Phase contrast microscopy (PCM) was used to study the relation of the phase structure and morphology of isotactic polypropylene/poly(ethylene-co-octene) (iPP/PEOc) blends and the composition and the shear rate. The digital image analysis containing the analysis both in real space and wave-number space was introduced to deal with the PCM micrographs. The average characteristic length, Lm, in real space and the mean square radius of gyration, , in wave-number space were defined and calculated to discuss the phase structure and morphology of iPP/PEOc blends. In addition, the fractal dimension, Dc, was introduced to describe spatial distribution uniformity of the dispersed phase. The results showed that these parameters were effective to study the size and its distribution of the dispersed phase particles.
ZhuLSongNXuXH. Real space and wave-number space studies of the structure and phase morphology of iPP / PEOC blends using scanning electron microscopy. Macromol Mater Eng2009; 294: 516–524.
2.
TanakaHHayashiTNishiT. Application of digital image analysis to pattern formation in polymer systems. J Appl Phys1986; 59: 3627–3643.
3.
FranconM. Progress in Microscopy. New York: Pergamon Press, 1961; 199–199.
4.
NishiokaHKidaKYanoOQuiTC. Phase separation of a polymer mixture driven by a gradient of light intensity. Macromolecules2000; 33: 4301–4303.
5.
DattaABairdDG. Compatibilization of thermoplastic composites based on blends of polypropylene with two liquid crystalline polymers. Polymer1995; 36: 505–514.
6.
ZhuLFanHNYangZQXuXH. Evaluation of phase morphology, rheological, and mechanical properties polypropylene toughened health laboratory With poly (ethylene-co-octene). Polym Plast Technol Eng2010; 49: 208–217.
7.
ZhuLXuXHYeNSongNShengJ. Influence of composition and phase morphology on rheological properties of polypropylene/poly(ethylene-co-octene) blends. Polym Compos2010; 31: 105–113.
8.
HuneaultMAShiZHUtrackiLA. Development of polymer blend morphology during compounding in a twin-screw extruder. Part IV: A new computational model with coalescence. Polym Eng Sci1995; 35: 115–127.
9.
LeeSHongSMSeoYParkTSHwangSSKimKULeeJW. Characterization and processing of blends of poly(ether imide) with thermotropic liquid crystalline polymer. Polymer1994; 35: 519–531.
10.
ZhuLXuXHWangFJSongNShengJ. Characterisation of the thickness of transition layer and its relation to mechanical properties of polypropylene/poly(ethylene-co-octene) blends. Mater Sci Eng A2008; 494: 449–455.
11.
GuinierAFournetG. Small angle scattering of X-ray. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1955.
12.
DebyePBuecheAM. Scattering by an inhomogeneous solid. J Appl Phys1949; 20: 518–525.
13.
GlatterOKratkyO. Small angle X-ray scattering. London: Academic Press, 1983.
14.
HanCD. Multiphase flow in polymer processing. New York: Academic Press, Inc, 1981.
15.
Luettmer-StrathmannJLipsonJEG. Miscibility of polyolefin blends. Macromolecules1999; 32: 1093–1102.
16.
PotenteHBastianM. Calculating morphology development of polymer blends in extruders on the basis of results of boundary and finite element simulations using simulation software The Sigma. Polym Eng Sci2000; 40: 727–737.
17.
IzumitaniTHashimotoT. Slow spinodal decomposition in binary liquid mixtures of polymers. J Chem Phys1985; 83: 3694–3701.
18.
JordhamoGMMansonJASperlingLH. Continuity and phase inversion in polymer blends and interpenetrating networks Simultaneous. Polym Eng Sci1986; 26: 517–524.
19.
ChenTSuAC. Morphology of poly(p-phenylene sulfide)polyethylene blends. Polymer1993; 34: 4826–4831.
20.
EveraetVAertsLGroeninckxG. Phase morphology development in immiscible PP/(PS/PPE) blends influence of the melt-viscosity ratio and blend composition. Polymer1999; 40: 6627–6644.
21.
BourryDFavisBD. Cocontinuity and phase inversion in HDPE/PS blends: Influence of interfacial modification and elasticity. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys1998; 36: 1889–1899.
22.
XuXHYanXLZhuTBZhangCHShengJ. Phase morphology development of polypropylene/ethylene-octene copolymer blends: effects of blend composition and processing conditions. Polym Bull2007; 58: 465–478.
23.
PlochockiAPDagliSSAndrewsRD. The interface in binary mixtures of polymers containing a corresponding block copolymer: Effects of industrial mixing processes and of coalescence. Polym Eng Sci1990; 30: 741–752.
24.
BordereauVCarregaMShiZHUtrackiLASammutP. Development of polymer blend morphology during compounding in a twin-screw extruder. III: Experimental procedure and preliminary results. Polym Eng Sci1992; 32: 1846–1856.
FavisBDTherrienD. Factors influencing structure formation and phase size in an immiscible polymer blend of polycarbonate and polypropylene prepared by twin-screw extrusion. Polymer1991; 32: 1474–1481.
27.
TaylorGI. The viscosity of a fluid containing small drops of another fluid. Proc R Soc London, Ser A1932; 138: 41–48.
28.
TaylorGI. The formation of emulsions in definable fields of flow. Proc R Soc London, Ser A1934; 146: 501–523.
29.
FavisBD. The effect of processing parameters on the morphology of an immiscible binary blend. J Appl Polym Sci1990; 39: 285–300.
30.
SundararajUMacoskoCWRolandoRJChanHT. Morphology development in polymer blends. Polym Eng Sci1992; 32: 1814–1823.
31.
GrizzutiNBifulcoO. Effects of coalescence and breakup on the steady-state morphology of an immiscible polymer blend in shear flow. Rheol Acta1997; 36: 406–415.
32.
RolandCMBouhmGGA. Shear-induced coalescence in two-phase polymeric systems. I. Determination from small-angle neutron scattering measurements. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys1984; 22: 79–93.
33.
SundararajUMacoskoCW. Drop breakup and coalescence in polymer blends: The effects of concentration and compatibilization. Macromolecules1995; 28: 2647–2657.
