Effects of vacuum pressure,inlet pressure,and mold temperature on the void content,volume fraction of polyester/e-glass fiber composites manufactured with VARTM process
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online December, 2011
Effects of vacuum pressure,inlet pressure,and mold temperature on the void content,volume fraction of polyester/e-glass fiber composites manufactured with VARTM process
Vacuum-assisted resin transfer molding (VARTM) process is one of the liquid composite molding (LCM) processes aimed at producing high-quality composite parts. The void content and fiber volume fraction of a VARTM part can be affected by many parameters and is critical to the mechanical properties and the quality of the part. In this paper, a series of experiments were conducted with a heated dual pressure control VARTM setup for investigating the effects of vacuum pressure, inlet pressure, and mold temperature on the void content and fiber volume fraction of polyester/E-glass fiber composite. It was found that stronger vacuum and higher mold temperature can better control and increase the fiber volume fraction; however, such a combination of strong vacuum and high mold temperature may also require a reduced inlet pressure for minimizing the void content. The need of pressure reduction can be explained with the compatibility between Darcy's flow and capillary flow in the fiber preform and can be calculated based on the room temperature VARTM results. The experimental results suggest that high mold temperature, high vacuum, and appropriately reduced inlet pressure can produce a VARTM part with high fiber volume fraction and low void content.
GreszczukLB. Effect of voids on strength properties of filamentary composites. In Proceedings of 22nd Annual Meeting of the Reinforced Plastics Division of the Society of the Plastics Industry1967; 20: A-1–20–A-10.
4.
HancoxNL. The effect of flaws and voids on the shear properties of CFRP. J Mater Sci1977; 12: 884–892.
5.
JuddNCWWrightWW. Voids and their effects on the mechanical properties of composites. SAMPE J1978; 14: 10–14.
6.
YosidaHTOgasaTHayashiR. Statistical approach to the relationship between ilss and void content of CFRP. Comp Sci Technol1986; 25: 3–18.
7.
HarperBDStaabGHChenRS. A note on the effects of voids upon the hygral and mechanical properties of AS4/3502 graphite/epoxy. J Comp Mat1987; 21: 280–289.
8.
FeldgoiseSFoleyMFMartinDBohanJ. The effect of microvoid content on composite shear strength. 23rd International SAMPE Technical Conference, 1991, 259–273.
9.
PatelNRohatgiVLeeLJ. Influence of processing and material variables on resin-fiber interface in liquid composite molding. Polymer Compos1993; 14(2): 161–172.
10.
LeclercJSRuizE. Porosity reduction using optimized flow velocity in resin transfer molding. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2008; 39: 1859–1868.
11.
ZhuH-YLiD-HZhangD-XWuB-CChenY-Y. Influence of voids on interlaminar shear strength of carbon/epoxy fabric laminates. Trans. Nonferrous Met Soc China2009; 19: s470–s475.
ParkSYChoiWJChoiHS. The effects of void contents on the long-term hygrothermal behaviors of glass/epoxy and GLARE laminates. Compos Struct2010; 92: 18–26.
14.
BowlesKJFrimpongS. Void effects on the interlaminar shear strength of unidirectional graphite-fiber-reinforced composites. J Comp Mat1992; 26: 1487–1509.
15.
MallickPK. Fiber reinforced composites materials, manufacturing, and design, 2nd. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc, 1993.
16.
AvilaAFMoraisDTS. A multiscale investigation based on variance analysis for hand lay-up composite manufacturing. Compos Sci Technol2005; 65: 827–838.
17.
BowlesKJFrimpongS. Relationship between voids and interlaminar shear strength of polymer matrix composites. 36th International SAMPE Symposium and Exhibition. 1991, 1–20.
18.
HaywardJSHarrisB. Effect of process variables on the quality of RTM mouldings. SAMPE J1990; 26: 39–46.
19.
HaywardJSHarrisB. The effect of vacuum assistance in resin transfer moulding. Compos Manuf1990; 1: 161–166.
20.
ParnasRSPhelanFRJr. The effect of heterogenous porous media on mold filling in resin transfer molding. SAMPE Quarterly1991; 22: 53–60.
21.
PillaiK. Modeling the unsaturated flow in liquid composite molding processes: a review and some thoughts. J Compos Mater2004; 38: 2097–2118.
22.
LundströmSTGebartBK. Influence from process parameters on void formation in resin transfer molding. Polymer Compos1994; 15: 25–32.
23.
KangMKLeeWIHahnHT. Formation of microvoids during resin-transfer molding process. Compos Sci Technol2000; 60: 2427–2434.
24.
RohatgiVPatelNLeeLJ. Experimental investigation of flow-induced microvoids during impregnation of unidirectional stitched fiberglass mat. Polymer Compos1996; 17: 161–170.
25.
ChenY-TDavisHTMacoskoCW. Wetting of fiber mats for composites manufacturing: I. Visualization experiments. AIChE J1995; 41: 2261–2273.
26.
ChenY-TMacoskoCWDavisHT. Wetting of fiber mats for composites manufacturing: II. Air entrapment model. AIChE J1995; 41: 2274–2281.
27.
YenilmezBSenanMSozerEM. Variation of part thickness and compaction pressure in vacuum infusion process. Compos Sci Technol2009; 69: 1710–1719.
28.
CorreiaNCRobitailleFLongACRuddCDSimacekPAdvaniSG. Analysis of the vacuum infusion moulding process: I. Analytical formulation. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2005; 36: 1645–1656.
DeparsevalYPillaiKMAdvaniSG. A simple model for the variation of permeability due to partial saturation in dual scale porous media. Transport Porous Media1997; 27: 243–264.
31.
HsiaoK-TAdvaniSG. Flow sensing and control strategies to address race-tracking disturbances in resin transfer molding. Part I: design and algorithm development. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2004; 35: 1149–1159.
32.
HsiaoK-TDevillardMAdvaniSG. Simulation based flow distribution network optimization for vacuum assisted resin transfer molding process. Model Simulat Mater Sci Eng2004; 12: S175–S190.
33.
SimacekPAdvaniSG. Modeling resin flow and fiber tow saturation induced by distribution media collapse in VARTM. Compos Sci Technol2007; 67: 2757–2769.
34.
ASTM Standard D792-08, 2008, “Test Methods for Density Specific Gravity (Relative Density) of Plastic byDisplacement,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2008, DOI: 10.1520/D0792-08, www.astm.org.
35.
ASTM Standard D3171-06, 2006, ‘‘Test Methods for Constituent Content of Composite Materials,’’ ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2006, DOI: 10.1520/D3171-06, www.astm.org.
36.
ASTM Standard D2734-94, 2003, ‘‘Test Methods for Void Content of Reinforced Plastics,’’ ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2003, DOI: 10.1520/D2734-94, www.astm.org.
37.
ChawlaKK. Composite materials science and engineering2nd. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1998.
38.
ASTM Standard D785-08, 2008, ‘‘Test Method for Rockwell Hardness of Plastics and Electrical Insulating Materials,’’ ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2008, DOI: 10.1520/D0785-08, www.astm.org.
39.
HsiaoK-TMathurRAdvaniSGGillespieJWJrFinkBK. A closed form solution for flow during the vacuum assisted resin transfer molding process. ASME J Manuf Sci Eng2000; 122: 463–475.
40.
SomashekarAABickertonSBhattacharyyaD. An experimental investigation of non-elastic deformation of fibrous reinforcement in composites manufacturing. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2006; 37: 858–867.
41.
RobitailleFGauvinR. Compaction of textile reinforcements for composites manufacturing. II: Compaction and relaxation of dry and H2O saturated woven reinforcements. Polym Compos1998; 19: 543–557.
