Impact Damage Resistance and Tolerance of Honeycomb Core Sandwich Panels

Abstract

The damage resistance and tolerance of flat [(0/45),/core/(45/0), ] sandwich plates with honeycomb core subjected to low-velocity impacts using hemispherical steel impactors has been investigated experimentally. The effects of impactor diameter on the impact behavior, resulting impact damage states, and residual strength under in-plane compressive loading was of particular interest. The impact responses characterized in terms of peak impact force was observed to be dependent on the facesheet type, core thickness, and impactor size, but was found to be independent of the boundary support conditions. The smaller impactor produced damage states characterized by residual dent depths that were comparable to the core thickness, accompanied by visible facesheet fractures. The larger diameter impactor produced damage states with large core damage regions but with dent depths less than the facesheet thickness. Under in-plane compressive loading, depending on the impact damage state, contrasting failure mechanisms involving net-section fracture and buckling failure were observed. A reduction in compressive strength up to 60% of the undamaged strength has been observed.

Keywords

polymer matrix composites impact behavior damage tolerance sandwich strength.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abrate, S. (1998). Impact on Composite Structures, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Tomblin, J. , Lacy, T. , Smith, B. , Hooper, S. , Vizzini, A. and Lee, S. (1999). Review of Damage Tolerance for Composite Sandwich Airframe Structures, Final Contract Report DOT/FAA/ AR-99/49.

ASTM D7136/D7136M-05, Standard Test Method for Measuring the Damage Resistance of a Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composite to a Drop-Weight Impact Event, American Society for Testing and Materials, 100 Barr Harbor Dr., West Conshohocken, PA 19428.

ASTM D7137/D7137M-05, Standard Test Method for Compressive Residual Strength Properties of Damaged Polymer Matrix Composite Plates, American Society for Testing and Materials, 100 Barr Harbor Dr., West Conshohocken, PA 19428.

Rhodes, M.D. (1975). Impact Fracture of Composite Sandwich Structures , AIAA.

Bernard, M.L. and Lagace, P.A. (1989). Impact Resistance of Composite Sandwich Plates, Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 8(5): 432-445.

Raju, K.S. and Tomblin, J.S. (2001). Damage Characteristics in Sandwich Panels subjected to Static Indentation using Spherical Indentors, AIAA-2001-1189, 42nd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/ AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Seattle, WA.

Ferri, R. and Sankar, B.V. (1997). Static Indentation and Low Velocity Impact Tests on Sandwich Plates, Proceedings of the ASME Aerospace Division , Ad-Vol. 55, ASME, New York, NY.

Nettles, A.T. and Hodge, A.J. (1990). Impact Testing of Glass/Phenolic Honeycomb Panels with Graphite/Epoxy Facesheets, 35th International SAMPE Symposium, Anaheim, CA.

10.

Hemp, E.J. and Palazotto, A.N. (1996). Low-velocity Impact Damage Initiation in GraphiteEpoxy/Nomex Honeycomb Sandwich Panels, AIAA-96-1519-CP.

11.

Tsang, P.H.W. and Lagace, P.A. (1994). Failure Mechanisms of Impact-Damaged Sandwich Panels under Uniaxial Compression, AIAA-94-1396-CP, Proceedings of the AIAA/ ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC 35th Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Hilton Head, SC.

12.

Tomblin, J. , McKenna, J. , Ng, Y. and Raju, K.S. (1997). B-Basis Design Allowables for EpoxyBased Prepreg Newport E-glass Fabric 7781/NB321, AGATE-WP3.3-033051-097.

13.

Tomblin, J. , McKenna, J. , Ng, Y. and Raju, K.S. (1995). B-Basis Design Allowables for Epoxy-Based Prepreg Newport Carbon Plain Weave Fabric 3K70P/NB321, AGATE-WP3.3-033051-095.

14.

Tomblin, J.S. , Raju, K.S. , Liew, J. and Smith, B.L. (2001). Impact Damage Characterization and Damage Tolerance of Composite Sandwich Airframe Structures, Final Contract Report DOT/FAA/AR-00/44.

15.

Data Translation, Inc. , 100 Locke Drive, Marlboro, MA 01752-1192, USA.

16.

Joel Liew Kok Hin (2000). Damage Resistance and Tolerance of Honeycomb Sandwich Composites With Quasi-Isotropic Face Sheets, M.S. Thesis, Aerospace Engineering Department, Wichita State University , Wichita, KS.

17.

Grapher, Golden Software, Inc. , 809, 14th Street, Golden, CO 80401, USA.

18.

MTS Corporation , Eden Prairie , MN, USA.

19.

Suresh Keshavanarayana (2001). The Static Indentation Behavior of Composite Sandwich Panels with Thin Quasi-Isotropic Facesheets, Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Aerospace Engineering , Wichita State University.

20.

Gibson, L.J. and Ashby, M.F. (1988). Cellular Solids, Structure and Properties, Pergamon Press, Oxford.