Strength of composite angle brackets with multiple geometries and nanofiber-enhanced resins

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the change in strength and failure mode of composite angle brackets due to changes in both the angle bend radius and laminate thickness, as well as the addition of vapor-grown carbon nanofiber to the epoxy resin matrix. The brackets explored within this study each contained a 90^° bend and was subjected to four-point bend loading. Such angle brackets exhibit weakness around the radius due to the excessive through-the-thickness tensile stresses which can lead to delamination. Composite brackets of 8- and 16-plies were examined, with bend radii of 3.175 and 6.35 mm. The composites consisted of Hexcel AS4 carbon fiber, five-harness satin weave, and Epon 862/Epikure W epoxy resin. Specimens were fabricated with and without ASI PR-24 vapor-grown carbon nanofiber in the epoxy matrix. A servo-hydraulic load frame was used to perform a four-point-bend test as per American Society for Testing and Materials International D6415 for measuring the curved beam strength (CBS) of a fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composite. Despite a threefold difference in failure load and CBS, data reduction using both closed-form and finite element modeling resulted in a nearly single critical value of radial peel stress at initial failure of 30—32 MPa for all specimens. The mechanical load response (large load drop vs. ‘stick-slip’ after initial failure) and optical microscopy results are explored in detail.

Keywords

composite bracket radial stress nano-scale nanofiber

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Daniel IM and Ishai O. Engineering mechanics of composite materials, 2nd edn. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2006, p.380.

Tibbetts GG , Lake ML , Strong KL and Rice BP A review of the fabrication and properties of vapor-grown carbon nanofiber/polymer composites. Compos Sci Technol 2007; 67: 1709-1718.

Lafdi K. and Matzek KM Carbon nanofibers as a nanoreinforcement for polymeric nanocomposites . In: 35th International SAMPE Technical Conference Proceedings , Dayton, OH, 28 September-2 October, 2003.

Astm D. 6415/D 6415M - 06a. Standard test method for measuring the curved beam strength of a fiber-reinforced polymer-matrix composite. West Conshohocken, PA, 19428 USA: ASTM International , 1999.

Kedward KT , Wilson RS and McLean SK Flexure of simply curved composite shapes. Composites 1989; 20(6): 527-536.

Layne AM and Carlsson LA Test method for measuring strength of a curved sandwich beam. Exp Mech 2002; 42(2): 194-199.

Smidt S. Bending of curved sandwich beams. Compos Struct 1995; 33: 211-225.

Smidt S. Bending of curved sandwich beams, a numerical approach. Compos Struct 1996; 34: 279-290.

Ko WL Delamination stresses in semicircular laminated composite bars. NASA, Technical Memorandum 4026, 1988.

10.

Ko WL and Jackson RH Multilayer theory for delamination analysis of a composite curved bar subjected to end forces and end moments. NASA, Technical Memorandum 4139, 1989 .

11.

Lekhnitskii SG Anisotropic plates. New York, NY: Gordon and Breach Publishers, 1968, pp.95-101.

12.

Shivakumar KN , Allen HG and Avva VS Interlaminar tension strength of graphite/epoxy composite laminates. AIAA J 1994; 32(7): 1478-1784.

13.

Jackson WC and Martin RH An interlaminar tensile strength specimen. In: Camponeschi Jr ET, (ed.) Composite materials: testing and design. ASTM STP 1206. Vol. 11. American Society for Testing and Materials , 1993, pp.333-354.

14.

Hiel CC , Sumich M. and Chappell DP A curved beam test specimen for determining the interlaminar tensile strength of a laminated composite. J Compos Mater 1990 ; 25: 854-868.

15.

Martin RH Delamination failure in a unidirectional curved composite laminate . In: Glenn Grimes C (ed.) Composite materials: testing and design. ASTM STP 1120 . Vol. 10, Philadelphia, PA : American Society for Testing and Materials, 1992, pp.365-383.

16.

Sun CT and Kelly SR Failure in composite angle structures part I: initial failure. J Reinf Plast Compos 1988; 7: 220-232.

17.

Martin RH and Jackson WC Damage prediction in cross-plied curved composites laminates. In: Stinchcomb WW, Ashbaugh NE (eds) Composite materials: fatigue and fracture . ASTM STP 1156. Vol. 4, Philadelphia, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials, 1993, pp.105-126.

18.

Chang F-K. The strength analysis of wooden bends. In: Environmental Effects on Composite Materials. Westport, CT: Technomic Publishing Company Inc, 1988, pp.421-433.

19.

Kress G. , Roos R. , Barbezat M. , Dransfeld C. and Ermanni P. Model for interlaminar normal stress in singly curved laminates. Compos Struct 2005; 69: 458-469.

20.

Roos R. , Kress G. , Barbezat M. and Ermanni P. Enhanced model for interlaminar normal stress in singly curved laminates . Compos Struct 2007; 80: 327-333.

21.

Mason BM , Haftka RT , Johnson ER and Farley GL Variable complexity design of composite fuselage frames by response surface techniques. Thin-Walled Structures 1998; 32: 235-261.

22.

Sun CT and Kelly SR Failure in composite angle structures part II: onset of delamination . J Reinf Plast Compos 1988; 7: 233-244.

23.

ABAQUS Users Manual. Version 6.7-1, ABAQUS, Inc , 2007.

24.

Avalon SC and Donaldson SL Strength of structural composite angle bracket with nano-enhanced resins. MS Thesis, University of Dayton , University Microfilms, OCLC: 262555205, 2008.

25.

Astm D3039 - 00. Standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials. West Conshohocken, PA, 19428 USA: ASTM International , 2000.

26.

Kim RY University of Dayton Research Institute, Unpublished data.

27.

Astm 3518 - 94. Standard test method for in-plane shear response of polymer matrix composite materials by tensile test of a 45° laminate. West Conshohocken, PA, 19428 USA: ASTM International, 1994.