Rheological Characterization and Statistical Modeling of Resin Flow of No-flow Polyimide Prepreg in Rigid-Flex Printed Circuit Lamination

Abstract

Low coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) prepreg is used, instead of the conventional high-CTE material like acrylic adhesive, as a bonding sheet to improve the reliability of rigid-flex printed circuit (RFPC). No-flow polyimide prepreg is then developed to fulfill the requirement of minimizing resin flow. Thermal characterization of no-flow polyimide prepreg reveals the resin behavior when a heat load is applied. Differential scanning calorimetry analysis reveals the process window when the resin starts to melt and then cure. Rheological tests further help us to observe the change in viscosity when the temperature rises as well as the resin flow effects at different heating rates (HRs). Moreover, a study of design of experiment (DOE) reveals that the HR, pressure and conformal material will have a significant impact on the resin flow of the no-flow polyimide prepreg in RFPC lamination. The combination of the resin behavior and DOE result provides the necessary information to achieve an optimized RFPC lamination process with minimized resin flow.

Keywords

resin flow no-flow polyimide prepreg rheological behavior DSC design of experiment rigid-flex printed circuit.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Huang, S.Q. and Yung, K.C. ( 2007). Reliability Comparison of Rigid Flex Printed Circuit Using Various Materials and Design Build-ups, Journal of Industrial Engineering Research, 4(2): 103-112.

Appelt, B.K. , Gotro, J.D. , Ellis, T.L. , Schmitt, G.P. and Wiley, J.P. (1986). Composite Lamination - Analysis and Modeling, Polymer Composites, 7(2): 91-95.

Kyle, P. ( 1993). Rheology: Materials in Motion, Part I, Printed Circuit Fabrication, 16(5): P22-P25.

Carreman, J. (1985). Rheology Testing of Multilayer Prepregs, Circuit World, 11(4): 32-36.

Smith, G.D. and Poursartip, A. ( 1993). A Comparison of Two Resin Flow Models for Laminate Processing , Journal of Composite Materials, 27(17): 1695-1711.

Simacek, P. , Advani, S.G. , Zonvide, K. and Barrett, L.W. ( 2008). Modeling of Resin Flow in Reinforced Dielectric Prepregs , Journal of Electronic Packaging, 130(2): 1-8.

Bloechle, D.P. (1982). Epoxy Prepreg Characterisation Using Scaled Flow Testing Techniques, Circuit World, 9(1): 8-10.

Kyle, P. ( 1993). Rheology: Materials in Motion, Part II, Printed Circuit Fabrication, 16(8): 36, 38-40.

Tait, R.A. ( 1995). Comparison of Methods for Measuring Flow of Resin in Electrical Lamination Prepregs, IEEE Transactions on Components, Packing and Manufacturing Technology - Part A, 18(3): 650-655.

10.

Smith, C.A. (1985). Using Thermochemical Analysis in the Quality Control of Prepregs and Laminates for Multilayer PCB Manufacture , Circuit World, 12(1): 29-33.

11.

Schiffer, W. (1986). Prepreg Testing - Quick, Informative, Reliable A Critical View , Circuit World, 12(3): 4-8.

12.

Loos, A.C. and Springe, G.S. ( 1983). Curing of Epoxy Matrix Composites, Journal of Composite Materials, 17(2): 135-169.

13.

Tang, J.M. , Lee, W.I. and Springe, G.S. ( 1987). Effects of Cure Pressure on Resin FlowVoids, and Mechanical Properties, Journal of Composite Materials, 21(5): 421-440.

14.

Springer, G.S. (1982). Resin Flow During the Cure of Fiber Reinforced Composites, Journal of Composite Materials , 16(5): 400-410.

15.

Gutowski, T.G. , Morigaki, T. and Cai, Z. (1987). The Consolidation of Laminate, Journal of Composite Materials, 21(2): 172-188.

16.

Del, J. , Marx, P. and Sallo, J. (1983). Scaled Flow is Adapted for Prepreg Characterization, Electronic Packaging and Production , 23(1): 60-63.