Statistical Energy and Failure Analysis of CFRP Compression Behavior Using a Uniaxial Microbuckling Model

Abstract

Compression failure followed by fragmentation is a pre-eminent energy absorption mechanism in fiber-reinforced composites and, therefore, it is often used in crash absorption devices. Fragmentation is the last stage of degradation leading to total failure of a carbon fiber reinforced plastic (CFRP) laminate in compression. Micromechanical studies have shown that this phenomenon is initiated mainly by a microbuckling mechanism which depends on microstructural imperfections (fiber misalignment and matrix plasticity). As far as energy absorption and dedicated modeling strategies are concerned, the question is whether the failure scenario is dependent on these imperfections in terms of dissipated energy. In this context, we used a one-dimensional microscale approach to model plastic microbuckling and evaluate the corresponding dissipated energy for a realistic range of microstructural parameters (with statistical treatment). Contrary to our expectations and to the well-known sensitivity of the peak loads, these energies seem unaffected by microscopic parameters. In conclusion, we propose some ideas on how to include the main aspects of fragmentation, which can occur in composite materials under in-plane compression loading, on the mesoscale.

Keywords

compression behavior composite fragmentation dissipated energy plastic microbuckling kink band.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Davila, C.G. , Ambur, D.R. and McGowan, D.M. (2000). Analytical Prediction Damage Growth in Notched Composite Panels Loaded in Axial Compression, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Journal of Aircraft, 37(5).

Ladevèze, P. (1986). On the Damage Mechanics of Composites, In: C. Bathias and D. Menkès, (eds), JNC 5, pp. 667—683, Pluralis Publication, Paris.

Allix, O. , Ladevèze, P. and Vittecoq, E. (1994). Modelling and Identification of the Mechanical Compression Behavior of Composite Laminates, Composite Science and Technology, 51(1): 35—42.

Ladevèze, P. and Le Dantec, E. (1992). Damage Modelling of the Elementary Ply for Laminated Composites, Comp. Science & Technol., 43(3): 257—267.

Ladevèze, P. (1992). A Damage Computational Method for Composite Structures, Computer and Structure, 44(1): 79—87.

Allix, O. and Ladevèze, P. (1992). Interlaminar Interface Modelling for the Prediction of Delamination, Composite Structures, 22(4): 235—242.

Lee, S.H. and Waas, A.M. (1999). Compressive Response and Failure of Fiber Reinforced Unidirectional Composites, International Journal of Fracture , 100: 275—306.

Yerramalli, C.S. and Waas, A.M.

Bai, J. and Phoenix, S.L. (2005). Compressive Failure Model for Fiber Composites by Kink Band Initiation from Obliquely Aligned, Shear-dislocated Fiber Breaks , International Journal of Solids and Structures, 42: 2089—2128.

10.

Narayanan, S. and Schadler, L.S. (1999). Mechanisms of Kink-Band Formation in Graphite/ Epoxy Composites: Micromechanical Experimental study, Composites Science and Technology, 59: 2201—2213.

11.

Effendi, R.R. , Barrau, J.J. and Guedra-Degeorges , D. (1996). Failure Mechanism Analysis Under Compression Loading of Unidrectional Carbon/Epoxy Composites Using Micromechanical Modelling, Composite Structures, 31(2): 87—98.

12.

Vinçon, I. , Allix, O. Sigety , P. and Auvray, M.H. (1998). Compressive Performance of Carbon Fibres: Experiments and Analysis, Composite Science and Technology, 58(10): 1649—1658.

13.

Yurgartis, S.W. (1987). Measurement of Small Angle Fibre Misalignments in Continuous Fiber Composites, Composites Science and Technology, 30: 279—293.

14.

Fleck, N. , Deng, L. and Budiansky, B. (1995). Prediction of Kink Width in Compressed Fiber Composites , Journal of Applied Mechanics, 62: 329—337.

15.

Kyriakidès, S. , Arseculeratne, R. , Perry, E.J. and Liechti, K.M. (1995). On the Compressive Failure of Fiber Reinforced Composites, IJSS, 32(6): 689—738.

16.

Drapier, S. , Grandidier, J.C. and Potier-Ferry, M. (1999). Towards a Numerical Model of the Compressive Strength for Long Fibre Composites, European Journal of Mechanics, 18: 69—92.

17.

Drapier, S. , Grandidier, J.C. and Potier-Ferry, M. (2001). A Structural Approach of Plastic Microbuckling in Long Fiber Composites: Comparison with Theoretical and Experimental Results, IJSS, 38: 3877—3904.

18.

Zhou, X.F. , Nairn, J.A. and Wagner, H.D. (1999). Fiber-Matrix Adhesion from the Single-Fiber: Composite Test: Nucleation of Interfacial Debonding, Composites Part A, 30: 1387—1400.

19.

Curtin, W.A. (2000). Dimensionality and Size Effects on the Strength of Fiber-Reinforced Composites, Composites Science and Technology, 60: 543—551.

20.

Simo, J.C. and Ortiz, M. (1986). An Analysis of a New Class of Integration Algorithms for Elastoplastic Constitutive Relations, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 23: 353—366.

21.

Paluch, B. (1994). Analysis of Geometric Imperfections in Fibers for Unidirectional Fiber Reinforced Composites, La Recherche Aéronautique, 6: 431—448.

22.

Riks, E. (1979). An Incremental Approach to the Solution of Snapping and Buckling Problems, International Journal of Solids Structures, 15: 529—551.

23.

Schapery, R.A. (1989). Mechanical Characterization and Analysis of Inelastic Composite Laminates with Growing Damage, In: Mechanics of Composite Materials and Structures, AMD—100: 1—9.

24.

Kyriakidès, S. and Ruff, A.E. (1997). Aspects of the Failure and Post Failure of Fiber Composites in Compression, Journal of Composite Materials, 31(20): 2000—2037.