Three-dimensional (3D) braided composites with high specific energy absorption behavior and excellent fatigue performances are widely used in structures under cycle or impact load. A comprehensive literature survey is conducted to review the numerical analysis methods of 3D braided composites, including meso-geometry modeling, mesh generation techniques, and progressive damage models. When the 3D braided composites are manufactured during a process cycle, the braid yarn can move and becomes a ‘deviated or imperfect’ architecture. Elaborate meso-geometrical models which directly influence the precision of numerical results can be established by different methods. Different mesh generation techniques of different numerical methods, which manage to discretize the complex geometry models, are provided. An analysis of various models involved in the prediction of damage development and failure of 3D braided composites by using finite element method is presented. This study highlights the importance of recognizing the meso-structure for analyzing mechanical behavior of 3D braided composites.
MiraveteA. 3-D textile reinforcements in composite materials. Cambridge, UK: Wood head Publishing, 1999.
2.
PastoreC. Opportunities and challenges for textile reinforced composites. Mech Compos Mater2000; 36(2): 165–194.
3.
YangJMaCChouT. Fiber inclination model of three dimensional textile structural composite. J Compos Mater1986; 20(9): 472–483.
4.
Ma C, Yang J and Chou T. Elastic stiffness of three-dimensional textile structural composite. In: Proceedings of the 7th Conference on Composite Materials: Testing and Design, ASTM STP893, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1986, pp. 402–421.
5.
PastoreCKoF. Modeling of textile structural composites: Part 1: a processing science model for three-dimensional braid. J Text Inst1990; 81(4): 480–490.
WangYWangA. Geometric mapping of yarn structures in 3-D braided composites due to shape change. Compos Sci Technol1995; 53(4): 359–370.
8.
WuD. Three-cell model and 5D braided structural composites. Compos Sci Technol1996; 56(3): 225–233.
9.
LiangJDuSHanJ. Effective elastic properties of three dimensional braided composites with matrix microcracks. Acta Mater Compos Sinica1997; 14(1): 101–107.
10.
AboudiJ. Mechanics of composite materials: a unified micromechanical approach. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, 1991.
11.
LomovSIvanovDVerpoestIZakoMKurashikiTNakaiH. Meso-FE modeling of textile composites: road map, data flow and algorithms. Compos Sci Technol2007; 67(9): 1870–1891.
12.
KoF. Tensile strength and modulus of a three dimensional braid composite. Proceedings of the 7th Conference on Composite Materials: Testing and Design1986ASTM STP 893, USA, 392–403. Philadelphia, PA.
13.
VerpoestILomovS. Virtual textile composites software wisetex: integration with micro-mechanical, permeability and structural analysis. Compos Sci Technol2005; 65(15-16): 2563–2574.
14.
QuekSCWaasAShahwanKWAgaramV. Compressive response and failure of braided textile composites: Part 1—experiments. Int J Non-Linear Mech2004; 39(4): 635–648.
15.
ByunJChouT. Process microstructure relationships of 2-step and 4-step braided composites. Compos Sci Technol1996; 56(3): 235–251.
16.
ByunJH. The analytical characterization of 2-D braided textile composites. Compos Sci Technol2000; 60(5): 705–716.
17.
ChenLTaoXChoyC. On the microstructure of three-dimensional braided performs. Compos Sci Technol1999; 59(3): 391–404.
18.
LuZYangZLiuZ. Geometrical characteristics of structural model for 3-d braided composites. J Beijing Univ Aeronaut Astronaut2006; 31(1): 92–96.
19.
XuKXuX. On the microstructure model of four-step 3D rectangular braided composite. Acta Mater Compos Sinica2006; 23(5): 154–160.
20.
FangGDLangJWangYWangBL. The effect of yarn distortion on the mechanical properties of 3d four-directional braided composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manufact2009; 40(4): 343–350.
21.
FangGDLiangJLuQWangBLWangY. Investigation on the compressive properties of the three dimensional four-directional braided composites. Compos Struct2011; 93(2): 392–405.
22.
PandeyRHahnH. Visualization of representative volume elements for three-dimensional four-step braided composites. Compos Sci Technol1996; 56(2): 161–170.
23.
SunWLinFHuX. Computer-aided design and modeling of composite unit cells. Compos Sci Technol2001; 61(2): 289–299.
24.
KangTJKimSJungK. Analysis of geometrical parameters using a CAD system for a 3-D braided perform. Textile Res J2008; 78(10): 922–935.
PotluriPThammandraV. Influence of uniaxial and biaxial tension on meso-scale geometry and strain fields in a woven composite. Compos Struct2007; 77(3): 405–418.
30.
PotluriPParlakIRamgulamRSagarT. Analysis of tow deformations in textile preforms subjected to forming forces. Compos Sci Technol2006; 66(2): 297–305.
31.
PotluriPSagarT. Compaction modeling of textile preforms for composite structures. Compos Struct2008; 86(1–3): 77–185.
32.
PotluriPPerezCRamgulamR. Measurement of meso-scale shear deformations for modeling textile composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manufact2006; 37(2): 303–314.
33.
PotluriPMananA. Mechanics of non-orthogonally interlaced textile composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manufact2007; 38(4): 1216–1226.
34.
DesplentereFLomovSWoerdemanDVerpoestIWeversMBogdanovichA. Micro-CT characterization of variability in 3d textile architecture. Compos Sci Technol2005; 65(13): 1920–1930.
35.
StockS. X-ray microtomography of materials. Int Mater Rev1999; 44(4): 141–164.
SchillingPJKaredlaBRTatiparthiAKVergesMAHerringtonPD. X-ray computed microtomography of internal damage in fiber reinforced polymer matrix composites. Compos Sci Technol2005; 65(14): 2071–2078.
38.
DjukicLPHerszbergIWalshWRSchoeppnerGAPrustyBGKellyDW. Contrast enhancement in visualisation of woven composite tow architecture using a microCT scanner. Part 1: fabric coating and resin additives. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manufact2009; 40(12): 553–565.
39.
DjukicLPHerszbergIWalshWRSchoeppnerGAPrustyBG. Contrast enhancement in visualisation of woven composite architecture using a microCT scanner. Part 2: tow and preform coatings. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manufact2009; 40(12): 1870–1879.
40.
Lomov S and Verpoest I. Wisetex-virtual textile reinforcement software. In Proceedings of 48th SAMPE-USA Symposium, Long Beach, 2003, pp.1320–1334.
41.
Sherburn M. Geometric and mechanical modeling of textiles. PhD thesis, University of Nottingham, 2007.
42.
GonzálezCLLorcaJ. Mechanical behavior of unidirectional fiber- reinforced polymers under transverse compression: microscopic mechanisms and modeling. Compos Sci Technol2007; 67(13): 2795–2806.
FangGDLiangJWangBLWangY. Effect of interface properties on mechanical behavior of 3D four-directional braided composites with large braid angle subjected to uniaxial tension. Appl Compos MaterDOI: 10.1007/s10443-010-9175-6.
46.
ZakoMUetsujiYKurashikiT. Finite element analysis of damaged woven fabric composite materials. Compos Sci Technol2003; 63(3–4): 507–516.
47.
QuekSCWaasAShahwanKWAgaramV. Compressive response and failure of braided textile composites: Part 2 – computations. Int J Non-Linear Mech2004; 39(4): 649–663.
48.
LomovSGusakovAHuysmansGProdromouAVerpoestI. Textile geometry preprocessor for meso-mechanical models of woven composites. Compos Sci Technol2000; 60(11): 2083–2095.
49.
LomovSVParnasRGhoshSBVerpoestINakaiA. Experimental and theoretical characterization of the geometry of two-dimensional braided fabrics. Textile Res J2002; 72(8): 706–712.
50.
LomovSVIvanovDSVerpoestIZakoMKurashikiTNakaiH. Full-field strain measurements for validation of meso-FE analysis of textile composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manufact2008; 39(8): 1218–1231.
51.
KimHJSwanCC. Voxel-based meshing and unit-cell analysis of textile composites. Int J Numer Meth Eng2003; 56: 977–1006.
52.
KimHJSwanCC. Algorithms for automated meshing and unit cell analysis of periodic composites with hierarchical tri-quadratic tetrahedral elements. Int J Numer Meth Eng2003; 56: 1683–1711.
53.
XuJCoxBMcGlocktonMACarterW. A binary model of textile composites: II. the elastic regime. Acta Metallurgica Mater1995; 43(9): 3511–3524.
54.
McGlocktonaMCoxbBMcMeekingcR. A binary model of textile composites: III high failure strain and work of fracture in 3D weaves. J Mech Phys Solids2003; 51(8): 1573–1600.
55.
Iarve E, Zhou E, Whitney T, Mollenhauer D and Breitzman T. Independent mesh method based predictionof local and volume average fields in textile composites. In: 49th Conference on Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials (AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC), Schaumburg, 2008.
56.
JiangWGHallettSRWisnomMR. Development of domain superposition technique for the modeling of woven fabric composites. Netherlands: Springer, 2008Ch. 14, pp. 281-291.
57.
WhitcombJSrirenganKChapmanC. Evaluation of homogenization for global/local stress analysis of textile composites. Compos Struct1995; 31(2): 137–149.
58.
SrirenganKWhitcombJChapmanC. Modal technique for three-dimensional global/local stress analysis of plain weave composites. Compos Struct1996; 39(1-2): 145–156.
59.
ZohdiTFeuchtMGrossDWriggersP. A description of macroscopic damage through microstructural relaxation. Int J Numer Meth Eng1998; 43(3): 493–506.
60.
ChenLTaoXChoyC. Mechanical analysis of 3-D braided composites by the finite multiphase element method. Compos Sci Technol1999; 59(16): 2383–2391.
61.
ZengTFangDMaLGuoL. Predicting the nonlinear response and failure of 3D braided composites. Mater Lett2004; 58(26): 3237–3241.
62.
BelytschkoTBlackT. Elastic crack growth in finite elements with minimal remeshing. Int J Numer Meth Eng1999; 45(5): 601–620.
63.
MöesNDolbowJBelytschkoT. A finite element method for crack growth without remeshing. Int J Numer Meth Eng1999; 46: 131–150.
64.
BelytschkoTMöesNUsuiSParimiC. Arbitrary discontinuities in finite elements. Int J Numer Meth Eng2001; 50: 993–1010.
65.
MelenkJBabuškaI. The partition of unity finite element method: basic theory and applications. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng1996; 139(1–4): 289–314.
66.
BabuškaIMelenkJ. The partition of unity methods. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng1997; 40(4): 727–758.
67.
SukumarNChoppDMöesNBelytschkoT. Modeling holes and inclusions by level sets in the extended finite-element method. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng2001; 190(46-47): 6183–6200.
68.
OsherSSethianJ. Fronts propagating with curvature-dependent speed: algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations. J Comput Phys1988; 79(1): 12–49.
69.
BelytschkoTParimiCMöesNSukumarNUsuiS. Structured extended finite element methods for solids defined by implicit surfaces. Int J Numer Meth Eng2003; 56(4): 609–635.
70.
MöesNCloirecMCartraudPRemacleJF. A computational approach to handle complex microstructure geometries. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng2003; 192(28-30): 3163–3177.
71.
Reifsnider KL. Some fundamental aspects of the fatigue and fracture response of composite materials. In: Proceedings of the 14th Annual Meeting, USA, 1977, pp. 373–384.
72.
RosenBW. Tensile failure of fibrous composites. AIAA Journal1964; 2(11): 1985–1991.
73.
ZengQMaRFanF. Micro-statistical analysis of ultimate tensile strength of cross-ply laminates. J Mech1994; 26(4): 451–461.
74.
OkabeTTakedaNKamoshidaYShimizuMCurtinW. A 3D shear-lag model considering micro-damage and statistical strength prediction of unidirectional fiber-reinforced composites. Compos Sci Technol2001; 61(12): 1773–1787.
75.
DesrumauxFMeraghnifFBenzeggaghM. Generalised Mori-Tanaka scheme to model anisotropic damage using numerical eshelby tensor. J Compos Mater2001; 35(7): 603–624.
76.
PangBDuSHanJWangD. Nonlinear behavior of the constitutive simulation of meso-scopic computational mechanics for there-dimensional muti-directional braided composites. Acta Mater Compos Sinica2000; 17(1): 98–102.
77.
SodenPDHintonbMJKaddourAS. A comparison of the predictive capabilities of current failure theories for composite laminates. Compos Sci Technol1998; 58: 1225–1254.
78.
HintonMKaddourASodenP. A comparison of the predictive capabilities of current failure theories for composite laminates, judged against experimental evidence. Compos Sci Technol2002; 62(12–13): 1725–1797.
79.
HintonMKaddourASodenP. Evaluation of failure prediction in composite laminates: background to ‘part B’ of the exercise. Compos Sci Technol2002; 62(12-13): 1481–1488.
80.
KaddourAHintonMSodenP. A comparison of the predictive capabilities of current failure theories for composite laminates: additional contributions. Compos Sci Technol2004; 64(3-4): 449–476.
81.
HintonMKaddourASodenP. Evaluation of failure prediction in composite laminates: background to ‘part C’ of the exercise. Compos Sci Technol2004; 64(3-4): 321–327.
82.
SodenPKaddourAHintonM. Recommendations for designers and researchers resulting from the world-wide failure exercise. Compos Sci Technol2004; 64(3-4): 589–904.
83.
PuckASchurmannH. Failure analysis of FRP laminates by means of physically based phenomenological models. Compos Sci Technol1998; 58(7): 1045–1068.
84.
CuntzeRFreundA. The predictive capability of failure mode concept-based strength criteria for multidirectional laminates. Compos Sci Technol2004; 64(3-4): 343–377.
85.
OrificiAHerszbergIThomsonR. Review of methodologies for composite material modeling incorporating failure. Compos Struct2008; 86(1-3): 194–210.
86.
Pinho S, Dávila C, Camanho P, Iannucci L and Robinson P. Failure models and criteria for FRP under in-plane or three-dimensional stress states including shear nonlinearity. Technical Report, NASA/TM-2005-213530 (2005).
87.
CoxBNDadkhahMSMorrisWLFJ. Failure mechanism of 3D woven composites in tension, compression, and bending. Acta Metall Mater1994; 42(12): 3967–3984.
88.
SmithLVSwansonSR. Micro-mechanics parameters controlling the strength of braided composites. Compos Sci Technol1995; 54(2): 177–184.
89.
KimSJChangSH. The relation between compressive strength of carbon/epoxy fabrics and micro-tow geometry with various bias angles. Compos Struct2006; 75(1-4): 400–407.
90.
SongSWaasAMShahwanKWXiaoXFaruqueO. Braided textile composites under compressive loads: modeling the response, strength and degradation. Compos Sci Technol2007; 67(15-16): 3059–3070.
91.
KyriakidesSArseculeratneRPerryEJLiechtiKM. On the compressive failure of fiber reinforced composites. Int J Solids Struct1995; 32(6/7): 689–738.
92.
LeeSHWaasAM. Compressive response and failure of fiber reinforced unidirectional composites. Int J Fract1999; 100(3): 275–306.
93.
AhnJHWaasAM. Prediction of compressive failure in laminated composites at room and elevated temperature. AIAA Journal2002; 40(2): 346–358.
94.
YerramalliCSWaasAM. A failure criterion for fiber reinforced polymer composites under combined compression-torsion loading. Int J Solids Struct2003; 40(5): 1139–1164.
95.
SuemasuHTakahashiHIshikawaT. On failure mechanisms of composite laminates with an open hole subjected to compressive load. Compos Sci Technol2006; 66(5): 634–641.
96.
Dávila C, Jaunky N and Goswami S. Failure criteria for FRP laminates in plane stress. In: 44th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Norfolk Virginia, 2003.
97.
Dávila C and Camanho P. Failure criteria for FRP laminates in plane stress. Technical Report, NASA/TM-2003-212663 (2003).
98.
PinhoSIannucciLRobinsonP. Physically-based failure models and criteria for laminated fibre-reinforced composites with emphasis on fibre kinking: Part I: development. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manufact2006; 37(1): 63–73.
99.
PinhoSIannucciLRobinsonP. Physically-based failure models and criteria for laminated fibre-reinforced composites with emphasis on fibre kinking. Part II: FE implementation. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manufact2006; 37(5): 766–777.
100.
SalviAGWaasAMCaliskanA. Rate dependent compressive response of 2D triaxially braided carbon fiber composites and the effects of resin on the interfacial shear strength. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manufact2009; 40(1): 19–27.
101.
SongSJWaasAMShahwanKW. Compression response of 2D braided composites: single cell and multiple cell micromechanics based strength preditions. JCompos Mater2008; 42(23): 2461–2482.
102.
TanSNuismerR. A theory for progressive matrix cracking in composite laminates. J Compos Mater1989; 23(10): 1029–1047.
103.
TanS. A progressive failure model for composite laminates containing openings. J Compos Mater1991; 25(5): 556–577.
104.
TanSPerezJ. Progressive failure of laminated composites with a hole under compressive loading. J Reinf Plast Compos1993; 12(10): 1043–1057.
105.
ChangFLessardL. Damage tolerance of laminated composites containing an open hole and subjected to compressive loadings: Part I analysis. J Compos Mater1991; 25(3): 2–43.
106.
ApalakZApalakMGencM. Progressive damage modeling of an adhesively bonded unidirectional composite single lap joint in tension at the mesoscale level. JThermoplast Compos Mater2006; 19(6): 671–702.
107.
ApalakZApalakMGencM. Progressive damage modeling of an adhesively bonded composite single lap joint under flexural loads at the mesoscale level. J Reinf Plast Compos2007; 26(9): 903–653.
108.
BlackketterDWalrathDHansenA. Modeling damage in a plain weave fabric reinforced composite material. J Compos Technol Res1993; 15(2): 136–142.
109.
CamanhoPMatthewsF. A progressive damage model for mechanically fastened joints in composite laminates. J Compos Mater1999; 33(24): 2248–2280.
110.
ZhaoLGWarriorNALongAC. Finite element modeling of damage progression in non-crimp fabric reinforced composites. Compos Sci Technol2006; 66(1): 36–50.
111.
MiraveteABielsaJChiminelliACuarteroJSerramoSTolosanaN. 3D mesomechanical analysis of three-axial braided composite materials. Compos Sci Technol2006; 66(15): 2954–2964.
112.
XuKXuX. Nonlinear numerical analysis of progressive damage of 3D braided composites. Chinese J Theor Appl Mech2007; 39(3): 398–407.
113.
Talreja R. Further developments in continuum damage modeling of composites aided by micromechanics. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Applied Mechanics Division, Vol. 150, Anaheim, CA, USA, 1992, pp. 103–106.
114.
LadevezePLeDE. Damage modeling of the elementary ply for laminated composites. Compos Sci Technol1992; 43(3): 257–267.
115.
Lo D, Allen D and Harris C. Progressive failure analysis of carbon fiber/epoxy composite laminates using continuum damage mechanics. ASTM Special Technical Publication, Philadelphia, USA, 1993, pp. 680–695.
116.
AllixOLadevèzeP. Interlaminar interface modeling for the prediction of delamination. Compos Struct1992; 22(4): 235–242.
117.
MatzenmillerALublinerJTaylorR. Constitutive model for anisotropic damage in fiber-composites. Mech Mater1995; 20(2): 125–125.
118.
ChabocheJKruchSMaireJ. Towards a micromechanics based inelastic and damage modeling of composites. Int J Plasticity2001; 17(4): 411–439.
119.
ChabocheJMaireJ. A new micromechanics based CDM model and its application to CMC’s. Aerospace Sci Technol2002; 6(2): 131–145.
120.
Schapery RA. Further development of a thermodynamic constitutive theory: stress formulation. Technical Report, Purdue University 1969.
121.
SchaperyRA. Nonlinear viscoelastic and viscoplastic constitutive equations based on thermodynamics. Mech Time Depend Mater1997; 1: 209–240.
122.
ParkSWSchaperyRA. A viscoelastic constitutive model for particulate composites with growing damage. Int J Solids Struct1997; 34(8): 931–947.
123.
LadevèzePLubineauG. On a damage mesomodel for laminates: micromechanics basis and improvement. Mech Mater2003; 35(8): 763–775.
124.
SironOPailhesJLamonJ. Modeling of the stress/strain behaviour of a carbon/carbon composite with a 2.5 dimensional fibre architecture under tensile and shear loads at room temperature. Compos Sci Technol1999; 59(1): 1–12.
125.
PailhesJCamusGLamonJ. A constitutive model for the mechanical behavior of a 3D C/C composite. Mech Mater2002; 34(3): 161–177.
BarberoELonettiP. An inelastic damage model for fiber reinforced laminates. J Compos Mater2002; 36(8): 941–962.
128.
SunCTChenJL. A Simple Flow Rule for Characterizing Nonlinear Behavior of Fiber Composites. J Compos Mater1989; 23(10): 1009–1020.
129.
AubardXCluzelCGuitardL. Modeling of the mechanical behaviour of 4D carbon/carbon composite material. Compos Sci Technol1998; 58(5): 701–708.
130.
AubardXCluzelCGuitardL. Damage modeling at the mesoscopic scale for 4D Carbon/Carbon composites. Key Eng Mater1999; 164-165: 159–162.
131.
AubardXCluzelCGuitardLLadevezeP. Damage modeling at two scales for 4D Carbon/Carbon composites. Comput Struct2000; 20(1): 83–91.
132.
Camanho P and Dávila C. Mixed-mode decohesion finite elements for the simulation of delamination in composite materials. Technical Report, NASA/TM-2002-211737 (2002).
133.
MaimíPCamanhoPMayugoJ. A continuumdamage model for composite laminates: PartI-constitutive model. Mech Mater2007; 39(10): 897–908.
134.
MaimíPCamanhoPMayugoJ. A continuum damage model for composite laminates: Part II -computational implementation and validation. Mech Mater2007; 39(10): 909–919.
135.
BažantZOhB. Crack band theory for fracture of concrete. Mater Struct1983; 16: 155–177.
136.
LapczykIHurtadoJA. Progressive damage modeling in fiber-reinforced materials. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manufact2007; 38(11): 2333–2341.
137.
FangGDLiangJWangBL. Progressive damage and nonlinear analysis of 3D four-directional braided composites under unidirectional tension. Compos Struct2009; 89(1): 126–133.
138.
NeedlemanA. A continuum model for void nucleation by inclusion debonding. J Appl Mech1987; 54(3): 525–531.
139.
VolokhKY. Comparison between cohesive zone models. Commun Numer Meth Eng2004; 20(11): 845–856.
140.
LoDAllenD. Modeling of delamination damage evolution on laminated composites subjected to low velocity impact. Int J Damage Mech1994; 3(4): 378–407.
141.
JiangWGHallettSRGreenBG. A concise interface constitutive law for analysis of delamination and splitting in composite materials and its application to scaled notched tensile specimens. Int J Numer Meth Eng2007; 69(9): 1982–1995.
142.
HuNZembaYOkabeT. A new cohesive model for simulating delamination propagation in composite laminates under transverse loads. Mech Mater2008; 40(11): 920–935.
143.
AymerichFDoreFPrioloP. Simulation of multiple delaminations in impacted cross-ply laminates using a finite element model based on cohesive interface elements. Compos Sci Technol2009; 69(11-12): 1699–1709.
144.
AlfanoG. and Sacco E. Combining interface damage and friction in a cohesive zone model. Int J Numer Meth Eng2006; 68(5): 542–582.
145.
TotryEGonzálezCLLorcaJ. Influence of the loading path on the strength of fiber-reinforced composites subjected to transverse compression and shear. Int J Solids Struct2008; 45(6): 1663–1675.
146.
TotryEGonzálezCLLorcaJ. Failure locus of fiber-reinforced composites under transverse compression and out-of-plane shear. Compos Sci Technol2008; 68(3-4): 829–839.
147.
XieDSalviAGSunC. Discrete cohesive zone model to simulate static fracture in 2D triaxially braided carbon fiber composites. J Compos Mater2006; 40(22): 2025–46.
148.
XieDWaasAM. Discrete cohesive zone model for mixed-mode fracture using finite element analysis. Eng Fract Mech2006; 73(13): 1783–96.
149.
YuvalFLeslieBS. A new cohesive zone model for mixed mode interface fracture in bimaterials. Eng Fract Mech2008; 75(15): 4583–4593.
