Eco-composite: the effects of the jute fiber treatments on the mechanical and environmental performance of the composite materials

Abstract

In this study, untreated and treated jute fiber composites were investigated as candidates to replace glass fibers as reinforcement to produce structural composites with better environmental performance. The surface of the jute fibers was modified by drying and bleaching/drying treatments to improve the wetting behavior of the apolar polyester, improving the mechanical properties of the composites. The mechanical characterization of the composites was obtained according to the ASTM standards (D-3039/D-790) and dynamic mechanical analysis. The environmental characterization was obtained by life-cycle assessment method. The treatment characterization was obtained by horizontal attenuated total reflectance infrared spectroscopy and thermogravimetry. Finally, jute composites were compared with glass composites and results show that the jute fiber treatments imply a significant increase of the mechanical properties of the composites without damaging their environmental performances.

Keywords

jute fiber TGA/DMA FTIR-HATR composites mechanical characterization

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Silva CA Design sustentável: a importância das fibras de juta, sisal e coco, no planejamento de produtos e éticas sustentáveis . MSc Thesis, Universidade Estadual Paulista, 2006.

Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). ‘Environmental Outlook’ , http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/51/6/2088589.pdf (2001, accessed October 2003).

Westerlind BS and Berg JC Surface energy of untreated and surface-modified cellulose fibers. J Appl Polym Sci 1988; 36: 523-534.

Felix JM and Gatenholm P. The nature of adhesion in composites of modified cellulose fibers and polypropylene . J Appl Polym Sci 1991 ; 42: 609-620.

Belgacem MN and Gandini A. Surface modification of cellulose fibres. Polímeros [online] 2005; 15(2): 114-121.

Schick MJ Surface characteristics of fibers and textiles. Part II. Vol. 2, New York: Dekker, 1977.

Barone JR Polyethylene/keratin fiber composites with varying polyethylene crystallinity . Composites: Part A 2005; 36: 1518-1524.

George J. , Bhagawan SS and Thomas S. Effects of environment on the properties of low-density polyethylene composites reinforced with pineapple-leaf fibre. Compos Sci Technol 1998; 58: 1471-1485.

Gassan J. and Bledzki AK Possibilities to improve the properties of natural fiber reinforced plastics by fiber modification - Jute Polypropylene Composites. Appl Compos Mater 2000; 7: 373-385.

10.

John MJ and Anandjiwala RD Recent developments in chemical modification and characterization of natural fiber-reinforced composites. Polym Compos 2008; 29: 187-202.

11.

Ray D. and Sengupta SP Static and dynamic mechanical properties of vinylester resin matrix composites reinforced with shellac-treated jute yarns. Ind Eng Chem Res 2006; 45: 2722-2727.

12.

Bogoeva-Gaceva G. , Dekanski A. , Panić V. , et al. Natural fibers in polymer composite materials. In: Proceedings of the XLIV Meeting of the Serbian Chemical Society , Belgrade, 6-7 February, 2006.

13.

George J. , Sreekala MS and Thomas S. A review on interface modification and characterization of natural fiber reinforced plastic composites. Polym Eng Sci 2001; 41(9): 1471-1485.

14.

Corrales F. , Llop MF , Mutjé P. , Vilaseca F. and Gandini A. Jute fibres esterification to improve the adhesion with the matrix in reinforced polymers . In: Proceedings of the Congreso iberoamericano de investigación en celulosa y papel , 2002. Available in: http://www.celuloseonline.-com.br/imagembank/Docs/DocBank/dc/dc341.pdf

15.

Dash BN , Rana AK , Mishra HK , Nayak AK and Tripathy SS Novel low-cost jute-polyester composites. III. Weathering and thermal behavior . J Appl Polym Sci 2000; 78: 1671-1679.

16.

Amin MN and Begum M. A method for the preparation of a jute-batching emulsion by using castor oil . J Text Inst 1996; 87(3): 432-437.

17.

Zadoreki P. and Flodin P. Surface modification of cellulose fibers. I. Spectroscopic characterization of surface-modified cellulose fibers and their copolymerization with styrene. J Appl Polym Sci 1985; 30: 2419-2429.

18.

Robinson N (ed.) Agenda 21 and the UNCED proceedings. Vol. 2, New York: Oceana, 1992 .

19.

Brown L. , Flavin C. , French H. , et al. State of the world 2000: a worldwatch institute report on progress toward a sustainable society. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc., 2000.

20.

Ljungberg LY Materials selection and design for development of sustainable products. Mater Des 2007; 28: 466-479.

21.

Roy R. Sustainable product-service systems. Futures 2000; 32(3-4): 289-299.

22.

Netravali AN and Chabba S. Composites get greener. Mater Today 2003; 6: 22-29.

23.

Sapuan SM and Maleque MA Design and fabrication of natural woven fabric reinforced epoxy composite for household telephone stand. Mater Des 2005 ; 26: 65-71.

24.

Zah R. , Hischier R. , Leão AL and Braun I. Curauá fibers in the automobile industry e a sustainability assessment . J Clean Prod 2007; 15: 1032-1040.

25.

Sorensen IW and Chang HW characterization of jute fiber reinforced composites. In: Proceedings of the 13th National Sampe Technical Conferences, Mount Pocono, PA, USA, 13-15 October, 1991.

26.

Tan TTM. Thermoplastic composite based on jute fiber treated with cardanol formaldehyde. Polym Polym Compos 1997; 5(4): 273-279.

27.

Harish S. , Peter Michael D. , Bensely A. , Mohan Lal D. and Rajadurai A. Mechanical property evaluation of natural fiber coir composite. Mater Character 2009; 6: 44-49.

28.

Leão AL , Rowell R. and Tavares N. Applications of natural fibers in automotive industry in Brazil- thermoforming process. In: Prasad PN , Mark JE , Kandil SH , Kafafi ZH (eds) Science and Technology of Polymers and Advanced Materials. Emerging technologies and business opportunities. New York: Plenum Press, 1998, pp.755-761.

29.

Rowell, R.M. Potentials for jute based composites. In: Jute India ’97, Expo-Business Meet-Seminar, Pragati Maidan, New Delhi, 1997.

30.

31.

Mohanty AK , Mirsa M. and Hinrichsen G. Biofibres, biodegradable polymers and biocomposites: an overview. Macromol Mater Eng 2000; 276/277: 1-24.

32.

Alves C. , Ferrão PMC , Freitas M. , Silva AJ , Luz SM and Alves DE Sustainable design procedure: the role of composite materials to combine mechanical and environmental features for agricultural machines. Mater Des 2009; 30: 4060-4068.

33.

34.

Joseph PV , Joseph K. , Thomas S. , et al. The thermal and crystallization studies of short sisal fibre reinforced polypropylene composites. Composites: Part A 2003; 34: 253-266.

35.

Rouison D. , Sain M. and Couturier M. Resin transfer molding of hemp fiber composites: optimization of the process and mechanical properties of the materials. Compos Sci Technol 2006; 66: 895-906.

36.

Oliveira HI Desenvolvimento do processo de fabricação de laminados de material composto polimérico de fibra de vidro para aplicação na construção aeronáutica. PhD Thesis, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, 2007.

37.

Judd NWC and Wright WW Voids and their effects on the mechanical properties of composites - an appraisal . SAMPE J 1978; 14: 10-14.

38.

Yang L. and Kruse B. Revised Kubelka-Munk Theory I. : theory and application. J Opt Soc Am A 2004 ; 21(10): 1933-1941.

39.

Ray D. and Sarkar BK Characterization of alkali-treated jute fibers for physical and mechanical properties. J Appl Polym Sci 2001; 80(7): 1013-1020.

40.

Jahan MS , Chowdhury DAN , Islam MK and Moeiz SMI. Characterization of lignin isolated from some non-wood available in Bangladesh . Bioresour Technol 2007; 98(2): 465-469.

41.

Seki Y. Innovative multifunctional siloxane treatment of jute fiber surface and its effect on the mechanical properties of jute/thermoset composites. Mater Sci Eng: A 2009; 508(1-2): 247-252.

42.

John MJ and Anandjiwala RD Recent developments in chemical modification and characterization of natural fiber-reinforced composites. Polym Compos 2008; 29(2): 187-207.

43.

Sydenstricker THD , Mochnaz S. and Amico SC Pull-out and other evaluations in sisal-reinforced polyester biocomposites. Polym Test 2003; 22: 375-380.

44.

Luz SM Estudo das propriedades mecânicas, interface e morfologia de compósitos de polipropileno reforçados com fibras de bagaço e palha de cana. PhD Thesis, Universidade de São Paulo, 2008.

45.

Alves C. , Ferrão PMC , Silva AJ , et al. Ecodesign of automotive components making use of natural jute fiber composites. J Clean Prod 2010; 18: 313-327.

46.

Software Simapro R 7. Pré consultants BV. Amersfoort , The Netherlands: Pré-Consultants .

47.

Mark G. and Spriensma R. The Eco-Indicator 99: A damage oriented method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment . Methodology Report. Pré consultants BV , Amersfoort, The Netherlands, 2001 .

48.

Santos ELM. Integration of environmental issues in electrical and electronic product design and development: environmental improvement through applied ecodesign strategies in the context of Portugal. MSc Thesis, Technical University of Lisbon, 2007.