Short cellulosic fiber/starch acetate composites — micromechanical modeling of Young’s modulus

Abstract

This study is presented to predict the Young’s modulus of injection-molded short cellulosic fiber/plasticized starch acetate composites with variable fiber and plasticizer content. A modified rule of mixtures model is applied where the effect of porosity is included, and where the fiber weight fraction is used as the basic independent variable. The values of the input model parameters are derived from experimental studies of the configuration of the composites (volumetric composition, dimensions, and orientation of fibers), as well as the properties of the constituent fiber and matrix phases (density and Young’s modulus). The measured Young’s modulus of the composites varies in the range 1.1—8.3 GPa, and this is well predicted by the model calculations. A property diagram is presented to be used for the tailor-making of composites with Young’s modulus in the range 0.2—10 GPa.

Keywords

natural fibers biopolymers biocomposites stiffness porosity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Madsen B. and Lilholt H. Guidelines for mechanical design with biocomposites - properties, weights and costs. JEC Compos Mag 2007; 37(December): 37-39.

Madsen B. , Lilholt H. , Thygesen A. , Arnold E. , Weager B. and Joffe R. Aligned flax fibre/polylactate composites - a materials model system to show the potential of biocomposites in engineering applications. J Nanostruct Polym Nanocompos 2009; 4: 139-145.

Karus M. , Kaup M. and Ortmann S. Use of natural fibres in the German and Austrian automotive industry. Market survey 2002: Status, analysis and trends. Germany: Nova-Institute GmbH, 2002.

Larotonda FDS , Matsui KN , Sobral PJA and Laurindo JB Hygroscopicity and water vapor permeability of Kraft paper impregnated with starch acetate. J Food Eng 2005; 71: 394-402.

Nättinen K. , Hyvärinen S. , Joffe R. , Wallström L. and Madsen B. Naturally compatible: starch acetate/cellulosic fiber composites. I. Processing and properties. Polym Compos 2010; 31: 524-535.

Madsen B. , Thygesen A. and Lilholt H. Plant fibre composites - porosity and stiffness. Compos Sci Technol 2009; 69: 1057-1069.

Cichocki FR and Thomason JL Thermoelastic anisotropy of a natural fiber. Compos Sci Technol 2002; 62: 669-678.

Krenchel H. Fibre reinforcement. Copenhagen, Denmark: Akademisk Forlag, 1964, pp.16-22.

Cox HL The elasticity and strength of paper and other fibrous materials. Br J Appl Phys 1952; 3: 72-79.

10.

Tucker CL and Liang E. Stiffness predictions for unidirectional short-fiber composites: review and evaluation. Compos Sci Technol 1999; 59: 655-671.

11.

Madsen B. , Thygesen A. and Lilholt H. Plant fibre composites - porosity and volumetric interaction. Compos Sci Technol 2007; 67: 1584-1600.

12.

Grankvist H. Properties and optimisation of starch acetate blends. Master thesis, Tampere, Finland: Department of Materials Engineering , Tampere University of Technology , 2008.

13.

Bledzki AK , Sperber VE and Faruk O. Natural and wood fibre reinforcement in polymers. Rapra Rev Rep 2002; 13(8): 1-144.

14.

Baillif ML and Oksman K. The effect of processing on fiber dispersion, fiber length, and thermal degradation of bleached sulfite cellulose fiber polypropylene composites. J Thermoplast Compos Mater 2009; 22: 115-133.

15.

Lilholt H. and Lawther JM Natural organic fibres. In: Kelly A and Zweben C (eds) Comprehensive composite materials (6 Vols). Vol. 1; Chap. 10. Amsterdam : Elsevier Science, 2000 , pp.303-325.

16.

Nyström B. , Joffe R. and Långström R. Microstructure and strength of injection molded natural fiber composites. J Reinf Plast Compos 2007; 26: 579-599.

17.

Thomason JL The influence of fibre length, diameter and concentration on the modulus of glass fibre reinforced polyamide 6,6. Composites Part A 2008; 39: 1732-1738.

18.

Arbelaiz A. , Fernandez B. , Ramos JA , Retegi A. , Llano-Ponte R. and Mondragon I. Mechanical properties of short flax fibre bundle/polypropylene composites: influence of matrix/fibre modification, fibre content, water uptake and recycling. Compos Sci Technol 2005; 65: 1582-1592.

19.

Bledzki AK and Gassan J. Composites reinforced with cellulose based fibres. Prog Polym Sci 1999; 24: 221-274.

20.

Garkhail SK , Heijenrath RWH and Peijs T. Mechanical properties of natural-fibre-mat-reinforced thermoplastics based on flax fibres and polypropylene . Appl Compos Mater 2000; 7: 351-372.

21.

Joffe R. and Andersons J. Mechanical performance of thermoplastic matrix natural-fibre composites . In: Pickering K (ed.) Properties and performance of natural fibre composites, Chap. 13. Cambridge: Woodhead, 2008, pp.402-459.

22.

Oksman K. , Skrifvars M. and Selin JF Natural fibres as reinforcement in polylactic acid (PLA) composites . Compos Sci Technol 2003; 63: 1317-1324.

23.

Rana AK , Mandal A. , Mitra BC , Jacobson R. , Rowell R. and Banerjee AN Short jute fiber-reinforced polypropylene composites: effect of compatibilizer . J Appl Polym Sci 1998; 69: 329-338.

24.

Williams GI and Wool RP Composites from natural fibers and soy oil resins. Appl Compos Mater 2000 ; 7: 421-432.

25.

Gassan J. , Chate A. and Bledzki AK Calculation of elastic properties of natural fibers. J Mater Sci 2001; 36: 3715-3720.

26.

Thygesen A. , Oddershede J. , Lilholt H. , Thomsen AB and Ståhl K. On the determination of crystallinity and cellulose content in plant fibres . Cellulose 2005; 12: 563-576.

27.

Karvinen P. , Oksman A. , Silvennoinen R. and Mikkonen H. Complex refractive index of starch acetate used as a biodegradable pigment and filler of paper. Opt Mater 2007; 29: 1171-1176.

28.

http://www.thegoodscentscompany.com/data/rw1012771.html (accessed 20 September 2009).