 13: 2177–2187.

2. Phoenix, S.L. , Schwartz, P. and Robinson, H.H. (1988). Statistics for the Strength and Lifetime in Creep-rupture of Model Carbon/Epoxy Composites, Comp. Sci. Tech., 32: 81–120.

3. Iyengar, N. and Curtin, W.A. (1997). Time Dependent Failure in Fiber Reinforced Composites by Fiber Degradation, Acta Mater. 45: 1489–1502.

4. Fabeny, B. and Curtin, W.A. (1996). Damage Enhanced Creep and Rupture in Fiber Reinforced Composites, Acta Mater. 44: 3439–3451.

5. Zhou, C.H. , Schadler, L.S. and Beyerlein, I.J. (2002). Time-dependent Micromechanical Behavior in Graphite/Epoxy Composites under Constant Load: a Combined Experimental and Theoretical Study, Acta Materialia, 50: 365–377.

6. Beyerlein, I.J. , Zhou, C.H. and Schadler, L.S. (2002). A Time Dependent Micromechanical Fiber Composite Model for Inelastic Zone Growth in Viscoelastic Matrices, International Journal of Solids and Structures, 40: 2171–2194.

7. Zhou, C.H. , Beyerlein, I.J. and Schadler, L.S. (2003). Time-dependent Micromechanical Behavior in Graphite/Epoxy Composites under Constant Load at Elevated Temperatures, J. Mater. Sci., 38: 877–884.

8. Hedgepeth, J.M. and Van Dyke, P. (1967). Local Stress Concentration in Imperfect Filamentary Composite Materials, J. Comp. Mater., 1: 294–309.

9. Beyerlein, I.J. , Amer, M. , Schadler, L.S. and Phoenix, S.L. (1998). New Methodology for Determining in situ Fiber, Matrix and Interface Stresses in Damaged Multifiber Composites, Sci. Eng. Comp. Mater., 7: 151–204.

10.

10. Beyerlein, I.J. and Phoenix, S.L. (1996). Stress Concentrations Around Multiple Fiber Breaks in an Elastic Matrix With Local Yielding or Debonding Using Quadratic Influence Superposition, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 44: 1997–2039.

11.

11. Beyerlein, I.J. , Phoenix, S.L. and Raj, R. (1998). Time Evolution of Stress Redistribution Around Multiple Fiber Breaks in a Composite with Viscous and Viscoelastic Matrices, International Journal of Solids and Structures, 35: 3177–3211.

12.

12. Beyerlein, I.J. (2000). Stress Fields Around Cracks with a Viscous Matrix and Discontinuous Fiber Bridging, Comp. Sci. Tech., 60: 2309–2326.

13.

13. Beyerlein, I.J. and Landis, C.M. (1999). Shear-lag Model for Failure Simulations of Unidirectional Fiber Composites Including Matrix Stiffness, Mechanics of Materials, 31: 331–350.

14.

14. Ochiai, S. and Hojo, M. (1996). Stress Disturbances Arising from Cut Fiber and Matrix in Unidirectional Metal Matrix Composites Calculated by Means of a Modified Shear-lag Analysis, J. Mater. Sci., 31: 3861–3869.

15.

15. Hedgepeth, J.M. (1961). Stress Concentrations in Filamentary Structures, NASA TN D-822.

16.

16. Beyerlein, I.J. and Phoenix, S.L. (1997). Stress Profiles and Energy Release Rates Around Fiber Breaks in a Lamina with Propagating Zones of Matrix Yielding and Debonding, Comp. Sci. Tech., 57: 869–885.

17.

17. Zhou, X-F. and Wagner, H.D. (1999). Stress Concentrations Caused by Fiber Failure in Twodimensional Composites, Comp. Sci. Tech., 59(7): 1063–1071.

18.

18. Atallah, K.M. and Galiotis, C. (1993). Fibre Strain Mapping in Aramid/Epoxy Microcomposites, Composites, 8: 635–642.

19.

19. Schadler, L.S. , Amer, M.S. and Iskandarani, B. (1996). Experimental Measurement of Fiber/ Fiber Interaction Using Micro Raman Spectroscopy, Mech. Mater., 23: 205–216.

20.

20. Van den Heuvel, P.W.J. , Peijs, T. and Young, R.J. (1997). Failure Phenomena in Two-Dimensional Multi-fibre Microcomposites. II. A Raman Spectroscopic Study of The Influence of Inter-fibre Spacing on Stress Concentrations, Comp. Sci. Techn., 57: 899–911.

21.

21. Phoenix, S.L. and Beyerlein, I.J. (2001). Statistical Strength Theory for Fibrous Composite Materials, In: Chou, T.W. and Zweben, C. (eds), Chapter 19 in Comprehensive Composites, 1: 559–640.

22.

22. Melanitis, N. and Galiotis, C. (1990). Compressional Behaviour of Carbon Fibres. I. A Raman Spectroscopic Study, J. Mater. Sci., 28: 5081–5090.